Councillor calls for referendum on Lansdowne 2.0, but mayor opposed
As the Lansdowne 2.0 redevelopment ticks along behind the scenes, one city councillor tried publicly on Tuesday to explore the idea of a referendum during the 2026 municipal election so residents could ultimately decide whether the new arena and football stands should be built.
Coun. Shawn Menard, who represents the Glebe neighbourhood where Lansdowne Park is located, pointed out that more than 5,000 people have signed a petition calling for a citywide vote on whether to spend upward of $419 million on the project.
The plan is to replace the north-side stands at the football stadium, and to replace the arena with a new one that has thousands fewer seats and is located where there's now a grassy berm. The city's private sector partner at Lansdowne, the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG), owns the Redblacks football team and Ottawa 67's hockey team, and manages those city facilities at TD Place.
"That's a nice-to-have. It's not necessary," Menard told reporters after a meeting during which the finance and corporate services committee discussed facing a $10.8-billion dollar funding gap for city infrastructure in the coming decade.
"Do we really want to be spending on this when all these other priorities are there?" asked Menard. "It's hard to get the basics right these days in the city."
The Lansdowne 2.0 concept was first discussed during the last term of council under former mayor Jim Watson, when OSEG was struggling to attract visitors to Lansdowne during the COVID-19 pandemic. The plans have been modified since then, including a two highrise towers instead of three, but the estimated price tag has risen from $332 million to $419 million.
Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said the public has had many chances to weigh in, and will have yet another opportunity before a final vote this fall.
"We were talking about Lansdowne in 2022 when the previous municipal election took place, so there's no need for a referendum," said Sutcliffe. "I don't think councillors want it."
No referendum was held for other big projects such as the new central library or the two stages of light rail construction, Sutcliffe pointed out, because those decisions are within the purview of council.
Going to tender June 16
Indeed, councillors on the finance and corporate services committee voted nine to three Tuesday to discuss Menard's motion that day, rather than weeks later as Menard intended, because they said it was time-sensitive.
Expecting it would be voted down, Menard quickly jumped in to withdraw his motion and preserve a chance to pursue the referendum discussion later.
This bit of procedural interest came after staff confirmed they plan to put the project out to tender on June 16, seeking construction companies to submit bids to build Lansdowne 2.0. Staff intend to get updated prices and choose a contractor to present to council for final approval in the fall.
The city also held a separate procurement in recent months to find developers wanting to either buy or lease the air rights for two highrise towers. It closed April 30, and the city is deep in negotiations with one preferred bidder.
"I think there's a reputational risk and a credibility risk in this motion where it would possibly negatively impact those conversations and those tenders," said Tammy Rose, general manager of the infrastructure and water services department.
Sutcliffe also underscored the importance of following the procurement process already laid out and not creating uncertainty for the construction industry.
Building permit application in March
Along with tendering the construction and air rights, the Lansdowne 2.0 team has been busy working on other tasks council gave them last year in order to prepare a final package for council approval.
One big goal was to apply for a building permit in time to fall under Ontario's 2012 building code, rather than the 2024 code that took effect Jan. 1.
Sean Moore, who is leading the Lansdowne project for the City of Ottawa, confirmed the application for a building permit went in on March 21, 2025 and would fall under the old code.
The province did allow a transition period and a project could still apply under the old code by March 31 if its working drawings were substantially complete by Dec. 31, 2024.
Site plan approved last month
Moore said those drawings were ready on time as part of yet another related task: getting approval for what's called the "site plan," which lays out details about everything from building elevations and design to landscaping and servicing with municipal water.
That key step only got final signoff by city planning staff on May 26, after the Lansdowne team and its consultants submitted dozens of studies to be reviewed by city subject matter experts and the urban design review panel.
Even with the signoff, city reviewers still had a long list of conditions for Lansdowne 2.0 to meet, such as updating its assessment of Lansdowne's transportation impact and updating its grading plan to show water won't pool.
