There's poison of regionalism, linguism in Maharashtra. Condemn & remove it: YB Chavan
I was asked to unveil a statue of Shivaji at Shivaji Park in Bombay. It was a huge gathering of 3-4 lakh people. I made my first statement there condemning these activities and appealing to the people of Maharashtra not to take up this linguistic attitude in this particular matter. I am on record about it.
Maharashtra has a tradition of nationalism, and Maharashtra has produced leaders as humble servants of the nation. The poison of regionalism or linguism, just as it is making its appearance and is raising its ugly head elsewhere, made a somewhat ugly appearance in Maharashtra also. Certainly, we shall have to condemn it and make every effort to remove that poison. I would like to assure this House that the Maharashtra Government are quite aware of this thing. The Chief Minister and the Revenue Minister themselves have made statements about it, and they have assured me that they will take all the necessary action against all manifestations of it, whatever they are.
The agony and the pangs of unemployment are the same. There are certainly some economic grievances. At the same time, I would say that however justified the economic grievances may be, nobody has a right to take unlawful means in his hands to solve even those economic grievances. This is my approach to this matter. I would like to put on record a certain statement on this matter. Our Constitution accepts only one citizenship and all citizens have the fundamental right to reside and settle in any part of India. … to acquire, hold, and dispose of property anywhere and to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
This fundamental right must be unreservedly respected both by the governments in the country and by the people. It is in the interest of the economic development of the country and of national integration that any citizen of India should feel free to go to any part of the country, seek employment or pursue any business or occupation of his choice.
He should have the confidence that while doing so, there will be no discrimination of any kind against him and that, in a very real sense, the principle of equality of opportunity would be respected. In the matter of public employment, equality of opportunity has been guaranteed by the Constitution itself, and this is a guarantee which we have been endeavouring, and will continue to endeavour, to have fully respected by all the public authorities in the country. In respect of the Central Government's corporate public enterprises, we have been issuing instructions that there should be no discrimination against people who come to seek employment from other parts of the country or against the local people.
The only preference which our instructions provide is that at the lower levels of employment, special consideration should be shown to people who had been displaced by a project. I am sure the House will agree this is a sound and humane policy. Complaints are sometimes made of discrimination in the organised sectors of private employment.
This is not a matter in which anything can or should be done through legal regulation, but the wider interests of the country require, as indeed does the enlightened self-interest of the employers themselves, that here, too, the principle of equality of opportunity should be observed. People will have grievances. Sometimes they are justified, and sometimes they are not. Obviously, where there are any legitimate grievances, they should be redressed to the extent possible. But one thing is certain. Nobody has any right to seek redress of his grievances, genuine or otherwise, by unlawful means. There can be no justification whatever for creating hatred or ill will, for one section of the community to show any kind of antagonism to another.
If there is anything of this kind, it should be strongly condemned, and where legal action is possible, such action should be taken. Some weeks ago, I said categorically at a press conference in Bombay that any agitation directed against any particular linguistic group deserved to be condemned. I also described the attitude of the Shiv Sena as reactionary and harmful, and against the unity of the country. I take this opportunity to reaffirm those observations.
I have heard from the Maharashtra Government again recently, in which the assurances and the determination to take necessary action have been reaffirmed. I am confident that the Maharashtra Government will stand by their assurances and take whatever action is necessary to prevent any manifestation of parochialism.
Editor's note: This is an edited excerpt from Yashwantrao Balwantrao Chavan's 1967 address in the Lok Sabha. Read the full speech here.
