Exchequer returns show a healthy surplus as budget negotiations approach
Mr Donohoe is due to publish the Summer Economic Statement later this month and unveil the date on which the budget will be presented to the Oireachtas later this year.
However, this budget is likely to be more restrained than previous years, as global economic uncertainty means the Government will likely be taking a cautious approach.
During the first half of the year, the exchequer recorded a surplus of €4.5bn — an increase of €1.4bn compared to the same period in 2024.
However, once the proceeds from the EU Apple tax case ruling are excluded, the underlying surplus drops to €1.2bn, a fall of €1.9 billion.
Gross exchequer revenue for these six months stood at €62.8bn — up by €8.1bn year-on-year. Of this, revenues accounted for €49.5bn — up by €4.7bn.
On the expenditure front, the Government spent €58.2bn between January and the end of June, of this, gross voted expenditure stood at €50.9bn, which was €3.8bn higher year-on-year.
In the year to the end of June, €3bn was transferred to the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund last month.
During an event last month, Mr Donohoe said in the event of an economic downturn, he would make every effort possible to protect capital expenditure, including using the money set aside in these two funds.
During June, €2.9bn was collected in income tax, bringing the total receipts so far this year to €17.4bn — up €700m year-on-year.
Corporation tax receipts of €7.4bn were collected during last month, bringing the total for the year to €14.8bn, however, this drops to €13.1bn when the Apple tax case proceeds are excluded. This is still €900m higher than last year and "slightly ahead of profile' for this year, according to the Department of Finance.
June is a non-Vat-due month, with just €200m collected. In total, Vat receipts of €11.6bn have been collected so far this year, an increase of €600m.
Excise duty receipts during June stood at €500m — up by €100m.
Other tax revenue for the year so far reached €13.3bn, with appropriations-in-aid accounting for €8.8bn, and non-tax revenue and capital resources revenue accounting for the remaining €4.5bn.
Exchequer debt service expenditure in the year to the end of June was €2.2bn, down by €300m compared to last year.
Read More
Government urged to show restraint amid €2bn overspend
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?
With billions flowing into the Government's coffers from our corporation tax bonanza, there were some big winners from last year's pre-election budget. Among the biggest were the children of wealthy parents. While CSO statistics show that an average person receives about €100,000 in gifts or inheritances from their parents over a lifetime, Budget 2025 announced a €25,000 tax cut for the tiny fraction who receive more than €400,000. Such giveaways contrast sharply with below-inflation increases to most social welfare payments over recent years. This has left core rates of payments worth less today than they were in January 2020: a remarkable situation given the strength of economic growth and the tens of billions in new spending announced. These real-terms cuts have contributed to stagnating incomes for the poorest households as well as stubbornly persistent levels of child poverty. READ MORE Research published by the ESRI in partnership with Community Foundation Ireland has shown that 250,000 children live in households below the poverty line after accounting for housing costs: more than one in five children. A wealth of evidence shows this has enormous economic and social costs , with a lack of adequate resources compromising the ability of children to grow and thrive, even in adulthood. The importance of reducing child poverty has been recognised by successive governments, with ambitious targets set out in various plans, strategies and roadmaps since 1997. However, we have seen no real progress for the best part of two decades. Shockingly, the share of children below the poverty line after housing costs is no lower than during the worst years of the financial crisis. The reason child poverty persists is that whenever the opportunity comes to translate words into action there is always some higher priority. This year that higher priority looks to be the hospitality sector, which has engaged in a sustained, well-funded lobbying campaign for even more preferential VAT treatment than it currently enjoys. VAT is currently levied on accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent, compared with the standard rate of 23 per cent. Estimates by Revenue suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year. Cutting the rate further to 9 per cent would cost more than €800 million more a year, sucking up most of the space available for new measures in the forthcoming budget. This is despite the fact the sector is – by any objective measure – doing well. CSO data shows that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier, while figures from the Companies Registration Office show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector. Even if the sector were struggling, a VAT cut makes little economic sense. Rather than supporting struggling small restaurants or cafes, the biggest beneficiaries would be large operators with the highest turnover. On what grounds can a multimillion-euro tax cut for outlets such as McDonald's possibly be justified? Yet the Tánaiste's recent elevation of this expensive and economically illiterate tax cut to a 'solemn commitment' would seem to place it ahead of all other promises in the programme for government. This includes a pledge to 'lift more children out of poverty, giving them the futures they deserve'. Doing so would have immense benefits, but unavoidably requires spending money. The most effective way of spending this money is to introduce a second-tier of child benefit. This would leave the current universal child benefit payment as it stands but give an additional amount to lower-income families with children, replacing the inadequate patchwork of existing supports. Recent estimates from the ESRI suggest such a reform would reduce child poverty by more than a quarter. This amounts to lifting more than 50,000 children out of poverty at a cost of €772 million. While substantial, this cost is about a quarter of achieving the same reduction by increasing the universal child benefit payment. Strikingly, it