Deep Dive: Stripe vs. Adyen – Comparing Product Stacks and Pricing: By Sam Boboev
The Payments Giants at a Glance
It helps to frame the comparison with scale and performance. In 2024, Stripe processed about $1.4 trillion in total payment volume (TPV), growing 38% year-over-year, while Adyen was close behind with €1.29 trillion (+33% YoY). These figures underscore that both companies handle enormous transaction flows (roughly on par with ~1–1.5% of global GDP each). Adyen has long been profitable – it sustained an impressive ~50% EBITDA margin in 2024 – whereas Stripe historically reinvested for growth but finally achieved full-year profitability in 2024. In other words, Adyen is the rare fintech operating at bank-like profit levels, while Stripe proved its business model can scale financially. Both are now plowing resources into R&D and expansion, setting the stage for an intense rivalry.
Stripe launched in 2010, targeting developers and small online businesses with easy-to-use APIs. Its strategy was bottom-up: win the hearts of startups and SMBs, then gradually move upmarket. Adyen, founded in 2006, took almost the opposite approach – a top-down focus on large enterprises and global retailers. Adyen built a single unified platform for 'unified commerce' (online, in-app, and in-store payments all in one), directly connecting to card networks and local payment methods. This made Adyen the go-to for many big multichannel merchants (think Uber, Spotify, Microsoft, McDonald's, H&M and the like), while Stripe became synonymous with the startup economy and SaaS world. Today, however, their offerings overlap significantly. Stripe now serves 50% of the Fortune 100 companies in some capacity, and Adyen is expanding its reach to mid-sized clients and platforms. Both are truly global – Stripe is used in 195+ countries with support for 135+ currencies, and Adyen similarly supports transactions worldwide (150+ currencies and dozens of local methods).
A quick external perspective sums it up well: 'Adyen is better for midsize or large companies with multiple sales channels, whereas Stripe is good for small, online businesses.' In practice, Stripe's flat-rate pricing and plug-and-play simplicity make it popular among SMBs and tech startups. Adyen's custom approach and interchange-plus pricing appeal to high-volume, omnichannel businesses that can integrate a more complex solution. But these lines are blurring. Stripe has been aggressively courting larger enterprises (even Amazon inked a deal in 2023 to have Stripe process a significant portion of its payments across the US, Europe, and Canada). Meanwhile, Adyen is indirectly serving many SMBs via platform partnerships (for example, when Etsy or eBay use Adyen as their payments engine, thousands of small sellers are on Adyen's rails). The competitive arena is set: both companies offer a broad payments platform, but how do their product stacks and pricing compare in detail?
Core Payments Infrastructure
At their heart, both Stripe and Adyen are payments processors – they enable businesses to accept a wide range of payment methods and get paid online (and offline). Let's compare their core payments capabilities:
Stripe and Adyen each support an extensive array of payment methods: global credit/debit cards (Visa, Mastercard, Amex, etc.), digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay, etc.), bank transfers, and region-specific options (from **SEPA Direct Debit in Europe to ACH in the US, Alipay and WeChat Pay in Asia, Klarna/Affirm for BNPL, and many more). Stripe advertises access to 100+ payment methods out-of-the-box with a single integration. Adyen similarly prides itself on being a one-stop solution to 'offer your customers all their preferred payment methods with a single integration'. For example, a merchant using either platform can easily offer local favorites like iDEAL in the Netherlands or Boleto in Brazil alongside global cards.
One difference is how these methods are integrated. Adyen built direct connections to many local payment schemes and card networks through its own licenses. This 'single platform' approach can improve authorization rates and reduce hops in the transaction process. Indeed, Adyen highlights its direct acquiring connections to Visa/Mastercard and even domestic networks, claiming it can optimize approval rates via intelligent routing (their RevenueAccelerate tools). Stripe, on the other hand, initially partnered with banks for acquiring in various regions, but over time it also obtained regulatory licenses and built out global infrastructure (Stripe has regulatory licenses in multiple jurisdictions and data centers worldwide, ensuring transactions are processed locally where possible for speed and better success rates). Both companies now can offer very high uptime (Stripe boasts 99.999% historical uptime, and Adyen is known for reliability as well) and the ability to settle funds in a currency of the merchant's choosing. Adyen explicitly lets merchants 'choose when and in which currency' to receive payouts, a flexibility important for international businesses.
Stripe is almost universally lauded for its developer-friendly APIs and documentation. It provides client libraries in every popular programming language and famously simple code snippets. For a small business or product team, Stripe's developer tools can shorten integration time dramatically. (As an example, Stripe's drop-in checkout or pre-built UI components – Stripe Elements and Checkout – let you start accepting cards with minimal coding.) Adyen's platform is also robust, but the common refrain is that Adyen is not as 'plug-and-play' for small merchants. Adyen often requires a bit more initial setup and understanding of payment flows. That said, Adyen offers comprehensive APIs and SDKs too, along with client-side components (its Drop-in UI and Components for web/mobile) to handle payment method selection and encryption. The gap in ease has narrowed over time, but Stripe's polish in developer experience and documentation remains a strong differentiator. For a startup with a lean engineering team, Stripe's 'it just works' approach can be very attractive – everything from the initial integration to handling webhooks for events is well-supported. Adyen tends to shine for merchants that need fine-grained control and are willing to invest in a more bespoke integration.
