logo
Gaza: ‘Unacceptable' Choice Between Getting Shot Or Getting Fed

Gaza: ‘Unacceptable' Choice Between Getting Shot Or Getting Fed

Scoop2 days ago
UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in Geneva on Friday that 'we've raised concerns about atrocity crimes having been committed and the risk of further atrocity crimes, where people are lining up for essential supplies such as food and medicine and where they are being attacked, where again… they have a choice between being shot or being fed'.
Deadly lottery
' This is unacceptable and it's continuing,' she deplored.
Ms. Shamdasani said that her office is still looking into the incident in which at least 15 Palestinians including women and children were reportedly killed by a strike in front of a clinic in Deir al-Balah run by US-based aid group Project Hope, a partner organisation of the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF).
In a statement on Thursday UNICEF chief Catherine Russell said that the killing of families trying to access life-saving aid is 'unconscionable'.
The Israeli military reportedly said that it was targeting a Hamas member involved in the terror attacks in Israel on 7 October 2023.
Asked about the rationale of putting civilians, including children, in mortal danger when targeting one specific person, Ms. Shamdasani said that over the course of the conflict in Gaza OHCHR has had serious concerns about respect for essential international humanitarian law principles, including that of distinction and proportionality.
'We have seen that of the overall death toll in Gaza; a large proportion are women and children. And again, that raises serious questions about whether these principles are being respected,' she said.
Hundreds killed queuing for food
Killings of Gazans at or around aid distribution sites and near humanitarian convoys have become a regular occurrence in a context of restrictions on the entry of food, fuel and relief items into the Strip and particularly since the establishment of food distribution sites bypassing the UN operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
Since late May, this militarised aid distribution model, backed by Israel and the United States, has sought to sideline the UN and its experienced humanitarian partners.
OHCHR's Ms. Shamdasani said that from 27 May, when the GHF started operations in Gaza, until 7 July, OHCHR recorded 798 killings 'including 615 in the vicinity of the GHF sites and 183 presumably on the routes of aid convoys'.
Gunshot injuries
The deaths of almost 800 people trying to access aid were 'mostly due to… gunshot injuries', Ms. Shamdasani said.
Joining her in condemning the killings, World Health Organization (WHO) spokesperson Christian Lindmeier said that he is ' slowly lacking words to describe the scenario '.
'People being shot at distribution sites… scores of women and children and men and boys and girls being killed while either getting food or in what's supposedly safe shelters or on the road to health clinics or inside health clinics - this is far beyond unacceptable.'
Fuel crisis
Asked to comment on a 75,000-litre fuel delivery into Gaza on Wednesday, the first such provision in over 130 days, Mr. Lindmeier said that 'as good as it is that these this amount of fuel came finally in… we should not be relying on special news of special deliveries,' be it on fuel, food or other relief items.
'There should be a reoccurring delivery into Gaza to keep the lifelines open, to supply the ambulances, the hospitals, the water desalination plants, the bakeries… whatever is necessary to keep a little bit of lifeline open there, to run the incubators,' he said.
The WHO spokesperson pointed out that 94 per cent of the hospitals in Gaza are now damaged or destroyed, while displacement continues and civilians are being pushed into ever smaller spaces.
Mr. Lindmeier also expressed his hope for a positive outcome of the ongoing ceasefire talks.
'Peace is the best medicine and opening the doors remains the only viable option,' he concluded.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leary slams govt over needle exchange decision
Leary slams govt over needle exchange decision

Otago Daily Times

time6 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Leary slams govt over needle exchange decision

