The Israel-Iran Conflict
So Israel has spent the last several days razing Iran's nuclear structures and killing the people in charge of them; more than 200 people have died, according to the Iranian health ministry. Iran has been shooting back, blowing up buildings in Tel Aviv; at least 24 people have died, according to Israel.
Why are these two nations in this mess? Iran watched the United States fell governments in Iraq and Afghanistan. The government believes nuclear bombs (and the threat that it could use them) will protect it, just as they have protected North Korea.
Israel does not believe in the power of diplomacy to solve this existential threat. North Korea has been tolerated as a rogue regime with nuclear bombs because nations assume Kim Jong-un won't use them. But Israel and its supporters treat Iran as uniquely irrational. Netanyahu saw a previous deal as vulnerable to cheating, and he struck Iran last week while President Trump was negotiating a new one.
But military intervention has its problems, too. Today's newsletter is about that puzzle.
The talking cure
American presidents have chased a nuclear deal and asked Israel for restraint. The agreement struck in the last years of the Obama administration did not meet Netanyahu's very high bar — the total elimination of Iran's nuclear program — but it put inspectors on the ground to ensure Iran halted development. In exchange, Western nations loosened sanctions and unfroze Iran's assets.
But even the most ardent proponents of Obama's deal had to admit that it was a temporary measure to hold off Iranian nuclear ambitions for a decade, with the hope that something — anything — would follow. By most accounts, Iran was abiding by the terms, but Trump shredded the agreement in his first term, promising in this term that he would deliver something more secure.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Nassau County will allow cops to wear face masks for ICE raids, undercover work: ‘We have their back'
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman has carved out a key exemption to the county's controversial mask ban — allowing local cops involved in ICE raids and working undercover to still wear face coverings. The existing law only exempts public mask-wearing for religious or health reasons, but Blakeman's new executive order now gives federal, state and local law-enforcement officers the option to wear masks during operations such as drug and gang raids and soon, immigration enforcement alongside ICE. 5 The existing law only exempts public mask-wearing for religious or health reasons. Brigitte Stelzer 'Here in Nassau County, we respect our law enforcement officers,' Blakeman said at the signing inside the legislative building in Mineola on Friday. 'And we have their back.' The executive order comes as Nassau is gearing up to fully launch its partnership with ICE. Ten detectives have been deputized for the work and are already trained and waiting for the green light. Blakeman said the purpose of the order is to allow cops to mask up during certain police operations 'when deemed necessary' to conceal their identity to 'protect the integrity of their mission' and to limit any possibility of retaliation against them or their families. 5 The executive order comes as Nassau is gearing up to fully launch its partnership with ICE. Brigitte Stelzer The county executive first signed the mask ban into law in August, after the GOP-majority local legislature passed the bill in response to anti-Israel protests across college campuses. The law makes it a misdemeanor crime to wear any face covering unless for religious or health reasons, punishable by a $1,000 fine or up to a year in jail. The law immediately sparked multiple lawsuits that have so far been unsuccessful at shutting it down, with courts citing the existing exemptions written within the legislation as valid. 5 Ten detectives have been deputized for the work and are already trained and waiting for the green light. Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Blakeman's executive order is effectively the opposite of a bill proposed Wednesday in neighboring New York City that would prevent any federal agents from wearing masks and other face coverings while on the job. Blakeman said he signed his executive order with the city's bill in mind — wanting to make clear that he will continue to be a partner in ICE's operations in the area despite pushback from the state, the five boroughs and pending lawsuits from civil-rights groups. 5 The law immediately sparked multiple lawsuits that have so far been unsuccessful at shutting it down. Brigitte Stelzer 'I think they're out of their mind,' Blakeman said about the city's proposal. 'I think that they will destroy the city, and I think they will make law enforcement in the metropolitan area, including Nassau County, much more difficult.' The suburb signed an agreement with ICE in February to deputize 10 detectives so they can work federally alongside ICE in helping detain and deport undocumented immigrants. Nassau Democrats slammed Blakeman's partnership with ICE and his executive order as politically motivated and called the carve-out for police an admission of guilt. 5 Blakeman said he signed his executive order with the city's bill in mind — wanting to make clear that he will continue to be a partner in ICE's operations. Brigitte Stelzer 'This executive order is a quiet admission that his original law is most likely illegal,' Nassau County Legislator Delia DeRiggi-Whitton told The Post. 'Democrats warned from Day One that Blakeman's mask ban was vague, over-broad and more focused on politics than public good. 'We proposed a clear, constitutional alternative focused on actual criminal conduct. Instead, the county executive chose a political headline over sound policy, and now he's scrambling to patch the consequences.' Blakeman fired back, 'What I find troubling is the very same people that criticized our mask law are the same people that are saying law enforcement officers in the performance of their duty can't wear a mask to protect their identity if they're involved in a sensitive investigation.' The county executive said the mask ban was never meant to target law enforcement but to deter agitators, who he previously called 'cowards' and claimed were using face coverings to avoid accountability during protests.