Transaction Performance: Both Stripe and Adyen invest heavily in optimizing payment success rates. Adyen's advantage of direct network connections means it can sometimes get slightly better authorization rates, especially in regions where local processing matters (for instance, processing European cards with a European acquiring license to avoid cross-border inefficiencies). Stripe has countered by developing its own smart routing and 'adaptive acceptance' algorithms, and by working with card issuers. Stripe even formed an Enhanced Issuer Network program to share data with card issuers, reportedly reducing fraud and boosting authorizations by 1–2% on eligible volume. In practice, both processors are top-tier in transaction quality; large merchants often run A/B tests between providers and find both Stripe and Adyen to be high performers, with differences depending on specific geographies or banks. It's not unusual for an enterprise to use multiple PSPs in active-active mode and route traffic between Stripe, Adyen, and others to optimize costs and uptime. Both companies understand this and continually roll out improvements (for example, Stripe has machine learning to retry failed payments at optimal times and auto-update saved card details, while Adyen recently introduced an AI-powered tool called Adyen Uplift to improve payment conversion by an average 6%).
On core payment processing capabilities, both Stripe and Adyen offer a full-spectrum, global solution. Stripe wins praise for ease and developer tooling; Adyen wins praise for technical robustness and global unified infrastructure. For most standard online payments use cases (accepting card payments on a website or app), either will get the job done with high standards. The differences emerge more clearly when we expand into other aspects: in-person payments, platform payments, and value-added services.
Source:
Stripe vs. Adyen 2024 performance and strategy highlights
NerdWallet on ideal customer profiles for Adyen vs Stripe
Stripe Newsroom: Amazon expanding use of Stripe (enterprise win)
Stripe Enterprise documentation (custom pricing options)
Adyen official pricing page (interchange++ transparency)
Codelevate 2025 PSP comparison (product features & pricing details)
Fintech Wrap Up deep dive (TPV and product developments in 2024)
Adyen website ('One platform' omnichannel messaging)
Codelevate on strengths/drawbacks of each platform
FXCintel analysis on Adyen's 2023 results (North America focus)
Disclaimer:
Fintech Wrap Up aggregates publicly available information for informational purposes only. Portions of the content may be reproduced verbatim from the original source, and full credit is provided with a "Source: [Name]" attribution. All copyrights and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. Fintech Wrap Up does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the aggregated content; these are the responsibility of the original source providers. Links to the original sources may not always be included. For questions or concerns, please contact us at sam.boboev@fintechwrapup.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Portugal has no favourite among 3 airlines interested in airline TAP, says minister
LISBON, July 8 (Reuters) - Portugal has no preferred pick among the three major European airlines that have shown interest in the flag carrier TAP, whose partial privatisation the government is due to relaunch soon, Finance Minister Joaquim Miranda Sarmento said on Tuesday. Speaking on the sidelines of a Eurogroup meeting in Brussels, he said that "in the coming weeks, the government will announce its decisions" regarding the terms and conditions for the planned sale of less than 50% of TAP's capital. "It is public knowledge that Air France ( opens new tab, Lufthansa ( opens new tab and IAG (ICAG.L), opens new tab have expressed an interest in looking at the company and eventually making a proposal, which is obviously very positive for the country," he told reporters. "The winning proposal will be the one that is best for the country, we do not have any preferred partner, nor any special bias in favour of A, B or C," he told reporters. TAP's most attractive assets are its key slots to Brazil, Portuguese-speaking African countries and the U.S. from its Lisbon hub, which the Portuguese government wants to maintain. Asked whether the three major European airlines might lose enthusiasm because the government will hold a majority stake, he said: "These companies have shown a very significant interest in TAP, we will see which of them, whether all or not, will present proposals based on the privatisation conditions." TAP has long been earmarked for privatisation, but the process had once again stalled when the centre-right minority government collapsed in March. The coalition returned to power after a national election in May, still well short of a majority in parliament, which could block the sale of TAP.
