First look inside Putin's secret 'death' factory where teenagers assemble drones
Vladimir Putin has pulled back the curtain on what has been described as the 'largest and most secret' drone factory ahead of a joint naval drill with Iran.
Footage – a blend of Cold War secrecy and TikTok-era propaganda – offers a rare glimpse of the Yelabuga production facility in the Russian republic of Tatarstan.
Recorded by Zvezda, the Russian defence ministry's TV channel, it shows the star of Putin's war in Ukraine – the 'Geran-2' drones.
This is the Kremlin's locally branded version of Iranian-designed Shahed 136.
Depending on the design, the long-range exploding aircraft has a range of 600 to 1,200 miles.
Timur Shagivaliev, CEO of the Yelabuga Special Economic Zone, told the channel: 'This is the largest such plant in the world and the most secret.
'At one time, the plan was to produce several thousand (Geran drones) – now we are producing nine times more than planned.'
As part of its efforts to scale up development of drones to catch up with Ukraine, Russia now produces more than 5,000 long-range drones each month.
Above the entrance to the factory, a giant screen read, 'Kurchatov, Korolyov and Stalin are living in your DNA,' featuring portraits of the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, Soviet nuclear physicist Igor Kurchatov and the father of the Soviet space programme Sergei Korolev.
But perhaps the most surreal detail is not the scale of the drone operation at Yelabuga and who is building them.
Teenagers – some barely old enough to drive – have bee recruited to work on the assembly lines at the factory.
They are shown working at various stages of the production process, highlighting a recruitment programme targeting students as young as 15 from local technical colleges.
'There are young people, boys and girls, both working here and studying here in the college created by the same people who organised the production of Gerans,' a voiceover in the Zvezda video says.
'They invite schoolchildren here immediately after the ninth grade [aged 15 and 16], and after college they invite them to the plant.
'Vladimir Putin has noted the experience of Yelabuga and even called for its replication.'
The drone production – using modified Shahed 136 technology – is another sign of the deepening cooperation between Russia and Iran.
Bonded over mutual hatred for the West and shared isolation, both nations have traded military technology and intelligencesince the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
To underscore this relationship further, the two have launched a joint naval drill in the Caspian Sea. More Trending
The CASAREX 2025 will be held under the slogan 'Together for a Safe and Secure Caspian Sea' and will take place over three days.
The Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) reported: 'The primary goal of the operation is to reinforce maritime safety and security while fostering greater cooperation among the naval forces of these countries.'
It is still unclear what vessels will be involved in the operation, but the Caspian Sea hold major strategic importance for both Russia and Iran as a secure, sanctions-free zone, away from Western eyes.
It also serves as a vital logistics and trade corridor, linking both nations.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Moscow airports in chaos after fourth night of Ukraine drone strikes on city
MORE: Tsunami threat looms over Russia and Hawaii after series of earthquakes
MORE: War planes scrambled over Nato country after Russia launches latest barage
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
17 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Zelensky announces new anti-corruption Bill after public outcry and EU criticism
Opponents of the contentious law passed by politicians and approved by Mr Zelensky earlier this week said that it stripped Ukraine's anti-corruption watchdogs of their independence by granting the government more oversight of their work. Mr Zelensky said it was needed to speed up investigations, ensure more convictions and remove 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption, though he did not provide examples of Russian meddling. In an abrupt change of course on Thursday, Mr Zelensky unexpectedly said that he had drawn up a new draft Bill on corruption that 'guarantees the real strengthening of the law and order system in Ukraine'. 'The most important thing is real tools, no Russian connections, and the independence of the (watchdogs),' he said in a Telegram post. The declaration appeared to bow to recent pressure that threatened to undermine public trust in Ukraine's leaders after more than three years of fighting Russia's full-scale invasion. The protests have not called for Mr Zelensky ousting, but they are the first major anti-government demonstrations since the war began. 'It is important that we maintain unity,' Mr Zelensky said in his post. The announcement also left some questions unanswered. Mr Zelensky had said on Wednesday that he met the heads of Ukraine's key anti-corruption and security agencies and gave them two weeks to make recommendations on how the graft law could be improved before he presented another Bill to Parliament. It is unclear what becomes of that effort to seek their input. Despite that assurance of new legislation, further street protests were scheduled for Thursday evening. The new pronouncement also left unclear whether Mr Zelensky intended to revoke the law that he approved earlier in the week after Parliament had passed it. He did not publicise details about the proposed new law. The unrest has come at a difficult time in the all-out war, which began on February 24 2022. Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities. Ukraine is also facing a question mark over whether the United States will provide more military aid and whether European commitments can take up the slack, with no end in sight to the war. Delegations from Russia and Ukraine met in Istanbul for a third round of talks in as many months on Wednesday. But once again, the talks were brief and delivered no major breakthrough. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid in the war. It is also an effort that enjoys broad public support. EU enlargement commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern on Wednesday over the new law, calling it 'a serious step back'. The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticizsed parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. Meanwhile, two women aged 48 and 59 were killed and 14 other people were injured when Russian forces dropped four powerful glide bombs on Kostiantynivka, an industrial city in eastern Ukraine, and shelled it with artillery, Donetsk regional governor Vadym Filashkin said. Russian planes also dropped two glide bombs on the centre of Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, on Thursday morning, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said. At least 42 people were wounded, including two babies, a 10-year-old girl and two 17 year olds, authorities said. The southern city of Odesa, and Cherkasy in central Ukraine, were also hit overnight, authorities said. The drone and missile strikes on the cities wounded 11 people, including a nine-year-old, and damaged historic landmarks and residential buildings, officials said. Ukraine has sought to step up its own long-range drone attacks on Russia, using domestic technology and manufacturing. An overnight Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi killed two women and wounded 11 other people, local authorities said Thursday. An oil depot was hit, officials said, without offering details.