This is part of ThePrint's Great Speeches series. It features speeches and debates that shaped modern India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ex-Foreign Secy, 26/11 prosecutor among 4 nominated to Rajya Sabha
A former Foreign Secretary, the lawyer who prosecuted 26/11 terrorist Ajmal Kasab, the historian who wrote the official textbook on India's medieval history during the Vajpayee government's tenure, and a veteran BJP leader in Kerala who was a victim of political violence three decades ago. These are the people President Droupadi Murmu nominated to the Rajya Sabha on Sunday. Retired diplomat Harsh Vardhan Shringla, prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam, historian Meenakshi Jain, and BJP leader C Sadanandan Master will join the Rajya Sabha, which, as per Article 80 of the Constitution, can have 12 nominated members who have specialised knowledge or practical experience of literature, science, art, or social service. Prime Minister Narendra Modi welcomed the nominations. Congratulating Shringla, he posted on X, 'Shri Harsh Vardhan Shringla Ji has excelled as a diplomat, intellectual and strategic thinker. Over the years, he's made key contributions to India's foreign policy and also contributed to our G20 Presidency.' Shringla is a 1984-batch IFS officer and served as India's Ambassador to the US, High Commissioner to Bangladesh, and Ambassador to Thailand. In 2019, during his tenure as the envoy to the US, the 'Howdy Modi' event was held in Texas. The 63-year-old was the Foreign Secretary from 2020 to 2022 and served as the chief coordinator of India's G-20 presidency in 2023. Ujjwal Nikam, 72, is best known as the man who prosecuted Kasab, and is the go-to man whenever a complicated or high-profile case crops up. 'Ujjwal Nikam's devotion to the legal field and to our Constitution is exemplary,' Modi posted on X. 'He has not only been a successful lawyer but also been at the forefront of seeking justice in important cases …' Following the announcement, Nikam told ANI, 'Yesterday, the PM called me and asked, 'Ujjwal ji, should I speak in Marathi or Hindi? I started laughing, and he also laughed. I told him, 'You know both languages well.' He then switched to Marathi and told me that the President has entrusted me with new responsibilities and asked if I was ready to take them on. I immediately said yes.' Nikam has represented the state in cases such as the 1993 Bombay blast trial, the murder of music executive Gulshan Kumar in 1997, the 2006 murder of BJP leader Pramod Mahajan, and the 2006 Khairlanji massacre in which four members of a Dalit family were killed. The case that made him a household name across the country was the trial of Kasab. During the proceedings, Nikam claimed the terrorist had demanded biryani in jail. However, he later admitted he had 'made up the statement as there was a sympathetic wave building towards Kasab', who was hanged in November 2012. In May 2024, Nikam resigned as special public prosecutor to contest the Lok Sabha elections from Mumbai North Central on a BJP ticket. However, he lost to the Congress's Varsha Gaikwad by more than 16,000 votes. Nikam was then reappointed as the special public prosecutor and was handling cases such as the 26/11 attack case against Zaibuddin Ansari alias Abu Jundal and the murder charges against Vijay Palande who challenged Nikam's reappointment, claiming 'he would act to further the BJP's agenda and may go to any extent to secure false convictions'. Congratulating Meenakshi Jain, Modi wrote on X, 'It's a matter of immense joy that Dr Meenakshi Jain Ji has been nominated to the Rajya Sabha by Rashtrapati Ji. She has distinguished herself as a scholar, researcher and historian…' Jain taught history at Delhi University's Gargi College for over three decades and authored the NCERT textbook on Medieval India during the Vajpayee government's tenure. Her book replaced the one authored by historian Satish Chandra and was, in turn, replaced once the Congress-led UPA came to power in 2004. Jain became a member of the Indian Council of Historical Research during the Modi government's first term and was honoured with the Padma Shri in 2020. A Senior Fellow at the Indian Council of Social Science Research at present, she has written several books. One of those is Rama and Ayodhya that traces, in depth, the conflict over the Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya. Delhi University Teachers' Association president Dr A K Bhagi described Jain's nomination as a moment of joy, saying, 'Only our ideology can provide such an honour to teachers.' The sole politician on the list, retired schoolteacher Sadanandan Master survived an attack in north Kerala's Kannur three decades ago in which he lost both his legs. The 61-year-old, who was last week appointed one of the Kerala BJP vice-presidents, hails from Perinchery village near Mattannur, Kannur, that is considered a CPI(M) stronghold. Although from a family of Communist supporters, he joined the