PNG anti-corruption commissioners suspended after accusing each other of offences
The decision to suspend commissioners Andrew Forbes, Daniel Baulch and Graham Gill was gazetted on June 20 but has not been publicly announced.
The chief commissioner, Mr Forbes, announced the suspensions at a staff meeting last week, while deputies Mr Baulch and Mr Gill were out of the country.
The development has been labelled a "major blow" to PNG's fledgling Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), which has only made one arrest and no prosecutions since it began operations in 2023.
It follows a drawn-out feud between the three commissioners, which rendered the organisation "chaotic" and "dysfunctional" according to inside sources.
Tensions reached fever pitch last month when Mr Forbes referred his deputies to police over alleged financial misconduct, prompting Mr Gill and Mr Baulch to leave the country.
The deputies told the ABC they would "strongly defend the allegations" and said they believed they had been "subjected to retaliatory behaviour".
Last year, Mr Baulch and Mr Gill accused Mr Forbes of suspected corruption and abuse of power, alleging in a letter to the prime minister that he secretly manipulated ICAC legislation to give himself exclusive power over key agency functions.
A warrant for Mr Forbes's arrest was issued in November, but he obtained a court injunction to suspend the probe.
When contacted by the ABC, Mr Forbes declined to comment.
Mr Baulch and Mr Gill have also declined to comment on the suspensions; however, the ABC understands they are considering legal options.
Maholopa Laveil, an economics lecturer at the University of Papua New Guinea, said the developments were troubling.
"It is shocking and disappointing that all three commissioners have been suspended, even more so given that two are from Australia and one from New Zealand," Mr Laveil said.
"There would be similar shock and disappointment … had they been Papua New Guinean … but even larger disappointment because they're from Australia and NZ."
Mr Forbes is a lawyer from Brisbane who was previously a partner at the commercial law firm Turks Legal and has no apparent prior experience in anti-corruption work.
Mr Baulch is a former detective with Victoria Police in Australia and Mr Gill was a senior executive in charge of evaluation, intelligence and corporate affairs at the Serious Fraud Office in New Zealand.
They were selected by a group — chaired by Prime Minister James Marape with representatives from the opposition, the judiciary and churches — called the Appointments Committee.
Questions have been raised about the lack of Papua New Guinean representation among ICAC commissioners.
But lawyer and MP Kerenga Kua, who helped set up PNG's ICAC, defended the decision.
"I thought it was good to have people who are not connected to the people of this country so they can do a totally impartial job," he said.
Mr Kua believed the problems came down to a clash of individual personalities.
Two weeks ago, the Appointments Committee resolved to appoint PNG nationals Mr Thomas Eluh, Justice Ellenas Batari and Justice Don Sawong as acting commissioners.
Do you know more about this story? Contact Faa.Marian@abc.net.au.
Mr Eluh was ICAC's interim chairman before the commission was appointed and Justice Batari and Justice Sawong have served as Supreme Court judges.
But the acting commissioners have not yet taken up their positions, leaving the organisation in a leadership limbo.
Kerenga Kua said he was confident the acting commissioners were equipped for the job.
But there are concerns the leadership struggles within ICAC have set the organisation back — with a number of senior staff having resigned over the tensions.
Dr Grant Walton, a Pacific governance and anti-corruption expert at the Australian National University, said the suspension of the commissioners was a "major blow".
"This is going to set that institution back even further and undermine the hopes that many people had that the PNG government was going to be serious in its response to corruption in the country," he said.
Maholopa Laveil said the ICAC had failed to meet people's expectations of prosecuting high-level corruption in PNG — estimated to cost the country over a billion dollars every year.
Since being established, the agency has only made one arrest, although the ABC understands some high-level officials were being investigated.
Mr Laveil said it was also a blow to Australia and other partners' efforts to support governance reforms in PNG.
Strengthening PNG's ICAC is a key pillar of an IMF economic reform program that underpins more than a billion dollars in budget support that Australia has given PNG since 2020.
Others have complained about the Appointments Committee's failure to deal with the issues swiftly, as more than a year has passed since it received an initial complaint against Mr Forbes.
A second complaint against Mr Baulch was referred to the committee in August last year by Mr Forbes.
One ICAC insider told the ABC that the slow response allowed issues to fester within the organisation.
Committee member Cardinal John Ribat said besides the initial meeting to appoint the original commissioners in 2023, he had not been invited to a single meeting until a couple of weeks ago.
Cardinal Ribat said he was not involved in selecting the investigations committee that probed allegations against at least two of the commissioners last year.
He said he was also concerned that the inclusion of the prime minister and opposition leader compromised the committee's independence.
