
Press shift: how the right-wing media are pivoting to Reform
The Daily Mail seemed to agree with everything Farage was saying, most notably his condemnation of the number of Romanians and Bulgarians coming to Britain. Why then, Farage's adviser asked a senior Daily Mail journalist, would the paper not endorse Ukip?
With a nod to the paper's seemingly unshakeable bond to the Conservative arty, the journalist replied: 'Orders, dear boy, orders.'
A decade on, Farage is once again leading in the polls, this time as head of Reform UK. There is no such frustration within his team, however. Recent media coverage has them believing those old bonds tying the traditionally Conservative-supporting press to the Tories are weakening.
In the past week, the Mail published a striking front page: 'Britain is facing societal collapse, warns Farage.' It was accompanied by a leading article generally supportive of a speech he had made on crime. The previous day, the paper had run an article by Farage arguing that Britain 'needs Reform'.
Meanwhile, a beaming Farage could be spotted on social media holding up a double-page spread from the Sun on Sunday. It showed another of his articles with the headline: 'Lawless Britain'. On Monday, the Telegraph's front page led with the Reform leader's promise to build more prisons.
In both Reform and Conservative circles such coverage is being watched closely. All believe it is being driven by Reform's now consistent poll lead. 'Things are progressing quite nicely,' said a senior Reform source. Another said: 'We have demonstrated to editors that we aren't going away.'
While this week marked a spate of glowing Reform coverage, a party insider said more important breakthroughs came in the spring. In April, the Sun ran the front page headline 'Britain is broken', Reform's local election slogan. 'That made Westminster sit up and take notice,' the Reform staffer said.
In May, Farage's team were delighted when the Mail published his essay setting out the agenda for a future Reform government.
The critical moments may have come even earlier, however. Farage's team are said to have held a series of meetings with senior figures from centre-right papers at the turn of the year. The talks were designed as a post-election reset. The Mail titles had backed the Tories and suspicion of them within Reform was significant. 'We've broken bread since then, of course, and things have got a lot better,' said one Reform figure.
More recently, Farage attended a summer party held by News UK, owner of the Times, Sunday Times and the Sun. Tim Shipman, the former chief political commentator for the Sunday Times, disclosed this week that Farage had dined with Victoria Newton, the Sun's editor.
Others believe that the positive coverage is simply part of a wider radicalisation on the British right, towards harder lines on immigration, culture and crime once seen as well beyond the mainstream. 'What we used to call the Tory press is not the Tory press any more,' said David Yelland, former editor of the Sun. 'They're embarrassed by the Conservative party. The agreed consensus of the Tory press has shifted right.'
Some Conservatives fear their party has been complicit in improving Farage's standing with some papers, alleging a lack of activity by the Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch. One former Conservative staffer blamed her for putting the party into 'cold storage' after the election, cutting off a brief poll rise it enjoyed last autumn.
'Fundamentally, [media outlets on the right] obviously are going to be anti-Labour,' they said. 'There's so little coming out of the Tories that they just don't really have that much of a choice but to go with Reform stuff. It comes down to effort. They really want it.'
Other Conservative critics blame Badenoch's poor relationship with reporters and editors. Some said she has been known to bypass newsrooms altogether and complain to media company executives when she disliked a story.
These criticisms are strongly rejected by Badenoch's team, who say the party consistently secures front pages with its media strategy.
Yet when it comes to the crunch, could any major newspaper groups back Reform at the next election? Such decisions are taken late in the day by editors and owners, but Conservatives that fear much damage could be done by then.
As a member of Rishi Sunak's team pointed out to Telegraph journalists after it endorsed him before last year's election: 'You've been kicking the shit out of us and giving these guys oxygen for the past 18 months. This is all a little bit late in the day.'
Yelland warned that papers risk 'boxing themselves in' by fanning Reform's flames now. 'Editors will have to back Farage or be forced to pull off 'a Washington Post' and endorse nobody at all,' he said.
One senior Conservative HQ source said a closer look at some of Farage's policies, such as nationalising some of the water industry, should raise obvious questions for the Telegraph and Mail. 'His policies are not conservative,' they said. 'That's tricky for them.'
