logo
How Tesla's brand loyalty suffered during Musk's alliance with Trump

How Tesla's brand loyalty suffered during Musk's alliance with Trump

Fast Company4 hours ago
Tesla for years had more repeat U.S. customers than any other major automotive brand but its loyalty has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility shared exclusively with Reuters.
The data, which has not been previously reported, shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73% of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, according to an S&P analysis of vehicle-registration data in all 50 states.
That industry-leading brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, that data showed, when Musk endorsed Trump following an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania on the Republican nominee.
The rate bottomed out at 49.9% last March, just below the industry average, after Musk launched Trump's budget-slashing Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government workers.
Tesla's U.S. loyalty rate has since ticked back up to 57.4% in May, the most recent month the S&P data is available, putting it back above the industry average and about the same as Toyota but behind Chevrolet and Ford.
S&P analyst Tom Libby called it 'unprecedented' to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels. 'I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time,' he said.
Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment.
On Monday, Tesla granted Musk 96 million shares worth about $29 billion, a move aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm as he fights a court ruling that voided his original pay deal for being unfair to shareholders.
The timing of Tesla's plunging brand loyalty suggests the CEO's involvement in politics turned off customers in the EV pioneer's eco-conscious customer base, some analysts said. 'If they have Democratic leanings, then perhaps they consider other brands in addition to Tesla,' said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar.
Tesla's aging model lineup also faces stiffer competition from an array of EVs from legacy automakers including General Motors, Hyundai and BMW. The only new model Tesla has released since 2020, its triangular Cybertruck, has proved a flop despite Musk's prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual sales.
On an April earnings call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja singled out 'the negative impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and people,' but also said there were 'several weeks of lost production' when the company retooled factories to produce a refreshed version of its top-selling Model Y.
Musk on the April call said that 'absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand.'
Tesla vehicle sales overall are falling globally and have declined 8% in the United States the first five months of 2025, according to S&P. Sales fell 33% over the first six months of the year in Europe, where public backlash to Musk's politicking has been particularly fierce.
Musk's increased political activism was 'very bad timing' for Tesla, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst who tracks the EV maker at CFRA Research, because it came exactly as the company faced heightened competition from Chinese EV makers and other traditional automakers. He said his top concerns for Tesla are its loss of market share and 'what can be done to repair the brand damage.'
LOYALTY NOSEDIVE
Tesla remains the U.S. electric-vehicle sales leader but has seen its dominance erode as Musk last year delved into politics and focused Tesla more on developing self-driving technology than on new affordable models for human drivers.
Customer loyalty is a closely watched auto-industry metric because it is 'much more expensive' to take new customers from competitors than to retain existing ones, said S&P's Libby.
S&P offers some of the most detailed industry data on automotive purchases because it analyzes vehicle registration data from all 50 states on a household-by-household basis. Unlike survey data, it follows actual vehicle transactions to track how consumers migrate among brands and models.
From the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of last year, more than 60% of Tesla-owning households bought another one for their next car purchase, the data show. Only one other brand – Ford – posted a quarterly loyalty rate exceeding 60% during the period, and only once.
CUSTOMER DEFECTIONS
S&P's data also examines another aspect of the automotive market: Which brands and models are taking customers away from others, and which ones are losing them?
Until recently, Tesla was in a different stratosphere than other automotive brands on this metric. For the four years prior to July 2024, Tesla, on average, acquired nearly five new households for every one it lost to another brand.
No other brand from a major automaker was even close: Hyundai's luxury Genesis brand was the next best, acquiring on average 2.8 households for every one it lost, followed by Kia and Hyundai, which acquired on average 1.5 and 1.4 households, respectively, for every one they lost. Ford, Toyota and Honda lost more households on average than they gained during that period.
Tesla's average inflow of customers started to decline in July 2024 along with its loyalty rate. Since February, Tesla has been gaining fewer than two households for every one it loses to the rest of the industry, its lowest level ever, according to the data.
'The data shows clearly that the net migration to Tesla is slowing,' Libby said.
Brands that now attract more Tesla customers than they lose to Tesla include Rivian, Polestar, Porsche and Cadillac, the data show.
Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Tesla investor Zacks Investment Management, said he isn't concerned about Tesla's long-term earnings because he expects enormous profits from its plans to operate robotaxis and license self-driving technology to other automakers.
Tesla launched a small test of robotaxis in Austin in June, giving rides to hand-picked fans and Internet personalities but the service isn't available to the general public. If Tesla succeeds in expanding the technology, Mulberry said, 'there's a case to be made that Tesla doesn't need to sell cars and trucks anymore.'​
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch These Novo Nordisk Stock Price Levels After Last Week's 33% Drop
Watch These Novo Nordisk Stock Price Levels After Last Week's 33% Drop

