Colombia's ex-President Alvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
The sentencing hearing on Friday also resulted in Uribe, 73, receiving a fine of $578,000 and a ban from serving in public office for 100 months and 20 days — or just over eight years.
He is now required to report to authorities in Rionegro, in his home province of Antioquia. Afterwards, Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia has ordered him to 'proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest'.
With his conviction on July 28, Uribe has become the first former Colombian president to be found guilty in a criminal trial.
But Uribe's defence lawyers have already announced that they plan to appeal.
The sentencing culminates a six-month trial and nearly 13 years of legal back-and-forth for the popular conservative leader, who is considered one of the defining forces in modern-day Colombian politics.
His house arrest also comes less than a year before Colombia is set to hold presidential elections in May 2026.
Allegations of human rights abuses
The case centres around Uribe's role in Colombia's more than six-decade-long internal conflict, which has seen government forces, right-wing paramilitaries, left-wing rebel groups and drug-trafficking networks all fighting for control over parts of the country.
During his tenure as president from 2002 to 2010, Uribe led a strong-armed offensive against left-wing rebels like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the largest such group at the time.
But that approach earned him criticism for alleged human rights abuses, which he has denied.
Under his presidency, the Colombian military faced increasing accusations that it was killing civilians in order to boost the number of enemy combatants it could report as dead.
This practice, known as the 'false positives' scandal, has been implicated in the deaths of at least 2,000 people, with experts indicating that the number could be far higher. As many as 6,402 killings have been investigated.
Critics have also questioned Uribe's ties to right-wing paramilitaries, another allegation the ex-president has rejected.
But more than a decade ago, Uribe took action to silence one of his most prominent critics, leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, sparking his current trial.
Cepeda and others had drawn connections between Uribe's rise in politics in the 1990s and the creation of the paramilitary group Bloque Metro.
A legal boomerang
In 2012, Uribe filed a libel complaint against Cepeda with Colombia's Supreme Court, after the senator launched a probe into the ex-president's paramilitary contacts.
But in 2018, the case took a surprising new direction: The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint against Cepeda, and the court system instead started to weigh charges against Uribe instead.
Prosecutors accused Uribe of seeking to pressure paramilitary witnesses to change or suppress their testimony. While Uribe has admitted to sending lawyers to meet with former members of Colombia's paramilitaries, he has denied taking illegal actions.
Two paramilitaries have testified that Uribe's lawyer Diego Cadena, who also faces criminal charges, offered them money to give favourable evidence.
Their witness statements were also being used in a murder trial featuring Uribe's brother, Santiago Uribe.
Uribe's conviction was announced after a 10-hour hearing in which Judge Heredia said there was ample evidence that the ex-president sought to change witness testimony.
But that decision has sparked backlash from the United States, where the administration of President Donald Trump has shown willingness to place political pressure on countries like Brazil that pursue criminal cases against former right-wing leaders.
On Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on social media in defence of Uribe, repeating charges of judicial bias that have become commonplace under Trump.
'Former Colombian President Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland,' Rubio said. 'The weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent.'
But Democrats in the US accused Trump of seeking to subvert the rule of law overseas for political gains.
'The Trump Admin is saying that foreign leaders shouldn't be subject to rule of law if they say nice things about Trump,' Representative Jim McGovern wrote in reply to Rubio's message.
'It is very wrong to support impunity for a strongman held accountable by courts in his own country. This statement is shameful, and you know it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Thailand, Cambodia officials meet in Malaysia to cement ceasefire details
Officials from Thailand and Cambodia have met in Malaysia for the start of border talks, a week after a fragile ceasefire brought an end to an eruption of five days of deadly clashes between the two countries. The meeting on Monday came ahead of a key meeting on Thursday, which is expected to be led by the Thai and Cambodian defence ministers. This week's talks, which will be observed by representatives from China, Malaysia and the United States, aim to iron out plans to maintain the current truce and avoid future border confrontations. They will include finalising details for a monitoring team from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Malaysian Chief of Defence Forces General Mohd Nizam Jaffar said on Monday. The sessions in Malaysia follow the worst fighting between Thailand and Cambodia in more than a decade. Clashes along the long-disputed border last month killed at least 43 people, including civilians, and left more than 300,000 others displaced, according to the Reuters news agency. Relations between the neighbours deteriorated in May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a border skirmish, before worsening when Thai soldiers were injured by landmines in contested territory last month. The Southeast Asian countries downgraded diplomatic relations and violence broke out, which both sides blamed the other for starting. The recent fighting involved infantry clashes, artillery exchanges, air strikes and rocket fire. A ceasefire was announced on July 28, in part following economic pressure from US President Donald Trump, who warned both countries that they could not make trade deals with Washington without a ceasefire. Despite the fragile truce, tensions remain high and mistrust between the two sides lingers. Cambodia's defence ministry has accused Thailand of violating the terms of the ceasefire by installing barbed wire in a disputed border area, while the Thai military has suggested that the Cambodian army has reinforced troops in key areas. Both countries have given foreign observers tours of last month's battle sites, while seeking to show the damage allegedly inflicted by the other nation. Thailand and Cambodia also accuse each other of violating international humanitarian laws by targeting citizens. Phnom Penh continues to demand the release of 18 of its captured troops, whom Bangkok says it will only release following 'a complete cessation of the armed conflict, not just a ceasefire'. On Friday, Thailand returned two wounded Cambodian soldiers through a border checkpoint connecting Thailand's Surin province and Cambodia's Oddar Meanchey. The neighbours dispute how the troops came to be captured, with Thailand rejecting Cambodia's claims that the troops approached Thai positions to offer post-conflict greetings.
