Important May 13 Deadline in enCore Energy (EU) Investor Lawsuit, Alleging Financial Misstatements and Internal Control Failures- Hagens Berman
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--enCore Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: EU), a company focused on the exploration and development of uranium resources, is facing a class-action lawsuit that accuses its leadership of misleading investors and failing to disclose serious financial vulnerabilities. The deadline for investors to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is May 13, 2025.
Hagens Berman urges enCore Energy investors who suffered substantial losses to submit your losses now.
enCore Energy Corp. (EU) Securities Class Action:
The case, formally known as Zhongjian v. enCore Energy Corp. (No. 25-cv-01234, S.D. Tex.), was brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired enCore securities between March 28, 2024, and March 2, 2025. The complaint centers on allegations that enCore and several of its executives violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making false or incomplete statements about the company's financial health.
According to the complaint, enCore is accused of lacking robust internal controls over its financial reporting. The lawsuit further contends that the company was unable to capitalize certain exploration and development expenses under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), a move that would have been permitted under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These accounting issues, the complaint asserts, contributed to a dramatic escalation in net losses.
On March 3, 2025, enCore released its fiscal 2024 results, reporting a net loss of $61.3 million-more than double the $25.6 million loss recorded in the previous year. In its public disclosures, the company attributed the widening losses to its inability to capitalize certain costs under GAAP, which would have been allowed under IFRS. Additionally, enCore acknowledged that it had identified a 'material weakness' in its internal controls over financial reporting, citing shortcomings in risk assessment, information flow, and monitoring.
These financial disclosures coincided with a sudden change in leadership. On March 2, 2025, enCore announced that Paul Goranson had resigned as chief executive and as a member of the board. Robert Willette, previously the company's Chief Legal Officer, was named Acting CEO by the board.
The fallout from these revelations was immediate and severe. enCore's share price plunged more than 46% following the announcements, erasing significant value for investors. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for those who suffered losses during the class period, alleging that shareholders were misled about the true state of the company's finances.
Hagens Berman's Investigation:
Acclaimed class action law firm Hagens Berman has launched an investigation into the alleged claims.
'The case highlights the risks investors face when companies allegedly fail to maintain rigorous internal controls and transparent financial reporting. Investors rely on accurate information to make informed decisions,' said Reed Kathrein, the partner leading the firm's investigation. 'When companies fall short, the consequences can be swift and severe.'
If you invested in enCore and have substantial losses, or have knowledge that may assist the firm's investigation, submit your losses now »
If you'd like more information and answers to frequently asked questions about the enCore case and our investigation, read more »
Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding enCore should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 844-916-0895 or email EU@hbsslaw.com.
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation firm focusing on corporate accountability. The firm is home to a robust practice and represents investors as well as whistleblowers, workers, consumers and others in cases achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and other wrongdoings. Hagens Berman's team has secured more than $2.9 billion in this area of law. More about the firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
LCI Industries to Participate in Upcoming CJS Securities Conference
ELKHART, Ind.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--LCI Industries (NYSE: LCII), a leading supplier of engineered components to the recreation and transportation markets, will participate in the CJS Securities 25th Annual Summer Conference on July 10, 2025. Jason Lippert, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lillian Etzkorn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will hold a presentation as well as engage in one-on-one meetings with institutional investors and analysts. Please contact CJS Securities for attendance information and additional details. About LCI Industries LCI Industries (NYSE: LCII), through its Lippert subsidiary, is a global leader in supplying engineered components to the outdoor recreation and transportation markets. We believe our innovative culture, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and dedication to enhancing the customer experience have established Lippert as a reliable partner for both OEM and aftermarket customers. For more information, visit Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains certain "forward-looking statements" with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, profitability, margin growth, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive position, growth opportunities, acquisitions, plans and objectives of management, markets for the Company's common stock, the impact of legal proceedings, and other matters. Statements in this press release that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to production levels, future business prospects, net sales, expenses and income (loss), capital expenditures, tax rate, cash flow, financial condition, liquidity, covenant compliance, retail and wholesale demand, integration of