The ABC has contacted the prime minister and the opposition leader for a response.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg
The final increase to the superannuation guarantee has taken effect, meaning employers are now required to pay a minimum contribution of 12 per cent into their employees' super funds. But around a third of people are unaware where their retirement funds are invested — a similar proportion don't know their super balance, and one in 10 have never checked. These were the findings of a survey of 3,146 Australians conducted by the Commonwealth Bank, which suggested the knowledge gap about how super is invested was higher among gen Z and women, at 43 per cent. Jessica Irvine, the bank's personal finance expert, said people have more confidence in managing their day-to-day finances, but need more assistance to understand retirement options. Echoing her views, Wayne Swan, the former federal treasurer who oversaw the legislation guaranteeing the increase from nine to 12 per cent, told SBS News that more needed to be done to engage Australians with their retirement planning. Swan, now chair of Cbus, an industry super fund, said: "I think that all superannuation funds acknowledge and do their best to achieve [that], and there's always more that can be done." What is happening with superannuation? Thirty-four years ago, former prime minister Paul Keating shared his vision of an Australian future that included a 12 per cent target for compulsory super contributions. Now, he said, that system "finally matures". The superannuation guarantee has risen since 2012 to reach 12 per cent. In a statement to mark the 1 July increase to 12 per cent, Keating said it "will guarantee personal super accumulations in excess of $3 million at retirement" for someone entering the workforce today. "Superannuation, like Medicare, is now an Australian community standard, binding the whole population as a national economic family, with each person having a place," he said. How did we get here? Superannuation in Australia stretches back to the early 20th century, but there were no attempts to institutionalise universal compulsory contributions before the mid-1980s. In 1985, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, with the support of the then-Hawke government, presented a National Wage Case to the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission about a 3 per cent compulsory contribution for all Australian workers. The tribunal sided with the union in 1986 but ruled it as optional — subject to agreement between employers and employees. Five years later, in Keating's final federal budget as treasurer, the 3 per cent superannuation guarantee levy was made compulsory. It came into effect the following year, when Keating was prime minister, with the introduction of a superannuation guarantee charge to penalise employers who don't meet their contribution obligations. The mandatory rate then gradually increased to 9 per cent by 2002. It was supposed to reach 12 per cent by 2000, but, under the Howard government, there were no further increases until 1 July 2013. In 2010, two years after the Global Financial Crisis and in response to the findings of the Henry Tax Review, then-treasurer Swan unveiled a plan to incrementally lift the superannuation guarantee levy to 12 per cent. He said it would increase by 0.5 per cent each year between 2013 and 2019. In 2010, then-treasurer Wayne Swan (pictured right) announced a plan to gradually increase the superannuation guarantee levy from 9 per cent to 12 per cent. Source: AAP / Alan Porritt But two months after it rose to 9.25 per cent in 2013, Tony Abbott stormed to a landslide election victory — and followed through on an election promise to delay increases to the guarantee due to cost pressures on small businesses. The government failed to legislate the delay the following year, and the rate was lifted to 9.5 per cent — a level it remained at for seven years. It wasn't until Australia was in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic that the incremental increases began. Starting in 2021, it rose by 0.5 per cent each year. LISTEN TO SBS News 30/06/2025 08:22 English The 12 per cent milestone Australia's superannuation system now manages over $4 trillion in assets, ranking as the fourth-largest pension market in the world. The 12 per cent milestone is expected to propel Australia to second place within a decade — just behind the United States — despite its relatively small population. Swan said the superannuation guarantee levy not only delivers a secure retirement for all Australians, but "fundamentally alters the distribution of wealth in our community". "It gives access to growth assets to everyone in the community. From a building worker through to a professional in the office tower, everyone in Australia gets to own a piece of the wealth of this great country in a way that's never before been possible," he said. Swan said he's "absolutely proud to have been part of this story". "I always think of those pioneers, particularly the unionists, who fought to establish this scheme 40 years ago. What it really shows is that ordinary working people can effect change in a society like ours," he said. "What visionaries they were, and what they have done to make our country not only a bigger and more successful economy, but a fairer one as well." What is