RSS's student wing ABVP and was officially a part of the Sangh by 1984. For a time, he was the Sangh's boudhik pramukh in Ernakulam, responsible for the ideological training of the cadre. By 1994, he was the RSS sahkaryavah (joint general secretary) for Kannur. On the night of January 25, 1994, he was walking home after alighting from a bus at Uruvachal near Mattannur when a group of suspected CPI(M) workers attacked him. Sadanadan later recalled, 'A gang suddenly started hurling bombs, seeking to create a scare, and people started running and shut their shops. The gang approached me from behind and caught me. They laid me down on the road, then hacked both my legs below the knee and threw them away. No one dared to come to help me until the police arrived and took me to the hospital.' After a few months in the hospital, Sadanandan, who has had prostheses for both legs, returned to his school, which was struggling to attract students. The BJP then appointed him sub-editor in the party mouthpiece Janmabhumi. In 1999, he joined as a teacher in a school in Thrissur run by the Sangh Parivar. In the 2016 Assembly elections, in which the BJP made 'CPI(M)-sponsored' violence a key issue, Sadanandan was fielded from the Koothuparamba Assembly constituency, where some of the brutal political killings in Kannur took place in the 1990s. He finished third behind K K Shailaja of the CPI(M) and the JD(U) candidate K P Mohanan, polling over 20,000 votes. Sadanandan retired as a teacher from a school in Peramangalam in Thrissur in 2020 and in recent years has been active with the Bharatiya Vichara Kendram, an intellectual wing of the RSS, and writes columns in the media. 'Shri C. Sadanandan Master's life is the epitome of courage and refusal to bow to injustice. Violence and intimidation couldn't deter his spirit towards national development. His efforts as a teacher and social worker are also commendable … Best wishes for his role as MP,' Modi wrote. — With ENS Delhi inputs
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Ram Madhav at Idea Exchange: ‘Any economic ideology benefitting the last man is priority. That's why India could do away with absolute poverty'
Senior BJP leader Ram Madhav on the need for revision of voter rolls, the new BJP president, the narrative on Operation Sindoor and why economic growth should be India's focus over the next two decades. The session was moderated by Deputy Associate Editor Vikas Pathak Vikas Pathak: These days, there is a controversy regarding the intensive revision of voter rolls in Bihar. The Opposition is claiming that this could end up disenfranchising many voters. What do you think about the exercise? The exercise per se is very legitimate. It's not just about Bihar. A large number of people in the country have more than one voting card because of migration within the country. At some point, we had to rationalise voters' lists. The Election Commission thought that it would probably do that exercise in Bihar but now that the matter is before the Supreme Court, which has asked some very pertinent questions about Aadhaar card and other proof, we should wait for its views on this matter. Vikas Pathak: Bihar is believed to be around 89 per cent rural and sends blue collar migrants across the country. Do you think it would be a major inconvenience for them to update their names? The Election Commission has relaxed the conditionalities for the so-called registration. In any case, once the matter is sub-judice, everything depends on what view the Supreme Court takes. However, I don't think the Election Commission's effort was to disenfranchise legitimate voters. In any case, what we call as universal adult franchise, a fundamental right, had been accepted by us in 1929. It wasn't something that our Constitution gave us for the first time. Of course, in the Constitution we made it clear that it would be an adult franchise. So every adult, irrespective of any other status, should have the right to be a legitimate voter. Unfortunately, in our country elections don't take place at the same time. If we have one nation, one election, that problem can probably be addressed even if somebody has multiple ID cards. But in the current scenario, where every six months there is an election somewhere, it's probably not a bad idea to rationalise the process once and for all. Vikas Pathak: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was a general perception that capitalism would become a hegemonic world ideology. How do you see capitalism under US President Donald Trump? Given this level of protectionism, the trade and tariff war can go anywhere… Capitalism as an economic ideology has undergone many transformations in the last 70 years. If anybody was familiar with the capitalism debate during the 1940s, they would have heard the name of a very important scholar called Karl Polanyi. He wrote that regional and national capitalism was also a form of capitalism at a time when we were building the first multilateral economic