is also less than that of the planned cut to VAT for the hospitality sector. This is the reason a second tier of child benefit has been called for since 2007 by a range of expert bodies, including the last government's Commission on Taxation and Welfare (which I was part of). A second tier of child benefit would mirror reforms implemented in the UK over the 2000s by then chancellor Gordon Brown. Writing in these pages last year, he described the approach as a 'progressive universalism' that ensures 'a floor of basic social rights for all, but with more support for those who need it most'. When Brown gave a keynote address to the Irish Government's inaugural Child Poverty Summit last year, he was introduced by then taoiseach Simon Harris, who declared that 'ending child poverty is a defining challenge for any leader' . After 20 years without progress in reducing – let alone ending – child poverty, it is a challenge our leaders are failing. Whether that failure defines their legacies depends on the decisions they take in the coming budgets. Dr Barra Roantree is director of the MSc in economic policy at Trinity College Dublin
Irish Independent
10 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Minister wants to persuade EU to avoid ‘emission fines', but experts say threat of €26bn penalty is real
He said if financial penalties were proposed for member states for breaching emissions targets, each should be directed to spend the money on renewable energy or related measures in their own country. He does not accept estimates that Ireland may be liable to pay as much €26bn in costs, however, insisting this was 'pure speculation'. The colossal figure is at the upper end of estimates jointly published earlier this year by the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council and Climate Change Advisory Council. Ireland has already had to buy tens of millions of euro worth of credits from other states to make up for missing 2020 targets, but the advisory bodies warned that the cost would escalate rapidly by 2030 if the country does not make dramatic emissions cuts. The minister insisted there was no specific mechanism in place in Europe to deal with breaches in 2030. 'There's no formula published and there's no informal formula as to what measures would be taken by the commission in relation to states that do not meet their target so it's just speculative,' he said. 'This is something I have discussed with the commission myself,' he said. 'Should there be financial impositions, I think the better thing to do would be to instruct and direct states to invest further in their own climate measures such as renewables.' He said other EU states shared that view, as they were also likely to miss their targets. Figures released yesterday show emissions fell by only 2pc last year – nowhere near the scale needed. Marie Donnelly, chair of the Climate Change Advisory Council, said the reduction was 'disappointing'. 'By delaying investment to deliver these reductions, the Government is increasing the risk and costs required to comply with targets that have already been agreed,' she said. 'It is better to make the investments now for households, communities and businesses, rather than paying large fines in a few years.' Friends of the Earth spokesman Seán McLoughlin said: 'A 2pc reduction, when we need to be making deep emissions cuts year-on-year, shows that the Government is still stuck in climate go-slow mode. We are falling further and further behind on our climate commitments, while the world continues to warm at terrifying speed.' Environmental NGO An Taisce said: 'The emissions inventories now published signal yet another year of climate action drift by the Irish State, and an ongoing failure of policy to address the climate emergency.' Social Democrats climate spokesperson Jennifer Whitmore said Mr O'Brien's attitude to potential fines was 'blasé'. 'The Government is delusional if it does not accept that severe financial consequences are now a very real threat,' she said.
Irish Independent
19 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Three companies paid €71m to reduce hospital waiting lists – one of which received more than €54m, HSE figures reveal
One of the companies was paid in the region €54.6m, according to the figures provided to the Oireachtas health committee. The other two were each paid €10m and over €5m. The figures supplied to the committee come after HSE chief Bernard Gloster said earlier this week it was planned to phase out of the use of these companies over the next year. They are hired by hospitals and the wider health service to help reduce waiting list backlogs. He told the health committee that a trawl carried out by the HSE covering 27 months found around €100m in total was paid out to these companies during that time employing the external companies to carry out waiting list work using public facilities in the evenings and weekends. The HSE review – which followed recent controversies – also shows that 83 directors of these companies are current or previous employees of the HSE. Some 23 are current employees – working in the HSE while also serving as directors of companies hired by hospitals to reduce backlogs of waiting list patients. He told the committee earlier this week he planned to phase out this form of insourcing in public hospitals by the end of June this year and it was not possible to do it immediately. These companies have grown in 'level and scale. We took our eye off the ball. We need to unwind it,' he told the committee. He add that the 'only way to change it is to stop it.' The winding down must be done 'sensibly', he added. He pointed out there is nothing unlawful about being a company director and there are obligations under the Standards in Public Office or employment contract terms. The review had found an over-reliance on these external companies – several of which had links to hospitals. He said the plan is to introduce more safeguards around them and he is to work with Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill on strengthening these. The review examined 148 companies which had 365 directors in total and found 93 matches with current or previous HSE employees. The implications for removing these companies from carrying out the work is that there is potential for having to use more private hospitals to treat public patients. The aim is to increase productivity through routine work.
