ED raids Karnataka Congress MLA-linked premises over undisclosed foreign assets
The searches covered the MLA's residence, his business entities, and premises linked to key associates. The Bagepalli constituency that Reddy represents is located in Karnataka's Chikkaballapura district.This comes a month after the ED, on June 11, conducted searches at eight locations in Karnataka linked to Congress leader and Ballari MP E Tukaram as well as other Congress leaders and MLAs.Those raids were part of a separate investigation into alleged embezzlement of funds from the Karnataka Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation Limited (KVSTDCL), with the siphoned money reportedly used to fund the Lok Sabha election campaign.- EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Karnataka
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Hounded for 10 years: Rahul Gandhi backs Robert Vadra amid ED crackdown
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday launched a scathing attack on the Centre, accusing it of carrying out a decade-long "witch hunt" against his brother-in-law Robert Vadra, after the Enforcement Directorate filed its latest chargesheet against him."My brother-in-law has been hounded by this government for the last ten years. This latest chargesheet is a continuation of that witch hunt. I stand with Robert, Priyanka and their children as they face yet another onslaught of malicious, politically motivated slander and harassment," Rahul Gandhi said in a post on X. advertisement"I know that they are all brave enough to withstand any kind of persecution and they will continue to do so with dignity. The truth will eventually prevail," he added. The Leader of Opposition's remarks came a day after the ED filed a charge sheet against Vadra, who is married to Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, in connection with a money laundering case linked to alleged irregularities in a land deal in Haryana. This is the first time any investigative agency has named the 56-year-old businessman in a criminal prosecution ED has attached 43 immovable properties across Rajasthan, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Gujarat worth over Rs 37 crore, allegedly linked to Vadra and his companies, including Sky Light Hospitality Pvt. Ltd, sources told news agency case stems from a 2018 FIR registered by Gurugram Police, which accused Vadra's firm of fraudulently purchasing 3.53 acres of land in Shikohpur village, Sector 83, Gurugram, in February 2008 through what investigators claim was a false declaration. The land was reportedly bought for Rs 7.5 crore from Onkareshwar Properties Pvt. who was questioned by the ED for three consecutive days in April, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that the case is part of a "political vendetta" targeting him and his family, which includes Congress matriarch Sonia Gandhi and Rahul a statement, Vadra's office described the latest chargesheet as "nothing more than an extension of the political witch hunt by the present government". "As a law-abiding Indian citizen, Mr Vadra has always and will continue to extend his fullest cooperation to the authorities. He is confident that at the end of it all, the truth will prevail and he will be cleared of any wrongdoing," the statement added. Backing Vadra, the Congress called the chargesheet another attempt by the Modi government to "intimidate and persecute" its leaders. "The witch hunting of Shri Robert Vadra is another vicious attempt of the Modi Government to intimidate and persecute, which will fail miserably," Congress general secretary Randeep Surjewala said.- Ends
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
An excerpt from Believer's Dilemma:Vajpayee and the Hindu Right's Path to Power (1977-2018)
The second volume of a two-part biography, Believer's Dilemma begins with a watershed moment when India voted in its first non-Congress government at the Centre in 1977. The Sangh Parivar was in the coalition, and Atal Bihari Vajpayee got the post of External Affairs Minister. Two years later, when the coalition collapsed, Vajpayee 'publicly apportioned some of the blame to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,' whose ideology he believed in. After a stint in government, 'the believer now had dilemmas,' and Vajpayee's relationship with the Sangh Parivar would 'remain a convoluted affair till the very end.' An edited excerpt: Janata went to its funeral not only unsung but also unbathed. In mid-July 1979, the RSS's labour wing Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh instigated a strike in Delhi's water supply department, demanding a pay hike and better working conditions. It led to 'choking lavatories, bursting sewers, threat of epidemics in the slums and not a drop to drink anywhere in the city'. Confined to his hospital bed, Vajpayee felt exasperated with old colleagues such as Dattopant Thengadi, who was spearheading the water strike, for worsening the chaos in the capital. Seeds of discord Away from the mayhem, undergoing physiotherapy at his private retreat, Vajpayee introspected on the previous twenty-eight months. He used the time to churn out a longish op-ed for theIndian Express, where he argued that the responsibility for the collapse of the first non-Congress government lay with leaders across all factions. Partly because he was under pressure from both sides, and divided in his loyalties, he adopted the tone of a detached referee. The highlight of this essay was Vajpayee's takedown of his own fraternity for their failure to demonstrate that they did not seek a political role: 'Patronising a press that takes sides in the sordid politics of power, involvement in youth bodies that interact with political parties, participating in trade union rivalries such as the one which recently brought enormous misery to the people of Delhi by callously cutting off the water supply – these do not help an organisation to establish its apolitical credentials. It is possible that some people genuinely feel apprehensively about the RSS. A certain onus accordingly devolved on the RSS, an onus that has not been discharged effectively by the RSS. Its repudiation of the theocratic form of the state was welcome, yet the question could legitimately be asked – why does it not open its doors to non-Hindus?' Vajpayee's unexpected outburst had an urgent purpose: it was a careful PR exercise in showcasing the Jan Sangh's independence from Nagpur, so Janata could lure back some of the MPs who had crossed over. In truth, he continued to be emotionally tied to and dependent on the RSS to bolster his political muscle. His mild criticism also evaded the more serious charges of the Sangh Parivar's involvement in anti-Muslim violence. Later, the enquiry commissions