US sanctions on China refiners over Iran oil disrupt operations: sources
[SINGAPORE] Recent US sanctions on two small Chinese refiners for buying Iranian oil have created difficulties receiving crude and led them to sell product under other names, sources familiar with the matter said, evidence of the disruption that Washington's stepped-up pressure is inflicting on Tehran's biggest oil buyer.
The targeting of independent refiners, known as teapots, marked an escalation in Washington's efforts to cut off Tehran's export revenue as US President Donald Trump seeks to pressure Iran into a deal over its nuclear programme.
Washington's sanctions against Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical in March and Shandong Shengxing Chemical in April have also begun to deter other, larger independent Chinese refiners from buying Iranian crude, three of the sources said.
About five plants in the refining hub of Shandong province have halted purchases of Iranian oil since last month, worried about being hit by sanctions, two trading executives said. That wariness is the main reason discounts for Iranian Light have widened to US$2.30 to US$2.40 a barrel against ICE Brent from about US$2 a month ago, the executives and another source said.
Among the inconveniences faced by the two sanctioned teapots, state-run Shandong Port Group, the main port operator in the province, has denied entry to vessels loaded with crude they have purchased, five trade sources said. That follows the port group's January ban on port calls by US-sanctioned tankers.
Shandong Port Group and Shengxing did not respond to requests for comment. A Luqing executive declined to comment.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Large state banks have also stopped providing Luqing with operational capital for purchasing crude, forcing it to work with smaller banks, four of the sources said.
The sources declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Beijing says it opposes unilateral sanctions and defends as legitimate its trade with Iran, which ships about 90 per cent of its oil exports to China. However, Chinese customs data has not shown any oil shipped from Iran since July 2022, with Iranian crude imports instead labelled as originating from Malaysia or other countries.
Shipping, sales headaches
The Shandong Port Group's banning of cargoes for the two refineries has forced them to discharge at other ports, according to three sources.
In one case, the tanker Bei Hai Ming Wang carrying oil for the Shengxing refinery was rejected when it sought to land at the Laizhou port, controlled by Shandong Port Group, around Apr 21, according to a source familiar with the matter.
It eventually unloaded on May 2 at the privately owned Wantong Crude Oil Terminal in neighbouring Dongying, data from analytics firm Vortexa showed.
In another sign of trading disruption from the sanctions, two Asia-based oil product traders who had previously dealt with Luqing said they stopped doing so after it was sanctioned.
In addition, no shipments of petrol blendstock have been recorded since the end of March out of Laizhou port, used by Luqing for most of its blendstock exports, Kpler and LSEG ship tracking data showed.
That contrasts with the first three months of this year when 83,000 metric tonnes (701,000 barrels) of methyl tertiary butyl ether, a key petrol blendstock export, were shipped from Laizhou, accounting for 15 per cent of China's total outflow of the blendstock.
State giant China National Offshore Oil Corporation (Cnooc) stopped supplying crude to Shandong Haihua Group's 40,000 barrel-per-day refinery, operated by Luqing, shortly after the US sanctions were announced, three trade sources and a Shandong-based Chinese oil market consultant said.
Cnooc did not respond to a request for comment. Calls to Haihua went unanswered.
