logo
Oklahoma committee begins search for textbook adhering to controversial social studies standards

Oklahoma committee begins search for textbook adhering to controversial social studies standards

USA Today09-06-2025
Nuria Martinez-Keel
Oklahoma Voice
OKLAHOMA CITY — An ousted member of the state's top school board will lead the process to approve K-12 textbooks that align with controversial new academic standards for social studies.
Former Oklahoma State Board of Education member Kendra Wesson will continue as the chair of a key committee that chooses all state-approved textbooks for public schools. She has been State Superintendent Ryan Walters' designee to lead the committee since she joined the state Board of Education in January 2023.
'​Serving in this role and being able to still help my state is what it's all about, right?' Wesson said. 'It's not about (having my) name in lights. It's about doing the serving and coming in and being who I am and consistently being who I am. So, I value it very much.'
Wesson, of Norman, said she brings high integrity to the role and has enjoyed the committee and its staff, so 'it meant a lot to me to be able to stay here.'
Walters said he has full confidence in her ability to lead the textbook adoption process.
'Kendra is pro-student, pro-education reform and a pro-Trump conservative who will uphold pro-American principles throughout this process,' Walters said in a statement. 'I look forward to working with her as we are posed to introduce the best academic standards in the country to Oklahoma classrooms this fall.'
Gov. Kevin Stitt replaced three state Board of Education members, including Wesson, on Feb. 11 while complaining the board had fallen victim to 'needless political drama.' The three removed members had voted with Walters to advance a now-defeated proposal to have public schools collect students' immigration status, an idea Stitt opposed.
What Oklahoma's textbook committee will do during the adoption cycle
Wesson and the State Textbook Committee gathered Friday, June 7, for an orientation meeting to initiate the 2025-26 adoption cycle, a process that determines which textbooks the state will approve for the next six years. The committee last met Feb. 7 to conclude the 2024-25 cycle.
Like with the state Board of Education, the governor appoints all members of the 13-member textbook committee except for one — the state superintendent, who can choose a designee to serve as the committee's chair in his place.
The committee, mostly made up of educators, will receive sample products by July 1 from textbook publishers interested in selling to Oklahoma school districts. The number of companies bidding in the small-market state has dwindled in recent years while political debates over classroom content grew.
After the July 1 deadline, teams of subject-matter experts will begin quality reviews of the submitted learning material in August before making recommendations to the textbook committee, said Carolynn Bristow, project manager of educational materials for the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
The process culminates in the committee's Nov. 14 vote to approve a list of textbooks aligning with the newly enacted standards for social studies education. The committee also will vote on instructional materials for personal financial literacy courses. The state will execute contracts with publishers in February after the board's final meeting of the adoption cycle.
Wesson said the committee will follow the typical textbook adoption process and doesn't anticipate any differences from previous cycles.
The committee and its review teams will adhere to a pre-approved rubric to evaluate textbook materials, she said.
The rubric checks for classroom usability and compliance with state academic standards. Last year, the committee also added social and moral questions to the rubric asking whether the submitted materials 'degrade traditional roles of men and women,' promote 'illegal lifestyles' or neglect the importance of religion in preserving American liberties.
'We have a great team here at (the state Education Department) that keeps us on track, and that's why that rubric is there, to keep everybody on the same page,' Wesson said. 'And so you will always find this committee, especially, following that process.'
Oklahoma's new social studies standards cast doubt on 2020 election results, require biblical teaching
The new social studies standards, which dictate what public schools must teach to students in history and government classes, have been the source of significant public scrutiny this year.
The standards now require schools to educate students about biblical teachings and Judeo-Christian values that influenced the American colonies and founding fathers, which Walters has said is crucial to ensuring students understand the full context of the country's history.
Language casting doubt on the integrity of the 2020 presidential election results also is required teaching.
Stitt's three new appointees to the state Board of Education said they were unaware of the 2020 election language at the time they voted on the standards on Feb. 27. Walters said he is responsible for adding the new content, but he didn't acknowledge it until weeks after the board vote.
Despite bipartisan concerns among the state Legislature, the Republican supermajority in the state House and Senate permitted the standards to take effect. A lawsuit in Oklahoma County District Court contends Walters' administration failed to uphold proper transparency procedures.
Wesson said the State Textbook Committee won't have any issues finding textbooks that align with the new social studies standards, even with the new content that has made headlines.
'We're not going to have a problem there at all,' she said.
Oklahoma Voice is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oklahoma Voice maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Janelle Stecklein for questions:info@oklahomavoice.com. Follow Oklahoma Voice onFacebook andTwitter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Trump's 30% tariff threat means for the European Union — in charts
What Trump's 30% tariff threat means for the European Union — in charts