.png%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Get travel money with zero commission fee from John Lewis – here's how
The countdown to your next holiday has begun – the flights are booked, your wardrobe is packed and all that's left is one crucial task: sorting out your travel money. But let's face it, the process can be a headache. You check exchange rates, worry about commission fees, and wonder whether that local Bureau de Change can actually offer you a decent deal. Then, just when you think you've got it figured out, there's the issue of lugging cash around or waiting in line. Sound familiar? Well, what if we told you there's a better way? Imagine a world where the only thing you need to worry about is your sun hat and passport. Enter John Lewis — the retail chain isn't just about stylish homeware and top-tier customer service. They've also got your travel money covered, and here's the kicker: zero commission fees. Whether you're off to the beaches of Bali, skiing in the Alps, or exploring cities across Europe, John Lewis Money has over 50 currencies ready online for you. With convenient home delivery or in-store collection, John Lewis offers hassle-free travel money. So, let's dive into how effortless it can be to get your travel cash sorted – so you can focus on soaking up the soon-to-be sunshine. Cash in on zero fees with John Lewis Travel Money* With John Lewis Travel Money, you don't have to worry about commission fees eating into your travel funds. That means every penny you exchange will come back to you, so you can make the most of it on your trip. Whether you're indulging in Parisian fine dining or exploring Tokyo's sakura blossoms, you can count on great rates. With more than 50 currencies available online – from euros and US dollars to Thai baht and Swiss francs – consider your holiday cash complete, and all of it commission-free. Now, with that lira in tow, let's start planning that Turkish food tour.* *Minimum online order value £250. Delivery or collection fee of £5.50 applies to orders under £500. Exchange rates may vary online and in-store. Benefits of John Lewis' currency exchange With John Lewis Money, peace of mind goes beyond commission-free currency exchange. If your plans change and your holiday is cancelled, you're covered with a 35-day refund guarantee. Simply bring your receipt, ID and proof of cancellation to any in-store location, and you'll get a full refund on your travel money order (minus any delivery costs). But that's not all – if you end up with unused foreign notes, you can easily sell it back to us. Whether it's Mexican pesos, Aussie dollars, or South African rand, you can exchange your leftover cash for pounds. And the best part? No commission when you sell it back, either. It's the perfect blend of convenience, flexibility, and reliability for savvy travellers. Before visiting a store, make sure we've got your chosen currency in stock and that the store can accept your leftover bills. You can do this by calling our Contact Centre on 0345 608 0677. Calls may be recorded or monitored and call charges will vary. Need your travel money in a hurry? With John Lewis Money, you've got options. Order online and collect it from over 330 Waitrose stores or a John Lewis Bureau de Change – all free on orders over £500. Really on a time crunch? Order online before 3pm to get next working day delivery. You can have your travel money delivered right to your door — again, at no extra cost on £500+ orders, and a £5.50 delivery fee for orders under £500. You'll need a minimum online order for £250 and remember that exchange rates may vary in-store and online. For instant access, visit your nearest John Lewis Bureau de Change. With so many ways to get travel money, it'll be easier than navigating airport security. John Lewis Money, John Lewis Finance and John Lewis & Partners Bureau de Change are trading names of John Lewis plc. Registered office: 1 Drummond Gate, Pimlico, London SW1V 2QQ. Registered in England and Wales (company number: 233462). John Lewis plc introduces the panel of carefully chosen providers in Bureau de Change products and services, who each hold the appropriate licences with the Financial Conduct Authority and HMRC. Travel Money online from John Lewis Money, John Lewis Finance, and John Lewis & Partners, is provided by First Rate Exchange Services Limited (company number: 04287490 and Money Service Business licence number: MLR-64068). Registered office: Botanica, Ditton Park, Riding Court Road, Datchet, Berkshire, SL3 9LL, England.
Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
US weekly jobless claims fall unexpectedly in latest week
July 10 (Reuters) - The number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits unexpectedly fell last week, suggesting employers may be holding on to workers despite other indications of a cooling labor market. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 227,000 for the week ended July 4, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 235,000 claims for the latest week. The data included last week's July Fourth holiday and claims tend to be volatile around public holidays. Economists and U.S. central bankers have generally viewed the labor market as solid, if weakening somewhat. This is a view reinforced by last week's monthly jobs report that showed the unemployment rate ticking down to 4.1%, though largely because the workforce shrank, and a bigger-than-expected gain of 147,000 jobs, though highly concentrated in just a few sectors. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has noted that in the current low-hiring and low-firing environment, any increase in layoffs could rapidly push up the unemployment rate. So far that has not happened, though nearly 100 U.S. companies have announced layoffs this month, including Microsoft and Intel. Economists say President Donald Trump's still unsettled tariff policy is making it difficult for businesses to plan ahead. Hiring has been lackluster, making it harder for people out of work to find jobs. Last month's jobs report showed the median duration of unemployment rose in June to 10.1 weeks from 9.5 weeks in May. The number of people receiving unemployment benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 10,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.965 million during the week ending June 28, Thursday's claims report showed. The so-called continuing claims are at their highest level since November 2021, suggesting those who lose a job are taking longer to find a new position. The Federal Reserve last week left its policy rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range where it has been since December as central bankers wait to see if tariffs push up inflation before moving to lower rates.
