logo
CIMB deepens push in Thailand, Indonesia

CIMB deepens push in Thailand, Indonesia

The Star3 days ago
KUALA LUMPUR: CIMB Group Holdings Bhd continues to sharpen its focus in Thailand and Indonesia despite economic headwinds, concentrating on cross-border banking in Thailand and scaling up Islamic finance in Indonesia to tap into long-term growth.
Group chief executive officer (CEO) Novan Amirudin said while Thailand's domestic growth remains challenging, cross-border activity is on the rise as Thai corporates expand abroad.
CIMB, he added, continues to play an active role in facilitating these transactions.
'Thailand is facing a number of economic headwinds, with the last major investment cycle centred around petrochemicals and automotive. It has been a while since the country saw large-scale investments.
'There is also a heavy reliance on tourism and while the numbers in tourism have returned, spending has yet to recover to pre-Covid-19 pandemic levels.
'As an operator in Thailand, CIMB is also feeling the impact of these issues. Nonetheless, Thailand remains a key part of our overall franchise because it completes our Asean proposition,' he said during the Asean Media Day at the bank's headquarters yesterday.
Meanwhile, Novan highlighted Islamic banking as a promising area for CIMB's Indonesian arm, noting that although Indonesia has the world's largest Muslim population, Islamic banking penetration remains low at only 8% of the market.
In comparison, Malaysia's Islamic banking penetration stands at 50%.
'Where I see CIMB Niaga Syariah playing a key role in the Indonesian market is through the product innovation and the solutions we can bring to Indonesia.
'There are a lot of lessons that we have learned from the Malaysian market, and if we can marry that with the domestic nuances of operating in Indonesia – the different perspectives, cultures, and requirements – we can offer Indonesians a good alternative to the banking products available today.
'I do see that there are a lot of areas for us to play in, given that the penetration is only at 8% and the demand for such services is high,' he said.
For the six months ended June 30, 2025, CIMB's Thai banking arm saw a 21.8% year-on-year (y-o-y) decline in net profit to 1.01 billion baht (RM132.45mil).
CIMB Thai Bank PCL, a 94.83%-owned subsidiary of CIMB, attributed the softer performance to one-off items, including adjustments in revenue recognition under the effective interest rate methodology and an additional expected credit loss overlay.
CIMB Thai president and chief executive officer Wut Thanittiraporn said in a statement that these were 'proactive measures taken to strengthen the bank's financial resilience in the long term, and were not a result of any deterioration in asset quality'.
CIMB Thai's consolidated operating income contracted 257.8 million baht or 3.7% on a y-o-y basis.
The decline was mainly due to a 13.6% drop in net interest income to 646 million baht, driven primarily by lower interest income on loans.
This was partially offset by higher net fee and service income of 30.5 million baht.
On a broader outlook, Novan said the bank is 'in a good place' and its portfolio remains 'extremely strong' despite uncertainties from tariffs.
When asked if CIMB expects a decline in earnings for financial year 2026, he said the group will 'do what it takes to be nimble, to pivot its strategies by looking at its efficiencies, portfolio, credit losses, non-interest income and cost of funds to mitigate the impact from tariffs.
'Assuming tariffs continue to rise, this will inevitably impact the broader economy through increased costs and shifting supply chains.
'If economic growth slows, loan growth will also slow – and loan growth is one source of income for banks.
'However, it is more complex than that as a bank's interest income comes from loan growth, as well as what it makes from the net interest margins, which in turn are influenced by the financial institution's cost of funds versus its credit spread that is tied to the customer risk profiles it onboards,' Novan said.
He added that in a declining interest rate environment, as seen in recent months, interest margins have narrowed, leading to lower interest income.
'However, interest income is not the only income that we make as a bank. About 30% of our income comes from non-interest income, such as fees, foreign exchange, payments, and advisory services.
'This is an area where CIMB has been extremely active and forms a critical part of our Forward 30 plan, where we plan to increase this portion of our income.'
Novan also noted that tools like artificial intelligence are being deployed to enhance the bank's efficiency.
He pointed out that another key component of the profit and loss statement is credit losses.
'If a bank grows loans very aggressively, takes on a lot of high-risk customers, then its risk of credit losses will be a lot higher.
'At CIMB, we have reconstituted our portfolio over the last few years.
'We have exited businesses that were very hard to operate.
> TURN TO PAGE 2
We have reduced our risk profile and credit losses as well as increased our coverage ratio.
'We are in a good place. Tariffs are just one factor that would impact a bank's financials. What is important is how we choose to play with different levers to offset the impact it brings,' he said.
Meanwhile, CIMB chief investment officer fixed income Ng Boon Hoa said the bank remains 'neutral' on the Malaysian market because 'the catalysts have been quite lacking'.
'Policy support and foreign direct investment flows have been relatively muted after a strong run last year.
'There is also some lingering uncertainty surrounding tariffs, seeing as Malaysia has not struck a trade deal with the United State. It remains to be seen whether the country can close the deal.'
Ng also noted that first-quarter earnings were relatively muted, growing only 1% to 2% compared to last year where the country had an earnings growth of 10%.
'That has not translated well into the equity market, and we do not think it paints a very positive picture moving forward,' he said.
Ng added that the wider scope of the sales and service tax has caused 'a bit of concern about higher prices and inflation and also softer consumer demand'.
'The inflection point, however, will probably come from the foreign flows. Foreign holdings are actually quite low in equities in Malaysia. Any pickup will be positive.
'Foreign direct investment – particularly in data centre developments across the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone – could provide a lift to Malaysian markets.
'We have a FBM KLCI target of around 1,600, based on a reasonable 14 times price-to-earnings ratio,' he said.
CIMB continues to favour high-yielding sectors such as banking, utilities and construction.
'We think they are quite good in terms of valuations,' Ng said.
He noted that the ringgit's strength could also play to the benefit of the Malaysian equity markets.
'The Singapore dollar and the ringgit are expected to appreciate against the greenback in the second half of the year.
'Hence, we still like Malaysian and Singaporean bonds, which deserve an allocation of investors' assets as they are considered safe havens, particularly from a currency perspective,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge
Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge

