'No Kings' Protests and Downpours Rain on Trump's Birthday Military Parade
The June 14 celebration was designed as both a tribute to the U.S. Army, founded in 1775, and a patriotic birthday spectacle for President Trump, who has long admired large-scale military displays.
Leading up to the event, Trump promoted the parade as a tribute to American victories in war, with preparations including tank deliveries, flight rehearsals, and heavy security infrastructure around the National Mall, CBS reported.
Saturday's festivities are set to feature thousands of troops, vintage and modern military equipment, and aerial flyovers, culminating in a parade down Constitution Avenue. Despite the pomp, storm clouds gathered, bringing downpours that soaked attendees and disrupted schedules.
"We're going to have a great time; we are going to have a great celebration," Trump said earlier this week.
While the event pressed on, a larger story unfolded across the country: "No Kings" rallies sprang up in dozens of cities, organized by labor groups and progressive coalitions to protest what they called Trump's authoritarian leanings.
These protests intentionally bypassed D.C., aiming instead to decentralize resistance and shift focus away from what organizers labeled a "strongman showcase." Democrats blasted the estimated $25–$45 million price tag as wasteful and self-serving, while some Republicans said the military display resembled those of authoritarian regimes.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth called it a "$30 million ego trip," and Sen. Rand Paul said the visuals were reminiscent of Soviet-style shows of force. Trump's warning earlier in the week that protesters would be "met with very big force" only added fuel, with Democratic lawmakers accusing him of using intimidation tactics.
The White House attempted damage control, stating Trump supported peaceful dissent, but the message was muddled.
Originally published on Latin Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
33 minutes ago
- DW
Trump signs 'Big Beautiful Bill' into law – DW – 07/05/2025
The signature policy enacts key parts of Donald Trump's agenda and could cement his second-term legacy. US President Donald Trump signed a sweeping tax and spending bill into law on Friday, a day after Congress narrowly passed it. It makes his 2017 tax cuts permanent, slashes federal spending on federal safety-net programs, and funds a major expansion of border security and defense. "I've never seen people so happy in our country because of that, because so many different groups of people are being taken care of: the military, civilians of all types, jobs of all types," Trump said at the signing ceremony during a Fourth of July picnic at the White House. It passed the House by just four votes, with nearly all Democrats and two Republicans opposing over concerns about health care cuts and a projected $3 trillion (€2.5 trillion) increase to the national debt. After a hard-fought legislative process, Trump achieved his goal of signing the signature policy bill on US Independence Day. "America's winning, winning, winning like never before," Trump said. He thanked the Republican lawmakers who helped pass the bill in Congress, especially House Speaker Mike Johnson who was on hand to witness the signing. The bill, dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," calls for tax breaks and increases in defense spending and immigration enforcement. "So you have the biggest tax cut, the biggest spending cut, the largest border security investment in American history," Trump said. At the same time, it will shrink the federal food assistance program and force through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. According to some estimates, up to 17 million people could lose their insurance coverage under the bill. Analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office also suggests it will add more than $3 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement that Trump's signature on the legislation "sealed the fate of the Republican Party, cementing them as the party for billionaires and special interests — not working families." He predicted the law would cost Republicans votes in next year's congressional elections in 2026. "This legislation will hang around the necks of the GOP for years to come," he said. Democrats are rolling out an ambitious campaign of rallies, voter registration drives, attack ads, bus tours, and even a multiday vigil, aimed at spotlighting the most controversial aspects of the legislation. "This was a full betrayal of the American people," Martin said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Readies New Tariffs While July 4 Costs Surge For Families And Firms
As Americans fire up their grills and gather for fireworks this Independence Day, a new economic flashpoint looms: a fresh wave of tariffs that could take effect in less than a month. With official notifications expected to go out as early as July 5, concerns are mounting over how the rising cost of imports may impact small businesses and everyday consumers. The tariff strategy—announced by former President Donald Trump—is expected to impose levies ranging from 10% to 70% on goods from countries without existing bilateral trade deals. These measures could be implemented by Aug. 1, according to CBS News. The move marks the expiration of a 90-day pause following April's unilateral tariff threats. Fireworks Industry Feels the Fuse Burning For an industry synonymous with July 4, the fireworks business is in a bind. Roughly 95% of consumer