institutions like the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and World Bank. It's another matter that those who built those institutions did not agree with him and they thought they would create a global level capitalist idea-driven financial institution. But by the 1960s, the US agreed that capitalism should also have a welfare component. That's when welfare capitalism came into existence. Welfarism is essentially a very liberal idea; you can say a communist idea. But it had to be incorporated for capitalism to survive. So capitalism has passed through many phases. Today, what Polanyi said is probably returning. National capitalism, regional capitalism will come back. On electoral roll revision | There is a problem of multiple voter cards. Unfortunately, in our country elections don't take place at the same time. If we have one nation, one election, that problem can probably be addressed Last year, the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Geneva came out with a very interesting paper titled 'Stakeholder capitalism.' What it means is that the priority of an economic entity will not just be to get maximum profit for its shareholders but for those people and groups who are influenced and affected by its stakeholders. What does it mean? Mahatma Gandhi said long, long ago that our economic model should be based on Dharma Kartrutva or trusteeship, meaning that your economic activity should benefit the larger society, not just you, your family or your shareholders. But then, we had discarded it as a very obscurantist idea. The WEF is saying the same thing. Remember, today's challenges require multiple solutions and some of the solutions can come from India. Generally, countries are turning inward. And let me caution that in the coming years and decades, there will be a lot of restrictions and embargoes. That's because capitalism and national interest are both getting mixed with each other. So if somebody is selling you a military aircraft, they will insist that you buy all the weapons that you can use with it. You can't fix any other weapon to that military aircraft. We have to be prepared for that kind of nationalism mixed with capitalism. Liz Mathew: Since you mentioned India's challenges in the new world order, what are the challenges India is facing in its diplomatic outreach in the neighbourhood after Sindoor ? Operation Sindoor teaches us many, many lessons, one of which is the nature of this changed world. We went to many countries in the world and tried to expose the terror underbelly of Pakistan, which is actively supported by the State and the military establishment there. But Pakistan was elected as a chair from the Asian region with the support of the UN Security Council's non-permanent members, securing 182 votes out of 193. People may be very sympathetic to us and they know that terrorism emanating from our neighbourhood is causing so much havoc in India. But when it comes to deciding about a global issue, the priorities are different. We are entering a world driven by national interests. So, one important message is to adhere to our national interest. I am mentioning this because there are enough people still saying that India is useless unless it sides with America. Yes, there is an argument that India should take sides. But number one, in the last 75 years, we have never taken sides in any conflict. We have never joined any bloc. Second, you can't hold up the tail of a tiger, knowing that once you leave it, it will swallow you. So you want India to catch the tiger so that you can escape. The whole idea is to drag India into these kinds of conflicts. India should strictly go by its national interest. That's why we follow the strategic autonomy formula which our Prime Minister repeatedly highlights. It's also partly because we are active in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) group. We are still standing on our own feet when it comes to the QUAD alliance, where we are the only country saying that it is not just about free and open Indo-Pacific, but free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific (FOIIP). Now, India has to stand on its own ground and pursue this policy of strategic autonomy very vigorously. That is the important message from Operation Sindoor or any other conflict. Liz Mathew: Could you throw some light on the current relationship between the RSS and the BJP? What role does the RSS play when it comes to crucial decisions like electing a party president? Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself is RSS. So are Amit Shah and JP Nadda. There is no other influence of RSS in the BJP. On a more serious note, the process of choosing the BJP's national president is on. The party leadership has discussed a few names. Hopefully, the new president will be elected and he or she will take charge soon. Although I'm not an RSS functionary today, I can say with authority that RSS is not a pressurising force or an organisation that causes any stalemate. It plays the role of a facilitator if necessary. RSS is not just an organisation; it's like a family. Each understands the other, so there is no separate criteria that RSS stipulates for president. The criteria are well-known: The person has to be a good organiser, somebody who can take everybody along and present a new face of the party before the people for the 2029 election. Whoever gets chosen will be a very competent leader. And the BJP doesn't have any shortage of such competent leaders by the way; that's why it is taking so long. Manoj CG: Speaking about senior RSS leader Moropant Pingale, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat recently recounted a moment from a meeting where Pingale had turned 75 and had remarked that his felicitation marked that his 'time was up.' The remark was interpreted differently. Was there a subtle message in that remark? The RSS is a very reticent organisation. If it was supposed to be a 'subtle' message, it would never be said in a public programme. Any message to be conveyed would be conveyed through appropriate forums. What he said at Nagpur was in the context of reminiscing about Pingale. I also worked with him for some time, a wonderful leader. Bhagwatji was only remembering those jovial moments from the event. As for leaders stepping down, they are mature and will take an appropriate decision. But there is no such age limit or any clause as far as my knowledge goes. Jatin Anand: There was a meeting between the sarsanghchalak and the PM that happened after Operation Sindoor. Could you tell us anything about what was discussed? Until 2021, they used to meet regularly, once a year at least. But between 2021 and 2024, the meetings did not happen. Before that they were together on the dais at the inauguration of the Ram temple. On new BJP president | The process of choosing the BJP's national president is on. The leadership has discussed a few names. Hopefully, the new president will be elected and he or she will take charge soon What actually transpired only those two people can tell. But I know this much that there was definitely some discussion about the Pahalgam incident and how India was planning to respond to it. The sarsanghchalak would have also briefed the Prime Minister about plans for the RSS centenary in October. Deeptiman Tiwary: One argument being given for a protectionist version of capitalism is the colossal failure of capitalism to take care of the bottom of the pyramid. At a time when the government is calling for India to become a developed nation by 2047, is there going to be an economic model that will take care of the poor? Classical capitalism by Adam Smith and others is long dead. We have modified versions of capitalism in so-called capitalist countries, like Sweden or Denmark, where the state's welfare component in public expenditure is 60 per cent. You might as well call it socialism or communism. Talking specifically about India, at least this government is very clear that Antyodaya, our economic ideology, which benefits the last man, should be the priority for any economic model or programme that we develop. That's the reason why India has been able to completely do away with absolute poverty. The World Bank says that India no longer has any population living in extreme poverty. A few days ago, I saw a report — maybe one can have views on these reports — which said that India is the fourth most equitable country in the world. So we are doing well in that aspect, in any case that's our commitment. I give one more example, call it my assumption. India's massive youth population today is facing an important challenge of finding jobs. But, there are no street riots, the reason being, there is sufficient economic activity. That is the reason why, despite the status of employment, there is no great poverty, stress or suffering at the grassroots. This government is conscious of its responsibility of ensuring that citizens at the grassroots level have a better life than what they were used to. Absolute equality is not possible in any society. But the gap should be minimised, and that is the commitment of this government. P Vaidyanathan Iyer: Post-Operation Sindoor, Pakistan seems to have had an edge in the narrative and made an impression on several people outside India. How do you look at this? Could we have managed the post-conflict information dissemination better? We have handled both – Operation Sindoor on the ground as well as the post-operation narrative – quite effectively. Maybe because no country openly came out (except two countries) and said Pakistan is the culprit, we are saying we have not succeeded in the war of narratives. That is because we have that expectation that dozens of countries would stand up and say that Pakistan is the villain, Pakistan is the culprit. But to say that Pakistan has gained in popularity is far from reality. I travelled after Operation Sindoor to at least eight countries. Everybody – foreign ministers, ministers – knows the potential of the