
In Pictures: Tearful politicians showing their sensitive side
She is far from the first politician to show her emotions by shedding tears though.
Here, the PA news agency looks at some other examples over the years of politicians becoming tearful:
– Theresa May
Theresa May's tenure as prime minister was dominated by Brexit. The former home secretary had the unenviable task of bringing the country back together after a divisive referendum and negotiating the UK's exit from the European Union as she succeeded David Cameron in 2016.
Mrs May ultimately failed to deliver the latter of those goals and the toll that responsibility had taken on her during her time in No 10 perhaps showed as she delivered her resignation speech outside Downing Street in May 2019.
– Margaret Thatcher
Known as the Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher portrayed strength during her 11-year reign as prime minister.
However, she too, showed a more human side when she broke down in tears as she said goodbye to Downing Street in 1990.
– George Osborne
George Osborne wept as he attended Baroness Thatcher's funeral in 2013.
Mr Osborne, who was chancellor at the time, was moved to tears during a sermon by then Bishop of London Lord Chartres.
– Matt Hancock
Matt Hancock raised eyebrows as he appeared to wipe away a tear during a live appearance on Good Morning Britain as he reacted to news that a man called William Shakespeare had become the second person in the UK to receive a Covid vaccine.
'It's been such a tough year for so many people,' the then health secretary told Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid in December 2020.
– Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown wept when he opened up about the death of his daughter Jennifer during a TV interview in 2010.
The then prime minister's eyes filled with tears as he told Piers Morgan he knew that his newborn daughter was not going to survive.
She died in 2002 aged just 10 days after suffering a brain haemorrhage.
– Cherie Blair
Cherie Blair broke down in tears in 2002 as she tried to explain away the controversy surrounding convicted fraudster Peter Foster's role in buying two flats for herself and her then prime minister husband Tony Blair.
'I know I'm in a very special position, I'm the wife of the Prime Minister, I have an interesting job and a wonderful family, but I also know I am not Superwoman,' she tearfully said in a statement to the press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Ireland will regret its planned Israeli settlements trade ban
If Ireland's foreign affairs minister expected plaudits from EU leaders for the republic's looming ban on Israeli settlement goods, he was sorely disappointed. Ireland, Simon Harris pontificated in Brussels, 'is the only country in the entire European Union that has published any legislation ever in relation to banning trade with the occupied Palestinian territories, but it's pretty lonely out there.' Frankly, this is hardly surprising when you take your country on a solo run into perilous economic and diplomatic territory. The Israeli Settlements (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025 (PIGS) will ban goods produced, or partly produced, in Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It applies to every type of goods, from dates and avocados, manufactured goods, raw materials to natural resources. It is purely symbolic, representing €1.5 million (£1.29 billion) of the €4.36 billion (£3.88 billion) trade between Ireland and Israel. But the penalties are draconian, the likely diplomatic and economic fallout ignored, and no thought was given to the many Palestinians employed by Israeli settlement companies whose livelihoods may be jeopardised by this ban. Well, it is the symbolism that counts. When enacted, Irish, UK and other citizens ordinarily resident in Ireland could face a five-year jail term, a €125,000 (£107,000) fine or both should they buy a string of beads or a bottle of holy water in the old city of East Jerusalem and turn up at Dublin airport with the offending items in their backpacks. Incredibly, the Bill has extraterritorial effect – although quite how this will be enforced is anyone's guess. Its astonishing implications have never been explored. The PIGS Bill is the renamed Occupied Territories Bill published by independents in the Irish parliament in 2018. But since October 2023, multifarious radical groups have effectively hijacked the legislation and are using it as a trojan horse to dismantle the entire EU-Israel trade agreement worth €46 billion (£39.6 billion). On the streets, mainly peaceful protesters demanding an end to Israeli trade march in lockstep with extremists carrying Hezbollah flags chanting 'let's go bomb Tel Aviv' and 'burn the settlers to the ground'. And nobody bats an eyelid. Since 2018, three attorneys general have warned the government that enacting this legislation would be at 'substantial risk to the state' because it violates EU law on international trade, free movement and customs rules by imposing a trade ban unilaterally. As one seasoned political correspondent put it, there's a reason this bill has been left hanging around since 2018: 'It stank'. The PIGS Bill aims to get around infringing EU law by framing the legislation on the advisory opinion published by the International Court of Justice last July urging states not to trade or invest in the occupied territories. Although not legally binding, the opinion allowed the government enough wriggle room to push the bill forward. Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin pressed pause momentarily when he got an earful from powerful Jewish organisations during his annual St Patrick's Day trip to Washington, but it's now full steam ahead in Ireland's war on dates and avocados. There remains, however, extreme nervousness about the bill in government and the likely diplomatic and economic fallout. One government figure described it as 'economic treason'. Documents have now emerged showing that John McCarthy, chief economist in the department of finance, raised the prospect of conflict between the state's diplomatic and economic policies. The ban 'might pose problems for businesses based in Ireland, including multinationals, which do not usually operate different regimes between Ireland and other EU countries,' he warned. Ireland acts as the gateway to Europe for US companies. They directly employ 211,000 people in the country and indirectly support a further 168,000 jobs. As things stand, 38 US states penalise businesses that boycott Israeli trade, which puts Ireland on a direct collision course with American multinationals based there. So far, the bill only applies to goods but the clamour to include services is getting louder. If services are included, companies such as Airbnb – which has its European headquarters in Dublin – may have a problem. And what of security software reportedly developed by an Israeli software firm and used by Irish banks? That could prove interesting. Ireland's head of police is none too happy either after spending €500,000 (£430,000) on the Israel-made technology 'Cellebrite', a vital tool for solving violent crime by extracting data from computers. Gardai commissioner Drew Harris said: It's a tool that we need to properly investigate crime which has some form of cyber or digital element. When you look at the detections we are getting, the crimes we're preventing and the convictions that there are, we'd be very reluctant to step away from a very important tool. All this is being put at risk for a legislative mess that will do nothing to help the Palestinian people. But symbolism matters. This will be the first piece of legislation in Europe since 1945 that will criminalise trade with Jewish businesses. Ireland will be the toast of Hamas yet again as its anti-Israel stance crosses another red line. Other European states are not exactly clamouring to jump aboard this particular bandwagon, but Harris has made clear Ireland is happy to go it alone. 'In the absence of Europe moving together, we're going to go ahead with our own domestic legislation', he said. Of course he is. This is a man who reopened an Irish embassy in Teheran and disinvite the Israeli ambassador from his party conference, all the while feting the Iranian one. Ireland is the most pro-Palestine state in the western world; this is the hill it is choosing to die on. But falling foul of EU law is the least of its problems. US President Donald Trump already has Ireland in his sights over its preferential 12.5 per cent corporation tax. Given the US President's unwavering support for Israel, is the Irish government prepared for the cold winds that will come from Washington if it panders to demands from keffiyeh-covered stormtroopers to cut trade ties with Israel? We will soon find out.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Ex-EU diplomat brands SNP Government decision to axe Europe scholarships as 'Scottish Brexit'
Federica Mogherini, former vice-president of the European Commission, has spoken about the Scottish Government's decision to axe scholarship funding. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The European Union's former foreign policy chief has criticised the Scottish Government's decision to end postgraduate scholarship funding for Scots to attend a prestigious European college, branding the move 'regrettable'. Federica Mogherini, former vice-president of the European Commission, agreed the decision to end the scholarships with the College of Europe amounted to a 'Scottish Brexit'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The college is a leading EU affairs institution that Ms Mogherini described as the 'education institution of the European Union'. Ms Mogherini, now rector of the College of Europe, said the decision by SNP ministers went 'against the trend'. She said: 'It is as if you were working on enlargement, and at the same time you have Brexit'. The Saltire alongside a European Union flag. The Bruges-based college - often described as the EU's equivalent of Oxbridge and founded with the support of Sir Winston Churchill - is just a stone's throw from the Brussels institutions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The college is widely regarded as a fast-track into EU and national policymaking. Among UK alumni are UK health minister Stephen Kinnock, former SNP MEP Alyn Smith, and former