The reason eggs are less likely to crack when dropped on their side
Want to avoid a yolky mess when hard-boiling eggs? Try dropping them in sideways. Experiments with over 200 eggs reveal they're less likely to crack when falling on their side, potentially preventing those stray fissures that release egg white into the boiling water.
While this might not revolutionise your morning scramble – cracking an egg around the middle remains the best way to access the yolk – it could offer a helpful tip for smoother hard-boiled eggs.
It's often assumed that eggs are strongest at their ends, mimicking how they're packaged. The rounded bottom is thought to deflect impact. However, compression tests show eggs crack under the same force whether squeezed from the ends or the sides. Hundreds of eggs were used to reveal the findings (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)
'The fun started when we thought we would get one result and then we saw another,' said Hudson Borja da Rocha with Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who helped run the experiments.
The researchers also ran simulations and dropped eggs horizontally and vertically from three short heights up to 0.4 inches (10 millimeters).
The egg result? The ones dropped horizontally cracked less .
'The common sense is that the egg in the vertical direction is stronger than if you lay the egg down. But they proved that's not the case,' said materials scientist Marc Meyers with the University of California, San Diego who was not involved with the new study. Read More Why do deep-sea fish look like aliens?
Scientists found that the egg's equator was more flexible and absorbed more of the energy of the fall before cracking. The findings were published Thursday in the journal Communications Physics.
Eggs are also usually nestled top-down into homemade contraptions for egg drop challenges as part of school STEM projects, which partially inspired the new study. It's not yet clear whether the new results will help protect these vulnerable eggs, which are dropped at much loftier heights.
It's a bit counterintuitive that the oblong side of an egg could hold up better against a tumble, said study co-author Tal Cohen with Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Countless broken eggs show 'the courage to go and challenge these very common, accepted notions,' Cohen said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
What's at the center of a black hole? Scientists have a sobering answer.
They're the boogeymen of science fiction, a paradox of science and quite possibly a key to understanding the universe. Scientists have been scrambling to understand the mysterious forces of black holes for decades, but so far it seems they've found more existential questions than answers. We know a black hole is so heavy that its gravity creates a kind of divot in the geometry of the universe, said Priyamvada Natarajan, a theoretical astrophysicist at Yale University. "A black hole is so concentrated that it causes a little deep puncture in space/time. At the end of the puncture you have a thing called a singularity where all known laws of nature break down. Nothing that we know of exists at that point." Understanding what science knows about black holes involves mysterious little red dots, the formation of galaxies, and spaghettification (the unpleasant thought experiment about what would happen to a person unlucky enough to be sucked into a black hole). First, the good news: Black holes aren't out to get us. They aren't whizzing around the universe looking for galaxies, suns and planets to devour. "They don't just sneak up to you in a dark alley," said Lloyd Knox, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of California, Davis. But our understanding of the very fundamentals of the universe has been transformed over the past decade by new telescopes and sensors that are letting scientists see more black holes and at every stage of their lives. "Our understanding of the role black holes play, that they are an essential part of the formation of galaxies, is new," said Natarajan. Here what cosmic secrets are being revealed: The original understanding of how black holes formed was that when a sufficiently large sun (about 10 times or more massive than our Sun) reached the end of its life, it could explode into a supernova that then collapses back into a black hole. The matter can collapse down into something only a few miles across, becoming so dense that its gravity is strong enough that nothing, not even light, can escape. This is what is called a stellar mass black hole. But in the past two decades, new types of black holes have been seen and astronomers are beginning to understand how they form. Called supermassive black holes, they have been found at the center of pretty much every galaxy and are a hundred thousand to billion times the mass of our Sun. But how did they form? "The original idea was that small black holes formed and then they grew," said Natarajan. "But then there's a timing crunch to explain the monsters seen in the early universe. Even if they're gobbling down stellar gas, did they have the time to get so big? That was an open question even 20 years ago." In 2017, she theorized that these supermassive black holes from the early beginnings of the universe happened when galactic gas clouds collapsed directly in on themselves, skipping the star stage entirely and going straight from gas to a massive black hole seed, with a head start, that could then grow. "Then guess what? In 2023 the James Webb telescope found these objects," she said. "This is what a scientist lives for, to make a prediction and see it proven." Because they have such massive gravity, black holes gobble up stellar gases and anything else that gets too close to them. But it's not an endless process that ends up with the entire universe being sucked into them. People sometimes worry that black holes are these huge vacuum cleaners that draw in everything in sight. "It's not like a whirlpool dragging everything into it," said Knox. Black holes are really like any other concentration of mass, whether it's a sun or a planet. They have their own gravitational pull but it isn't infinite. "If you're far enough away, you'd just feel the gravitational force, just the way you'd feel it from a planet," said Brenna Mockler, a post-doctoral fellow at the Carnegie Observatories at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Pasadena, California. All matter causes a dip or pothole in space/time, said Natarajan. A black hole is so heavy that its gravity creates a kind of divot in the geometry of the universe. "The bigger the mass, the bigger the pothole," she said. "At the end of the puncture you have a thing called a singularity where all known laws of nature break down. Nothing that we know of exists at that point." Where that puncture leads is unknown. "It's an open question," said Natarajan. "We don't think it could be another universe, because we don't know where in our universe it could go. But we don't know." So what if a human being fell into a black hole? Astrophysicists have a word for it – spaghettification. "If you were to fall into head first into a black hole, the different in gravity between your head and your toes would be so intense that you'd be stretched out and spaghettified," Natarajan said. There's no fear that our own Sun will become a black hole, said Knox. It's not big enough. "Lower mass stars burn through their hydrogen to make helium and then they'll start burning helium into carbon. And then at some point it ends up just pushing itself all apart," he said. "Our Sun will eventually expand and envelop the Earth and destroy it – but that's in 5 billion years, so you have some time to get ready. But it won't become a black hole." NASA's super powerful James Webb Space Telescope began its scientific mission in 2022 and almost immediately picked up something that so far no one can explain: small red objects that appear to be abundant in the cosmos. Dubbed "little red dots," these objects have perplexed astronomers. They could be very, very dense, highly star-forming galaxies. "Or they could be highly accreting supermassive black holes from the very early universe," said Mockler, who is an incoming professor at the University of California, Davis. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What is a black hole? Scientists scramble to untangle cosmic mystery
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
What's at the center of a black hole? Scientists have a sobering answer.
