No duty concessions to US on agri, dairy, GM foods: An explainer
With the US not able to finalise a deal with India so far, US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced imposition of an additional 25 per cent import duty on Indian goods entering American markets from August 7.
New Delhi, Aug 2 (PTI) India has toughened its stance on extending duty concessions on agri products, dairy and GM foods in the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the US.
Here is a list of Q&A (questions and answers) to explain reasons behind India's stand and impact of US tariffs on labour-intensive sectors: * What is the India-US bilateral trade agreement (BTA)? – India and the US entered into negotiations for a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial BTA in March 2025 with a target to complete the first tranche/phase of the pact by fall (October-November) of 2025.
So far, five rounds of talks have been completed. For the next round, the US team, headed by Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia Brendan Lynch, is visiting India from August 25.
* What is the aim of the BTA? – Normally in a trade agreement, two trading partners either significantly reduce or eliminate import duties on the maximum number of goods traded between them. Besides, they ease norms to promote trade in services and increase two-way investments.
The India-US BTA is aimed at more than doubling the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 from the present USD 191 billion.
*What are the major demands of the two countries from each other in the BTA? – The US wants duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, agri goods, dairy items, apples, tree nuts, and genetically-modified crops.
India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (25 per cent now) and cut in tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent), auto sector (25 per cent), labour-intensive sectors, such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas.
*How much tariff is imposed by the US on Indian goods at present? – India's average import duty is about 17 per cent, while the US' is 3.3 per cent. On April 2, the US announced to impose 26 per cent duty (16 per cent reciprocal tariff and 10 per cent baseline tariff). At present, only the baseline tariff is in force. It is over and above the existing import duty on Indian goods.
For example, before April 2, the Indian textiles were attracting a 6-9 per cent tariff in America. With the baseline tariff, it rose to 16-19 per cent. But from August 7, the sector will attract a 31-34 per cent duty. The baseline tariff will be replaced by 25 per cent duty notified on July 31 by the White House.
However, certain products are exempted from these tariffs such as pharmaceutical, electronics and energy products.
* From when the 25 per cent duty will come into force? – The duty, announced this week, will come into force from August 7 (9.30 am IST). The executive order has also clarified that goods in transit until October 5, 12:01 am eastern daylight time (EDT), or 09:30 am IST, will be subject to a 10 per cent tariff, provided that such goods have entered into transit before August 7 12:01 am EDT.
*Why India is not ready to provide duty concessions on dairy, agri and GM foods? – Agri: Farm livelihoods are at stake. This is a politically and economically sensitive area as over 700 million people in India's rural economy are dependent on the sector. If India removes tariffs, cheap, subsidised US grains could flood Indian markets during global price crashes.
Unlike the US, where agriculture is corporatised, Indian farming is a livelihood issue. Tariffs are essential to protect small farmers, manage price volatility, and ensure food security.
Dairy: India wants to safeguard its small farmers. GTRI stated that the US argues that India's GM-free feed certification and facility registration protocols effectively bar American dairy imports.
'Indian rules prohibit imports from animals fed with animal-derived feed'for example, butter from a cow fed meat'due to religious sensitivities. India considers this policy non-negotiable,' GTRI has said.
GM Food: These are created by inserting specific genes, often from bacteria, viruses, other plants, or occasionally animals, into a plant's DNA to introduce new traits, such as pest resistance or herbicide tolerance.
