Conor McGregor appeal: MMA star and witness couple could face prosecution after evidence withdrawal - as issue is referred to prosecutors
Last year, a 12-person jury in Dublin found the MMA star guilty of sexually assaulting Nikita Hand in a civil case after McGregor had been accused of raping her at a Dublin hotel in December 2018.
The Irishman, 36, was subsequently ordered to pay Ms Hand more than €248,000 (£206,000) in damages and an estimated €1.3million (£1.12m) in legal costs.
McGregor, who has always denied the claims, appealed against the decision and Ireland's Court of Appeal has been hearing evidence over the past two days, with a verdict expected to be reached at a later date.
His grounds for appeal included claims that Judge Alexander Owens erred in directing the jury be asked to answer whether Mr McGregor 'assaulted' Ms Hand, rather than whether he had 'sexually assaulted' her.
He believed this left the verdict open to interpretation. His barrister, Remy Farrell, said McGregor was also challenging how the judge allowed Ms Hand's lawyers to ask McGregor about dozens of 'no comment' responses he gave gardaí in 2019 interviews, after he was arrested following the initial rape complaint.
McGregor was also seeking to introduce new evidence, which included allegations that Ms Hand was beaten by her then-partner on the evening she claimed she had been raped by the fighter.
McGregor said new evidence had come from Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins, who lived across the street from Ms Hand and her then-partner Stephen Redmond at the time.
He said Ms O'Reilly had now alleged she saw a 'heated row' from her upstairs window on the night of December 9, 2018. He said she alleged Ms Hand was punched and kicked by Mr Redmond on the ground.
Meanwhile, Mr Cummins claimed he did not see what had happened, but that in the night he was woken by screams and shouts from Ms Hand's house.
McGregor's legal team has suggested this explained the serious bruising on Ms Hand's body when she was taken by ambulance to hospital.
McGregor has always denied causing the bruising, which was a significant feature of the civil trial, but could not offer a plausible alternative explanation.
However, this new evidence was dramatically withdrawn at the beginning of the appeal on Tuesday, despite the couple having previously revealed their evidence in a sworn affidavit.
Ms Hand has previously debunked the claims, labelling them 'lies' and was prepared to be cross-examined about the matter.
Her lawyer also hit out at McGregor in regards to the evidence that was dropped and claimed his client was due an apology for being 'put through the wringer'.
He then alleged on Wednesday that the proposed evidence, which had been picked up and circulated in various media reports, had only been done to undermine Ms Hand's reputation.
As a result, he suggested that 'perjury' may have occurred and the three judges subsequently agreed to his request to refer documentation to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
The DPP is the head of the prosecuting authority in several jurisdictions and one of their key roles is to oversee the conduct of criminal proceedings.
They will now investigate and examine whether 'perjury' has taken place and anyone found guilty of that could be criminally prosecuted.
However, McGregor's legal team claimed the withdrawal came because there would be no way to correlate the evidence and also that other supporting material they would be keen to introduce wouldn't be admissible.
Despite the explanation, judges were left confused and attempted to gain further clarity over the decision.
One claimed they didn't understand why it had been withdrawn and another admitted they had been left 'bemused'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie shock jock turns on his bosses and sues radio network after 'royal prank' call to a UK hospital led to nurse's suicide
A 'shock jock' who made a prank call to a UK hospital caring for Princess Catherine claims he was not supported by his employer in the fall-out of a nurse's death by suicide. Mike Christian and Mel Greig were presenting on 2Day FM on December 4, 2012 when they made the phone call to the King Edward VII Hospital in London. The then-Duchess of Cambridge had been admitted to the hospital for severe morning sickness ahead of her first child's birth. Christian alleges he was ordered by 2Day FM's production team to make a prank call to the hospital and impersonate Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth to try to gain access to the duchess. Nurse Jacintha Saldanha died by suicide days after the prank call, leading to widespread backlash against the radio hosts and broadcaster. Almost 13 years later, Christian has sued 2Day FM's broadcaster Southern Cross Austereo in the Federal Court, claiming the firm promised to provide support if the content put out by its 'shock jocks' ever went too far. The former radio host - who was made redundant in February - says he believed these claims, but was let down by the organisation. The broadcaster did not 'step in' but rather let its radio presenters take the blame, negatively impacting their careers, court documents seen by AAP allege. Christian and Greig called out Southern Cross Austereo and tried to prevent the company from crossing the line, but were left in the cold after the suicide, the documents say. 'SCA did not immediately take public accountability for the incident, but rather allowed Mr Christian and Ms Greig to be left exposed to relentless public vitriol, harassment and abuse, including death threats,' his lawyers wrote. 