Ultimately, several Reform and Conservative figures said it would come down to whether Reform's poll lead endures. 'I really cannot see anything changing,' said Gawain Towler, Reform's former head of press. 'If that's the case, everybody wants to back a winner. The Tories are not a winner.'
For now, senior figures inside the Mail and Telegraph do not believe that the odd glowing front page will translate into election support for Reform. However, Yelland warned that election endorsements were beside the point. 'It's the day-to-day coverage that matters,' he said. 'And there's no doubt that despite the fall in circulation, the Mail in particular influences broadcast media in this country immensely.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Evening Standard
42 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
I Am Giorgia: All the Right stuff —the making of Meloni
Her creed is based on being a mother, an Italian, a European and a Catholic. She is against abortion and single-sex marriage, reveres Popes John-Paul II and Benedict XVI and prizes respect above mere tolerance. Most intriguing are her thoughts about Italy's population decline and immigration, and how these may, or may not, connect. She believes in going really hard on illegal migrant control — and licensing legal migration for the mutual benefit of source and destination communities.


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Why Zelensky reversed his anti-corruption overhaul
On Tuesday, Volodymyr Zelenskyy approved a law to gut Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies. On Thursday he backtracked, and said he would put forward new legislation to restore their independence. The original legislation would have stripped both the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) and the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (Sapo) of their independence, bringing them under direct executive control. The official reason for the legislation was to cleanse Ukraine's investigative bodies of Russian influence. A spy, apparently, was suspected in their ranks. But treason has become the calling card for the consolidation of power in Ukraine. Earlier this year, Petro Poroshenko – President Zelensky's main declared challenger in the next election – was sanctioned for high treason, effectively barring him from running for high office. Ukrainians have had enough. With Donald Trump warming to his Ukrainian counterpart after their bust-up in the Oval Office, the 'rally-around-the-flag' effect that recently buoyed Zelensky – after months of sagging poll numbers – has now dissipated. The legislative coup provoked the largest demonstration since Russia's invasion in 2022. Many read it as creeping authoritarianism, marked by increasingly staccato punctuation. Even in international media that reliably lionises Zelensky, stories are beginning to percolate about the monopolisation of power, the use of lawfare to sideline political opponents, the harassment of civil society and a growing crackdown on dissent. Yet Tuesday's institutional hijacking was an escalation, considering what is at stake. Nabu and Sapo were originally established as a condition for western support after Russia's invasion of Crimea and eastern Ukraine in 2014. Donors needed assurances that funds would not be siphoned off, viewing accountability as essential for maintaining domestic backing for their aid packages. The IMF predicated its bailout programmes on Ukraine's anti-corruption commitments, and western capitals have repeatedly linked continued support to efforts to root out graft. At a time when European governments are struggling to cover the shortfall left by President Trump's withdrawal of US aid, the implications for international support could be severe. Before this week's legislation, Ukraine's anti-corruption community was under pressure. Earlier in July, Ukrainian authorities raidedthe home of the country's leading anti-corruption campaigner without a warrant, accusing him of draft evasion and fraud. Then, on the eve of the vote, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) – long seen as a tool for political enforcement – carried out 70 raids on Nabu and Sapo staff. They ransacked their offices and arrested a lead investigator. But as Ukrainians know – and western diplomats will privately concede – the problems within Nabu run deeper. The agency has long been accused of operating under the influence of the presidential administration and Zelensky's éminence grise, chief of staff Andriy Yermak. Nabu has been variously criticised for ineffectiveness, for steering clear of presidential allies, or conversely, for being used as a tool of political persecution. It begs the question what changed. The threads lead back to the case of Oleksiy Chernyshov, a former deputy prime minister, a close ally of the president, who was charged with corruption last month. Nabu had long been accused of toothlessness when it came to investigating those close to power. But the consequence of baring its teeth has been its defanging. For some time, Chernyshov's case was rumoured to have been quietly manoeuvred out of investigation by the pliant head of Nabu, Semen Kryvonos. Last year, a court issued a warrant to search Chernyshov's residence in connection with alleged corruption in 'Big Construction' – Zelensky's flagship infrastructure programme, known locally as the 'Great Theft'. But the search was never executed, reportedly at Kryvonos' request. Kryvonos himself owed his previous post to the backing of both Chernyshov and Yermak. The inner circle, it seemed, would remain safe under his tenure at the agency – a role he was appointed to despite having no background in anti-corruption. It was only after internal pressure within Nabu eventually forced Kryvonos to act on Chernyshov. It confirmed what many had long suspected – that the President's office exercised quiet control over the institution. The moment that control looked in doubt, its independence was shut down. For western partners, the balancing act of funding Ukraine while withholding public criticism has collapsed. The G7 ambassadors have released a statement confirming they had met with Nabu and now 'have serious concerns and intend to discuss these developments with government leaders'. Corruption has long stymied Ukraine. It was the thrust behind the Maidan protests: the call to expel the oligarchs that controlled the country without accountability. It made Ukraine vulnerable to invasion in 2014 in Crimea and eastern Ukraine. It propelled Zelensky himself to political power as an outsider who could sweep away graft. Still, more Ukrainians now see corruption as a greater threat to the country's development than Russian aggression. Many of Ukraine's western partners have justified their support as a defence of democracy against corrupt autocracy. Even with Zelensky's backtracking, with the dismemberment of Ukraine's independent institutions, many will now legitimately ask: whom, and what, are they funding?