deputy prime minister Sir Nick Clegg. Ms Mogherini's rare intervention follows the quiet cancellation of a long-standing Scottish Government scholarship scheme that funds up to three Scottish students. Although the college receives substantial EU funding, the Scottish Government's contribution covers tuition, accommodation and totals roughly £85,000 annually. While insiders cite budgetary pressures, the cuts follow a broader decline in UK government funding for EU affairs training that began in the David Cameron years, when UK-wide scholarships peaked at more than two dozen. Today, only the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office funds a handful of places for its civil servants. Ms Mogherini said this latest cut caused 'regret - I wish that this decision can be reviewed, changed … even partially'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad College of Europe rector Federica Mogherini at the opening of the 2021-22 academic year at the College of Europe. Picture: James Arthur Gekiere/AFP via Getty Images | BELGA MAG/AFP via Getty Images The rector said: 'It's not only because we value enormously Scottish students being part of the college, but also because since I started as rector, we've invested enormously in expanding the scholarship schemes.' '[The Scottish Government scholarship], it's one that has always been there … supporting students that are very good and who contribute, I believe, in a crucial manner to keeping Scotland and the European Union connected.' Over the past ten months, students at the college have met top EU figures, including the European Commission president, multiple current and former commissioners, and leaders such as the Prime Ministers of Malaysia and Luxembourg, the Spanish King, and Catalonia's regional president. Ms Mogherini said the scholarship scheme's main advantage was giving graduates 'access to the [Brussels] network'. She said: 'Being connected with a network of alumni and professors that are into EU affairs, I wouldn't say it can ever substitute for being a member state. but at least it gives you a glimpse and a hook to what is happening inside the European institutions. So institutionally, it's important. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Our students focus on the European integration process. But obviously also Brexit - the one element of disintegration that happened recently - is a matter of not only studies, but also discussion, and the Scottish perspective on that is particularly important to have in the college community. 'I think it's also important from a societal point of view, because it keeps the Scottish students, and through them Scottish society. connected with the EU environment. It preserves the memory … the institutional memory and maybe prepares for the future.' The latest cuts form part of a broader set of budget-tightening measures in October last year affecting both the Scottish Government's education and skills portfolio, as well as its international footprint. This included withdrawing funding for Scotland Europa, a Brussels-based network that for 33 years has supported Scottish businesses and public agencies by promoting their interests within the EU's institutions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite an increase of £1,126.6 million to the Scottish Government budget in the autumn, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'We are facing the most challenging fiscal climate since devolution and it is vital that we ensure all available funding is used to maximum effect. 'The historical arrangement between the Scottish Government and the College of Europe provided support via SAAS for a maximum of three students per year at a cost of around €33,000 [£28,495] per student.' The spokesperson added that 'financial support will continue to be available for students who require to spend time abroad as part of their course requirements with a UK institution and [that] scholarships are available for Scottish students to the College of Europe through the Brunat Scholarships Fund' - a small private initiative not funded by the Government. The priorities of these recent cuts appear to contradict the First Minister's recent remarks at Edinburgh's Scotland 2050 conference. Mr Swinney had described a future Scotland as 'a nation state in our own right, as a member state of … the world's biggest single social and economic community, the European Union'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'The UK Government ended austerity, with the budget last October delivering over £5 billion extra for Scottish public services in this year alone. 'That is more funding than ever before … many students and academics will rightly expect the Scottish Government to invest that extra cash in devolved policy areas, such as higher education." Paul Anderson, the sole Scottish graduate at the college's new Albanian campus, said: "The EU and the countries of the Western Balkans are taking the accession process seriously and the opportunities provided by the Tirana campus demonstrate their commitment. "It was a privilege to be part of the first cohort and share my insights as a Scottish islander with the group, which included many students' first Burns Supper. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "Without the scholarship, it would have been difficult for me take up my place at the college. Post-Brexit, it is more important than ever that we maintain as many ties as possible with our European friends.' Labour MP Chris Murray also stressed the need to 'engage with our European friends and neighbours', adding: 'I want to see more engagement, not less'.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Scottish Labour 'firebrand' Brian Leishman on why Sir Keir Starmer should apologise, and Jeremy Corbyn's party