acquisitions, R&D investments, commodity prices, addressable markets, and industry trends, whenever they occur in this press release are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of the Company's senior management at the time such statements were made. There are a number of factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control, which could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, in addition to other matters described in this press release, the impacts of future pandemics, geopolitical tensions, armed conflicts, or natural disasters on the global economy and on the Company's customers, suppliers, employees, business and cash flows, pricing pressures due to domestic and foreign competition, costs and availability of, and tariffs on, raw materials (particularly steel and aluminum) and other components, seasonality and cyclicality in the industries to which we sell our products, availability of credit for financing the retail and wholesale purchase of products for which we sell our components, inventory levels of retail dealers and manufacturers, availability of transportation for products for which we sell our components, the financial condition of our customers, the financial condition of retail dealers of products for which we sell our components, retention and concentration of significant customers, the costs, pace of and successful integration of acquisitions and other growth initiatives, availability and costs of production facilities and labor, team member benefits, team member retention, realization and impact of expansion plans, efficiency improvements and cost reductions, the disruption of business resulting from natural disasters or other unforeseen events, the successful entry into new markets, the costs of compliance with environmental laws, laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, other operational and financial risks related to conducting business internationally, and increased governmental regulation and oversight, information technology performance and security, the ability to protect intellectual property, warranty and product liability claims or product recalls, interest rates, oil and gasoline prices, and availability, the impact of international, national and regional economic conditions and consumer confidence on the retail sale of products for which we sell our components, and other risks and uncertainties discussed more fully under the caption "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and in the Company's subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers of this press release are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, since there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. The Company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made, except as required by law.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
EQT settles class action lawsuit for $167.5m over merger claims
American energy company EQT has agreed to pay $167.5m to settle a class action lawsuit filed by investors who alleged that the company overstated the benefits of its $6.7bn merger with Rice Energy in 2017. This settlement was disclosed in a federal court filing on 31 October 2023, reported Reuters. The plaintiffs in this case include the Government of Guam Retirement Fund, Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Annuity Fund, Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Pension Fund, and Cambridge Retirement System. The focus of the lawsuit was on claims that EQT misrepresented the advantages of the merger, which aimed to position the company as the largest natural gas producer in the US. The merger was a significant move for EQT as it sought to expand its gas business, making it the largest deal in the company's history. According to the plaintiffs: 'The recovery - $167.5min cash - is notable as it is (by far) the largest securities class action recovery ever in the history of this District and the 14th largest in the history of the Third Circuit.' The district in question is the US District Court Western District of Pennsylvania, while the Third Circuit refers to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The settlement was reached after nearly six years of litigation and three mediation sessions. The plaintiffs noted: 'The settlement provides a favourable result for class members because it allows for an immediate recovery and removes the considerable possibility that class members could recover significantly less or even nothing.' The case is officially titled "In Re EQT Corporation Securities Litigation" and was filed in June 2019, as per the federal court website. EQT officials were unavailable for comment. In April 2025, EQT entered an agreement to purchase the upstream and midstream assets of Olympus Energy for $1.8bn. This acquisition, which encompasses approximately 90,000 net acres and a production rate of 500 million cubic feet per day, is anticipated to substantially expand EQT's presence in south-west Pennsylvania. "EQT settles class action lawsuit for $167.5m over merger claims" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
UK Releases Draft Sustainability Reporting Standards, Seeks Input