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Ukraine's protests: Zelenskyy must heed critics at home and abroad
When Russian troops rolled across the border in 2022, it established a new contract between Ukrainians and their president. The existential need for unity was cemented by admiration for Volodymyr Zelenskyy's courage, and recognition of his ability to articulate the national mood and rally international support. Ordinary politics were suspended. Critics who were already suspicious of his populist instincts and centralising tendencies did not want to aid Russia's cause. They understood that wartime could require a different mode of leadership. This informal contract essentially held despite growing concerns about the concentration of power, the role of Mr Zelenskyy's right-hand man, Andriy Yermak, and the departure of popular figures seen as potential rivals – notably the military chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi, now ambassador to London, and the foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba. It is Mr Zelenskyy himself who broke it by stripping independence from Ukraine's key anti-corruption bodies this week – prompting the first significant protests since the full-scale war began, with thousands demonstrating in Kyiv and other cities. The legislation brought the national anti-corruption bureau and specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office under the prosecutor general's control – allowing him to access case files and to oversee and even close investigations. Demonstrators were angered by the way these changes were rushed into law as well as by their substance. The suspicion is that allies of the president felt under threat from investigators. The president, apparently taken aback by the reaction, has now approved a draft law that he said would restore the agencies' independence. Those challenging him will want to see the details. For many, this crisis is the culmination of concerns about his style of rule and the conduct of some of those around him. It also has alarming echoes of his predecessors. Protesters are not suggesting that he is a new Viktor Yanukovych, still less the 'dictator' he is portrayed as by Russian (and Maga) disinformation. But a new generation has taken to the streets, as their elders did, because they value democracy. As the broadcaster Tetyana Troshchynska wrote: 'The existential threat from Russia is greater and more intense than from corruption … [but] you can't spit on those values for which, in fact, the fight is going on.' The current US administration has no admiration for Ukraine's anti-corruption investigators. That may have emboldened Mr Zelenskyy. But European partners do care – and have warned that this law has endangered Ukraine's path to EU membership. The agencies were created in part to protect foreign aid and investment. And allies had already been disturbed by moves such as last year's dismissal of the deputy prime minister for restoration, Oleksandr Kubrakov, who had impressed them with his commitment to transparency. It's also worrying that the president tried to tarnish the anti-corruption agencies with talk of 'Russian connections'. Mr Zelenskyy has maintained strong support at home, boosted by Donald Trump's bullying of him. His personal popularity has always been central to his leadership – too much so. But if that has prompted him to fully reverse course, that is all to the good. He should recover support at home and abroad not only by restoring the independence of anti-corruption investigators, but by taking heed of the broader lessons about the people's justified expectations of their government.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Putin is preparing for another invasion while Nato is fatally distracted
At the latest Nato summit in The Hague, the alliance announced that members had set a new target of spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence and security by 2035. In part, this is likely to have been driven by a realisation that Trump envoy Steve Witkoff's shuttle diplomacy and Europe's denunciations of Vladimir Putin will not be enough to end the war in Ukraine. More fundamentally, however, members are waking up to the need to deter Russia from attacking a Nato country – which, according to Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary-general, it could be ready to do within five years. As a military intelligence analyst specialising in Putin's thinking and Russian military strategy, I agree with Rutte's assessment about Russia's readiness for another offensive military campaign in just a few years. I'm less convinced that a Nato country is likely to be the Kremlin's next target, unless the alliance directly intervenes in Ukraine by deploying troops onto the battlefield. Nevertheless, what Nato does or doesn't do in the next few years could be highly significant in determining whether Putin decides to attack another post-Soviet state – such as Moldova. The problem is that increasing spending on defence and security-related areas will not do the trick on its own. Money and technology, the staples of the West's style of warfare, do not by themselves prevent or win wars. Strategy does. And a successful strategy must be based on a deep understanding of the opponent's way of war, addressing the key elements of its military planning. I briefed Nato members on Russia's war-fighting strategy in September 2013, just months prior to Putin's invasion of Crimea. Regrettably, no counter-strategy was developed by the Pentagon and its Nato counterparts. Hence Putin's invasions. Developed by the Russian General Staff and often dubbed 'asymmetric