fireworks are imported from China, and importers say recent tariff policy changes have created serious disruptions in supply and pricing. "We're seeing costs that have doubled in some categories over the last three years," said Julie Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association, in an interview with CBS News. Retailers are reporting higher costs per container, which have not fully stabilized since earlier tariff rounds that peaked at 145%. As reported by Business Insider, wholesalers like Indiana-based distributor Bob Hamilton said he secured extra inventory early, but warns that "margins are being eaten alive" by unpredictable import costs. The Cookout Crunch: Families Paying More for Fourth of July Basics This year's holiday cookouts are also costing more. According to Axios, the average cost of July 4 cookout staples—like beef, buns, soda, and condiments—has jumped 12.7% year-over-year. Items like hamburger meat and ice cream are among the steepest climbers, as import-linked ingredients and packaging materials face cost pressure. An Axios/Ipsos poll found 32% of Americans are opting for cheaper food options—like pizza or store-brand hot dogs—rather than hosting traditional barbecues. Economist Natalie Ortega of the National Retail Federation told Axios the inflation isn't isolated: "It's not just food—it's grills, folding chairs, decorations. Tariffs are driving up the cost of celebration." Small Businesses Caught in the Middle For small businesses, especially those relying on international supply chains, the pressure is mounting. According to a recent CBS MoneyWatch report, more than 30% of small firms say they've raised prices due to tariff-related costs, while others fear closure if current trade uncertainty continues. Shayai Lucero, owner of Earth & Sky Floral Designs in New Mexico, described her struggle to keep costs manageable. "Roses that used to cost under a dollar are now close to $2.50," she told CBS News. "We can't eat those costs forever." Trade groups have echoed these concerns. In comments cited by Financial Times, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce warned that business sentiment could weaken further if tariff escalation continues without diplomatic resolution. A Political Playbook or Economic Gamble? While the administration frames the move as reclaiming "economic independence," analysts are skeptical. Julia Sutherland, a policy analyst at the Brookings Institution, told CBS News that "tariffs are regressive taxes. They hit working families long before they touch corporations." Further analysis from Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan suggests the U.S. tariff burden is climbing toward 13%—levels not seen since the pre-WWII Smoot-Hawley era. Experts caution this could raise consumer prices into Q3 and chill capital expenditure among small manufacturers. What to Watch Next July 5: Official tariff letters expected to go out to U.S. trade partners. July 9: Deadline for the 90-day tariff pause to expire. August 1: Full implementation of new tariffs anticipated. Global reactions could follow. India has floated WTO action, while the EU and China are weighing possible retaliatory tariffs. Meanwhile, U.S. families are adjusting to holiday inflation. As noted by AP News, even sales of essentials like soft drinks and paper goods have dipped in lower-income households, which are disproportionately affected by price volatility. Final Thought While July 4 remains a day to celebrate American independence, 2025's edition offers a deeper reflection: What does economic independence mean when it comes at a rising cost to small businesses and families? As the country watches fireworks, many on Main Street are watching price tags—and wondering what the rest of the summer will bring.
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
'One event' arms pause troubling for Ukraine – DW – 07/04/2025
The US says its pause on arms shipments is a one-off. But amid the turbulent US-Ukraine relationship, the assurance is little comfort to Volodymyr Zelenskyy or his European supporters. Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy will seek "clarity" from Donald Trump on Friday amid a challenging week that saw a scheduled US arms shipment paused and Kyiv pummeled by another Russian drone strike. The US confirmed earlier this week that a batch of arms shipments to Ukraine would be paused in yet another reminder that the eastern European country's supply of advanced military equipment is not as secure as it once was. The US has downplayed this decision to withhold crucial arms shipments to Ukraine, as a state department spokesperson told reporters it was a one-off. "This is not a cessation of us assisting Ukraine or of providing weapons," said spokeswoman Tammy Bruce. "This is one event and one situation, and we'll discuss what else comes up in future." The US president has continued to press both sides of the conflict to negotiate a ceasefire and spoke with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the matter on Thursday. But progress, according to Trump said, was limited. "I didn't make any progress with him today at all," he told reporters. "I'm not happy about that. I'm not happy… I don't think he's looking to stop." Russia followed that call with a massive drone strike on the Ukrainian capital. Zelenskyy is due to speak with Trump on Friday about the shipment pause. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The pair have had a strained relationship during Trump's second term, publicly evidenced in a televised falling out during a White House sit-down in early March. Following the disastrous visit, Zelenskyy sought to shore up support closer to home with key European allies. Europe has since stepped up their support in financial and supply terms. But if the US were to continue to withhold support, it would significantly undermine Ukraine's position versus Russia. "If this were to be a longer-term issue, it would definitely be a challenge for Ukraine to cope," Jana Kobzova, a senior policy fellow specializing at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told DW. "Partly because some of the US systems are not easily replaceable, that goes especially for air defense, but also some of the longer-range capabilities which Ukraine has started to produce domestically but not in the quantities needed." Despite the spat between Trump and Zelenskyy, the pause on shipments could be as much about the US needing to weigh its own interests against the support it gives to dozens of other countries, including Israel. "After the Israel-Iranian exchange, I can imagine that Trump wants to relocate resources," Marina Miron, a defense researcher specializing in military technology and Russian capability at Kings College London, UK, told DW. Brent Sadler, a research fellow at the conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, told Politico the move is likely a "due diligence" measure to ensure adequate resourcing for US forces elsewhere, including the Indo-Pacific in the event of a conflict outbreak in that region. Retired US Army General Ben Hodges, took a different view, saying the shipment pause was not about stockpiles. "It's a choice of this administration to placate Russia, at the expense of Ukraine," Hodges said. "It also shows the very limited understanding this administration [has] of the importance to America's strategic interests to help Ukraine and Europe deter Russia." Irrespective of the US' reasons for pausing its military shipments, the signals from the first months of the new administration suggest Europe's transatlantic ally is not the steadfast partner it once was. "There is a sober analysis both in Kyiv and the European part of NATO that relying on US military assistance to continue forever in Ukraine is not an option," said Kobzova. "And that has been there ever since March when the assistance was stopped for the first time." Among the American weapons due for shipping were Patriot air defense missiles and precision-guided artillery, according to officials speaking to newswires anonymously. The pause on these shipments comes at a critical time, with Russia ramping up weapons production and attacks. Those include strikes on soldier draft hubs in Poltava, the national capital Kyiv, the port city Odesa, and ground advances in key regions in Eastern Ukraine. Despite increased spending on defense from Europe's NATO members — now 5% of GDP following its June meeting — any long-term US stall on weapons will likely squeeze Ukraine and its neighbors. "There is recognition at the political level … that [Europe] would need to be increasing production, but none of that happens quickly enough for Ukraine," said Kobzova. Kobzova also pointed to investments being made into Ukraine's own defense industry to buffer against future supply-line cuts from the US. Europe is now the biggest investor in Ukraine's domestic defense industry. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video But even that might not be enough. Experts interviewed by DW highlighted the offer made by Zelenskyy to directly purchase armaments from the US, but in reality, arms manufacturing is a time-consuming process. "It takes two years to produce one [air defense missile] battery," the defense expert Miron told DW. "So even if you buy them now, it doesn't mean that they will be on the battlefield. You place a purchase order and you get in the queue." Finding a way to more effectively repair and adapt equipment for different missiles could be a potential stopgap to meet immediate needs. But, as defense supplies are again in doubt, Miron questioned whether Ukraine has what it needs to push back Russia's offensive. "The problem is time and money and we also have the variable of people," she said, adding that about 90 people are needed to operate a Patriot air missile battery. And Ukraine, Miron pointed out, is losing people, with no guarantee of replacement as the war grinds through its fourth year. Ukraine's support in Europe has been increasing — both rhetorically and materially. As it took over the presidency of the EU for the next six months, Denmark has seized the early opportunity to put Ukraine's membership application into the bloc back on the agenda. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Thursday said the EU "must strengthen Ukraine. And we must weaken Russia." "Ukraine is essential to Europe's security. Our contribution to Ukraine is also a protection of our freedom. Ukraine belongs in the European Union. It is in both in Denmark's and Europe's interest." Her comments come on the back of a visit to Ukraine from German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, who branded Ukraine's plight Berlin's most important foreign policy task. These statements from Europe might be more important than ever, as Miron says she is pessimistic about the future of the US-Ukraine relationship. "Certainly you can try some diplomacy, and explain to Trump that Ukraine matters, but I think Trump has already made up his mind," she said. "Trump has much more to solve with Russia in terms of global problems than with Ukraine."