Asked how the building permit had complete drawings on Dec. 31 when many more studies were submitted and reviews were done afterward, Moore explained the architect's designs were submitted for the arena in August 2024, and for the north-side stands in December.
The structural and mechanical elements needed to meet the building code were complete, he said. As for elements outstanding on the approved site plan, Moore said only final clarifications are missing — an entire transportation plan doesn't need to be redone.
"We're just talking now about crossing t's and dotting i's," explained Moore. "But overall, staff have accepted how it all works in terms of [Lansdowne's] design, and how it's modelled, the transportation system and so forth."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
40 minutes ago
- CTV News
Carney meets with auto sector CEOs as U.S. trade talks continue
Calgary Watch Mark Carney met with automotive sector CEOs to discuss U.S. tariffs and ways to protect Canadian supply chains from the trade war with the United States. Hannah Lepine reports.
National Observer
43 minutes ago
- National Observer
New supply management law can't save the system from Trump, experts say
A new law meant to protect supply management might not be enough to shield the system in trade talks with a Trump administration bent on eliminating it, trade experts say. "It's certainly more difficult to strike a deal with the United States now with the passage of this bill that basically forces Canada to negotiate with one hand tied behind its back," said William Pellerin, a trade lawyer and partner at the firm McMillan LLP. "Now that we've removed the digital service tax, dairy and supply management is probably the number 1 trade irritant that we have with the United States. That remains very much unresolved." When Trump briefly paused trade talks with Canada on June 27 over the digital services tax — shortly before Ottawa capitulated by dropping the tax — he zeroed in on Canada's system of supply management. In a social media post, Trump called Canada a "very difficult country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products." Canada can charge about 250 per cent tariffs on US dairy imports over a set quota established by the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement. The International Dairy Foods Association, which represents the US dairy industry, said in March the US has never come close to reaching those quotas, though the association also said that's because of other barriers Canada has erected. When Bill C-202 passed through Parliament last month, Bloc Québécois MPs hailed it as a clear win protecting Quebec farmers from American trade demands. The Bloc's bill, which received royal assent on June 26, prevents the foreign affairs minister from making commitments in trade negotiations to either increase the tariff rate quota or reduce tariffs for imports over a set threshold. On its face, that rule would prevent Canadian trade negotiators from offering to drop the import barriers that shield dairy and egg producers in Canada from price shocks. But while the law appears to rule out using supply management as a bargaining chip in trade talks with the US, it doesn't completely constrain the government. Pellerin said that if Prime Minister Mark Carney is seeking a way around C-202, he might start by looking into conducting the trade talks personally, instead of leaving them to Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand. Carney dismissed the need for the new law during the recent election but vowed to keep supply management off the table in negotiations with the US. Pellerin said the government could also address the trade irritant by expanding the number of players who can access dairy quotas beyond "processors." "(C-202) doesn't expressly talk about changing or modifying who would be able to access the quota," he said. Expanding access to quota, he said, would likely "lead to companies like grocery stores being able to import US cheeses, and that would probably please the United States to a significant degree." Carleton University associate professor Philippe Lagassé, an expert on Parliament and the Crown, said the new law doesn't extend past something called the "royal prerogative" — the ability of the executive branch of government to carry out certain actions in, for example, the conduct of foreign affairs. That suggests the government isn't constrained by the law, he said. "I have doubts that the royal prerogative has been displaced by the law. There is no specific language binding the Crown and it would appear to run contrary to the wider intent of the (law that it modifies)," he said by email. "That said, if the government believes that the law is binding, then it effectively is. As defenders of the bill insisted, it gives the government leverage in negotiation by giving the impression that Parliament has bound it on this issue." He said a trade treaty requires enabling legislation, so a new bill could remove the supply management constraints. "The bill adds an extra step and some constraints, but doesn't prevent supply management from eventually being removed or weakened," he said. Trade lawyer Mark