New Straits Times

time14 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge

WALL Street's concentration in the red-hot tech sector is, by some measures, greater than it has ever been, eclipsing levels hit during the 1990s dotcom bubble. But does this mean history is bound to repeat itself? The growing concentration in United States equities instantly brings to mind the Internet and communications frenzy of the late 1990s. The tech-heavy Nasdaq peaked in March 2000 before cratering 65 per cent over the following 12 months. And it didn't revisit its previous high for 14 years. It seems unlikely that we will see a repeat of this today, right? Maybe. The market's reaction function appears to be different from what it was during the dotcom boom and bust. Just look at the current rebound from its post-"Liberation Day" tariff slump in early April — one of the fastest on record — or its rally during the Covid-19 pandemic. But despite all of these differences, there are also some worrying parallels. Investors would do well to keep both in mind. The most obvious similarity between these two periods is the concentration of tech and related industries in US equity markets. The broad tech sector now accounts for 34 per cent of the S&P 500's market cap, according to some data, exceeding the previous record of 33 per cent set in March 2000. Of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation today, eight are tech or communications behemoths. They include Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — as well as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan. By contrast, only five of the 10 biggest companies in 1999 were tech firms. The other five were General Electric, Citi, Exxon, Walmart and Home Depot. Plus, the top 10 companies' footprint in the S&P 500 today is much larger than it was back then. The combined market cap of the top 10 today is almost US$22 trillion, or 40 per cent of the index's total, significantly higher than the comparable 25 per cent in 1999. This all reflects the fact that technology plays a much bigger role in the US economy today. By some measures, the current tech boom, driven in part by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI), is more extreme than the information technology bubble of the late 1990s. As Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, points out, the 12-month forward earnings valuation of today's top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 is higher than it was 25 years ago. However, it's worth remembering that the dotcom bubble was characterised by a frenzy of public offerings and a raft of companies with shares valued at triple-digit multiples of future earnings. That's not the case today. While the S&P tech sector is trading at 29.5 times forward earnings today, which is high by historical standards, this is nowhere near the peak of almost 50 times recorded in 2000. Similarly, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are currently trading around 22 and 28.5 times forward earnings, compared with the dotcom peaks of 24.5 and over 70 times, respectively. With all that being said, a meaningful, prolonged market correction cannot be ruled out, especially if AI-driven growth isn't delivered as quickly as investors expect. AI, the new driver of technological development, will require vast capital outlays, especially on data centres, which may mean that earnings and share price growth in tech could slow in the short run. According to Morgan Stanley, the transformative potential of generative AI will require roughly US$2.9 trillion of global data centre spending through 2028, comprising US$1.6 trillion on hardware like chips and servers and US$1.3 trillion on infrastructure. That means investment needs of over US$900 billion in 2028, they reckon. For context, combined capital expenditure by all S&P 500 companies last year was around US$950 billion. Wall Street analysts are well aware of these figures, which suggests that at least some percentage of these huge sums should be factored into current share prices and expected earnings, but what if the benefits of AI take longer to deliver? Or what if an upstart (remember China's DeepSeek?) dramatically shifts growth expectations for a major component of the index, like US$4-trillion chipmaker Nvidia? Of course, technology is so fundamental to today's society and economy that it's difficult to imagine its market footprint shrinking too much, for too long, as this raises the inevitable question of where investor capital would go.