Long exposure photo from Big Ben in sunrise getty On June 25, the United Kingdom's Department for Business and Trade released a draft of sustainability reporting standards for the UK. The proposal implements guidelines on climate-related risk and greenhouse gas emissions reporting, at a time when other jurisdictions are considering reducing requirements. The consultation period is open until September 17, with the final requirements set to be published by December. The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation, the organization that drafts financial reporting standards used in 168 jurisdictions, began drafting sustainability reporting standards in 2021, through the International Sustainability Standards Board. The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards were released in June 2023. National regulatory agencies were then tasked with amending the standards to comply with national laws. The IFRS Sustainability Standards are divided into two reporting tiers. IFRS S1 establishes sustainability disclosure requirements, while IFRS S2 sets out specific climate-related disclosures to be used along with IFRS S1. Both focus on a company's governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and target, as they relate to either sustainability or climate. The UK initially required sustainability reporting in 2022. Following the release of the IFRS Sustainability Standards, in May 2024, the Department of Business & Trade began the process of converting the standards to work with national law. On June 25, the Department released the 'exposure draft of UK Sustainability Reporting Standards: UK SRS S1 and UK SRS S2." The draft states, 'making the transition to an economy that is climate resilient and sustainable is essential for long-term economic growth. One of the 5 missions of this government is to make the UK a clean energy superpower – delivering clean power by 2030 and accelerating to net zero. This will support growth through the creation of hundreds of thousands of good jobs across the UK and protect our economy from the future price shocks that reliance on fossil fuels creates, while delivering a range of social and health benefits.' The UK is using a phased approach to adopt sustainability reporting requirements, starting with the proposed draft. The second 'focuses on providers of assurance over sustainability- related financial disclosures following the conclusion of the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) recent market study on this theme.' The third 'published by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero – seeks views on the government's manifesto commitment on the theme of transition planning.' The Department of Business & Trade's draft includes six proposed amendments to the ISSB Standards. Amendments 1 - 4 were proposed by UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee, known as TAC in the document. Amendments 5 & 6 were proposed by the UK Sustainability Disclosure Policy and Implementation Committee, known as PIC in the document. The amendments are as follows. Amendment 1 - IFRS S1 included 'transition relief' that allowed companies to delay sustainability reporting during the first year. While the reporting would still take place, it would not be in alignment with the existing financial reporting requirements. The proposal removes that relief. 'The TAC concluded that allowing entities to disclose sustainability-related information at a later time compromises the principle of 'connectivity' with the financial statements and other narrative reporting.' Amendment 2 - In addition to transition relief, IFRS S1 also allowed companies to only report climate-related risks the first year, delaying the broader sustainability reporting until the second year in a 'climate-first' approach. The draft proposal extends that relief to the first two years. In practice, for year 1 companies will be required to report 'climate-related risks and opportunities except Scope 3 emissions.' In year 2, 'all climate-related risks and opportunities including Scope 3 emissions.' In year 3, 'climate-related risks and opportunities, Scope 3 emissions, and wider sustainability-related risks and opportunities.' Amendment 3 - IFRS S2 requires companies to use the Global Industry Classification Standard when reporting 'financed emissions.' There are GHG emissions attributed to 'loans an investments made by an entity.' The proposal allows flexibility in the usage of GICS, changing the language to give companies the option to use the standard of choice. 'The TAC recommended that entities should be able to use any appropriate classification standard – which could be GICS or an alternative standard that they use within existing reporting practices. The use of an existing classification could allow for increased connectivity with existing reporting. A requirement to use GICS, if not already used, could also impose an unnecessary additional cost.' Amendment 4 - The ISSB Standards were effective January 1, 2024. However, the UK did not implement them by that timeline. As a result, the draft removes the effective date, allowing for voluntary usage until required by law or regulation. Amendment 5 - The ISSB Standards require companies to use industry-specific standards for the 'disclosures of financially-material sustainability information' as provided by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. However, the SASB was created in 2011 to draft standards for use with reporting to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result, the choice of language is specific to the SEC. The ISSB is updating those standards, with an anticipated release in July, but for now, the draft takes issue with the use. Further, the draft states 'the detailed content of the SASB materials had not been through the same level of due process as the ISSB Standards. The PIC also observed that the TAC's stakeholder engagement found mixed feedback on the SASB materials, with many UK organisations supporting voluntary (rather than mandatory) use.' To resolve the issues, the proposal changes the standard from 'shall' to 'may', providing flexibility to companies to use the SASB standards if they feel it is the best option. Amendment 6 - Referring back to the transition releif addressed in Amendments 1 & 2, the PIC wants to clarify that relief is tied to the date standards become mandatory, not when companies begin voluntary reporting. 'The PIC agreed that it wanted to facilitate use of the reliefs for any mandatory reporting while avoiding penalising any early voluntary reporters.' The Department provided 20 consultation questions for interested parties to address via an online form. Responses are due by September 17. The draft states that the new UK Sustainability Reporting Standards will be finalized in autumn 2025. Expect to see the final draft in early December.
