
ITR filing due date extended but deadline to pay final tax without penalty is July 31 or Sept 15 now for FY 2024-25?
Will penal interest be applicable if self-assessment tax is deposited after July 31, 2025?
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Penal interest will be applicable on advance tax
What is penal interest on delay in payment of self-assessment tax?
The income tax department has extended the due date to file an income tax return for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) from July 31, 2025, to September 15, 2025. The last date to file the ITR has been extended beyond July 31 for taxpayers whose accounts are not required to be audited, such as salaried taxpayers, NRIs, and pensioners.Typically, July 31 is also the due date for taxpayers to deposit their self-assessment tax . It is the amount of tax that a taxpayer is liable to pay after deducting the TDS, TCS and advance tax payments. If a belated ITR is filed (i.e., the income tax return is filed after the due date) and the self-assessment tax is also paid after the due date, then the taxpayer has to pay penal interest under Section 234A on the self-assessment tax due.The deadline to file ITR has been extended, but does this mean taxpayers can deposit their self-assessment tax without penalty till September 15, 2025, i.e., has the due date for payment of self-assessment tax for FY 2024-2025 (AY 2025-26) also been extended? ET Wealth online asks experts for their opinions:Also Read: What are the changes in the Form 16 this year? Tarun Garg, Director, Deloitte India, says, "Interest under Section 234A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is applicable when the ITR is filed after the due date as specified under Section 139(1), and the self-assessment tax remains unpaid as of that due date. With the ITR filing due date for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) being extended to 15 September 2025, this revised date will be considered as the "due date" for the purposes of Section 234A. Accordingly, interest under Section 234A of the Act will not be levied provided the due amount of tax is paid on or before the extended timeline of 15 September 2025. This position is supported by the Supreme Court's ruling in CIT vs. Prannoy Roy [309 ITR 231 (2009)], and CBDT Circular No. 2/2015, which accepted the Court's decision."Also Read: Income tax slabs for ITR filing FY 2024-25 are different Tarun Kumar Madaan, Practising Chartered Accountant, says, "In the present case, since the due date under Section 139(1) has been extended to 15th September 2025, interest under Section 234A should not be applicable if the ITR is filed, and the entire self-assessment tax is paid, on or before this extended date. In several past instances where the due date for filing the return was extended, the CBDT had expressly clarified that such extension would not apply for the purposes of Section 234A, and interest would still be computed from the original due date. However, Circular No. 6/2025 contains no such caveat. Given that the extension has been granted due to reasons beyond the taxpayer's control (such as non-availability of return filing utilities), it is reasonable to interpret that no interest under Section 234A should be charged if the return is filed by 15th September 2025."Shubham Jain, Associate Director, Nangia Andersen India, says, "Interest under section 234A is chargeable at the rate of 1% on unpaid tax if the ITR is filed beyond the due date specified in Section 139(1). The CBDT circular announcing the due date extension specifies that the due date itself, as provided under Section 139(1), has been extended from July 31, 2025, to September 15, 2025. Thus, interest under Section 234A should technically not be levied in cases where the ITR is filed after 31 July but before 15 September. Further, considering that the ITR due date extension has been announced much before the release of the ITR utility, one would hope that the date extension would be natively built into the ITR utility, as otherwise the ITR utility would automatically levy the interest under Section 234A if the return is filed after 31 July 2025."It is important to note that taxpayers will have to pay penal interest for the non-payment/shortfall of advance tax payments for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26), as is the norm. Penal interest under Section 234B is applicable if the taxpayer has not paid advance tax in full by the due dates. Penal interest under Section 234C is levied if the taxpayer has paid advance tax less than the prescribed amount.Even though the due date is extended, the penal interest on non-payment/shortfall of advance tax will continue.Garg says, "Although the ITR filing deadline has been extended, interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Act will continue to be applicable."Madaan says, "The penal interest under Section 234B and Section 234C is independent of the tax return filing due date and continues to apply where advance tax provisions are not complied with. The extension of the tax return filing due date does not affect the computation or applicability of interest under Section 234B and Section 234C."Penal interest at 1% per month is applicable for both Section 234B and 234C.If self-assessment tax is paid after the extended due date for ITR filing, i.e., September 15, 2025, then penal interest at 1% per month will be applicable.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Employee details ordeal of manager 'shamelessly' asking for money despite repeated refusals
