Blistering heat and empty chairs mar U.N.'s flagship development event
But at a once-a-decade U.N. development finance conference in Seville, two key ingredients were in less abundance: money and power.
Just one Group of Seven leader — French President Emmanuel Macron — attended the event, where he and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez addressed rooms with dozens of empty chairs. Organizers initially said they expected 70 heads of state; that was whittled to 50 as the conference got underway.
Back in Washington, Paris, London and Berlin, rich-country leaders are slashing aid and cutting bilateral lending in a pivot to defense spending and rising debt at home.
"The mood is ... I would say realistic, but also a sense of unity and of pragmatism," said Alvaro Lario, president of the International Fund of Agricultural Development, adding that the question on everyone's mind this week was how to do more with less.
"How can we come together, or think out of the box, or create new type of ways of really stretching it more?"
The Financing For Development meeting is a flagship U.N. conference, charting the trajectory to help tackle changes the world must make to tax policies, aid spending or key areas such as debt, health and education. Its outcomes guide global aid funding and U.N. policies for the decade to come.
Few disagree over the need for action. Hundred-year floods and storms are happening with alarming regularity, and rising debt-servicing costs are siphoning money away from health, education and infrastructure spending in the developing world.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez delivers a speech during the close of the U.N. conference in Seville on Thursday. |
AFP-Jiji
But even top developing-world leaders such as Mia Mottley, the Barbados prime minister and a prominent global climate champion, and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, currently chairing the Group of 20 major economies, backed out of the event at the last minute.
The media room was stacked with Spanish press gossiping about a domestic political scandal while disillusioned civil-society leaders stalked the halls, upset with the watered-down agenda and the lack of fiscal or political firepower.
"We are facing a backsliding of many agendas that we had advanced a few years ago," said Henrique Frota, director of ABONG, a Brazilian association of NGOs. "Developed countries are reducing their investment in (official development assistance) and European countries are not fulfilling their commitment ... they are giving less and less money right now for every kind of agenda."
Event leaders were relieved to produce an outcome document — despite gnawing fears in the past months that Washington would torpedo any deal.
In the end, U.S. officials backed out altogether.
"The entire community was very afraid of coming here because one country wasn't attending," said U.N. Assistant Secretary-General Marcos Neto. "But the document ended up working out ... I'm leaving happy, with more optimism than I thought I would leave with."
Neto highlighted significant steps toward implementing climate and development goals, including the Seville Platform and multiple agreements from public and private sectors to leverage funds for the biggest possible impact.
A woman carries an umbrella near Las Setas during a heat wave in Seville on July 2. |
REUTERS
The Seville Commitment included tripling multilateral lending capacity, debt relief, a push to boost tax-to-gross domestic product ratios to at least 15%, and get more rich countries to let the International Monetary Fund use "special drawing rights" money for countries that need it most.
But in Seville, only host nation Spain signed on to commit 50% of its special drawing rights funds for the purpose.
U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Amina J. Mohammed acknowledged that the attendance was not as star-studded as hoped, and that public funds are under pressure.
"But there's innovative financing, there's the private sector, there's the triple lending of MDBs... so the resources are there," she said, referring to multilateral development banks.
"We just have to have the political will to leverage through these mechanisms that have come out of the platform of action and continue moving with them."
U.S. President Donald Trump, despite his country's absence, loomed large over the event; his climate change skepticism, hostility toward diversity initiatives and pledge to review U.S. participation in multilateral organizations made some keen to strip out references to climate change and rebrand initiatives as focused on resilience, education or health.
Still, some said the gloomy backdrop should not deter leaders focused on progress.
"Ultimately the important thing is doing it," said Jose Vinals, a former group chairman of Standard Chartered and cochair of both the FFD4 Business Steering Committee and the Global Investors for Sustainable Development Alliance.