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ex-Secret Service director fires back at Rand Paul's accusations she lied about lack of resources given to Trump's Butler rally
Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle was adamant that she directed 'additional assets to be provided' for President Trump's Butler, Pa., rally a year ago and refuted Sen. Rand Paul's blistering report. Paul (R-Ky.) alleged that Cheatle had not been truthful to Congress when she testified that the Secret Service didn't deny Trump's team resources it requested for the Butler, Pa. rally. 'The Director of the Secret Service is not typically directly engaged in the approval or denial of requests for support,' she said in a statement Sunday, released by her attorney. 'For the Butler rally, I actually did direct additional assets to be provided, particularly in the form of agency counter-snipers.' Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure.' Cheatle's attorney confirmed to The Post that her statement was directed at Paul's report and his 'defamatory comments on Face the Nation' earlier in the day on Sunday. 3 Kimberly Cheatle vehemently refuted allegations that she gave misleading testimony to Congress. The Washington Post via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Sunday marks the one-year anniversary of the Butler, Pa., assassination attempt. AP Paul, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, released his scathing report on the one-year anniversary of the assassination attempt against Trump. It concluded based on documents that there were 'at least two instances of assets being denied' by the Secret Service related to the Butler rally. That entailed a request for more Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS), which are used to counter drones, which was 'unfulfilled due to the lack of manpower to support the request.' Additionally, the Secret Service did not provide a Counter Assault Team liaison to coordinate between its operation and the local team, according to testimony from the advance agent. Advertisement Paul's report found that broadly speaking, there were at least 10 major requests for more resources from the president's team during the 2024 campaign cycle that were either denied or unfulfilled. Cheatle had testified to the House Oversight Committee nine days after the assassination attempt last year that 'for the event in Butler, there were no requests that were denied.' 'She did not tell the truth,' Paul told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday. 'The primary request that was made by both Trump's Secret Service detail, as well as his campaign, was for counter-snipers. 'Counter-snipers were denied until Butler. So, thank God, on that day in Butler County, Pennsylvania, that was the first time he was allowed counter-snipers.' Advertisement The former Secret Service director revealed that she read through some of the report, was 'aware of certain congressional criticism,' and agrees that 'mistakes were made and reform is needed.' 3 Sen. Rand Paul had ripped into former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle in his report on the assassination attempt. AFP via Getty Images She stressed that her testimony to the Oversight Committee was based on 'information provided to me by personnel from Headquarters' as well as current Secret Service Director Sean Curran, who helmed Trump's detail at the time. Cheatle also paid tribute to the families impacted by the deadly shooting at the rally. 'The tragedy that occurred on July 13, 2024, remains a profound event that deeply affected our nation,' she said. 'My thoughts and heartfelt condolences continue to be with all those impacted.' Cheatle resigned as Secret Service director a day after she testified before the House Oversight Committee. Acting director Ronald Rowe briefly took her place during the months that followed. Trump appointed Curran as Secret Service director shortly after taking office again back in January. Multiple investigations from lawmakers in Congress, as well as law enforcement, have uncovered a myriad of shortcomings in the run-up to the assassination attempt. Advertisement Despite the concerns, Trump has said that he still retains 'great confidence in these people.' 'They should have had somebody in the building [Crooks shot from], that was a mistake,' he told Fox News' 'My View With Lara Trump' in an interview that aired Saturday. 'They should have had communications with the local police, they weren't tied in. 'So there were mistakes made … But I was satisfied in terms of the bigger plot, the larger plot,' he added. 'I have great confidence in these people. I know the people. And they're very talented, very capable. But they had a bad day. And I think they'll admit that. They had a rough day.'
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Secret Service did not 'act on direct threats' before Trump shooting, Senate report says
WASHINGTON — Stunning failures and inexcusable negligence by the Secret Service allowed then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump to be shot at during a Pennsylvania rally last year, according to a scathing Senate committee report released on the anniversary of the assassination attempt. The Secret Service did not act on credible intelligence and failed to appropriately communicate with local law enforcement and Trump's protective detail ahead of the July 13, 2024, event in Butler, Pennsylvania, the report released by Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul said. "This was not a single lapse in judgment. It was a complete breakdown of security at every level—fueled by bureaucratic indifference, a lack of clear protocols, and a shocking refusal to act on direct threats," Paul, a Republican U.S. senator who represents Kentucky, said. "We must hold individuals accountable and ensure reforms are fully implemented so this never happens again.' The report details threats against Trump and errors that the committee said resulted in the near assassination of a major party's presidential candidate, the death of rallygoer Corey Comperatore, and injuries to two other attendees. The committee assessed that the failures culminated in a "preventable tragedy," for which the agency has been insufficiently held accountable. Sen. Paul on Trump shooting: 'It was a cultural cover-up for the agency' Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle resigned, and six individuals received disciplinary action in the wake of the shooting that injured two additional attendees, the report said. But no one was fired, and the penalties were weaker than what the committee said it would have recommended. "Some of these people could be in charge of security for another presidential candidate. And really, that's a danger. That's not right," Paul said on the CBS show "Face the Nation." In the appearance, Paul said Cheatle "did not tell the truth" when she told Congress that no assets that were requested for the Butler rally were denied. He also said that counter-snipers were denied until the Butler rally. The report said that at least 10 requests by the division protecting Trump were denied or left unfulfilled during the presidential campaign. "I think it was a cultural cover-up for the agency. They did not want to assess blame. They did not want to look internally. And they wanted to discount any of their actions that might have led to this," Paul said on the CBS program. 'Saved for a reason': How Trump's second term is full of assassination attempt reminders Secret Service director: Agency 'implemented substantive reforms' after shooting In response to the report, Secret Service Director Sean Curran said in a statement provided to USA TODAY that the agency would continue to cooperate with the committee. "Following the events of July 13, the Secret Service took a serious look at our operations and implemented substantive reforms to address the failures that occurred that day," Curran said. The agency last week acknowledged "breakdowns in communication, technological issues, and human failure, among other contributing factors, led to the events of July 13." The attack was "nothing short of a tragedy" and "represents an operational failure," the Secret Service said. Since then, the agency said it has revised and streamlined its practices and requested additional resources to address recommendations made by Congress.