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is not your standard political backstory. Until just a few years ago, Brian Leishman was a golf professional, including a stint at the luxurious Gleneagles resort in Perthshire where he coached A-list celebrities such as John Travolta, Gerard Butler and Shakira. He is now one of Scottish Labour's highest-profile MPs, with a reputation as a left-wing firebrand unafraid to speak his mind and take his own party's leadership to task. On Tuesday, he was one of 49 Labour MPs to rebel against the Government's welfare reforms. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Brian Leishman, the Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth. Picture: Michael Gillen | Michael Gillen/National World "I don't know about firebrand," Mr Leishman told The Scotsman from his constituency office in Alloa. "My politics is described as left-wing, but I would say, to be honest with you, I would describe it as common-sense stuff." The Alloa and Grangemouth MP said he is amazed by the lack of debate about class in Westminster. "For me, all the societal problems that we've got are class issues," he said. 'We see gross inequality.' He is scathing about his party's benefits reforms. Sir Keir Starmer was forced to make major last-minute concessions to avoid a humiliating defeat on Tuesday, but Mr Leishman wants the entire Bill scrapped. He also wants the Prime Minister to apologise to disabled and vulnerable people. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "It was messy, and I would say it is certainly no way to govern a country and legislate, that's the important thing," he said. "We've seen chaos with the Tories over Brexit and over a whole host of other things. It doesn't paint Parliament in a good light. "The Prime Minister can still emerge out of this with credit, if he were to acknowledge he's made a mistake, apologise to the disabled and vulnerable community - the disabled community that have been so terrified at these potential changes - and actually withdraw the Bill.' He said Sir Keir should go back to the drawing board and "get round the table with key stakeholders" such as disability charities. Mr Leishman argued apologising would be a sign of strength. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Brian Leishman, Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, at Alloa Business Centre. | Michael Gillen/National World "No one is ever expecting a Government or a Prime Minister or whoever to be perfect,' he added. 'If anyone wants perfection, they are hoping for something that they will never, ever get.' He continued: 'We're talking about legislation that is going to impact millions of people. It's going to have huge, life-changing consequences for people. There's nothing wrong with saying, right, OK, maybe I need to take a step back here, and actually go again.' Mr Leishman said the UK Labour government's first 12 months have damaged the chances of Scottish party leader Anas Sarwar winning the Holyrood election in May. "Last summer, when we got elected a year ago, I'm sure all the bookies fancied we were going to have a Labour Government in Holyrood,' he said. "I would say the first 12 months of the Labour Government in Westminster, we've damaged and weakened Anas's chances. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "So I would say that it's all to play for, what, ten months out? But if we're better in Westminster, we'll improve his chances of getting elected in Holyrood. His wagon is hitched to us. If we do better in Westminster, we improve his chances in Holyrood." The breakaway party Mr Leishman joined Labour in 2016, when Jeremy Corbyn was leader. "I was listening to the leadership at the time, and I thought, this is speaking to who I am politically,' he recalled. He described the 2017 and 2019 election manifestos as 'phenomenal'. Mr Corbyn, of course, has since been expelled from Labour. He is now in talks over the creation of a new left-wing political force that could challenge his old party at the ballot box. Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana, who had the Labour whip suspended last year, said on Thursday she was quitting Sir Keir's party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with Mr Corbyn. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The former Labour leader and independent MP from Islington North insisted on Friday that 'real change is coming' in a 'new kind of political party' with 'democratic foundations'. There are plans to build the movement from the grassroots up, by bringing together left-wing independents across the country. Mr Leishman is full of praise for the pair, but insisted he is a 'proud' Labour Party member. "I've got an enormous amount of respect for them both,' he said. 