"The private sector is, for the most part, still willing to walk the talk."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
Data centers and small reactors could change Asia's nuclear dynamic
Notice how hot your cellphone gets when it multitasks on a steamy day? It doesn't take much to make me put my keitai down and worry about it overheating. Multiply that heat by, say, infinity, and you've got the biggest problem that data centers face in an increasingly digital world. An estimated 402.74 million terabytes of data are created each day and storing and processing all that information creates virtual volcanoes. The rise of artificial intelligence is compounding the problem. In a much-cited report released earlier this year, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated that electricity demand from data centers worldwide will more than double by 2030 to around 945 terawatt-hours, an amount that exceeds Japan's current entire electricity consumption. By 2035, global data center electricity consumption will increase again by one-third to around 1,200 TWh. (Goldman Sachs reached roughly similar conclusions in reports issued last year.) Data center electricity consumption has grown 12% a year since 2017 — more than four times the rate of total electricity consumption — and last year accounted for around 1.5% of the world's electricity consumption in 2024, or 415 TWh. The U.S. accounted for 45% of that amount, followed by China (25%) and Europe (15%). It's estimated that a typical AI-focused data center consumes as much electricity as 100,000 homes and the largest ones currently under construction will consume 20 times that amount, or the equivalent of 2 million households. A huge part of that demand comes from the cooling systems critical to their operation. New technology such as graphics processing units, needed for increasingly complex computation, consume more power and generate more heat than the central processing units that are more widely used today. It's estimated that cooling systems can account for as much as 40% of a data center's power consumption. The IEA sources 85% of global data center power consumption — and hence data centers — to the U.S., China and Europe. In Japan, data centers account for less than 20 TWh of electricity consumption (about 2% of the total, roughly equivalent to that of Europe). That will change. The transition to Society 5.0, with its deep integration of digital services into daily life, will accelerate demand for computing power. In addition, the Japanese government has made data centers a core component of efforts to increase foreign direct investment in the country to ¥100 trillion by the end of 2030. Japan is already scheduled to add more than 500MW to power its data centers, bringing total capacity for those facilities to 1.5 GW. Consistent with those plans, the IEA concluded that data centers will be responsible for more than half the growth in electricity demand in Japan. The rest of the world accounts for about 10% of total data center electricity generation, with Southeast Asia and India prominent. In many ways, Southeast Asia may be the most interesting — and concerning — place to watch. A BCG report last year anticipated that data center capacity in Southeast Asia would triple by 2030, reaching between 5.2 GW and 6.5 GW, which would make it the world's third hub for such services, behind the U.S. and China. This will, reports the IEA, double electricity demand in the region. As one example, the agency forecast that data centers would be responsible for as much as 20% of the increase in Malaysia's national power demand by 2030. Ambitious politicians, such as Thaksin Shinawatra, Thailand's eminence grise, hope to emulate Japan and use that demand to entice foreign investment. 'We want to be competitive in data centers and AI,' Thaksin said earlier this year. Bangkok has already reportedly secured billions of dollars in investment commitments by technology giants like Amazon and Alibaba. The big question is where they will get their juice. Rising demand is pushing tech giants such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon to invest in nuclear power. This shift, from governments to big companies, as the primary drivers of nuclear power development, has powerful implications that we have been slow to consider. Big nuclear projects remain problematic, with government policies and regulations inhibiting — if not blocking — the sector's development. There is only one nuclear power plant in Southeast Asia — in the Philippines, built 40 years ago but never commissioned. It has never produced a single watt of energy. Yet, in a report issued late last year, the IEA concluded that nuclear power would become part of the region's energy mix by 2035, with installed nuclear capacity ranging from 6 GW to 13 GW by 2050, depending on the scenario. The development of small modular reactors is the wild card. SMRs have a capacity of under 300 MW (small, most conventional reactors produce about 1,000 MW) and their components can be mass-produced and assembled on site (modular). They are also considerably cheaper than traditional nuclear power plants: They cost about $2 billion while conventional reactors can cost more than $10 billion. Thus far, only Russia and China have commercially operable reactors, although the U.S. and Japan are working on the technology. According to the IEA, there are plans to build as much as 25 GW of SMR capacity to supply data centers worldwide, almost all in the U.S., with the first projects expected to go online after 2030. But does the readiness of tech giants to acquire their own nuclear capability change the regional dynamic? SMRs are intended to sidestep the big issues surrounding nuclear power, namely the huge costs required to build the plant and the accompanying grid as well as looming and rightly concerning safety and security issues. SMRs can be installed into an existing grid or remotely off-grid, reducing or even eliminating the infrastructure concerns. They're also thought to be safer and more secure. While those reactors will still be subject to national regulatory frameworks, it seems obvious to me that moving the locus of decision-making away from governments to companies could accelerate the adoption process. Especially when those companies are pursuing business objectives that align with national economic goals — promoting investment and the development of high-tech industries. Companies can move more quickly than governments. Their readiness to assume regulatory and financial burdens helps shift the decision-making dynamic. I checked in with Carl Baker, my colleague at Pacific Forum who has been running programs that explore regional thinking about nuclear energy for nearly two decades. He agreed that 'the potential availability of SMRs has had an impact on thinking about the viability of nuclear technology, especially in Southeast Asia.' But, he added 'the conversation regarding the introduction of nuclear energy as a source of electrical power is still in its early stages and has not gotten into the specific issues related to governance and other regulatory considerations.' He is less sanguine than I about the impact of the private sector's enthusiasm for SMRs. The idea that tech giants can change the prevailing mindset 'is not really an issue in countries that have not developed the national regulatory framework for use of nuclear power as an energy source.' Moreover, 'conglomerates are not going to be able to avoid the bottlenecks and roadblocks any more than large power companies have been.' Finally, Baker said, 'the impetus for accommodating specialized applications is coming primarily from the U.S at this point' and regulators there have been pretty reluctant to let go of overly stringent safety requirements. He is probably right. But in a recent conversation in Southeast Asia about nuclear power and accompanying concerns, local participants approached the problem from the traditional perspective — big nukes, national infrastructure and government bottlenecks. Those are powerful forces but I can't help but wonder if that paradigm is ready for revision. After all, things are heating up. Brad Glosserman is a senior adviser at Pacific Forum and the author of "Peak Japan." His upcoming book on the geopolitics of high-tech is expected to be released by Hurst Publishers this fall.
Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Russian use of chemical weapons against Ukraine 'widespread,' Dutch defense minister says
Dutch and German intelligence agencies have gathered evidence of widespread Russian use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine, including dropping a choking agent from drones to drive soldiers out of trenches so they can be shot, they said on Friday. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans called for tougher sanctions against Moscow. "The main conclusion is that we can confirm Russia is intensifying its use of chemical weapons," he said. "This intensification is concerning because it is part of a trend we have been observing for several years now, where Russia's use of chemical weapons in this war is becoming more normalized, standardized, and widespread." Germany's BND foreign intelligence agency confirmed the findings, saying in a statement that it had obtained the evidence alongside its Dutch counterparts. The head of the Dutch Military Intelligence Agency (MIVD), Peter Reesink, said the conclusions followed "our own independent intelligence, so we have observed it ourselves based on our own investigations." Reuters has not been able to independently verify the use of banned chemical substances by either side in the Ukraine war. The United States first accused Russia of using chloropicrin, a chemical compound more toxic than riot control agents and first used by Germany during World War I, in May last year. A Ukrainian military engineer inspects a trench near the front lines outside Kupiansk, Ukraine, in December 2023. | REUTERS Ukraine alleges thousands of instances of Russian chemical weapons use. Russia's defense ministry did not immediately respond to a request to comment for this article. Russia has denied using illegal munitions and it has accused Ukraine of doing so. Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for the Russian foreign ministry, said on Wednesday that the Federal Security Service discovered a Ukrainian cache of explosive devices in the east of the country containing chloropicrin. Ukraine has consistently denied such accusations. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), a disarmament agency in The Hague with 193 member states, said last year that initial accusations leveled by both countries at each other were "insufficiently substantiated." It has not been asked to conduct a full investigation, which must be initiated by member states. At least three Ukrainian deaths have been tied to chemical weapons use, Brekelmans said, while more than 2,500 people injured on the battlefield reported chemical weapons-related symptoms to Ukrainian health authorities. Increased use of chemical weapons by Russia poses a threat not only to Ukraine but to other countries, Brekelmans added. "We must further increase the pressure. This means looking at more sanctions and specifically not allowing them (Russia) to participate in international bodies like the Executive Council of the OPCW," he said. An infantry soldier scans the sky for enemy drones as he stands in a front line trench in the Donetsk region, Ukraine, in April 2024. | REUTERS Reesink spoke of "thousands of instances" of chemical weapons use, while also citing a Ukrainian figure of 9,000. Rotating two-year seats on the OPCW council will be up for negotiation in the coming months. The intelligence findings were presented in a letter to the Dutch parliament on Friday. Russia is a member of the OPCW and, like the United States, has destroyed its declared chemical weapons stockpiles. Increased sanctions could happen in conjunction with the European Commission, which has proposed listing 15 additional new entities and individuals to its sanctions framework, including for suspected use of chemical weapons in Ukraine. The Dutch military and general intelligence agencies, working with foreign partners, say they have uncovered concrete evidence of intensified Russian chemical weapons production. This includes heightened research capabilities and the recruitment of scientists for chemical weapons development, Reesink said. He added that Russian officials have given instructions to soldiers on the use of poisonous warfare agents. "This isn't just some ad-hoc tinkering at the frontline; it is truly part of a large-scale program. And that is, of course, also concerning because if we don't clarify and publicize what Russia is doing, it's highly likely these trends will continue," Reesink said. He called the use of chemical weapons by Russian armed forces "almost standing operating procedure." "We specifically linked the use of chloropicrin to improvised munitions, such as filled light bulbs and empty bottles that are hung from a drone. When it comes to teargas, we see that they are also misusing and converting existing munitions to act as the carrier for the gas," he said. Chloropicrin is listed as a banned choking agent by OPCW, which was created to implement and monitor compliance with the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). It can cause severe irritation to the skin, eyes, and respiratory tract. If ingested, it can cause burns in the mouth and stomach, nausea and vomiting, as well as difficulty breathing or shortness of breath.
