logo
Who should pay for green retrofits to apartment buildings? Not tenants, report argues

Who should pay for green retrofits to apartment buildings? Not tenants, report argues

Above guideline rent increases are the most 'regressive' way to fund green retrofits in rental housing, a new report from Ontario ACORN argues.
The report from the tenant union spells out how some landlords have used
above-guideline rent increases
(AGIs) to pass the cost of climate-conscious upgrades on to tenants and make a profit.
'ACORN members agree these retrofits are needed and at a much greater scale. However, it shouldn't be low-income tenants paying the bill so we can achieve our climate goals,' the report says.
The report looks at 16 applications
to raise rents above the provincial maximum for rent-controlled units to cover the cost of energy and water conservation projects — including things like new boilers, windows and doors, lighting retrofits and common area renovations.
In one case, an AGI application for one Toronto building was approved to cover nearly $77,000 for new toilets and breaker panels.
But because the cost of water is built into the rent for most of its units, tenants aren't 'seeing any of the savings on the water bill,' said Stacey Semple, who lives in the building and is a tenant leader in ACORN's downtown Toronto chapter.
The report outlines how AGIs, especially when applied repeatedly, can drastically increase rent costs over time.
Thorncliffe Park tenants have withheld rent from landlord Starlight Investments since 2023.
In Ontario, units occupied before Nov. 15, 2018, are rent-controlled, meaning for this year rent in those units can only be increased by 2.5 per cent (for 2026, the rent increase guideline is 2.1 per cent). However, the Residential Tenancies Act allows applications to the
Landlord and Tenant Board for AGIs
for a number of reasons, including covering the cost of energy and water conservation upgrades.
Landlords can apply for AGIs for a maximum of 9 per cent over three years on top of the rental increase guideline.
Increases are cumulative, so when an AGI is carried out over multiple years, the annual increase is based on the last year's rent rate, not the rate when the AGI was first granted — which Ricardo Tranjan, senior researcher with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, who had no involvement in the report, sees as a flaw.
For example, on top of the 2.5 per cent increase allowed annually, a 9 per cent AGI spread over three years applied to a starting rent of $1,500 a month grows to $1761.40 a month at the end of the three years.
Another flaw noted by Tranjan is that AGIs for capital expenditures have interest built in at the standard five-year mortgage rate to cover the upgrade's useful life. But that interest rate, 'may or may not be what (landlords were) charged themselves if they borrowed' to pay for the upgrades, he said.
'If you're charging more interest than you're paying yourself, you're keeping the change,' said Tranjan. 'It's is a pretty bad formula that benefits landlords instead of tenants.'
It's not just a Toronto problem as rents have skyrocketed in cities outside the GTA, says the CCPA.
Ontario ACORN, which advocates for an end to AGIs altogether, is calling on the province to make green retrofits ineligible for AGIs as well as require landlords to prove they aren't eligible for any rebates or funding in their AGI applications, according to the report.
The report notes there are government programs to help fund green retrofits, but says there's low uptake by private landlords and a mismatch between what's offered and what tenants need.
Because many tenants pay for utilities themselves, and thus pay the price for energy inefficiency, landlords don't have much incentive to apply for grants or low-cost financing to cover improvements when they could apply for an AGI instead, the report says.
'AGIs will always be seen as more attractive to corporate landlords because they're easy to approve and they make a huge profit,' said Jamie Gooch, a leader in the McWatters ACORN Tenant Union in Ottawa.
In addition to ACORN's demands to ban AGIs, the union wants to see more funding for green retrofits in rental buildings from all levels of government.
'If private landlords won't pay for green retrofits, then the government should,' said Gooch.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Welcome aboard the 'AI crazy train'
Welcome aboard the 'AI crazy train'

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Welcome aboard the 'AI crazy train'

Big Tech is in an AI arms race, each company trying to outspend the others on data centers, GPUs, networking gear, and talent. Engineers can be let go. But the infrastructure? That's permanent. If the AGI dream fades, you're stuck with massive, costly assets. So when Google announced it would hike capex by $10 billion to $85 billion in 2025 eyebrows went up. Most of it is for things you can't walk back: chips, data centers, and networking. Google is "jumping aboard the AI crazy train," Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik wrote, referencing a song by the late bat biter Ozzy Osbourne. Meta's Mark Zuckerberg brags about Manhattan-sized data centers. And Elon Musk keeps hoarding GPUs. While Sam Altman is building mega-data centers with partners. JPMorgan dubbed this " vibe spending," warning OpenAI might burn $46 billion in four years. It's no shock when Elon, Zuck, and Sam flex on capex. But Google? That's surprising. "Google doesn't do this," Shmulik said. The company has been viewed as measured in recent years, prioritizing investment intensity with care. Not anymore. Now investors want to know: Will these swelling bets pay off? There are promising signs. Since May, Google's monthly token processing (the currency of generative AI) has doubled from 480 trillion to nearly a quadrillion. Search grew 12% in Q2, beating forecasts. Cloud sales surged 32%. CEO Sundar Pichai said Google is ramping up capex to support all this growth. But it's still a huge gamble. "Does the current return on invested capital seen in both Search and Cloud hold up at higher [capex] intensity levels," Shmulik asked, "or is the spend a very expensive piece of gum trying to plug an AI-sized hole?" He leans optimistic.