First, the good news: Black holes aren't out to get us. But they do hold unfathomable mysteries. They're the boogeymen of science fiction, a paradox of science and quite possibly a key to understanding the universe. Scientists have been scrambling to understand the mysterious forces of black holes for decades, but so far it seems they've found more existential questions than answers. We know a black hole is so heavy that its gravity creates a kind of divot in the geometry of the universe, said Priyamvada Natarajan, a theoretical astrophysicist at Yale University. "A black hole is so concentrated that it causes a little deep puncture in space/time. At the end of the puncture you have a thing called a singularity where all known laws of nature break down. Nothing that we know of exists at that point." Understanding what science knows about black holes involves mysterious little red dots, the formation of galaxies, and spaghettification (the unpleasant thought experiment about what would happen to a person unlucky enough to be sucked into a black hole). First, the good news: Black holes aren't out to get us. They aren't whizzing around the universe looking for galaxies, suns and planets to devour. "They don't just sneak up to you in a dark alley," said Lloyd Knox, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of California, Davis. But our understanding of the very fundamentals of the universe has been transformed over the past decade by new telescopes and sensors that are letting scientists see more black holes and at every stage of their lives. "Our understanding of the role black holes play, that they are an essential part of the formation of galaxies, is new," said Natarajan. Here what cosmic secrets are being revealed: A new kind of black hole and a newly proven theory The original understanding of how black holes formed was that when a sufficiently large sun (about 10 times or more massive than our Sun) reached the end of its life, it could explode into a supernova that then collapses back into a black hole. The matter can collapse down into something only a few miles across, becoming so dense that its gravity is strong enough that nothing, not even light, can escape. This is what is called a stellar mass black hole. But in the past two decades, new types of black holes have been seen and astronomers are beginning to understand how they form. Called supermassive black holes, they have been found at the center of pretty much every galaxy and are a hundred thousand to billion times the mass of our Sun. But how did they form? "The original idea was that small black holes formed and then they grew," said Natarajan. "But then there's a timing crunch to explain the monsters seen in the early universe. Even if they're gobbling down stellar gas, did they have the time to get so big? That was an open question even 20 years ago." In 2017, she theorized that these supermassive black holes from the early beginnings of the universe happened when galactic gas clouds collapsed directly in on themselves, skipping the star stage entirely and going straight from gas to a massive black hole seed, with a head start, that could then grow. "Then guess what? In 2023 the James Webb telescope found these objects," she said. "This is what a scientist lives for, to make a prediction and see it proven." Black holes don't suck everything into them Because they have such massive gravity, black holes gobble up stellar gases and anything else that gets too close to them. But it's not an endless process that ends up with the entire universe being sucked into them. People sometimes worry that black holes are these huge vacuum cleaners that draw in everything in sight. "It's not like a whirlpool dragging everything into it," said Knox. Black holes are really like any other concentration of mass, whether it's a sun or a planet. They have their own gravitational pull but it isn't infinite. "If you're far enough away, you'd just feel the gravitational force, just the way you'd feel it from a planet," said Brenna Mockler, a post-doctoral fellow at the Carnegie Observatories at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Pasadena, California. If you fell into a black hole, you'd be 'spaghettified' All matter causes a dip or pothole in space/time, said Natarajan. A black hole is so heavy that its gravity creates a kind of divot in the geometry of the universe. "The bigger the mass, the bigger the pothole," she said. "At the end of the puncture you have a thing called a singularity where all known laws of nature break down. Nothing that we know of exists at that point." Where that puncture leads is unknown. "It's an open question," said Natarajan. "We don't think it could be another universe, because we don't know where in our universe it could go. But we don't know." So what if a human being fell into a black hole? Astrophysicists have a word for it – spaghettification. "If you were to fall into head first into a black hole, the different in gravity between your head and your toes would be so intense that you'd be stretched out and spaghettified," Natarajan said. Our Sun will never become a black hole There's no fear that our own Sun will become a black hole, said Knox. It's not big enough. "Lower mass stars burn through their hydrogen to make helium and then they'll start burning helium into carbon. And then at some point it ends up just pushing itself all apart," he said. "Our Sun will eventually expand and envelop the Earth and destroy it – but that's in 5 billion years, so you have some time to get ready. But it won't become a black hole." A still unanswered mystery – 'little red dots' NASA's super powerful James Webb Space Telescope began its scientific mission in 2022 and almost immediately picked up something that so far no one can explain: small red objects that appear to be abundant in the cosmos. Dubbed "little red dots," these objects have perplexed astronomers. They could be very, very dense, highly star-forming galaxies. "Or they could be highly accreting supermassive black holes from the very early universe," said Mockler, who is an incoming professor at the University of California, Davis.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
This Giant Bird Went Extinct 600 Years Ago. Scientists Say They Can Resurrect It.
