Dalai Lama, on eve of 90th, aims to live for decades more
Thumping drums and deep horns reverberated from the Indian hilltop temple, as a chanting chorus of red-robed monks and nuns offered long-life prayers for Tenzin Gyatso, who followers believe is the 14th reincarnation of the Dalai Lama.
Looking in good health, dressed in traditional maroon monk robes and a flowing yellow wrap, he led prayers -- days after confirming that the 600-year-old Tibetan Buddhist institution will continue after his death.
Many exiled Tibetans fear China will name its own successor to the Dalai Lama, to bolster control over a territory it poured troops into in 1950 and has ruled ever since.
"So far, I have done my best and with the continued blessings of Avalokiteshvara (a Buddhist spiritual protector), I hope to live another 30 or 40 years, continuing to serve sentient beings and the Buddha Dharma", he said, referring to the teachings of the Buddha.
Followers of the Dalai Lama laud his tireless campaign for greater autonomy for Tibet, a vast high-altitude plateau about the size of South Africa.
AFP | Niharika KULKARNI
But speaking at the main temple in the Indian Himalayan town where he has lived for decades -- after Chinese troops crushed an uprising in the Tibetan capital Lhasa in 1959 -- he offered teachings to a far wider audience.
"In my life, I have encountered people from all walks of life, those with faith in religion and others with no interest in it at all. This is only natural, as individuals have different mental dispositions", he said, speaking in Tibetan.
"Yet, the common desire shared by all, including the Tibetan people, is the wish to avoid suffering and to experience happiness."
The charismatic Buddhist had previously said the institution would continue only if there was popular demand -- and his confirmation on Wednesday it would has reassured followers around the globe.
He said he had received multiple appeals from Tibetans in Tibet and in exile, as well as from Buddhists from across the Himalayan region, Mongolia and parts of Russia and China.
He said responsibility for identifying the 15th Dalai Lama "will rest exclusively" with his office, the India-based Gaden Phodrang Trust.
Self-declared atheist and Communist China, which condemns the Nobel Peace Prize winner as a rebel and separatist, issued a swift response.
China said on Wednesday that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama "must be approved by the central government" in Beijing, and that it would be carried out "by drawing lots from a golden urn", foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters.
That urn is held by Beijing, and the Dalai Lama has already warned that, when used dishonestly, it lacks "any spiritual quality".
India and China are intense rivals competing for influence across South Asia, but have sought to repair ties after a 2020 border clash.
New Delhi's foreign minister said it had "always upheld freedom of religion for all in India and will continue to do so".
- 'Struggle' -
The birthday celebrations have also been a time for reflection on an inevitable future without the Dalai Lama.
"Seeing him turn 90 today fills me with happiness, but also a deep sadness," said Dorje Dolma, 27, who fled Tibet to India.
"His Holiness has always felt like a father figure to me," she added. "His good health brings me joy, but his age sometimes worries me."
Hollywood star Richard Gere, a longtime backer of the Tibetans in exile, has been among the tens of thousands taking part in days of celebrations.
"There's something about this Tibetan cause that touches people, and certainly, a central part of that is His Holiness the Dalai Lama," Gere said during celebrations on Thursday.
"Which begs the question: What do we do when we don't have His Holiness to open those doors? He's not there to carry us. And we struggle with that, all of us now."
by Tenzin Woeden
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The collapse of precision warfare: Iran's role in the struggle for dignity
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrives to attend the funeral of Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander Hossein Salami and other military commanders, who were killed during Israeli strikes on the first day of the war, during a state funeral procession at Enghelab (Revolution) Square in the capital Tehran on June developments were not 'escalations', but a culmination, argues the writer. Image: Iranian Foreign Ministry / AFP Ali Ridha Khan THE fantasy of precision warfare is collapsing. With each Israeli airstrike, each Iranian drone, and each jittery American deployment, the veneer of 'surgical retaliation' is being stripped away. What remains is raw and elemental: a struggle not merely over territory or proxies, but over dignity, narrative, and the political horizon of the Global South. And it is in this horizon that Iran has positioned itself as the last strategic spine in a region otherwise bent by American fear and Israeli force. Let us be clear. The West— then led by an ever-confused Biden and now shadowed by Trump's isolationist pantomime—still believes that violence can be compartmentalised. That one can bomb Gaza, assassinate scientists, and sanction hospitals without consequence. But this belief, like Zionism itself, is a settler delusion. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has understood something Washington cannot: reputation is a weapon more potent than warheads. The Islamic Republic's restraint during the escalations of 2023 and 2024 was not a weakness. It was the patience of the hunted turning hunter. Israel's moral currency has never been lower; its genocidal siege on Gaza has moved even the most cynical into recognition. Iran knew then that the world did not need its rockets—it needed its example: a state that would not be baited into annihilation but would strike when the strike became unavoidable. And yet, we hope—for the sake of history, for the raped soil of Gaza and the bombed flesh of Beirut—that Iran's restraint ends soon. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Not because war is noble, but because there are worse violences than war. The violence of waiting. The violence of witnessing. The violence of survival without sovereignty. This is the violence Frantz Fanon spoke of when he wrote that the colonized 'learns that he is nothing in the eyes of the settler.' And so he must rise, not simply to destroy his oppressor, but to resurrect his own worth. Iran, in this framework, becomes not just a nation-state—but a vessel of defiance. Fanon never saw 1979, but he would have recognised it immediately: a rupture in the colonial order. Ayatollah Khomeini, like Ali Shariati before him, did not believe in Westoxification—the intoxication with the West that neutralises the revolutionary soul. The Islamic Revolution was never meant to mimic the Westphalian world—it was a call to reimagine it. Today's battle lines are no longer Cold War relics. They are metaphysical. On one side, Zionism, bolstered by empire and Silicon Valley surveillance; on the other, a constellation of wounded nations refusing to forget. As Steve Biko reminded us:'The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.' Iran's war is as much epistemological as it is ballistic—it is about reclaiming truth from CNN, memory from Mossad, and meaning from a UN that counts bodies but never blames the butcher. Some will call last week's developments 'escalations.' That is incorrect. This is the culmination. The slow agony of colonised people cannot continue in half-measures. The Arab regimes, with their palatial cowardice and U.S. bases, now face a mirror they cannot avoid. To host the empire's hardware is to be targeted by the rage it generates. Iran's message is clear: if we burn, you burn with us. And what of the world's so-called 'moderates'? The liberals who pace between peace and politics, issuing statements and equivocations? Ghassan Kanafani dismissed them best: 'If the Palestinian cause is not the cause of every revolutionary, it is not a cause at all.'