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Watch These Novo Nordisk Stock Price Levels After Last Week's 33% Drop

Key Takeaways Novo Nordisk's U.S.-listed shares were slightly higher in recent trading after shedding a third of their value last week, when the company cut its full-year outlook and named a new CEO. The shares had resumed their steep downtrend last week on above-average volume, indicating selling conviction from larger market participants. Investors should watch major support levels on Novo Nordisk's chart around $36 and $29, while also monitoring key overhead areas near $60 and $ Nordisk's (NVO) U.S.-listed shares were up about 2% in recent trading after shedding about a third of their value last week, when the company cut its full-year outlook and named a new CEO, leading Wall Street analysts to downgrade the stock. Since hitting a record high in June last year, Novo Nordisk shares have lost roughly two-thirds of their value, pressured by increasing competition from rival Eli Lilly's (LLY) weight-loss drugs and challenges during trials of the company's next-generation obesity drugs. Below, we take a closer look at Novo Nordisk's weekly chart and use technical analysis to identify major price levels that investors will likely be watching after last week's dramatic sell-off. An Extended Downtrend With last week's drop, Novo Nordisk shares resumed their steep downtrend on above-average trading volume, indicating selling conviction from larger market participants. The sell-off coincided with the relative strength index (RSI) falling to its lowest levels since early May, signaling weakening price momentum, though the indicator neared its oversold threshold, increasing the chances for short-term bounces. It's also worth noting that the 50-week moving average continues to converge toward the 200-week MA, potentially setting the stage for an ominous death cross, a bearish pattern that forecasts lower prices. Let's identify two major support levels on Novo Nordisk's chart worth watching if selling resumes this week and also point out several key overhead areas to monitor during potential recovery efforts. Major Support Levels Worth Watching The first major lower level to watch sits around $36. This area would likely provide support near the upper range of a consolidation period that formed on the chart between October 2020 and April 2021. A more significant move lower could see the shares test lower support at the $29 level. Investors may look for buying opportunities in this area near a horizontal line that connects a range of corresponding price action on the chart between January 2018 and April 2020. Key Overhead Areas to Monitor An initial recovery effort could see the shares climb to overhead resistance around $60. The price may encounter selling pressure in this area near the prominent April trough and April 2022 peak. A more bullish upswing opens the door for a rally toward $78. Investors who have bought Novo Nordisk shares at lower levels may decide to lock in profits in this location near the June peak, which closely aligns with the completion of a pullback in July 2023. The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our warranty and liability disclaimer for more info. As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio

NCAA Tournament fields to remain at 68 teams in 2026, but future growth is possible
NCAA Tournament fields to remain at 68 teams in 2026, but future growth is possible

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NCAA Tournament fields to remain at 68 teams in 2026, but future growth is possible

The NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments will not expand beyond 68 teams in 2026, but future growth remains on the radar. 'Expanding the tournament fields is no longer being contemplated for the 2026 men's and women's basketball championships," Dan Gavitt, NCAA senior vice president of basketball, said in a statement on Monday. "However, the committees will continue conversations on whether to recommend expanding to 72 or 76 teams in advance of the 2027 championships.' NCAA President Charlie Baker has said adding teams could add value to the tournament, and he said the NCAA already has had 'good conversations' with TV partners CBS and Warner Bros., whose deal runs through 2032 at the cost of around $1.1 billion a year. ___ AP college basketball: and

RGTI: Rigetti Shares Jump after Needham hikes target on U.S. quantum momentum
RGTI: Rigetti Shares Jump after Needham hikes target on U.S. quantum momentum

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RGTI: Rigetti Shares Jump after Needham hikes target on U.S. quantum momentum

Aug 4 - Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) jumped more than 5% on Monday shortly after Needham raised its price target by $3, signaling fresh momentum in quantum computing. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with RGTI. Analyst Quinn Bolton sees growing buzz around federal programs like DARPA's Quantum Benchmark Initiative (QBI) and the proposed Department of Energy Quantum Leadership Act. He believes those efforts could unlock new research funding and commercial opportunities. Rigetti leads a pack of startups racing to prove quantum machines can outperform classical systems. QBI aims to assess whether quantum devices deliver more value than their cost by 2033. Meanwhile, the DOE bill would allocate $2.5 billion over five years to boost quantum research. Investors weigh the promise of those programs against current realities: most quantum firms still run R&D losses and generate modest revenue. Bolton urges a cautious stance, recommending smaller, speculative positions. Yet his buy rating on Rigetti reflects confidence that government backing could pave the way for breakthroughs and higher stock gains. With Washington pulling out all the stops to keep the U.S. on the leading edge of high-tech, Rigetti advocacy demonstrates the crossroad of policy and private money. This is the place to keep an eye on future legislative actions and DARPA milestones to get new startup catalysts. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store