NFL-Native American groups slam Trump call to bring back Washington's NFL team name name
Some Native American groups slammed Mr Donald Trump for pushing for a return to what they called harmful names.
Two Native American groups on July 21 condemned US President Donald Trump's threat to block a new football stadium in Washington, unless the local NFL team
restores its old and controversial Redskins name .
In posts on his Truth Social platform on July 20, Mr Trump said there was 'a big clamoring' for the team, which has been called the Commanders since 2022, to revert to its former name and that 'our great Indian people' want it to happen.
Mr Trump also urged Major League Baseball's Cleveland Guardians, who changed their name from Indians in 2021, to follow suit.
But some Native American groups slammed Mr Trump for pushing for a return to what they called harmful names.
'These mascots and names do not honour Native Peoples – they reduce us to caricatures,' the Association on American Indian Affairs said in a statement. 'Our diverse Peoples and cultures are not relics of the past or mascots for entertainment.'
'Native Nations are sovereign, contemporary cultures who deserve respect and self-determination, not misrepresentation.'
After decades of criticism that the name was a racial slur, the Washington NFL team in July 2020 retired the Redskins name and logo – featuring the profile of a red-faced Native American with feathers in his hair – that had been in place since 1933.
The National Congress of American Indians said it opposes any effort to revive what it called racist mascots that demean Indigenous communities, calling it 'an affront to Tribal sovereignty.'
'For seventy-five years, NCAI has held an unbroken voice: Imagery and fan behaviors that mock, demean, and dehumanise Native people have no place in modern society,' NCAI President Mark Macarro said in a statement.
Because Congress retains oversight of Washington under its home-rule law, Mr Trump could try to influence federal funding or approvals tied to the stadium, but he lacks direct authority to block it.
Congress, controlled by Mr Trump's Republicans, also has the power to override decisions by the Democratic-dominated Washington, City Council, though it rarely exercises this authority.
The team, which has been in suburban Landover, Maryland, since 1997, reached an agreement with the District of Columbia government in April to return to the city with a new stadium expected to open in 2030.
The White House did not respond to a request for further comment on Mr Trump's post. The Commanders and NFL also did not respond to requests for comment.
While some groups oppose the Commanders returning to the former name, the Native American Guardians Association said it supported Mr Trump's desire to bring back the Redskins name.
'The Native American Guardians Association stands with the President of the United States in the call to return common sense and sanity back to our nation,' the group said in a statement.
'Virtually all Americans, to include American Indians, are fed up with cancel culture.'
The Commanders have won three Super Bowls and are one of the NFL's marquee franchises, ranked by Forbes last year as the league's 10th most valuable franchise at US$6.3 billion.
Many American professional and collegiate sports teams have Native American-themed names. Major League Baseball's Atlanta Braves, the National Hockey League's Chicago Blackhawks and NFL's Kansas City Chiefs have said they have no plans to change their names. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
6 minutes ago
- CNA
'Mission complete': What's in the US-Japan trade deal?
US President Donald Trump has struck a trade deal with Japan that lowers tariffs on auto imports and spares Tokyo from punishing new levies on other goods, in exchange for a US$550 billion package of US-bound investment and loans. Trump on Tuesday (Jul 22) hailed the "massive" deal with Japan as "perhaps the largest deal ever made". "#Mission Complete," Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa wrote on X following a meeting with Trump at the White House. Trade between the two countries totalled nearly US$230 billion in 2024, with Japan running a trade surplus of nearly US$70 billion. Japan is the fifth-largest US trading partner in goods, US Census Bureau data shows. Here's what we know about the deal so far. WHAT'S IN THE DEAL? Trump, in a post on Truth Social, said Japan would "open" its economy to American autos and rice. Crucially, Japanese autos, which account for more than a quarter of the country's exports to the US, will see existing tariffs cut to 15 per cent from levies totalling 27.5 per cent previously. Duties that were due to come into effect on other Japanese goods from Aug 1 will also be cut to 15 per cent from 25 per cent. "We are the first (country) in the world to reduce tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, with no limits on volume," Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told reporters. Japan will keep its existing tariffs on imports of US agricultural products, but agreed to import more rice from the US within the existing tariff-free quota. Steel and aluminium, subject to a separate 50 per cent tariff, were not included in the deal, said Japan's Akazawa. The trade deal also does not cover spending on defence - something Trump had pressed for. The US$550 billion of investment into the US is part of a new Japan Investment America Initiative. It is aimed at boosting investment in economic security sectors including semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, steel, shipbuilding, critical minerals, energy, autos and AI technologies. The sum was the upper limit of loan investments and guarantees that Japanese government state banks and agencies would make available to promote Japanese corporate investment in the US. According to Akazawa, the agreement follows the idea of "investment over tariffs" proposed to Trump by Ishiba at their meeting in February. WHAT WERE THE STICKING POINTS? A contentious point in trade negotiations had been US rice exports to Japan. Trump had previously threatened tariffs on the country over what he called Japan's reluctance to accept rice exports. On Wednesday, a consensus was finally reached, with Japan agreeing to import more rice from the US – but within the tariff-free quota. Under a World Trade Organization (WTO) "minimum access" framework introduced in 1995, Japan imports about 770,000 metric tons of rice tariff-free every year. Last fiscal year, the US accounted for 45 per cent of the total. Ishiba said Japan would import more US grain within this framework. In agreeing to the deal with the US, Ishiba stressed Tokyo's success in protecting the agricultural sector. 