Welcome aboard the 'AI crazy train'
Welcome aboard the 'AI crazy train'

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Welcome aboard the 'AI crazy train'

There's a fear in investing when a sector swells rapidly. Booming stock prices and aggressive spending feel great, until things inevitably cool off. Then comes the reckoning: Who overdid it in irreversible ways? Big Tech is in an AI arms race, each company trying to outspend the others on data centers, GPUs, networking gear, and talent. Engineers can be let go. But the infrastructure? That's permanent. If the AGI dream fades, you're stuck with massive, costly assets. So when Google announced it would hike capex by $10 billion to $85 billion in 2025 eyebrows went up. Most of it is for things you can't walk back: chips, data centers, and networking. Google is "jumping aboard the AI crazy train," Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik wrote, referencing a song by the late bat biter Ozzy Osbourne. Meta's Mark Zuckerberg brags about Manhattan-sized data centers. And Elon Musk keeps hoarding GPUs. While Sam Altman is building mega-data centers with partners. JPMorgan dubbed this " vibe spending," warning OpenAI might burn $46 billion in four years. It's no shock when Elon, Zuck, and Sam flex on capex. But Google? That's surprising. "Google doesn't do this," Shmulik said. The company has been viewed as measured in recent years, prioritizing investment intensity with care. Not anymore. Now investors want to know: Will these swelling bets pay off? There are promising signs. Since May, Google's monthly token processing (the currency of generative AI) has doubled from 480 trillion to nearly a quadrillion. Search grew 12% in Q2, beating forecasts. Cloud sales surged 32%. CEO Sundar Pichai said Google is ramping up capex to support all this growth. But it's still a huge gamble. "Does the current return on invested capital seen in both Search and Cloud hold up at higher [capex] intensity levels," Shmulik asked, "or is the spend a very expensive piece of gum trying to plug an AI-sized hole?" He leans optimistic. Still, Google shares rose just 1% after these results. Not exactly a resounding endorsement.

AI Agents - The Internet Is Being Rewritten - Survey Users Vs Brands?
AI Agents - The Internet Is Being Rewritten - Survey Users Vs Brands?

Forbes

timea day ago

  • Forbes

AI Agents - The Internet Is Being Rewritten - Survey Users Vs Brands?

SAN DIEGO, CA - APRIL 30: The start of cybersex in the 1990's, Megan, a 26 yr old cyber stripper ... More with the online company "Virtual Dreams", founded by Gary Mittman an early entrepreneur in the online sex industry performs online April 30, 1996 San Diego, California ( Photo by) A recent memo from OpenAI lays it out clearly: they aim to become the dominant interface for everything on the internet. Bold? Yes. Feasible? Maybe! As a faculty member at Cornell and an active investor in AI startups, I've been studying how AI reshapes our digital habits. Today, I'm launching a survey to better understand how users and companies are adjusting to this shift. Who leads and who lags in the ecosystems? Let's unpack this transformation of … everything. The End Of Chrome And The Beginning AI Agents Quite early in the LLM hype cycle, I said that: AGI is still a long way off. Large Language Models (LLMs), however, are a new user interface. This change will create many new opportunities for brands and micro-brands aggregated by a few giants. And yes, OpenAI will be one of them. OpenAI's ambition to become the universal interface to what we knew as the Internet isn't surprising. If anything, they might be late. Remember Perplexity's 'Shop Like a Pro'? Their goal was to handle all of shopping—from research to payment. Now OpenAI is extending that idea from Perplexity to … yes … to everything. The interesting part is that it might be feasible. During my user research, one user told me he uploaded his blood test to ChatGPT. It analyzed the results, suggested supplements, and suggested a web-store. The user went on and spent over $200—at a retailer he had never visited before, because 'ChatGPT said so'. This isn't a fringe case. And it shows a few areas where ChatGPT is already extending their reach: • OpenAI just became his personal health record — trusted with sensitive data. • It just became his doctor — providing medical recommendations. • It just replaced Google — suggesting where to buy. • It also guided the purchase — skipping traditional product pages. Sam Altman's vision is clear. He wants to be the agent for healthcare, for finance, for e-commerce and many other areas. I hear that Sam invited many startups to 'private dinner' events at his personal maison in San Francisco. Some of the founders described his vision as 'he wants to forward integrate into our business' or 'he wants to be Everyone's Agent' — much like Amazon once wanted to be The Everything Store. OpenAI has a real chance of realizing this vision. We see high speed in how users adopt. The question is whether organizations or ecosystems can match this speed. If not, OpenAI has a winning chance. We've seen this before. The early internet changed how we consume media, but it took media ecosystems years to adapt. Today, AI is driving a similar transformation — and again, most companies and ecosystems are behind. Many Industries Will Be Impacted By AI Agents That's why I'm doing this research. I want to find out how far users, organizations, and the ecosystem have evolved. I have already looked at many different areas: • IDE — or how we code — has been changed. See my conversation with a16z's Martin Casado. User behavior is driving the industry. • FINANCE — or how we underwrite risk — has been changed. See my discussion with Varo Bank founder Colin Walsh. Here the industry is driving user behavior. • E-Commerce — AI is changing how we sell and shop. It's not yet clear who is driving whom here… I've chosen to focus on e-commerce for this study because the power distribution is not yet clear: 1. Users prefer answer-first experiences — powered by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. 2. Users now bypass the homepage entirely, leading to a decline of the website. On the other hand: 3. Brands push GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) — the art of influencing LLMs to list the brand. 4. Brands create ChatGPT-like experiences on site search. LLMs like OpenAI and Perplexity: 5. Want to integrate agent capabilities (even though there are still many technical questions unanswered) 6. And the ability to place ads Why I Need Your Help To track how users vs. how companies are adapting, I partnered with Chase Binnie from RetailWire — you may remember our Shoptalk discussion. Together, we launched a survey focused on GEO. It's short. It's targeted. The data is strictly used for research. It will help us all understand: • How brands show up (or don't) in AI-generated answers • What strategies actually move the needle • What tooling or support is still missing Whether you're a marketer, founder, or product lead — your perspective will help. We'll publish all findings openly, and create a public playbook for working in the new AI-powered discovery ecosystem. Please take the survey here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store