A Dunedin-based opposition MP has slammed the government for cutting funding for a world-leading needle exchange service for intravenous drug users. The Otago Daily Times has learned the Disc Trust, which has administered the needle-exchange programme since 1988, has lost its contract. The funding available for the service in the South Island has dropped in the latest round from $1.4 million to $1m. Labour MP for Taieri Ingrid Leary said the cut to the budget for these vital services was "another short-sighted approach by the current government". "This decision fails to recognise the significant value for money that needle exchange services provide. "Preventing diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C not only saves lives and improves quality of life, it also generates substantial long-term savings for taxpayers by averting the much more expensive costs associated with treating these conditions ... once again, it appears the South Island is not being prioritised." Ms Leary said the effectiveness of these services was largely built upon the long-standing and deep relationships providers had cultivated with their communities over many decades. "It will be exceptionally difficult for new providers to achieve the same level of reach and engagement without the benefit of these established relationships." The decision risked undermining the trust and accessibility fundamental to the success of needle-exchange programmes. Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) has said the funding was based on a new population model, but Ms Leary challenged that approach. "Funding these types of services purely on a population health basis is not necessarily the most logical approach, especially when specific communities within the broader population have demonstrably much higher needs." The decision-making process should have prioritised these specific needs rather than a broad population metric when formulating its approach, she said. "A needs-based assessment would likely have resulted in a different scoring matrix for the request for proposals [RFPs]. "I have raised a number of questions with the minister regarding this issue. There are widespread concerns across the motu that needle-exchange services are being centralised in an attempt to cut costs, and I am particularly worried about the adverse flow-on effects this will have on communities that are considered outposts of the primary provider. "The decisions regarding needle-exchange services in Dunedin are deeply problematic, reflecting a concerning trend in health funding and community engagement."

If it ain't broke ...
If it ain't broke ...

Otago Daily Times

time7 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

If it ain't broke ...

Decisions about health services which have an impact on vulnerable people must always consider much more than the immediate bottom line. Any changes need to cover whether some of the marginalised served might lose confidence and be unwilling to engage with a new service, and what the long-term cost of that might be to the people personally, and to the public purse. With that in mind, it is hard not to be worried about news the longstanding free needle-exchange service for intravenous drug users in Dunedin, provided through the Dunedin Intravenous Organisation (DIVO) is one of the DISC Trust services which has lost its contract. The trust also included the Southland Harm Reduction Programme, the Timaru Needle Exchange Trust and Nelson Injecting Community Health Enterprise, part of a network that had built a trusted programme which had run for decades. But now Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) has chosen Christchurch-based health service provider He Waka Tapu to deliver the service. That organisation provides a variety of services including personalised health consultations, community health initiatives, mental health crisis intervention, addiction support services, reintegration programmes, family violence prevention and educational offerings to promote holistic wellbeing. It has, however, drawn criticism from some in the existing programme because of its lack of experience in providing a service led by peers. Getting the confidence of intravenous drug users, likely to be fearful of any authority because they know they are breaking the law, is not easy. Workers in the current programme say it can sometimes take years, particularly when it comes to persuading drug users to use health services. (The Dunedin group also runs a free general practice clinic for its clients, and its future is unclear.) While HNZ says the request for proposal (RFP) for regional needle-exchange and harm-reduction services clearly outlined the requirements including that people with lived and living experience had significant roles in the design, delivery and leadership of the programme, questions are being asked about how central lived experience will be to service delivery. We note the brief overview of the RFP on the Government Electronic Tenders Service website makes no specific reference to the need for contenders to provide a peer-based service. Peer-run services in this area are considered internationally best practice. Public health academic Prof Michael Baker says the HIV response in New Zealand was among the most effective in the world and it would be a "grave step backwards" if any new provider moved away from a peer service. It is hard to judge what, if any, consideration was given to the effect of a change on clients of the existing service and whether this might lead to less engagement and more disease. Fears have already been raised the change could lead to more HIV or hepatitis cases. On the face of it, the decision looks like a cost-cutting exercise, with the funding for the South Island services reduced from the previous $1.4 million to $1m. HNZ has said the funding was based on a new population model. This seems a blunt tool to apply to such a programme. That suggests that the number of people who might need such a service would be uniform throughout the country. Is there evidence of that or that existing services were getting more money than they needed? Taieri member of Parliament, Labour's Ingrid Leary, is right to question the population approach rather than a needs-based one. As she says, funding these types of services purely on a population health basis is not necessarily the most logical, especially when specific communities within the broader population have demonstrably much higher needs. The existing service is to wind up in September, but little is known about how the new service will operate. It is difficult for members of a marginalised group such as intravenous drug users to speak up about their needs. That can make it too easy, and possibly even cynically convenient, for decisions to be made about them rather than with them. If this move is expected to be as good as or better for them than the existing service, they and we need to know how.