Japan Times
14 hours ago
- Japan Times
Shintaro Awa appointed to head the kitchen of L'Ambroisie in Paris
Shintaro Awa, formerly the chef de cuisine of the three-Michelin-starred Epicure of Hotel Le Bristol in Paris, has taken over esteemed chef-owner Bernard Pacaud's role at the stalwart L'Ambroisie in Paris. L'Ambroisie is a dining icon. Opened in 1981 by Pacaud, it went on to earn three Michelin stars in 1988, a feat it has maintained till this day. In November 2015, U.S. President Barack Obama dined with French President Francois Hollande at the restaurant. The establishment also made an appearance in the 2019 Japanese drama series, 'La Grande Maison Tokyo,' in which Takuya Kimura's character trained at the restaurant. The 77-year-old Pacaud announced his gradual retirement two years ago. In 2023, he sold a majority share of his restaurant to Butler Industries — an investor in France's luxury and lifestyle sectors that also owns Pierre Herme Paris — but continued to oversee the restaurant during its two-year handover period. In July 2023, chef Christophe Moret, who was previously working at Shangri-La Paris, was announced as his successor. But Moret left the job after only two months as the philosophies of the two chefs did not align. Pacaud's son, Mathieu, is a chef who used to work with him, but the pair reportedly have different culinary styles: In 2015, Mathieu decided to set up his own restaurants, ruling out the chance of a family succession. A top Parisian chef, who has declined to be named, introduced Awa to Butler Industries' founder Walter Butler as a possible replacement for Pacaud. Pacaud was already aware of Awa's talent, having tasted his food at Epicure and being impressed with his minimal style and deft cooking techniques. Convinced by his potential, he agreed to hire him. Together with L'Ambroisie's new owner, Butler Industries' CEO Walter Butler (center), chef Awa will continue the fine dining legacy of his predecessor, Pacaud (right). | BUTLER INDUSTRIES Awa, 39, is a devotee of French cuisine. Inspired by the legendary Japanese chef Masao Saisu who worked with Pacaud at L'Ambroisie, he left Japan for France in 2004 when he was just 18 years old. He started his career in Restaurant Regis & Jacques Marcon in Haute-Loire in 2007, before moving to Restaurant Paul Bocuse in Lyon in 2009 and Alain Ducasse au Plaza Athenee in Paris in 2012. In 2013, he was hired as a sous-chef at Epicure before being promoted to chef de cuisine in 2022. A fan of Pacaud's food, Awa recalls being impressed by the chef's famous sea bass escalopes with sliced artichoke and caviar, describing the dish as 'no frills but (filled with) perfection.' He calls Pacaud a true shokunin (craftsman), a chef who has kept his head down and focused only on his cooking even though he has the fame of retaining three Michelin stars for 37 years. 'His passion to deliver delicious food to the guests is what I admire,' says Awa. 'I want to be such a chef. Since the start of my career, I've wanted to be such a shokunin.' Pacaud says Awa possesses the 'rigor, humility and passion that make great chefs.' 'I'm very happy to support him and open the doors of this great establishment that is so dear to my heart,' he adds. With his successor found, Pacaud will officially retire, bringing an end to a nearly 45-year career in the echelons of French fine dining. For nearly 45 years, Pacaud stuck by his brand of classic French cuisine, offering simple, precise dishes such as sea bass escalopes with sliced artichoke and caviar. | KYOKO NAKAYAMA On July 1, Butler Industries officially became L'Ambroisie's new owner while Awa formally took over the kitchen as its executive chef. In August, the restaurant will undergo a renovation, which would likely be completed by autumn. L'Ambrosie made a name for itself as a place for traditional French cuisine, and Awa plans to continue this legacy. 'I don't want to do fusion. The only Japanese element I would like to express is 'minimalism,'' he says. 'I don't want to put too many components in one dish. I'll only add what is truly necessary — whether it's vegetables, spices, a sauce or condiments — to enhance its texture. I would like to showcase the beauty of French ingredients.'