a 'comfortable retirement'? Swan said while the six-year delay in achieving a 12 per cent increase came at a cost to Australian superannuation balances, the benefits are greater from having finally reached that milestone. "For someone who's, say, 30 years old now, it's going to mean an extra $130,000 in their retirement," he said. That follows recent modelling by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). The super peak body's retirement standard for June 2025 projects a 30-year-old today on the median wage of $75,000 and a $30,000 super balance would witness that figure rise to $610,000 by the retirement age of 67. This amount exceeds ASFA's estimate of the $595,000 needed to afford a comfortable retirement for singles and $690,000 for couples. ASFA defines a 'comfortable' retirement as someone who owns their home outright, is in good health, can afford top-level private health insurance, has a good car, and engages in a range of leisure and recreational activities, including taking one domestic trip a year and one international trip every seven years. Business concerns There are concerns that a string of 1 July changes , including the increase to the superannuation guarantee levy, could hit businesses and place further pressure on cash flow. Luke Achterstraat, CEO, Council of Small Business Organisations Australia, said: "The increase of the superannuation guarantee comes at a time when award rates have also increased 3.5 per cent, national productivity is in decline, and payroll tax and workers' compensation insurance will also increase." There are concerns that an increase to the superannuation guarantee levy and other changes that took effect on 1 July could negatively impact small businesses and further pressure their cash flow. Source: AAP "This puts small businesses between a rock and a hard place, needing to either absorb or pass on these costs to consumers," Achterstraat said. Beyond 12 per cent: Where to from here? The 0.5 per cent increase to 12 per cent is the last one legislated by the Australian government. However, with life expectancy improving, would we need more in our nest egg, and is there a case for raising the superannuation guarantee even further? "I think there's going to be a debate about whether we need to go above 12 per cent," Swan said. "I think 12 per cent can certainly guarantee quite a dignified retirement for all Australians, but that will be a discussion that will be had in the years ahead."


West Australian
11 hours ago
- West Australian
Senator Penny Wong spruiks WA's geographic position as a key benefit in AUKUS pact during Quad trip
Penny Wong has spruiked WA's geographic position as a key benefit in the AUKUS pact, which she described as a 'win, win, win' during discussions with US counterparts in Washington. The Foreign Affairs Minister said the Quad meeting — a diplomatic dialogue between Australia, the US, Japan and India — had focused on the strategic importance of the deal, which WA would play a central role in. 'The focus yesterday was much more on what we can do together and also on AUKUS — that's a win, win or a win, win, win,' she told Sky on Thursday. Senator Wong said 'geography and capability' of Australia's defence posture benefited America in the pact. 'That's one of the benefits of AUKUS — the geographic location of Fleet Base West and the additional capability that that will provide,' she said. 'That is more maintenance for American submarines, that translates to more days in the water for US submarines.' A new defence precinct at Henderson, south of Perth, will be the maintenance home of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine fleet. The precinct will be home to a production line churning out army landing craft — first medium then heavy — and general-purpose frigates at new shipbuilding facilities. It is in the vicinity of The Royal Australian Navy's largest naval base, HMAS Stirling at Garden Island — housing much of Australia's fleet submarines and frigates as a key defence hub. 'One of the great things about the AUKUS arrangements is it increases the capability of all three countries,' Senator Wong said. 'Certainly, in the near and medium term it's a benefit to the US because it increases both the build rates but also maintenance rates. That equals submarine capability in the water.' In 2023, Australia's defence strategic review stated that WA's north was the first line of defence alongside the Northern Territory. The high-level talks on Indo-Pacific security in Washington comes amid growing pressure from the Trump administration for Australia to hike its defence spending. Senator Wong said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio hadn't raised defence spending during the Quad meeting or sideline bilateral discussions. She also said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was 'very flexible' about arrangements to meet with US President Donald Trump and that Secretary Rubio made clear 'they're keen for a meeting'. 'We're obviously very flexible about those arrangements,' Senator Wong said. 'The president is a very, very busy man, but I was pleased that Secretary Rubio made clear that obviously they're keen for a meeting, they want to reschedule it, it was disappointing, as he said, that they had to reschedule because the President had to return as a consequence of what was occurring in the Middle East.'