implicated the RSS. As in the past, the essay declared the riots to be a law-and-order failure (in Aligarh) or a response to provocation from the Muslims, such as an attack on a Ram Navami procession (in Jamshedpur). Power games Charan Singh had found his moment of supreme glory, but with enough hint that he could not hold on to it for long. He had agreed to withdraw Emergency cases against Indira and Sanjay Gandhi. But this demand was rebuffed by Congress-U, a breakaway faction of Mrs. Gandhi's party that formed the backbone of his ragtag coalition. It served Indira Gandhi well to pull the plug after twenty-three days of outside support. The way was finally clear for Jagjivan Ram, who had more than 200 Janata MPs supporting him. Vajpayee's essay helped the Janata president, Chandra Shekhar, who praised 'Atal jee on his courageous clear vision' and beseeched the defectors to return and help usher Jagjivan Ram as the first Dalit prime minister of the republic. If the plan succeeded, it would make for a profound moment of democratic deepening. On 22 August, Vajpayee had flown to Madras to induce M. G. Ramachandran of the AIADMK – All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam – whose flock had eighteen MPs, to support the Dalit leader. Just when MGR had nearly agreed that afternoon, the bid turned infructuous. Vajpayee received news from the capital: the president of India had, rather dubiously, dissolved the Lok Sabha. Claims, counter claims It was now a three-ring circus. Touring for elections, Vajpayee's twin targets were Charan Singh and Indira Gandhi. The strategy left many voters confused, unable to distinguish between Janata and Charan Singh's new party. Vajpayee tried convincing the voters that Janata had accomplished 'a lot in its short tenure'. Everywhere he flew – now in a private plane – he made hour-long speeches reminding the crowd of Janata having restored democracy, freedom of press, and judiciary. He cited improved economic indicators: falling prices, rising food stocks, doubled foreign exchange reserves. He pointed out that Janata had boosted relations with all major countries without damaging with any. Mrs. Gandhi mocked Janata as a mishmash – a 'khichdi sarkaar' – and beseeched people to 'vote for a government that works'. The Congress-I even managed to pierce the armour of the former foreign minister: they convinced his eldest brother, Awadh Behari, who had recently retired from his government job in Bhopal, to join Mrs. Gandhi's party. Atal was obviously embarrassed, but salvaged the situation saying there was 'nothing wrong' with his elder brother joining his rivals: 'It is his personal decision. I will not mind if my other brothers joined the Lok Dal or the Congress-U.' Excerpted with permission from Pan Macmillan India
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Bengaluru tunnel road sparks fresh clash: Tejasvi Surya dares govt for open debate, alleges mega scam
Bengaluru: The politics surrounding Bengaluru's controversial tunnel road project has taken a fiery turn, with BJP MP Tejasvi Surya launching a direct challenge to the ruling Congress government — accusing it of pushing a 'white elephant' project marred by massive corruption while ignoring real urban mobility solutions. The young Bengaluru South MP, known for his sharp attacks, has not only held a press conference exposing what he claims are shocking facts about the tunnel road's cost-benefit failures but has also thrown down the gauntlet for a live, public debate with Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, who is spearheading the project. Name the time and place, I am ready for an open debate. ' If the Congress government really believes in technical scrutiny and public consultation as it claims, then D.K. Shivakumar must accept this open challenge. Let Bengalureans see for themselves who is telling the truth about this gigantic scam,' Tejasvi posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday. Two days ago, Surya had laid out a blistering indictment of the tunnel road plan in a detailed press conference. He claimed that the multi-thousand crore rupee project would benefit only a handful of affluent commuters while draining public money that could be used to expand Metro rail, suburban trains, and city buses. 'This tunnel road will destroy the city's existing infrastructure, displace thousands, and open the floodgates for corruption and misuse of funds. It has zero benefit for common Bengalureans stuck in traffic jams every day. This is a scam in the making, plain and simple,' he had said. Surya presented documents and figures to argue that the cost per kilometer is unjustifiably high, there is no credible feasibility study on traffic decongestion, and land acquisition will fuel real estate speculation to benefit cronies. Unwilling to let the charges go unanswered, the Congress responded with a flurry of posts on X defending the tunnel road as an essential step towards building a 'Brand Bengaluru' of the future. 'This is not about political mileage. This is about integrated mobility for Bengaluru's next generation. Metro, suburban rail, buses and tunnel roads — all of it together will cut travel time, reduce air pollution and boost the economy. Please don't sabotage every project for petty politics,' the party said in its posts. The Congress also claimed that it welcomes 'technical advice and public scrutiny' but accused Surya of grandstanding for the sake of headlines. 'Public audit, technical review and open consultation will always be welcome. But painting every bold vision as a scam stalls Bengaluru's growth. The people want execution, not endless bickering,' the party asserted. Undeterred, Surya doubled down on Wednesday, telling the Congress to stop hiding behind tweets and face the people. 'If you genuinely stand by your plan, debate me publicly. Let experts, citizens, urban planners watch it live. I'm ready. Are you?' he asked, tagging D.K. Shivakumar in his tweet. Surya has also hinted that he will soon submit a memorandum to the Governor and even move court if the government pushes the project without wider consultations and a detailed independent review. Urban transport activists say the government has failed to clearly disclose detailed project reports, cost-benefit studies or independent environmental impact assessments. 'Everything is hush-hush, and that's what makes people suspect another mega scam,' says Suresh Kumar, a member of the Bengaluru Mobility Forum. Meanwhile, the Congress insists the plan is part of a multi-modal strategy to 'decarbonize' city traffic by reducing idling vehicles and creating signal-free corridors. It argues that flyovers and tunnels, if executed properly, can complement mass transport — but admits that the public must be kept in the loop.