A Reddit post has drawn attention to a disturbing trend in the corporate workspace, where a senior manager has been persistently asking a team member for money, despite multiple refusals. The post, titled "My manager keeps asking me to lend money", has sparked widespread discussion among users, with many condemning the manager's behaviour and calling for appropriate action. Redditors reacted strongly after a user exposed their manager's repeated money requests.(Representational image/Unsplash) In the post shared by Reddit user @GlitteringBug25, the employee recounted their ordeal, explaining that they have been working in a service-based company on the same project for over four and a half years. The same manager has been supervising the project since day one. (Also read: Toxic boss demands injured employee to return to work by Friday: 'I can give you a chair') 'I joined as a fresher. He knows my salary and often says that my salary is the highest among my offshore team members including my TL. I graduated from a top-tier college, so my starting package was high,' the user wrote. The situation escalated when the manager began asking for money. 'He asked for 25k and then 15k. I straight away refused. But now he keeps asking me every month,' the user added. Just a week ago, the manager demanded ₹ 17,000. 'I told him I didn't have money even though I had it. Yesterday he called me and directly told me he is sending a QR code and that I should send him ₹ 2,000 through it. He didn't even bother asking if I was okay.' The employee expressed frustration: 'I'm getting fed up of refusing each and every time. He shamelessly keeps asking even though I had refused him just a few days back.' Check out the post here: Internet reacts The post has triggered concern and strong reactions from fellow Reddit users, many of whom advised taking the issue to the Human Resources (HR) department. One commenter sarcastically remarked, 'The only thing left in Indian corporate now is the manager asking for a bribe for giving good reviews.' Another urged, 'Stop sending and escalate to HR.' (Also read: 'Why do Indian hiring managers think they're God?': Candidate shares bitter Bengaluru job interview) Others shared tactics to discourage the behaviour. 'One day ask him for ₹ 50k claiming a serious emergency. Then see how fast he stops asking you,' one user advised. Another said, 'Lent money never comes back. Tell him your parents handle your finances, or that you're paying off loans—just avoid giving him your Form 16.' A more serious concern came from a commenter warning, 'Do not lend him money at any cost! Plus, file a complaint with HR and save all communications. This might be a trap to build a case against you.'


NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
G7 Agrees To Exempt US Multinationals From Global Minimum Tax
The Group of Seven nations said Saturday they have agreed to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries -- a win for President Donald Trump's government, which pushed hard for the compromise. The deal will see US companies benefit from a "side-by-side" solution under which they will only be taxed at home, on both domestic and foreign profits, the G7 said in a statement released by Canada, which holds the group's rotating presidency. The agreement was reached in part due to "recently proposed changes to the US international tax system" included in Trump's signature domestic policy bill, which is still being debated in Congress, the statement said. The side-by-side system could "provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward," it added. Nearly 140 countries struck a deal in 2021 to tax multinational companies, an agreement negotiated under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That agreement, deeply criticized by Trump, includes two "pillars," the second of which sets a minimum global tax rate of 15 percent. The OECD must ultimately decide to exempt the US companies from that tax -- or not. The G7 said it looked forward to "expeditiously reaching a solution that is acceptable and implementable to all." On Thursday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had signaled that a "joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests" was in the works. He also asked US lawmakers to "to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill" -- Trump's policy mega-bill. Section 899 has been dubbed a "revenge tax," allowing the government to impose levies on firms with foreign owners and on investors from countries deemed to impose unfair taxes on US businesses. The clause sparked concern that it would inhibit foreign companies from investing in the United States.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
G7 okays deal to spare US and UK companies from higher taxes
G7 has created a 'side-by-side' system in response to the US administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, read more A man walk past the G7 members flags at the Manoir Richelieu before the G7 Foreign Ministers summit in La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada March 12, 2025. Source: Reuters The United States and the Group of Seven nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt U.S. companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G7 said in a statement on Saturday. The group has created a 'side-by-side' system in response to the U.S. administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The G7 said the plan recognizes existing U.S. minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system. The U.S Treasury Department said that following the removal of Section 899 from the U.S. Senate version of the tax and spending bill, there is a shared understanding that a side-by-side system could preserve important gains made by jurisdictions inside the Inclusive Framework in tackling base erosion and profit shifting. 'We look forward to discussing and developing this understanding within the Inclusive Framework,' the Department said in a post on X on Saturday. UK businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Britain said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been removed. 'Today's agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns,' finance minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was needed to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance. G7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is 'acceptable and implementable to all'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the U.S., effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries. He also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on U.S. firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the U.S. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Firstpost staff.)