'We made absolutely no sacrifice in the agricultural sector," Ishiba told reporters. Rice imports are a sensitive issue in Japan, and Ishiba's government - which lost its upper house majority in elections on Sunday - had previously ruled out any concessions. HOW HAVE MARKETS REACTED? Tokyo stocks surged to a one-year high on news that a trade deal had been reached. The Nikkei jumped nearly 4 per cent, led by stocks in automakers with Toyota up more than 14 per cent and Honda nearly 11 per cent. Even with tariffs, the US remains by far the most important market for many Japanese automakers. At Toyota and Hyundai alone, North America accounts for at least 40 per cent of the revenue, filings show. The US is also Toyota's biggest market in terms of vehicles. Besides Japan, the auto industry is also a crucial sector for South Korea. The sector in both countries provides major exports, millions of manufacturing jobs and is a deep source of national pride. Japan's trade deal also stoked optimism in South Korea on hopes Seoul would clinch a similar deal. Shares of South Korean automakers gained, with both Hyundai Motor and Kia rising more than 7 per cent. IMPACT OF THE TRADE DEAL? Analysts were cautiously optimistic about the impact of the trade deal. Kazutaka Maeda, an economist at Meiji Yasuda Research Institute, said that he expects the Japanese economy to avoid recession with the new 15 per cent tariff rate. But Hinrich Foundation's head of trade policy Deborah Elms noted that while the reduced levy is better than the earlier threatened 25 per cent duty, it is still a "significant escalation" in tariffs overall compared to US tariffs of about 2 per cent on Japan heading into April. She also cautioned that while Japan's lower tariff rate would give it a competitive advantage compared to other foreign producers of automobiles shipped to the US, the levy on autos is not the only challenge for Japan. 'Many of the vehicles that Japan manufactures for the United States market are made in the US - and so what matters to them is also auto parts tariffs, and crucially, things like metals, so steel, aluminium and all of the derivatives,' Elms told CNA's Asia First. Steel and aluminium exports to the US are still subject to 50 per cent tariffs. Still, Jared Mondschein, director of research at the United States Studies Centre noted that Japan's auto relationship with the US is "huge and should not be underestimated". 'This is a sensitive point for Japan, and this could very well be a huge opportunity for them to sort of provide some balance and stability to a pretty unwieldy economic relationship with the United States,' he told CNA's Asia Now, though noting it was still too early to tell the impact of lowered tariffs with details still forthcoming. WHAT'S NEXT? So far, the US has also announced framework agreements with the UK, Vietnam, Indonesia and paused a tit-for-tat battle with China. Countries that have yet to strike a deal with the US will be looking to Japan's trade deal as a potential example before the Aug 1 deadline. Seoul, for example, is taking a close look, according to the South Korean industry minister. The country heads into high-level talks with the US on Friday.
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Australia makes second $673 million Aukus payment amid US review
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Australia has maintained it is confident the pact will proceed. SYDNEY - Australia has paid the United States A$800 million (S$673 million) in the second instalment under the Aukus nuclear submarine deal, despite an ongoing formal review of the agreement by US President Donald Trump's administration. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed the latest instalment on July 23 , following an initial US $500 million (S$639 million) paid in February. In 2023, the United States, Australia and Britain unveiled details of a plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines from the early 2030s to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. Australia committed to spend A$368 billion over three decades in its biggest-ever defence deal. Canberra is due to pay Washington US$2 billion by end-2025 to support the expansion of American submarine shipyards, Reuters reported in April. 'There's a schedule of payments to be made. We have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom, it is about increasing their capacity, their industrial capacity,' Mr Albanese told national broadcaster ABC. 'As part of that as well, we have Australians on the ground, learning those skills.' Mr Trump launched a formal review of Aukus in June to examine whether the pact met his 'American First' criteria. It will be led by Mr Elbridge Colby, who in the past has expressed scepticism about Aukus . Australia, which sees the submarines as critical to its own defence as tensions grow over China's military build-up , has maintained it is confident the pact will proceed. 'We support Aukus ,' Mr Albanese said. 'We have an agreement to a treaty level, with our partners, signed, of course in San Diego with the United States and United Kingdom,' he added. Washington will sell several Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, while Britain and Australia will later build a new Aukus -class submarine. REUTERS
Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China says US withdrawal from Unesco not the behaviour of a ‘responsible country'
Find out what's new on ST website and app. China said it has always firmly supported the work of Unesco. BEIJING - China said it regretted on July 23 the United States' decision to withdraw from the UN cultural and education agency Unesco. 'This is not the action that a responsible major country should take,' foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said. 'China has always firmly supported the work of Unesco,' he added. The United States said on July 22 it would quit Unesco , best known for establishing world heritage sites, claiming it was biased against Israel and promoted 'divisive' causes. US President Donald Trump also ordered the country's withdrawal from Unesco in 2017 during his first term. President Joe Biden later re-established membership. This latest withdrawal will take effect in December 2026. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore's domestic recycling rate drops to all-time low of 11% Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Local buyers are key to recovery of prime district condo market Singapore New online channel for public to report illegal ride-hailing services Singapore Ex-Tanjong Pagar United footballer charged with assault after Singapore Premier League match in Feb Singapore COE prices for cars mostly unchanged; premium for commercial vehicles up 2.9% Life The Projector will resume daily screenings at Golden Mile Tower. Is it exiting Cineleisure next? Singapore Cyclist charged after hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him Since taking office, Mr Trump has indicated he would pull the United States out of several multilateral institutions – including the World Health Organisation and the Paris climate agreement – and has launched punishing trade tariffs against allies and foes alike. China, meanwhile, has sought to promote itself as a responsible major power by expressing support for the United Nations and other international bodies. 'This is already the third time that the US has withdrawn from Unesco, and it has long been in arrears with its membership fees,' Mr Guo told reporters on July 23. 'We call on all countries to reaffirm their commitment to multilateralism and take concrete actions to support the international system with the UN at its core,' he said. AFP
