
How redistricting in Texas and other states could change US House elections
Other states are waiting to see what Texas does and whether to follow suit.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The rules of redistricting can be vague and variable; each state has its own set of rules and procedures. Politicians are gauging what voters will tolerate when it comes to politically motivated mapmaking.
Here's what to know about the rules of congressional redistricting:
When does redistricting normally happen?
Every decade, the Census Bureau collects population data used to divide the 435 House seats among the 50 states based on the updated head count.
It's a process known as reapportionment. States that grew relative to others might gain a seat at the expense of those whose populations stagnated or declined.
States use their own procedures to draw lines for the assigned number of districts. The smallest states receive just one representative, which means the entire state is a single congressional district.
Advertisement
Some state constitutions require independent commissions to devise the political boundaries or to advise the legislature. When legislatures take the lead, lawmakers can risk drawing lines that end up challenged in court, usually for violating the Voting Rights Act. Mapmakers can get another chance to resubmit new maps. Sometimes, judges draw the maps on their own.
California Governor Gavin Newsom in Sacramento after meeting with Texas lawmakers to push back on that state's redistricting maneuver that aims to tilt the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections.
Justin Sullivan/Getty
Is midcycle redistricting allowed?
By the first midterm elections after the latest population count, each state is ready with its maps, but those districts do not always stick. Courts can find that the political lines are unconstitutional.
There is no national impediment to a state trying to redraw districts in the middle of the decade and to do it for political reasons, such as increasing representation by the party in power.
'The laws about redistricting just say you have to redistrict after every census,' Spencer said. 'And then some state legislatures got a little clever and said, well it doesn't say we can't do it more.'
Some states do have laws that would prevent midcycle redistricting or make it difficult to do so in a way that benefits one party.
Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has threatened to retaliate against the GOP push in Texas by drawing more favorable Democratic seats in his state. That goal, however, is complicated by a constitutional amendment that requires an independent commission to lead the process.
Is Texas' effort unprecedented?
Texas has done it before.
When the Legislature failed to agree on a redistricting plan after the 2000 census, a federal court stepped in with its own map.
Republican Tom DeLay of Texas, who was then the U.S. House majority leader, thought his state should have five more districts friendly to his party. 'I'm the majority leader and we want more seats,′′ he said at the time.
Advertisement
Statehouse Democrats protested by fleeing to Oklahoma, depriving the Legislature of enough votes to officially conduct any business. But DeLay eventually got his way, and Republicans replaced Democrats in five seats in 2004.
What do the courts say about gerrymandering?
In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not get involved in debates over political gerrymandering, the practice of drawing districts for partisan gain. In that decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said redistricting is " highly partisan by any measure. "
But courts may demand new maps if they believe the congressional boundaries dilute the votes of a racial minority group, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
Could other states follow suit?
Washington Rep. Suzan DelBene, who leads House Democrats' campaign arm, indicated at a Christian Science Monitor event that if Texas follows through on passing new maps, Democratic-led states would look at their own political lines.
'If they go down this path, absolutely folks are going to respond across the country,' DelBene said. 'We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine voices of the American people.'
In New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul recently joined Newsom in expressing openness to taking up mid-decade redistricting. But state laws mandating independent commissions or blunting the ability to gerrymander would come into play.
Among Republican-led states, Ohio could try to further expand the 10-5 edge that the GOP holds in the House delegation; a quirk in state law requires Ohio to redraw its maps before the 2026 midterms.
Advertisement
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he was considering early redistricting and 'working through what that would look like.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
12 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Unhinged Reposting Spree On Truth Social
President Donald Trump hit the reshare button hard on his Truth Social platform Wednesday, flooding his profile with wild and weird posts and memes that slammed his political enemies. Among them was an image depicting former President Barack Obama, his 2016 Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, and other foes behind prison bars. One post declared, ' It's time to indict Obama the traitor. ' Another labeled former President Joe Biden's time in office ' the biggest scam in U.S. history! ' @IStandWithTrump47 / Via Trump has, in particular, ramped up his attacks on Obama in recent weeks, falsely accusing his predecessor of orchestrating a 'deep state' plot to sabotage his presidency. Earlier this month, Trump shared an AI-generated video that depicted Obama being arrested in the Oval Office and hauled off to prison. The president's latest meme spree comes amid rising anger from his MAGA base over his administration's refusal to release documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — who was once a close friend of Trump.

Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Reset, not amnesty: A Florida lawmaker's immigration proposal
We have all heard the shouting: amnesty versus deportation. But I think Floridians and Americans are tired of the noise. They want something practical. Something just. A solution that does not punish the good or reward the worst. Here is the proposal I believe Congress should consider adopting. As a Republican state legislator in Florida representing Miami Beach, I see the real-life impact of federal inaction. Our border agents and immigration officers work tirelessly to protect the nation. They deserve a clear, enforceable policy that distinguishes between law-abiding individuals and bad actors. Unfortunately, Congress has yet to deliver the comprehensive solution Americans deserve. It is time for a one-time national reset. Here's how it would work: Every individual who entered this country unlawfully would be given 30 days to voluntarily come forward, plead guilty and agree to strict conditions. If they qualify and comply, they could avoid jail, fines or deportation. This is not amnesty. It is earned redemption. They must learn English, remain crime-free, maintain lawful employment and complete a probation period equal to the time they were undocumented. Employers would be required to register and report, ensuring labor clarity and legal protections across the board. Those who have built stable lives, contributed to their communities and followed the law in every other way should have a lawful, accountable path forward. I mean legal status with strict conditions, not automatic citizenship. Anyone who wants citizenship should go through the regular process. This is about restoring order and giving people a chance to do things right. This proposal is not about blanket citizenship. Of course, those involved in trafficking, fraud or repeat violations would face swift removal. And oversight should not grow government. We can partner with vetted nonprofits, legal clinics and employers to implement this program without building another bloated federal agency. Mixed-status families deserve stability. No U.S. citizen child should live in fear of losing a parent when a lawful alternative exists. And those who waited in line and followed the rules? They should go to the front. Doing it right should still matter. After the 30-day registration period, there would be a final 72-hour public warning. Then full enforcement begins. Those who refuse to comply or violate the terms should be treated as national security concerns and pursued accordingly. I am urging Congress to consider this plan. It is clear, constitutional and compassionate without being soft. It honors the hard work of law enforcement, restores order and closes loopholes without rewarding abuse. Other leaders have offered similar frameworks, including Miami Republican Congresswoman María Elvira Salazar's Dignity Act. I have shared my proposal with her as part of this broader push for serious, solutions-based immigration reform. We may differ in some details, but the goal is the same: a secure, orderly and humane system that upholds the law without abandoning compassion. As a state leader, I support aligning our laws with strong federal enforcement and will work with my colleagues to pass supportive state-level measures. This is not about fear. It is about fairness. I do not want working families living in the shadows. I do not want our nation's values undermined. And I do not want to see another generation trapped in a system that punishes honesty and rewards manipulation. I understand why people flee broken countries. But America cannot fix the world by absorbing its failures. We can, however, invest in rebuilding institutions abroad, fighting corruption and restoring opportunity so fewer people feel forced to leave home in the first place. Let's rise above the extremes. Let's demand that Congress finally do its job. This is just my opinion. But I believe it is a starting point worth serious discussion. Fabián Basabe is a Republican state representative from Miami Beach. He was first elected in 2022.


The Intercept
12 minutes ago
- The Intercept
U.S. Security Contractors in Gaza Risk War Crimes Charges, Democrats Say
Security firms employing U.S. military veterans for a controversial food distribution operation in Gaza have exposed them to the risk of criminal charges under U.S. laws against war crimes, torture, and forced deportation, four Democrats in Congress said Thursday. In a letter to the two firms' CEOs, Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and three other lawmakers said they were 'horrified' by reporting about the companies' 'deadly' security operations on behalf of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. 'We are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel — or investors — of the immense legal risks they face.' The members of Congress say that news reports and firsthand witnesses indicated employees for Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions were 'sent to Gaza armed for combat' and directed by Israeli officials to use lethal force. 'As a result, we are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel — or investors — of the immense legal risks they face for conducting what amounts to military operations on behalf of the Israeli government on land outside of the State of Israel,' the lawmakers say. They asked the companies to answer a series of questions about whether they had warned staffers about their legal risks, including from international courts, and to preserve documents related to their interactions with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The letter represents the latest ratcheting up of congressional pressure — so far all from Democrats — on the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and the contractors supporting its operations in the Middle East. Founded only in February, the foundation became the main conduit for U.S.- and Israeli-backed aid into Gaza after Israel lifted a total blockade at the end of May. The foundation's decision to employ armed contractors at its sites, and its close cooperation with Israel, have drawn widespread condemnation from other aid groups who say they violate core humanitarian principles. Some of the security contractors supporting its operations are former U.S. service members, including Special Operations veterans. Welch was joined by Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Democratic U.S. Reps. Joaquin Castro of Texas and Sara Jacobs of California. Castro and Jacobs's districts in San Antonio and San Diego, respectively, are home to large populations of U.S. military veterans. Hundreds of people have died trying to access aid at the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's distribution points, according to the United Nations, many of them under Israeli fire. Read our complete coverage The foundation's chair has brushed off reports of chaos and violence at its distribution sites as 'Hamas disinformation' and boasted about its success. Dozens of Senate Democrats in a letter earlier this week said the foundation had failed to address the growing crisis in Gaza and called on President Donald Trump's administration to expand aid through other nonprofits.