Pakistan administration for creating trouble or promoting terror. Their stock has not gone up. Another lesson that we should learn is that in the new world, wars are going to be very different. In this era, you can't finally decide who is the victor and who is the vanquished. That's exactly what Pakistan tried to do. In spite of being badly beaten by India, badly suffering, it also claimed that it stood up to India. Nobody really believes that in the outside world. On new capitalism | Welfarism is essentially a very liberal idea; you can say a communist idea. But it had to be incorporated for capitalism to survive. National capitalism, regional capitalism will come back Pakistan-exported terrorism is not new in India. We have had worst instances like the Parliament and Mumbai attacks. How many countries really stood up and said Pakistan should be blamed? They blamed terror organisations, they blamed those individuals. There is a way countries respond because of various geopolitical or geo-strategic situations in which they operate. But that doesn't mean they are not standing with us. Every country stood by us on terrorism and India being the victim time and again. And they all believed that it was happening from across the border. That's the reason why the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) went after Pakistan for years. Pakistan manages to escape sanctions, thanks to its friends, but that doesn't mean people are giving it a clean chit. In that sense, our outreach efforts have definitely helped us. Vikas Pathak: In your book, you have talked about the need for India to focus only on economic growth in the next 20 years. At the same time, we have identity politics playing out everywhere. Do you think any economic development agenda is tenable in this scenario? I actually compare India with what happened in China in the 1980s and 90s under its leader Deng Xiaoping and his successors. Those 20 years were very pragmatic for China. In fact, Deng went to the extent of telling his Communist Party that 'I don't care about the colour of the cat as long as it is catching the mice.' They asked him about contracts to Western companies, he said his focus was not on communist ideology, just economic growth. Issues will keep cropping up in India because we are a diverse society but leadership has to now seriously focus on the economy for at least the next 10 to 15 years. Unless India becomes a 10 trillion dollar economy, there is no way we can play any big role in the world. Even with $10 trillion, our per capita will be around $6,500, which is half of that of China today. By the time we reach $10,000, they will go somewhere else. The leadership's focus has to be on economic growth. I'm sure that is what the government is doing.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
JMM urges SC to declare SIR unconstitutional
Dharwad: The Janandolan Maha Maitri (JMM), a branch of National Committee for Protection of Natural Resources (NCPNR), has criticised the Election Commission of India for taking up SIR (Special Intensive Revision) in Bihar and has termed it as an ill-advised move. Speaking to media in Dharwad JMM chief and anti-graft activist SR Hiremath urged the Supreme Court of India to declare SIR as unconstitutional and uphold the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution. He stated that SIR violates Articles 14, 19, 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution, as it contravenes the provisions of the Representation of the People's Act, 1950, and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. If SIR is not set aside by the SC, it can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise crores of voters (as much as 30 to 50% of the country) from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of basic structure of the Constitution, Hiremath said. "This would be totally against the bold experiment of Universal Franchise pledged by our Founding Fathers, who enshrined it in Constitution will be negated. It is important to identify and expose the powers that be, who have made the ECI do this 'retrograde' and 'dangerous move' of the ECI," he added. Dropping land acquisition The JMM, Citizens for Democracy (CFD) and NCPNR fully support the satyagraha of the 13 villages of Channapattana Hobli (Devanahalli Taluka, Bengaluru Rural Dist) 'Bhoo Swadheena Virodhi Horata' and call upon the state govt and the chief minister, who when in the opposition, had promised that, if voted to power, they would cancel the acquisition proceedings of the KIADB to acquire 1,777 acres of fertile lands of the farmers in 13 villages. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo "Siddaramaiah reiterated his promise to the Samyukta Horata members during a meeting, that he would need additional time until July 15 to overcome legal hurdles and confirming the next meeting. The govt should quash the land acquisition process and protect the interests of the farmers by protecting their fertile lands", Hiremath demanded.