Allowing the import of GM products such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed would affect India's agricultural exports to the EU, a key destination for Indian exporters. PTI RR ANU ANU
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fibre2Fashion
7 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
China-US tensions could bring more Chinese goods to Europe: ECB blog
Hit by higher US tariffs, Chinese exporters may redirect some of their goods from the United States to the euro area, and that could bring down headline harmonised index of consumer prices (HICP) inflation in the zone by around 0.15 percentage points in 2026, with smaller effects persisting into 2027, according to a blog by European Central Bank (ECB) experts. During the 2018 US-China trade war, such redirection resulted in euro area imports from China increasing by around 2-3 per cent between 2018 and 2019, they noted. Now, history could repeat. In a severe scenario in which US tariffs on Chinese goods escalate to an effective rate of around 135 per cent, the euro area could see imports from China rise by up to 10 per cent in 2026. Hit by higher US tariffs, Chinese exporters may redirect some of their goods from the US to the euro area, and that could bring down headline HICP inflation in the zone by around 0.15 pps in 2026, with smaller effects persisting into 2027, an European Central Bank blog said. Chinese authorities have pledged targeted support to help affected exporters redirect sales to domestic or third markets. A second estimate that uses general equilibrium models featuring production inter-linkages suggests a somewhat more moderate increase in euro area imports from China of 7-9 per cent, the blog said. Several factors suggest that the euro area could experience a larger redirection of Chinese exports this time than it did back in 2018. First, the composition of Chinese exports to the United States and to the euro area is similar, making the euro area a natural alternative. Second, established supply chain links, which have expanded since the last China-US trade war, and ongoing industrial upgrades in China facilitate the redirection of trade flows. Many euro area firms already rely on Chinese imports, making it easier to absorb redirected goods. More broadly, around three-fourths of all products imported by large euro area countries already have at least one Chinese supplier. Third, Chinese businesses have laid the groundwork to facilitate faster market entry. For example, they have almost tripled their presence with investments in European sales and distribution networks since 2017, the ECB blog noted. Fourth, the depreciation of the Chinese renminbi makes Chinese goods cheaper and more attractive for European importers. And fifth, while the profit margins of Chinese exporters have narrowed since the onset of the first trade conflict in 2018, many firms, especially those in final goods production, still have room to absorb the reduced profit margins, the blog said. In addition, Chinese authorities have pledged targeted support to help affected exporters redirect sales to domestic or third markets, which could allow for further price cuts, it noted. Calculations by the ECB experts indicate that lower Chinese import prices would reduce overall import prices by 1.6 per cent. But it will take some time for consumer prices to drop. The magnitude of the effect depends on several factors, including the strength of domestic demand, the scale of the shock itself and the potential policy responses that may offset the disinflationary impact, the blog added. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Scroll.in
9 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor shows Indian democracy is ‘reeling' away
At 10.32 pm on Monday, Rajasthan MP Hanuman Beniwal rose to speak in the Lok Sabha. Six minutes in, the chair rang a bell to let him know that he was running out of time. This piqued the Jat leader. 'What has happened?' he asked. 'You gave me a chance so late in the night anyway. It is certain that I won't be in the newspapers tomorrow. I will have to make do with social media.' Beniwal's reaction encapsulates how elected representatives seem to increasingly be approaching debates in Parliament. Rather than making substantive interventions, many MPs are choosing to deliver a series of snippets tailored for social media – specifically, video-sharing platforms like YouTube and Instagram. This tendency was on full display during the much anticipated discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh set the tone for the debate by sidestepping the contentious issue of India losing aircraft during the strikes. 'We determine if a child has done well in an examination by looking at the results,' Singh argued. 'Only his marks should matter to us. Not how many pencils he broke or how many pens he lost.' The clever metaphor worked well for the mainstream media but not for Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. The leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha cited public comments made by Army personnel to suggest that the government's tactics were to blame for the alleged loss of equipment. In response, Anurag Thakur of the Bharatiya Janata Party asked for Gandhi's position to be rechristened 'Leader of Opposing Bharat' and called his party 'Islamabad National Congress'. News agency ANI deemed these 'fiery' comments reel-worthy. Not to be outdone, Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, while trying to pin responsibility for the security lapses in Pahalgam on the ruling party, decided to name the terror victims one by one for effect. This was the opportunity for theatrics. Each time Vadra uttered a name, BJP MPs screamed 'Hindu!' Those in the Opposition started chanting 'Indian!' in response. The excruciating clash found a sizeable audience online. Those who neither belong to the ruling nor the Opposition alliance, such as the Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi, sought attention in other ways. Owaisi had received flak from his supporters for his enthusiastic participation in the all-party delegations that went overseas after Operation Sindoor. He swung the other way in the Lok Sabha, criticising the government's foreign policy and its military preparedness. But what made waves on social media was his demand that India withdraw from playing a cricket match against Pakistan scheduled in September. 