Gaza: ‘Unacceptable' Choice Between Getting Shot Or Getting Fed
Gaza: ‘Unacceptable' Choice Between Getting Shot Or Getting Fed

Scoop

time2 days ago

  • Scoop

Gaza: ‘Unacceptable' Choice Between Getting Shot Or Getting Fed

UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in Geneva on Friday that 'we've raised concerns about atrocity crimes having been committed and the risk of further atrocity crimes, where people are lining up for essential supplies such as food and medicine and where they are being attacked, where again… they have a choice between being shot or being fed'. Deadly lottery ' This is unacceptable and it's continuing,' she deplored. Ms. Shamdasani said that her office is still looking into the incident in which at least 15 Palestinians including women and children were reportedly killed by a strike in front of a clinic in Deir al-Balah run by US-based aid group Project Hope, a partner organisation of the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). In a statement on Thursday UNICEF chief Catherine Russell said that the killing of families trying to access life-saving aid is 'unconscionable'. The Israeli military reportedly said that it was targeting a Hamas member involved in the terror attacks in Israel on 7 October 2023. Asked about the rationale of putting civilians, including children, in mortal danger when targeting one specific person, Ms. Shamdasani said that over the course of the conflict in Gaza OHCHR has had serious concerns about respect for essential international humanitarian law principles, including that of distinction and proportionality. 'We have seen that of the overall death toll in Gaza; a large proportion are women and children. And again, that raises serious questions about whether these principles are being respected,' she said. Hundreds killed queuing for food Killings of Gazans at or around aid distribution sites and near humanitarian convoys have become a regular occurrence in a context of restrictions on the entry of food, fuel and relief items into the Strip and particularly since the establishment of food distribution sites bypassing the UN operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Since late May, this militarised aid distribution model, backed by Israel and the United States, has sought to sideline the UN and its experienced humanitarian partners. OHCHR's Ms. Shamdasani said that from 27 May, when the GHF started operations in Gaza, until 7 July, OHCHR recorded 798 killings 'including 615 in the vicinity of the GHF sites and 183 presumably on the routes of aid convoys'. Gunshot injuries The deaths of almost 800 people trying to access aid were 'mostly due to… gunshot injuries', Ms. Shamdasani said. Joining her in condemning the killings, World Health Organization (WHO) spokesperson Christian Lindmeier said that he is ' slowly lacking words to describe the scenario '. 'People being shot at distribution sites… scores of women and children and men and boys and girls being killed while either getting food or in what's supposedly safe shelters or on the road to health clinics or inside health clinics - this is far beyond unacceptable.' Fuel crisis Asked to comment on a 75,000-litre fuel delivery into Gaza on Wednesday, the first such provision in over 130 days, Mr. Lindmeier said that 'as good as it is that these this amount of fuel came finally in… we should not be relying on special news of special deliveries,' be it on fuel, food or other relief items. 'There should be a reoccurring delivery into Gaza to keep the lifelines open, to supply the ambulances, the hospitals, the water desalination plants, the bakeries… whatever is necessary to keep a little bit of lifeline open there, to run the incubators,' he said. The WHO spokesperson pointed out that 94 per cent of the hospitals in Gaza are now damaged or destroyed, while displacement continues and civilians are being pushed into ever smaller spaces. Mr. Lindmeier also expressed his hope for a positive outcome of the ongoing ceasefire talks. 'Peace is the best medicine and opening the doors remains the only viable option,' he concluded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store