Sydney Morning Herald
12 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Nail in the coffin': Pacific rugby leaders raise alarm about NRL's PNG deal
The Drua say their games are watched by half Fiji's population of 900,000, but the money flowing toward rugby union from Australia pales in comparison to what has been pledged for the government-financed Pacific rugby league soft diplomacy strategy. The Fiji Rugby Union last month signed a memorandum of understanding with the Chinese Rugby Football Association and Tonga Rugby Union also has a partnership in the works with China, which funded the Polynesian kingdom's new $40 million national sports complex. In Samoa, meanwhile, China has offered to build a new national stadium. Tonga Rugby Union chief Aisea Aholelei said he would like to have seen more consultation from Australia on the impact of the government underwriting rugby league expansion. 'You just tell them that there is money involved and it's not hard for the players here or parents here to go to rugby league,' he said. 'It's a small place, and Australia government funded money, it would be good that it has a lot of mileage through organisations, sports bodies and the population, not just for the benefit of rugby league. 'It would be nice to have it on equal par with the funding to rugby league. What I would like [the Australian government] to consider is rugby union has been the national game for a long time in Tonga, Fiji and Samoa ... to have a consideration how much impact it has had in the past and what impact it will have in the future, especially the near future of the 2027 World Cup [in Australia].' In Samoa, rugby union is 'still the sport that determines the mood of the nation', according to Seumanu Douglas Ngau Chun, who heads the 15-a-side game there. But he said it would not be able to compete with the deep pockets the Australian government has given rugby league in the Pacific. 'Samoa only has a population of 200,000 people, with a limited private sector. Seeing that kind of investment going to league it concerns us. That means it might be a nail in the coffin for rugby here in the Pacific, especially for Samoa. As a struggling nation we are concerned,' the Samoa Rugby Union CEO said. 'We're tired of sending our elite players overseas to end up playing for the All Blacks and for other countries. With this kind of proposal that we're making to Australia, this will benefit our people to remain on island. But we'd also have access to top-quality assistance from Australian rugby.' The three island nations have drawn up a proposal for funding be boosted to a level where they could draw closer to Australia and New Zealand in international rugby union, as well as to enable Tonga and Samoa to push for their own Super Rugby franchises rather than see more players enticed to play for overseas teams. It is understood they will put forward a proposal for $150 million in assistance from the Australian government. Sewabu cited Fiji rugby union's tour of 1952 which drew large crowds and helped lift the Australian game up from financial troubles and fierce competition from rugby league. 'Our two countries have been rugby partners since 1952, when Fiji's visit helped keep rugby union alive in Australia,' he said. 'Today we face a new crossroads and can again work together for the good of Pacific rugby.' He said he hoped Australia could return the favour to 'protect the game we love that has so much historical, cultural and social significance to our people and our country'. An Australian government spokesperson said it already partnered with Rugby Australia and Oceania Rugby including with financial support in what was 'a great example of the power of sports diplomacy in bringing the Pacific family, of which Australia is a part, closer together'. 'Rugby union is something we have in common with our fellow Pacific family members. We share a rich history, whether it be through Tonga's iconic victory over the Wallabies in 1973 or through former World Cup-winning Wallaby Toutai Kefu, whose father Fatai played in the 1973 Tonga team. Again, this weekend, those ties will be strengthened further when the Wallabies and Fiji compete for the inaugural Vuvale Bowl. 'Australia is a proud member of the Pacific family. Australia continues to be the Pacific's largest development partner, and security partner of choice. The Pacific is best served by Pacific-led institutions and processes.' Loaded with NRL players, the Tongan and Samoan national rugby league teams have made great strides in the past decade, with Tonga recording historic wins against Australia and New Zealand and Samoa shocking England to reach the Rugby League World Cup final in 2022. About 50 per cent of NRL players now are from a Pasifika background. Rugby union, however, retains a firm link to the Pacific nations' cultural identities and power bases. Rabuka himself is former international for the Flying Fijians, the country's national rugby union team, and Tongan rugby's president is the country's prime minister, 'Aisake Valu Eke. The chairman of the Samoa Rugby Union is Tuilaʻepa Saʻilele Malielegaoi, the long-serving former prime minister bidding to reclaim the top job at an election on August 29. The Australian reported that one of Fiji's three deputy prime ministers, Manoa Kamikamica, told a forum at the Perth Sevens rugby union tournament in January that the NRL's government-funded Pacific handout was 'the biggest threat our sport has ever faced'. Rabuka, speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday, was more phlegmatic, pointing to the potential benefits of Fijian players being paid more. 'We are concerned that they might be pulling some of our people away,' he said. 'It may affect rugby union, but I don't think very much. But it could help the economy.' Loading Albanese, a fan of NRL team the South Sydney Rabbitohs, has used rugby league as a tool to safeguard Australia's national security interests in PNG in particular as Beijing seeks to expand its influence. But as cash-strapped Pacific rugby unions confront the prospect of state-sponsored rugby league, it has left a gap for China to step into the breach. 'We need to expand our horizons and see who is willing to help us,' said Tongan rugby chief Aholelei, who toured Chinese cities in June to explore commercial, player pathway and coaching ties. 'That's the reason we embarked on the tour of China. Kindly, the Chinese government helped us to partake. It was very insightful and thee's a lot of help there for us ... we're really optimistic about that impending partnership with China.' Douglas said Samoan rugby was also exploring an MOU with China after being approached by officials from Beijing's embassy in Apia.