'What I would say is, my first reaction is that it's very sad that there's not room in the Labour Party for Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana. Jeremy Corbyn, MP and former Labour leader, will be speaking on social justice in a show called In Conversation with Jeremy Corbyn. | Getty Images "Jeremy has dedicated his life to the Labour movement, and to the protection and the advancement of the working class, not just in this country, but he's been fantastic on foreign issues as well. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "I would say that Zarah has been a phenomenal member of Parliament. She is an absolute whirlwind, a driving force, again, for working-class communities. "She's a credit to the Labour movement, and it's very, very sad that the pair of them are not in the Labour Party. I think there should always be room for people like Jeremy and Zarah in the Labour Party. "In regard to joining another party, it's not entered my head. I'm a Labour Party member. I'm a proud Labour Party member." He said there needed to be more internal democracy and "tolerance" for different views within the party. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pushed on whether he had been approached about a new left-wing party, Mr Leishman said: "I've not had anyone approach me. There's been no discussion about me joining any other political party." On a Labour collision course Welfare reform is far from the only issue to put him on a collision course with the Labour leadership. Earlier this year, he said he was "disgusted" by his party's broken promises on the Grangemouth oil refinery, which ceased processing crude oil in April. He has also backed the Waspi [Women Against State Pension Inequality] women in their fight for compensation. But Mr Leishman said the UK Labour government has also done some "fantastic" things, pointing to examples such as boosting workers' rights. "Those things, they're terrific,' he said. 'I just want to see more of them." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He is critical of his party for 'aping' the language of Nigel Farage's Reform UK, and highlighted Sir Keir's speech about immigration in May in which he said the UK risked becoming "an island of strangers". Mr Leishman said: "When it comes to 'island of strangers' and comments like that, he admits he was wrong on that, and that's quite right, because you know what, I find that language pretty appalling to be honest. We should not be aping Reform." He said Labour should instead set out exactly what it stands for. "We've got to say, this is who we are, this is what we believe in, this is what we stand for, and take people on that,' he said. 'That's strong leadership, for me. "That's got to come from the top in both Scottish Labour, but also down in Westminster as well. We've got to nail our colours to the mast and say this is who we are, this is what we are, this is what we believe, and give people that choice.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Leishman said Labour amplifies Reform 'far too much', adding: 'When I go to Prime Minister's Questions, the amount of times that 'the honourable member for Clacton' [Mr Farage] gets mentioned in a derogatory manner, he sits and laughs." He continued: "How much airtime do they [Reform] get for five MPs? An incredible amount. We amplify that by mentioning them. "Now, what we need to do is instead of trying to paint somebody else as some sort of bogeyman, how about actually let's just try and improve things ourselves. "Let's concentrate on ourselves. Let's get our house in order and let's actually positively change society, instead of pointing the finger at anybody else." 'Very concerned' for Scottish Labour Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Leishman said he was "very concerned" that Scottish Labour could be heading for defeat at next year's Holyrood election. "We've got to be awake, and we've got to be alert and alive to Reform, but let's concentrate on ourselves,' he said. 'Let's get our own house in order and let's actually deliver a proper change for people." Asked if he is satisfied with Mr Sarwar's leadership of Scottish Labour, Mr Leishman pauses for a couple of seconds before giving the answer quoted above about the UK government damaging and weakening his position. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes and Cherie Blair share a platform at the Scotland 2050 conference in Edinburgh (Picture: Andrew Milligan) | PA But he is also critical of some of the Scottish party's messaging. "What I would be saying is, let's talk less about quangos,' he said. 'Because in all the years that I've been out door-knocking and knocked thousands of doors, how many times do you think the word quango has come up on the doorstep? Zero." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Sarwar has promised to 'strip back the number of quangos', arguing there are too many public bodies in Scotland. Mr Leishman said the focus needs to be on 'big ticket' issues, such as the NHS and public services.