CNBC

time9 minutes ago

  • CNBC

What Trump's 30% tariff threat means for the European Union — in charts

U.S. President Donald Trump has pledged to impose a 30% tariff on imports from the European Union from August 1. The announcement, which follows similar warnings to other trading partners, could make everything from German machinery and French cheese to Italian luxury goods and Danish pharmaceuticals more expensive in the U.S. Trump revealed the new rate in a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which he posted on Saturday on his social media site Truth Social. The U.S. president shared a similar letter to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. For the EU, the prospect of fresh U.S. tariffs represents a major blow. The 27-nation bloc had been scrambling to secure a preliminary agreement to spare it from becoming the latest recipient of a Trump letter dictating a new, across-the-board tariff on its exports to the U.S. Here's a look at some of the key figures of the U.S.-EU's massive trading relationship. The U.S. and EU have the largest bilateral trade and investment relationship in the world, representing almost 30% of global trade in goods and services, and accounting for 43% of global gross domestic product (GDP), according to EU figures . Last year alone, the value of EU-U.S. trade amounted to 1.68 trillion euros ($1.96 trillion). That's the equivalent of roughly 4.6 billion euros of trade per day. Trump has repeatedly hit out at the EU for what he perceives to be an unfair trading relationship, often citing the EU's trade surplus with the U.S. For its part, the EU has signaled a willingness to reduce its 198 billion euros trade surplus in goods with the U.S. by increasing its purchase of U.S. products, notably defense and liquified natural gas (LNG). Taking into account both trade and services, the EU's total trade surplus with the U.S. stood at a total of 50 billion euros in 2024, a figure which the bloc says represents less than 3% of total U.S.-EU trade. By sector, the pharmaceutical, automotive and aircraft sectors appear to be the most exposed to U.S. tariffs, while Germany, Italy and Ireland are among the EU members likely to be the hardest hit. Trump has said the proposed 30% tariff rate would be separate from sectoral tariffs, suggesting the 50% duties on steel and aluminum imports and 25% on auto imports would remain. The EU has not yet retaliated to Trump's next big tariff deadline. EU ministers are meeting in Brussels, Belgium on Monday to discuss how best to respond. In a Monday note, analysts at UBS said they continued to believe the EU and U.S. would reach an agreement before Aug. 1 or that the White House would extend its deadline again while negotiations continue. However, they added that "aggressive" U.S. demands, including for complete open market access with no tariff charged to it, made it hard to predict how Brussels would respond and increased the risk of economic damage to both sides. — CNBC's Jenni Reid contributed to this report.

China is exploiting our government's tech weakness. We need a rapid reboot
China is exploiting our government's tech weakness. We need a rapid reboot

Fox News

time22 minutes ago

  • Fox News

China is exploiting our government's tech weakness. We need a rapid reboot

After more than two decades of serving in the U.S. Navy and building government systems, I have witnessed firsthand how millions of dedicated Americans work every day in service of their fellow citizens and the security of our democracy. I have also seen both the immense potential — and frustrating inertia — that plagues public service. An unrealized opportunity exists to connect the U.S. government's critical missions with the transformative power of commercial technology. Consider this: of the world's 10 largest companies by market capitalization, a staggering eight are American founded. This is no accident; it is a direct result of our nation's unparalleled entrepreneurial spirit. The critical question, however, is whether our own government is prepared to harness this strategic asset. Instead of tapping this engine of innovation, the U.S. government is held captive by its outdated processes. Entrenched legacy vendors have dug their claws in, and this has led to a general resistance to change. As the saying goes, "it takes a while to turn a big ship around." That rings true with actual warships and aircraft carriers, but it also applies to how government agencies resist adopting new tools that improve collaboration, efficiency and security. Instead, the U.S. government and its outdated procurement processes cling to existing technology platforms, such as Microsoft's suite of products that have been compromised time and again by China, which also happens to be one of the company's most significant business partners. Breaking the shackles of "vendor lock-in" — where the government becomes overly reliant on specific vendors even if they underperform — is crucial for fostering a new era of innovation that benefits America. When a company or product fails to perform well in the commercial sector, it's terminated immediately. In the public sector, the company is usually allowed to see out their multi-year contracts and when it's finally time to negotiate a renewal, all is forgotten. A more competitive public sector landscape, welcoming innovators and startups, can provide fresh perspectives, specialized solutions, and the speed to address rapidly evolving challenges. This is not a unique approach. Other nations are adopting this model, attempting to gain an edge over America. For example, China launched a program in 2023, with 39 partners, including Alibaba Cloud and Baidu, to advance computing power and AI. Russia subsidizes companies implementing digital transformation; and Iran, despite sanctions, is investing significantly in AI research and building a sovereign AI ecosystem. Our adversaries recognize that commercial tools drive rapid progress and are actively breaking down barriers to catch up to American AI leadership. There are understandable reasons for hesitancy. For years, Silicon Valley has been closely associated with the "move fast and break things" mantra, while the U.S. government has looked on with both envy (of the speed and efficiency) and concern (over potential impacts to its services). However, learning from the commercial mindset of agility and a relentless drive for improvement will help it to serve the American public better. The benefits? Reduced waste, greater efficiency and better taxpayer value. Nowhere is this approach more critical than in national security. The threats America faces are constantly evolving and leveraging emerging technology to do so. Maintaining our edge requires more than just incremental improvements; it demands continuous access to cutting-edge capabilities. Leveraging the R&D engines of American commercial innovation — in areas like AI, cybersecurity, data analytics and resilient infrastructure — is not just advantageous; it's essential. If Washington fails to leverage this homegrown ingenuity, it does so at our national peril, especially as our adversaries work tirelessly to do just that. Other nations are adopting this model, attempting to gain an edge over America. For example, China launched a program in 2023, with 39 partners, including Alibaba Cloud and Baidu, to advance computing power and AI. Government agencies tasked with everything from defending the nation to delivering health services need to have immediate access to the latest advancements in AI and data analytics, and they can only do so by leveraging powerful commercial tools with a platform for continuous improvement — an asset for national security and public service. AI could be used to accelerate some of the government's most notorious backlogs, such as the millions of immigration court cases, the accumulation in environmental reviews for energy projects, and pileups in programs like Social Security or Veterans Affairs healthcare. AI can analyze data at lightning speed, helping federal agencies and their partners deliver on mission-critical work at an accelerated pace. The urgent need for a more agile, efficient, innovative and secure government is too significant to ignore. This is a pivotal moment. By embracing the discipline, accountability, and innovative spirit of the commercial sector, the U.S. government can unlock new levels of performance and effectiveness. Change is hard. But as adversaries gain on America — or worse, overtake us — change is mandatory.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store