NST Leader: Consumer Credit Bill brings order to Malaysia's spending madness
NST Leader: Consumer Credit Bill brings order to Malaysia's spending madness

New Straits Times

time14 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

NST Leader: Consumer Credit Bill brings order to Malaysia's spending madness

MANY Malaysians are financially challenged, but it has not stopped them from splurging on flashy cars and apparel, the latest gadgets and even coveted concert tickets. Add to these essentials such as food and beverage, rental, Internet data and leisurely pursuits, consumer spending in Malaysia hit a RM258.6 billion in the first quarter. Here's the paradox: such heavy spending is why small businesses survived during Covid-19 and through the post-pandemic years. But this same "gung-ho" spending is also why prices have inflated, thus the desperate call for government anti-inflationary measures and financial assistance. This has compelled the government to put together an interim package of financial goodies, effective Aug 31 to Dec 31. Top of the package is the one-off RM100 for all Malaysians above 18 under the Sumbangan Asas Rahmah initiative. There's also a six sen reduction in the price of RON95 under fuel subsidy reforms, deferred toll hikes, and expansion of the Madani Rahmah Sales programme allocation to RM600 million. Lest critics deem it a strain on government debt, it's worth noting that the initiative is not new. It was implemented years ago in the name of "economic stimulation". Still, many Malaysians are indifferent to sensible financial management, spending needlessly, such as the obsession of changing cars year after year. A new safeguard is on the horizon: the just-passed Consumer Credit Bill 2025 (CCB), designed to protect against risks from uncontrolled credit and unethical lending practices. In the dizzying digital economy that elevates consumerism and fuels unrestrained spending, a new law had to be formulated to regulate credit-related businesses and services, compelling fair conduct. Credit providers will soon be mandated to ensure transparency in charges and adopt professional guidelines for debt collection and dispute resolution. A key provision of the bill is the regulation of instant loans and the increasingly popular "Buy Now, Pay Later" (BNPL) schemes. BNPL has gained such traction that even cash-strapped Malaysians have been able to snap up My Chemical Romance concert tickets. It means that people who couldn't afford the tickets bought them anyway. The downside? More debt. The CCB is hoped to be the "silver bullet" in curbing extreme consumerism — particularly among non-bank credit providers, including BNPL operators, leasing firms and factoring companies. It also extends to debt collection agencies, many of which have been running with little to no official oversight. The CCB will require full disclosure of credit terms, fees and hidden charges, while prohibiting misleading advertisements, undue pressure and deceptive credit tactics. It will also ban harassment, threats and public shaming of borrowers. Malaysians will soon be nudged to cut trivial spending and adopt more sensible personal financial management. The CCB will see to it.

Nvidia AI chips worth US$1bil entered China despite US curbs
Nvidia AI chips worth US$1bil entered China despite US curbs

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Nvidia AI chips worth US$1bil entered China despite US curbs

NEW YORK: Nvidia's advanced artificial intelligence chips worth at least US$1 billion were smuggled into China in the three months after Washington tightened chip export controls, the Financial Times reported on Thursday The AI chip designer's high-end B200 processors — banned for sale in China — are widely available on a thriving Chinese black market for US chips, the report said, citing sales contracts, company filings and multiple people with direct knowledge of the deals. Nvidia told Reuters that building data centres with smuggled products is inefficient both technically and financially, as the company only offers service and support for authorised products. The US Department of Commerce, White House and Thai government did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters could not independently verify the FT report. In May, multiple Chinese distributors began selling B200s to suppliers of data centres serving Chinese AI groups, according to the report. The US and China are battling for global dominance in AI and other cutting-edge technologies, triggering a tightrope walk for companies such as Nvidia between the world's two largest economies. Nvidia last week said it would be allowed to resume sales to China after the Trump administration reversed an export restriction on the sales of chips such as the H20. The curbs were imposed in April. In the three months before that, Chinese distributors from Guangdong, Zhejiang and Anhui provinces sold Nvidia's B200s, as well as other restricted processors such as the H100 and H200, according to the report. Southeast Asian countries have become markets where Chinese groups obtained restricted chips, the report said, citing industry experts. The US Commerce Department is discussing adding more export controls on advanced AI products to countries such as Thailand as soon as September, the report said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store