'The radio presenters were left by SCA as the convenient fall guys and scapegoats for SCA management decisions and non-compliance.' Greig made a tearful apology to Ms Saldanha's family at an inquest into the nurse's death in 2014, placing the blame on the radio station and commercial radio culture. Rhys Holleran, SCA's chief executive at the time of the incident, told the ABC in 2024 he suffers anxiety about it. 'I have always felt completely and utterly responsible for this,' he said. Christian says he started as a 2Day FM presenter just two days before the prank call, which he alleges breached the Australian Communications and Media Authority code of practice. He claims he was told in early 2013 the broadcaster would help restore his reputation and rebuild his career. He remained working for 2Day FM and did not pursue legal proceedings against them because of this promise, court documents say. However, the firm failed to provide meaningful health support, did not start a public relations campaign to rebuild his brand, and failed to offer meaningful opportunities or pay rises to reward his loyalty, he alleges. Instead, he claims he was 'gradually marginalised' within the organisation. Christian did not sign a release preventing him from speaking publicly about his time at the broadcaster, instead retaining lawyers after learning of his impending redundancy in February. 'Mr Christian claims that the redundancy was not genuine, particularly in circumstances where SCA still requires Mr Christian's former role to be performed,' court documents allege. Christian is seeking penalties, compensation for economic loss and damages. The matter is yet to appear before the Federal Court.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Judge recommends that case against Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan proceed
A federal magistrate judge recommended Monday that the case proceed against a Wisconsin judge who was indicted on allegations that she helped a man who is in the country illegally evade U.S. immigration agents seeking to arrest him in her courthouse. Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested in April and indicted on federal charges in May. She pleaded not guilty. The case highlighted a clash between President Donald Trump's administration and local authorities over the Republican's sweeping immigration crackdown. Democrats have accused the Trump administration of trying to make a national example of Dugan to chill judicial opposition. Dugan filed a motion in May to dismiss the charges against her, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. She argued that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on Monday recommended against dropping the charges. The ultimate decision is up to U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, who can accept the other judge's recommendation or reject it. 'We are disappointed in the magistrate judge's non-binding recommendation, and we will appeal it," Dugan attorney Steven Biskupic, a former federal prosecutor, said in a statement. "This is only one step in what we expect will be a long journey to preserve the independence and integrity of our courts.' Joseph wrote in her recommendation that while judges have immunity from civil lawsuits seeking monetary damages when engaging in judicial acts, that does not apply to criminal charges like those in this case. Joseph also rejected Dugan's other arguments in favor of dismissal. 'It is important to note that nothing said here speaks to the merits of the allegations against Dugan,' the judge said in the recommendation. 'Dugan is presumed innocent, and innocent she remains, unless and until the government proves the allegations against her beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury at trial.' No trial date has been set. Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country without permanent legal status. Agents arrested Ruiz outside of the courthouse after a brief foot chase. Dugan could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts. Her case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge, who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Incredible moment hero caretaker saves babies from burning tower - while balancing on narrow ledge
A hero caretaker helped save two babies from the sixth floor of a burning apartment block in Paris. Fousseynou Cissé, 39, said he 'didn't think twice' about the danger as he stood on a ledge outside the building's window to help those inside. Footage shows him standing next to the window filled with black smoke, signaling to those inside to pass their children to him. He first helps a five-month old baby and hands him the infant to a man in the the next building before doing the same with a one-year-old. The school caretaker also rescued two other children and two adults from the burning building in the north end of the city on Friday . Speaking to Le Parisien, a French newspaper, he said: 'Given the amount of smoke, they and their children could have suffocated. 'Their last hope was to throw themselves out the window otherwise... I didn't ask myself the question. Their lives were in danger. I didn't think twice.' He was lying on the sofa after returning home from work when he smelled the smoke from the nearby building and saw a desperate mother holding her baby out of a window. After telling his wife to evacuate with their two-year-old, he started to help his neighbours. 'I thought I was going to die with my children,' Naomi, one of the rescued mothers, said following the sire. It has been reported by local media that ten residents have been taken to hospital for smoke inhalation Rémi Féraud, a senator, wrote: 'Impressive courage that saved lives. Fousseynou Cissé is a hero who deserves our admiration and the recognition of Paris.' French MEP Matthieu Valet wrote: 'Facing death, armed only with his bravery, he saved Naomie, her two children, a neighbor's five-month-old baby, and her other one-and-a-half-year-old child.