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Ukraine says defence sector corruption scheme uncovered
Ukrainian authorities have detained several officials over a 'large-scale corruption scheme' in the defence sector, just days after lawmakers restored the independence of the country's two main investigative bodies. The National Anti-Corruption Agency (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP) said in a joint statement on Saturday that they made four arrests in connection with the scheme, which involved the procurement of military drones and signal jamming systems. 'The essence of the scheme was to conclude state contracts with supplier companies at deliberately inflated prices,' they said, adding that the suspects had received kickbacks of up to 30 percent of the contract amounts. NABU and SAPO said they had caught a sitting lawmaker, two local officials and an unspecified number of National Guard personnel taking bribes. The suspects were not identified in Saturday's statement. The Ministry of Internal Affairs also said it had suspended the suspected National Guard members. The announcement comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy came under criticism last month for trying to take away the anticorruption agencies' independence and place them under the control of his prosecutor-general. The agencies regained their autonomy after Zelenskyy's move sparked the first antigovernment demonstrations in Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022. Zelenskyy, who enjoys far-reaching wartime powers, initially said he needed to bring the agencies under his control because they were inefficient and under 'Russian influence'. But he then said he had heard people's anger and submitted a bill restoring the agencies' independence, which was passed by lawmakers on Thursday. 'It is important that anticorruption institutions operate independently, and the law passed on Thursday guarantees them all the tools necessary for a real fight against corruption,' Zelenskyy said. Ukraine's European allies praised the about-face, having voiced concerns about the original defanging of the agencies. Top officials had told Zelenskyy that Ukraine was jeopardising its bid for European Union membership by curbing the powers of its antigraft authorities. In a statement about Saturday's arrests, Zelenskyy said he was 'grateful to the anti-corruption agencies for their work'.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Colombia's ex-President Alvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has been sentenced to 12 years of house arrest following his conviction for witness-tampering and bribery, according to local media reports. The sentencing hearing on Friday also resulted in Uribe, 73, receiving a fine of $578,000 and a ban from serving in public office for 100 months and 20 days — or just over eight years. He is now required to report to authorities in Rionegro, in his home province of Antioquia. Afterwards, Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia has ordered him to 'proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest'. With his conviction on July 28, Uribe has become the first former Colombian president to be found guilty in a criminal trial. But Uribe's defence lawyers have already announced that they plan to appeal. The sentencing culminates a six-month trial and nearly 13 years of legal back-and-forth for the popular conservative leader, who is considered one of the defining forces in modern-day Colombian politics. His house arrest also comes less than a year before Colombia is set to hold presidential elections in May 2026. Allegations of human rights abuses The case centres around Uribe's role in Colombia's more than six-decade-long internal conflict, which has seen government forces, right-wing paramilitaries, left-wing rebel groups and drug-trafficking networks all fighting for control over parts of the country. During his tenure as president from 2002 to 2010, Uribe led a strong-armed offensive against left-wing rebels like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the largest such group at the time. But that approach earned him criticism for alleged human rights abuses, which he has denied. Under his presidency, the Colombian military faced increasing accusations that it was killing civilians in order to boost the number of enemy combatants it could report as dead. This practice, known as the 'false positives' scandal, has been implicated in the deaths of at least 2,000 people, with experts indicating that the number could be far higher. As many as 6,402 killings have been investigated. Critics have also questioned Uribe's ties to right-wing paramilitaries, another allegation the ex-president has rejected. But more than a decade ago, Uribe took action to silence one of his most prominent critics, leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, sparking his current trial. Cepeda and others had drawn connections between Uribe's rise in politics in the 1990s and the creation of the paramilitary group Bloque Metro. A legal boomerang In 2012, Uribe filed a libel complaint against Cepeda with Colombia's Supreme Court, after the senator launched a probe into the ex-president's paramilitary contacts. But in 2018, the case took a surprising new direction: The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint against Cepeda, and the court system instead started to weigh charges against Uribe instead. Prosecutors accused Uribe of seeking to pressure paramilitary witnesses to change or suppress their testimony. While Uribe has admitted to sending lawyers to meet with former members of Colombia's paramilitaries, he has denied taking illegal actions. Two paramilitaries have testified that Uribe's lawyer Diego Cadena, who also faces criminal charges, offered them money to give favourable evidence. Their witness statements were also being used in a murder trial featuring Uribe's brother, Santiago Uribe. Uribe's conviction was announced after a 10-hour hearing in which Judge Heredia said there was ample evidence that the ex-president sought to change witness testimony. But that decision has sparked backlash from the United States, where the administration of President Donald Trump has shown willingness to place political pressure on countries like Brazil that pursue criminal cases against former right-wing leaders. On Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on social media in defence of Uribe, repeating charges of judicial bias that have become commonplace under Trump. 'Former Colombian President Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland,' Rubio said. 'The weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent.' But Democrats in the US accused Trump of seeking to subvert the rule of law overseas for political gains. 'The Trump Admin is saying that foreign leaders shouldn't be subject to rule of law if they say nice things about Trump,' Representative Jim McGovern wrote in reply to Rubio's message. 'It is very wrong to support impunity for a strongman held accountable by courts in his own country. This statement is shameful, and you know it.'