'Does this government have the courage to tell the grieving families that they should watch the cricket match with Pakistan because their loss has been avenged?' Owaisi asked. The focus on military and foreign policy matters did not stop regional politicians from signalling to their own audiences. In keeping with the thrust of the Bhasha Andolan launched on July 27 by Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee, her MPs spoke in Bangla. To counter them, Bengal leaders of the BJP demonstrated their own proficiency in the language. It is not as if everything that happened in Parliament this week bordered on the frivolous. Representatives from Jammu and Kashmir as well as Punjab – two regions that bore the brunt of the recent fighting between India and Pakistan – made critical interventions. Their speeches fell through the cracks. The MP from Amritsar, for example, flagged the 'politicisation' of the armed forces. He was referring to controversial claims about protecting the Golden Temple during Operation Sindoor made by a senior Army officer. His turn to speak came after midnight though. Perhaps the most important speech of the monsoon session was delivered by Mian Altaf Ahmad of the J&K National Conference. His constituency includes Pahalgam, Poonch and Rajouri – places which accounted for the bulk of casualties before and during Operation Sindoor. Ahmad prayed that the region does not experience conflict again. But he also pleaded with the home minister to provide bulletproof ambulances and bunkers in the area before future wars. 'We have to make arrangements so that the next time something like this happens, decent, innocent people don't get caught in the crossfire,' he hoped. Not quite the stuff that flies on Instagram reels or YouTube shorts. Here is a summary of last week's top stories. Trump and New Delhi. United States President Donald Trump said that he does not care about 'what India does with Russia' and that 'they can take their dead economies down together, for all I care'. The comment came a day after he announced on Wednesday that Washington will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from India from August 1. He also said that India will have to pay a 'penalty' for buying military equipment and oil from Russia amid the war on Ukraine. However, on Thursday, Trump said that his administration is still negotiating final tariff rates with New Delhi. He also announced that the US would help develop Pakistan's 'massive' oil reserves. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' the US president said on social media. Malegaon blast case. A court in Mumbai has acquitted Bharatiya Janata Party leader Pragya Singh Thakur, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit and five others in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. The court held that the prosecution had failed to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Six persons were killed and around 100 were injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in Malegaon in northern Maharashtra on September 29, 2008. The court said there was no evidence that Thakur owned or was in possession of the vehicle. The court directed the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 2 lakh as compensation to the families of those who died in the blast and Rs 50,000 to those who were injured. Crimes against women. Former Janata Dal (Secular) MP Prajwal Revanna has been convicted in a rape case. The judge held that Revanna was guilty of raping a 48-year-old worker employed at the Revanna family's farmhouse and recording the assault. The quantum of punishment is likely to be announced on Saturday. This is the first verdict in four cases that have been filed against Revanna, the grandson of former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda. Three women have filed sexual assault cases against Revanna. The fourth case involves charges of sexual harassment, stalking and criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code. He was suspended from the Janata Dal (Secular) in April 2024 after videos of alleged sexual assaults on several women, allegedly recorded by Revanna himself, surfaced. He was arrested on May 31, 2024. Johanna Deeksha writes about . Pahalgam terrorists killed. Union Home Minister Amit Shah told Parliament that three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam terror attack were killed on Monday in a security operation codenamed Operation Mahadev. The Army had said on Monday that it had killed three suspected militants in the Lidwas meadows of Srinagar's Dara area. Shah claimed on Tuesday that the men, identified as Suleiman Shah, Afghan and Jibran, were members of the Lashkar-e-Taiba terror group. They were identified as having been involved in the Pahalgam attack by those who had provided them shelter, said the minister. Also on Scroll this week
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliament must condemn Trump blabber
US President Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on India, calling its economy "dead" and imposing a 25 pr cent tariff on its imports, effective from August 1. Trump expressed displeasure with India's purchase of oil and defence equipment from Russia, stating that India has "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia" and is Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China. He said that maybe India will buy oil from Pakistan someday, which further strained the already tense relationship between the two neighbours. The Indian Parliament should condemn Trump's statement in one voice, as his remarks have sparked concern and added fuel to the escalating tensions between the US and India. Ganti Venkata Sudhir, Secunderabad Modi's foreign policy dealt Trump blow US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods has dealt a severe blow to the Indian economy. Citing India's trade ties with Russia and high tariffs as reasons, this decision is set to disrupt Indian exports, particularly in critical sectors like pharmaceuticals and textiles. The move has sparked widespread criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy, which has failed to avert the crisis. Despite Modi's much-touted close relationship with Trump, the lack of progress in securing a favourable trade agreement highlights a perceived leadership shortfall. Urgent measures are needed to safeguard India's economic interests. Srinivaas Goud Muddam, Hyderabad