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump fires warning shot to EU as millions face huge price rises
President Donald Trump gave even odds for reaching a trade deal with the European Union as he left Washington to begin his trip to Scotland – with a path to a solution where the Europeans 'buy down' the tariffs he is imposing. 'I would say that we have a fifty-fifty chance,' Trump said, amid reports that the two sides are narrowing in on a possible deal. 'Maybe less than that,' he hedged. 'But a fifty-fifty chance of making a deal with the EU. And It will be a deal where they have to buy down their tariffs. Because they're right now at 30 percent,' Trump said. He was referencing the tariffs set to take effect by the new 'doomsday' August 1 deadline - unless there is an agreement struck. 'They'll have to buy them down - maybe. Or they can leave them the way they are,' he went on. Trump, using a favorite negotiating tactic, described his counterparts as desperate. 'But they want to make a deal very badly. I would have said we have a 25 percent chance with Japan and they kept coming back and we made a deal,' Trump said. He was referencing the deal he announced days ago, which has Japan paying a 15 percent tariff, lower than the threatened 25 percent tariff, while opening markets to U.S. exporters. Trump and his top negotiators continue to gush about the Japanese investment – while describing it in terms different than what is coming out of Tokyo. 'Don't forget Japan's putting up $550 billion,' Trump said Friday. 'That's a lot of money. And also paying tariffs. The biggest part of the Japan deal and maybe we get this with EU maybe we don't is we have the right to go in and trade. They've totally opened Japan just for the U.S.' Trump made the comments as he left the White House at the start of a five-day trip that will have him visit his two Scottish golf courses – and meet with British PM Keir Starmer to try to 'refine' an existing U.S.-UK trade deal. He had earlier escalated his demands with the EU in mid-July by raising the tariff threat. In his Truth Social post announcing the deal, Trump said: 'Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 billion dollars into the United States, which will receive 90 percent of the profits.' Andy Laperriere, head of U.S. policy research at Piper Sandler, told CNBC that Japanese officials are 'describing it differently' and 'see the $550 billion figure as a cap and inclusive of government loan guarantees.' But Commerce Secretary Larry Lutnick has been describing it as an investment kitty that Trump can personally direct to ramp up industrial production – with no mention of a legislative role. 'This is literally the Japanese government giving Donald Trump $550 billion, and says: Go fix whatever you need to fix,' he told host Laura Ingraham on Fox News. 'Donald Trump can take the Japanese money and say 'let's go build a factory. Let's get an American company to operate it, we'll lease them the factory. They don't make much money - so what. That's the beauty of this deal,' he said. As he calls for the Europeans to 'buy down' tariffs, Trump may have been emboldened by other moves besides the Japan deal. On Thursday, Columbia University reached a settlement with the Justice Department where it will pay $200 million and a civil rights investigation will be dropped. The Federal Communications Commission this week approved a merger between Paramount and Skydance after the CBS parent company agreed to pay Trump $16 million, ending litigation Trump lost after the Kamala Harris interview on '60 Minutes.'