The two teapots have also begun selling product through new entities, according to seven trade sources, with Luqing using Shouguang Jiaqing Petroleum Sales and Shengxing selling via Shandong Xuxing Petrochemical. Calls to the two entities seeking comment went unanswered. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran could again enrich uranium ‘in matter of months', says UN nuclear watchdog chief
IAEA director-general Rafael Grossi says Iran's estimated 400kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium is enough to produce at least nine nuclear bombs. PHOTO: EPA Iran could again enrich uranium 'in matter of months', says UN nuclear watchdog chief WASHINGTON - UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi says Iran likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium 'in a matter of months,' despite damage to several nuclear facilities from US and Israeli attacks, CBS News said on June 28. Israel launched a bombing campaign on Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, saying it was aimed at keeping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon – an ambition the Islamic republic has consistently denied. The United States subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic programme. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is 'serious,' but the details are unknown. US President Donald Trump insisted Iran's nuclear programme had been set back 'decades.' But Mr Grossi, the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said 'some is still standing.' 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that,' Mr Grossi said on June 27, according to a transcript of the interview released June 28. Another key question is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6 kilo stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks. The uranium in question is enriched to 60 per cent – above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. Mr Grossi admitted to CBS: 'We don't know where this material could be.' 'So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification,' he said in the interview. For now, Iranian lawmakers voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA and Tehran rejected Mr Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites, especially Fordo, the main uranium enrichment facility. 'We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened,' Mr Grossi said. A Maxar satellite image shows damage at Iran's Fordow enrichment facility after strikes on June 23. PHOTO: NYTIMES In a separate interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures programme, Mr Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved. 'It's a very hard thing to do, plus we didn't give much notice,' he said, according to excerpts of the interview. 'They didn't move anything.' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on June 28 underscored Washington's support for 'the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran,' commending Mr Grossi and his agency for their 'dedication and professionalism.' The full interview with Mr Grossi will air on Face The Nation With Margaret Brennan on June 29. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Iran could again enrich uranium 'in matter of months': IAEA chief
WASHINGTON: UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi says Iran likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium"in a matter of months," despite damage to several nuclear facilities from US and Israeli attacks, CBS News said Saturday. Israel launched a bombing campaign on Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, saying it was aimed at keeping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon - an ambition the Islamic republic has consistently denied. The United States subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic program. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is "serious," but the details are unknown. US President Donald Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "decades". But Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said "some is still standing". "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi said Friday, according to a transcript of the interview released Saturday (Jun 28). Another key question is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6-kilo (900-pound) stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks. The uranium in question is enriched to 60 per cent - above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. Grossi admitted to CBS: "We don't know where this material could be". "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification," he said in the interview. For now, Iranian lawmakers voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA and Tehran rejected Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites, especially Fordo, the main uranium enrichment facility. "We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened," Grossi said. In a separate interview with Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" program, Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved. "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice," he said, according to excerpts of the interview. "They didn't move anything". US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday underscored Washington's support for "the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran," commending Grossi and his agency for their "dedication and professionalism".
International Business Times
4 hours ago
- International Business Times
What is Canada's Digital Services Tax and Why It Sparked a Trade War With US?
Trade tensions between the United States and Canada reached a boiling point this week as President Donald Trump abruptly ended trade negotiations in response to Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST). Trump described the tax as "a direct and blatant attack" on American businesses and warned that new tariffs on Canadian goods would be imposed within a week. Canada confirmed it will enforce the DST starting Monday, following months of tense discussions. The tax was introduced under the Trudeau government in June 2024 and applies a 3% levy on revenue earned by large digital firms—particularly those with over €750 million in global revenue and more than $20 million in Canadian digital sales. This move primarily targets major US tech firms like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Uber, with retroactive application to January 2022, creating a US$2 billion bill due by the end of June. Under Canadian law, companies are required to register with the Canada Revenue Agency by January 31, 2025, and file returns by June 30, 2025. Penalties include fines of $20,000 per year for failure to register, and late filing could result in additional financial penalties of up to 5% plus 1% monthly interest. Trump reacted strongly, ending trade discussions and stating on social media that Canada would regret its decision. He asserted, "We have such power over Canada. They were foolish to do it." Trump insisted Canada would eventually retract the tax but made clear he was indifferent to their decision. The tax has long been a sore point for US policymakers who claim it unfairly singles out American digital companies. Industry leaders welcomed Trump's firm approach. Matt Schruers of the Computer & Communications Industry Association praised the administration's move, saying it protected US digital exports from discriminatory treatment. In response to the DST, tech companies have started passing costs to Canadian customers. Google, for example, introduced a "Canada DST Fee" of 2.5% on ads purchased in the country. Despite US pressure, Canada remains resolute. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne confirmed the government is moving forward, and Prime Minister Mark Carney stated negotiations will continue but only on Canada's terms. Canada relies heavily on trade with the US, with nearly 80% of its exports heading south. It is also America's top foreign supplier of oil, uranium, steel, and electricity. The highly integrated auto sector could be significantly affected by any new tariffs. This dispute is not isolated. The US had earlier initiated consultations under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement regarding the DST. Canadian business groups have warned of potential harm to both economies if the situation escalates.