warfare', Russia's strategy borrows heavily from the classic works of the British strategist Sir Basil Liddell Hart. He advocated indirect methods of fighting the opponent, rather than the brute application of force. The centrepiece of this approach is to bypass the enemy's areas of strength and focus on exploiting weaknesses and vulnerabilities. Obviously, the war in Ukraine has developed into precisely the sort of conflict Russia seeks to avoid. But that doesn't mean that the Kremlin has fundamentally changed its approach to conflict, particularly when facing new opponents. Since Nato militaries are technologically superior to the Russian forces, Moscow knows it will have to rely on seizing the strategic initiative during the initial period of any future war. It will not be seeking a repeat of what has happened in Ukraine. Russian planners therefore envision undermining Nato's network-centric approach to war by disrupting its forces' 'kill chain', the process that enables military decision-making to detect, target, and destroy adversaries. This could be achieved by targeting, perhaps pre-emptively, the C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) and space systems on which Nato forces depend. So Nato members need to do more than spend money. They need to understand what the Russians consider to be the alliance's vulnerabilities, and take action to remove the Kremlin's incentive to exploit them. There are five principal areas that require action. 1. Secure space-related infrastructure Russia has a formidable arsenal of counter-space weapons, designed to degrade or destroy US and allied satellites. It includes GPS-jamming systems, lasers, orbital interceptors, and anti-satellite missiles. The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence warned in its 2025 Annual Threat Assessment that Russia is training its space forces, fielding new anti-satellite weapons, and is already using electronic warfare to counter Western assets. Moscow is also developing a new satellite meant to carry a nuclear weapon as an anti-satellite capability. 2. Harden critical infrastructure against cyber attacks Russia has one of the world's most destructive arsenals of cyber weapons, a sophisticated doctrine, and advanced expertise. The 2025 Annual Threat Assessment warned about Russia's repeated success in compromising sensitive targets for intelligence collection. Moscow is likely to already have access to critical infrastructure in the US and Europe. Moscow has a particular strength and practical experience in integrating cyber attacks with military operations in wartime. 3. Establish stronger protocols to guard undersea communications cables Russia's General Staff Main Directorate has a highly secretive deep sea research programme, known as GUGI. Moscow is highly likely to have put this expertise into practice, with several suspected sabotage operations of undersea cables in the Baltic Sea since the war in Ukraine began. A similar risk applies to energy pipelines. In October 2022, the UK Ministry of Defence acknowledged that a Royal Navy frigate was deployed to the North Sea to assist Norwegian forces in protecting gas pipelines, after the rupture of Nord Stream in the Baltic. 4. Bullet-proof against Russian espionage It hardly needs saying that Russia routinely infiltrates spies all across Europe and recruits locals to steal military, political, and economic secrets. But Moscow has also been able to insert intelligence operatives to conduct destabilisation operations, targeting critical infrastructure. Some estimates suggest that such sabotage operations almost quadrupled in number between 2023-24. Multiple arrests have taken place, including in Germany, Poland, and the UK. But the alliance must take a more pro-active approach, neutralising and disrupting Russia's espionage operations before they are able to do damage. 5. Establish advantage in total combat potential Having moved onto a war footing several years prior to the invasion of Ukraine, Russia now produces more ammunition in three months than Europe does in one year. Scaling up production of air defence systems, tanks, drones, and ammunition is imperative for Nato to catch up to Russia and restock its depleted arsenals. Weapons don't shoot themselves, however. The alliance must recruit, train, and equip a fighting force sufficient to change Putin's decision calculus. Moscow has been mobilising overtly and covertly throughout its three and a half year war in Ukraine. And on Tuesday, a bill was submitted to the State Duma introducing year-round conscription for military service. If approved and signed by Putin, the law will come into effect on Jan 1, 2026. In Europe, only a few countries have mandatory military service, and so far most of the others are not considering it. But in a war of attrition, such as the one Russia is fighting in Ukraine, the side that has more manpower is better positioned to win. The good news is that the alliance has time to get its act together to prevent another invasion. It would be tragic if the alliance fails to step up to the plate now, especially given the colossal price Ukraine is paying to defend itself against the Russians. Nato owes it to all those dead Ukrainians and their families to develop a viable counter-strategy to Putin's playbook. Rebekah Koffler is a strategic military intelligence analyst, formerly with the US Defense Intelligence Agency. She is the author of 'Putin's Playbook', Regnery 2021. Her next book 'Trump's Playbook' will be published later this year. Rebekah's podcast Trump's Playbook is running on her channel Censored But Not Silenced and is available on most social media platforms @Rebekah0132.