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Israel agrees to Gaza truce talks
GAZA CITY - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was sending a team to Qatar on Sunday for talks on a truce and hostage release in Gaza, after Hamas said it was ready to start negotiations "immediately". But Netanyahu, who is due to meet with President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday, said the Palestinian Islamist group's proposals for changes to a draft US-backed ceasefire deal were "unacceptable". Trump has been making a renewed push to end nearly 21 months of war in Gaza, where the civil defence agency said 42 people were killed in Israeli military operations on Saturday. Hamas said Friday it was ready "to engage immediately and seriously" in negotiations, and was sending its responses to the truce proposal. "The changes that Hamas is seeking to make in the Qatari proposal were conveyed to us last night and are unacceptable to Israel," said a statement from Netanyahu's office. "In light of an assessment of the situation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has directed that the invitation to proximity talks be accepted and that the contacts for the return of our hostages -- on the basis of the Qatari proposal that Israel has agreed to -- be continued," the statement added. Hamas has not publicly detailed its responses to the US-sponsored proposal, which was transmitted by mediators from Qatar and Egypt. Two Palestinian sources close to the discussions told AFP the proposal included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel. However, they said, the group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations, and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system. Two previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States secured temporary halts in fighting and the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. The Egyptian foreign ministry said Saturday that top diplomat Badr Abdelatty held a phone call with Washington's main representative in the truce talks, Steve Witkoff, to discuss recent developments "and preparations for holding indirect meetings between the two parties concerned to reach an agreement".
eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
Is the BRICS Summit just talk - or is it delivering on its promises?
A banner of the BRICS summit is displayed at the Modern Art Museum (MAM) where the BRICS Summit 2025 will be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on July 4, 2025. JOHANNESBURG - As global leaders gather once again for the BRICS Summit, questions are mounting over whether the annual event is producing meaningful results — or merely a stage for lofty declarations and diplomatic photo ops. The group is made up of founding members Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and was formed to provide a counterweight to Western-dominated global structures. But nearly two decades since its inception, some still ask whether the bloc is achieving what it set out to do? This year's summit comes at a time when global inequality, trade tensions, and the energy transition are front and centre, especially for developing nations. For African countries and South Africa in particular, there's a growing interest in whether BRICS can do more than just talk. Is it able to shift trade patterns, increase investment and help the continent benefit from its vast resources? Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva speaks during the BRICS Business Forum in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 5, 2025. BRICS leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro from Sunday are expected to decry Donald Trump's hardline trade policies, but are struggling to bridge divides over crises roiling the Middle East. Daniel RAMALHO / AFP Former Mauritian President Ameenah Gurib-Fakim believes it can. Speaking ahead of the summit, she noted that 'BRICS is not just about talk — it's about trading.' Her comments highlight a key success of the bloc. China, a founding BRICS member, has been Africa's largest trading partner for over 15 years, with trade between the two valued at more than $280 billion. There's also growing evidence that BRICS nations are bypassing traditional Western systems to trade in local currencies, promote cooperation in the Global South and fund infrastructure through the New Development Bank. And these are not small shifts — they point to a steady and measured transformation of global economic relationships. Attendees stand at the entrance to the BRICS Business Forum in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 5, 2025. BRICS leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro from Sunday are expected to decry Donald Trump's hardline trade policies, but are struggling to bridge divides over crises roiling the Middle East. Daniel RAMALHO / AFP Despite its expansion, still the scepticism persists. The lack of binding agreements and divergent political systems within the bloc, and internal disagreements often raise doubts about the bloc's ability to act as a unified force. But critics may be overlooking a key point. BRICS was never designed to be a military alliance or a monolithic power bloc. Its strength lies in its ability to create space — for dialogue, for new partnerships and for reshaping the rules of global engagement on more equal terms. As the 2025 summit unfolds in Brazil, it's clear that BRICS still has a lot to prove. But the numbers, the deals, and the growing influence of its member states suggest that this is more than just a talking shop. For Africa — where the stakes of global inequality are most visible — BRICS remains a platform with the potential to shift outcomes, not just opinions.