Warner, principal at MAAW Law, said Canada could simply dispense with the law through Parliament if it decides it needs to make concessions to, for example, preserve the auto industry. "The argument for me that the government of Canada sits down with another country, particularly the United States, and says we can't negotiate that because Parliament has passed a bill — I have to tell you, I've never met an American trade official or lawyer who would take that seriously," Warner said. "My sense of this is it would just go through Parliament, unless you think other opposition parties would bring down the government over it." While supply management has long been a target for US trade negotiators, the idea of killing it has been a non-starter in Canadian politics for at least as long. Warner said any attempt to do away with it would be swiftly met with litigation, Charter challenges and provinces stepping up to fill a federal void. "The real cost of that sort of thing is political, so if you try to take it away, people are screaming and they're blocking the highways and they are calling you names and the Bloc is blocking anything through Parliament — you pay a cost that way," he said. But a compromise on supply management might not be that far-fetched. "The system itself won't be dismantled. I don't think that's anywhere near happening in the coming years and even decades," said Pellerin. "But I think that there are changes that could be made, particularly through the trade agreements, including by way of kind of further quotas. Further reduction in the tariffs for outside quota amounts and also in terms of who can actually bring in product." The United States trade representative raised specific concerns about supply management in the spring, citing quota rules established under the CUSMA trade pact that are not being applied as the US expected and ongoing frustration with the pricing of certain types of milk products. Former Canadian diplomat Louise Blais said that if Canada were to 'respect the spirit' of CUSMA as the Americans understand it, the problem might actually solve itself. 'We jump to the conclusion that it's dismantlement or nothing else, but in fact there's a middle ground," she said.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canada's trade deficit in May narrows, exports to U.S. drop
A refinery is seen in Burnaby, B.C., on Monday, June 30, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck OTTAWA -- Canada's trade deficit in May met expectations and narrowed after a record breaking deficit in April, data showed on Thursday, as total exports rose and imports fell even as the impact of the U.S. tariffs dented shipments south of the border. The trade deficit in May was at $5.9 billion, down from a downwardly revised $7.6 billion in the prior month, Statistics Canada said, led by a 1.1% increase in exports on a monthly basis which followed a 11% slump in April. This was the first increase in exports in four months, StatCan said, and was driven by record exports to the rest of the world, excluding the U.S. Exports and imports to the U.S. dropped to their lowest levels in May, barring the pandemic year of 2020. Exports to the U.S., the destination for three quarters of Canada's outbound shipments, fell for the fourth month in a row with May registering a drop of 0.9%. In volume terms total exports were up 0.7% in May. U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed 25% tariffs on imports of Canada-made automobiles and 50% tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum from the north of the border. Canada has also imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. This trade skirmish between the two countries whose bilateral trade surpassed a trillion dollars last year has depleted Canada's exports and has hit the job market. Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump have agreed to reach some form of a trade deal by July 21. Canada's total exports for May were at $60.81 billion, up from $60.12 billion in April, led by exports of metallic and non-metallic mineral products, StatCan said. This category increased by 15.1% and was driven by mainly exports of unwrought gold which posted an increase of 30.1% to reach a record $5.9 billion. 'Most of the rise was attributable to higher physical shipments of gold to the United Kingdom,' the statistics agency said. Excluding metal and non-metallic mineral products, total exports were down 1.2%, it added. As trade with the U.S. has dropped, Canadian companies have been scouting for opportunities to increase trade with rest of the world. Exports to countries other than the United States rose 5.7% in May to reach a record high, StatCan said, but it was not enough to mitigate the impact of loss of exports to the U.S., as well as China due to a drop in canola and crude oil shipments. Total imports dropped by 1.6% to $66.66 billion, with imports from the U.S. falling by 1.2% in May. The Canadian dollar slightly weakened after the trade data and was trading down 0.23% to 1.3615 to the U.S. dollar. Yields on the two-year government bonds were up 3.7 basis points to 2.706%. Reporting by Promit Mukherjee; Editing by Dale Smith and Nick Zieminski, Reuters