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Only a few months after announcing the controversial 'de-extinction' of the dire wolf, Colossal Biosciences has now set its sights on restoring the nine species of giant moa that roamed New Zealand some 600 years ago. The biotech company plans on extracting DNA from moa bones and comparing to them to living relatives—such as the emu and the tinamou—to see what edits need to be made to bring back these flightless legends. Although this project will include more DNA edits than the dire wolf project, many scientists are skeptical that any resulting genetically modified organism will be anything more than a facsimile of the original, leaving them unable to fulfill the moa's original ecological role and relegating them to a life of captivity. Earlier this year, scientists at the Texas-based Colossal Biosciences boldly announced the 'world's first de-extinction' by bringing back the long dead dire wolf. Nicknamed Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi, these pups were far from the magnificent animals that prowled North America before the early Holocene. Instead, as Colossal's own chief science officer later clarified, they were really just grey wolves with around 20 gene edits—not the millions that'd likely be needed to actually create a dire wolf (if such a thing was even possible). Now, Colossal is at it again. And this time the company wants to bring back all nine species of the giant moa—a flightless bird native to New Zealand that died out as a result of overhunting some 600 years ago. Of course, this announcement differs from the previous one in a key way: They didn't actually bring the bird back (at least, not yet.) But a media blitz of news coverage, interviews with legendary New Zealand director Peter Jackson, and a flashy announcement video show that Colossal is serious about bringing the giant moa back to the southwestern Pacific island. This diverse group of birds sported a variety of different attributes and (most notably) sizes. The smallest of the bunch—the bush moa (Anomalopteryx didiformis)—was about the size of a turkey, while the the South Island giant moa (Dinornis robustus) and North Island giant moa (Dinornis novaezealandiae) both stood roughly 11 feet tall. Even through they looked like a strange cross between an emu and kiwi, the moa's closest living relative is the tinamou group, which lives in central and South America. With the geographical differences providing a big clue, the word 'closest' is doing a lot of heavy lifting, as the two groups separated roughly 60 million years ago. The Associated Press reports that Colossal will first identify well-preserved moa bones from which DNA can be extracted. For his part, Jackson himself owns the world's largest collection of moa bones (around 300 to 400 specimens). From there, they'll compare the genetic sequences to tinamou and emu, the latter of which will be required for their impressive stature. 'What emus have is very large embryos, very large eggs,' Andrew Pask, a Colossal scientific advisor from the University of Melbourne Australia, told New Scientist. 'And that's one of the things that you definitely need to de-extinct a moa.' Pask also clarified that this project will be more expansive than the dire wolf project, and that there will be 'orders of magnitude' more DNA edits. The other (sort of) positive is that the moa hasn't been extinct for thousands of years like the dire wolf, so its natural ecosystem hasn't evolved far beyond its extinction. Some scientists are critical of the idea. Even with the more DNA edits, the resulting 'Colossal moa' won't be a de-extinct moa, but a genetically modified animal that's a close facsimile to the original. It's also unlikely that these GMO-moas will ever be able to roam their natural habitat. They may look like moas, but they won't be able to fulfill the moa's ecological role, which will relegate them to a life as little more than a living museum piece, like the dire wolves. Despite Colossal's attempts at 'de-extinction,' genetic modification does play an increasingly important role in conservation. Genetic research brought the critically endangered black-footed ferret back from the brink, and that's just one of many examples. The world is currently experiencing its sixth mass extinction, with potentially thousands of species lost every year. Bringing back woolly mammoths, dire wolves, and giant moa (or close approximations of those ancient creatures) is undeniably enticing, but it doesn't do much for the animals and ecosystems that need our help today. Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the IssueGet the Issue Get the Issue You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
