
The secret free games on Netflix, Amazon, Sky and phones your kids will love playing for hours – & even get them moving
You'll find that there are plenty of hidden games wrapped into Netflix, Amazon and even Sky telly. Your mobiles and gadgets have loads of great options for kids (and adults) too. And there's even a clever way to play console games like Fortnite on the TV without owning a console.
17
17
FREE GAMES #1 – NETFLIX
If you're paying for Netflix on any level of plan, you'll get a load of free games to enjoy.
This is true even if you're getting Netflix for free as part of your Sky TV package.
The easiest way to find them is to go to the main Netflix screen, and look for the Games tab at the top of the screen.
Just note that not all devices support Netflix games. If you're using an Apple TV streaming box for instance, you won't be able to see them.
But I tried it with an Amazon Fire TV Stick and it was right there at the top.
A load of games should surface, each with a listed genre, description, and an age rating. Some of them are even multiplayer, so you can play together.
Typically, you'll click play on a game, and then use your smartphone as a controller. You'll be guided through it – it only took me a few seconds to get set up. It's as simple as scanning a QR code.
Cozy Grove: Camp Spirit is meant for kids aged 10 and older, and is a fun adventure game where you help ghostly bears find peace.
A slightly more mature option for children aged 13 and older is Oxenfree. It's a supernatural thriller about pals who accidentally open a ghostly rift. It's all very Stranger Things, and is well-reviewed on other platforms.
For more Arcade-style gameplay that gamers aged seven and up can enjoy, just try Centipede Recharged, Caverns of Mars Recharged, or Rocket.
You don't need a telly either.
There are lots of games that your Netflix membership will unlock on your phone, too.
Just go into the Netflix app on your mobile, navigate to the Games section, and they'll re-route you to your App Store to claim premium titles without paying the usual prices.
But getting them on the big screen is definitely more fun, and works really well.
17
FREE GAMES #2 – AMAZON
If you're paying for Amazon Prime (and millions of Brits are!) there are two free gaming perks you'll want to know about.
The first is that you get a monthly selection of free games to download.
This list is available through the Prime Gaming website here, and refreshes every month with new titles.
The monthly games are released as batches each Thursday, so there's always something new to play. They can be worth hundreds of pounds each month.
17
Usually the games are PC, but sometimes they'll be for consoles or mobile, too.
It'll be a different bunch of games every month, so you'll need to click Free Games at the top and then see what's on the list.
Claim them before they vanish and then they're yours forever.
Each game will show a rating, so you can easily tell what's appropriate for your child or not.
It's very likely that you'll find several child-friendly titles on the list each month.
A better option if you don't have a gaming PC or console is Amazon Luna.
This is like a "Netflix for games" that streams titles to you over the internet – meaning you don't need a physical Xbox or PlayStation.
All you need is a joypad that can connect to your Fire TV, Fire Stick, or Samsung or LG telly. Amazon sells a Luna controller for £60, which I've tried and really liked – but an old Xbox or PlayStation joypad will work just the same.
17
Then just go to download the Luna app on your telly or streaming stick. It's free to install.
Now normally you'd pay £8.99 a month to unlock the full library of Luna games.
But if you have Amazon Prime, you can enjoy a selection of titles even without a Luna membership.
That includes smash-hit shooter Fortnite, a cartoonish rival to the likes of Call of Duty that is a big hit with teens. In the UK, it's rated for kids aged 12 and older.
17
Fortnite is endlessly replayable, receives constant updates, and even hosts live music events with past stars including Travis Scott and Ariana Grande.
Normally you'd need an expensive console to enjoy, but Amazon Luna will let you do it for free with Amazon Prime (or for £9 a month if you want the full roster of games).
As a bonus trick, see if you're eligible for an Amazon Prime discount.
Higher-education students or anyone aged 18-22 years old in the UK can claim Prime for half price (plus an extended six-month free trial).
TRY XBOX CLOUD GAMING TOO!
There's a savvy option for dodging console cost, writes The Sun's tech editor Sean Keach...
Buying a console is expensive. It might cost you north of £400 or £500 (or even £700 for the new PS5 Pro).
A cheaper option is to try cloud gaming.
Instead of owning a physical console, you simply sign up to an app and "stream" the games from an online library. It's a bit like Netflix.
This was previously impossible. We used to need consoles to render the gaming visuals. But internet speeds are now so fast that they can be beamed straight to your TV, phone or laptop.
One option is Xbox Cloud Gaming, which is included as part of the £14.99-a-month Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription.
It'll get you hundreds of top games that you'd normally need an Xbox for. All you need is decent internet, a game controller, and a screen. The app is available on loads of TVs, Fire Sticks, and via web browsers.
Of course, you can also stick with Amazon Luna, which is much the same. This has a slightly smaller selection of games, but only costs £8.99 a month for Luna+.
The big perk here is that if you already have Amazon Prime, there's a small selection of games you can play for free. That includes smash-hit shooter Fortnite.
Picture Credit: Xbox
FREE GAMES #3 – SKY TV
If you've got Sky TV, you can access a load of free kid-friendly games very easily.
They're available through the Play.Works app, which you should be able to find on the apps rail.
If you can't see it, just ask for it using your voice by hitting the microphone button on your Sky remote.
The icon might say "Games by Play.Works" for you.
17
Once you click it, you'll be transported to a special gaming hub full of fun titles for you to enjoy on the telly. They're all free, so don't stress about surprise payments. You will have to sit through some ads though.
An obvious choice is Pac-Man, which is as fun today as it was in the 1980s. Tetris is on there too. I struggled to get off it and write this article.
You play with the Sky remote, so there's no need to buy extra gear.
This is also a bonus for kid-friendly gameplay, because it means most of the games have very simple controls.
17
SpongeBob Bounce is a great child-friendly option for fans of SpongeBob Squarepants – and it's easy to pick up.
You can also find Sky games by going to the dedicated Games section in the Apps panel.
There should be a Sky Kids rail that only shows child-friendly titles.
Parents might like it too: you've probably watched enough to have a good go at Peppa Pig Quiz, by Nick Jr.
FREE GAMES #4 – IPHONE, IPAD & ANDROID
If your child has their own phone or tablet – or can borrow yours – then you're in luck.
Mobile platforms are absolutely brimming with gaming freebies.
The problem is that it can be a nightmare to find titles that are actually decent and child-friendly.
What you want to download depends on the age of your youngster.
17
Earlier this year, I revealed five free mobile games that you can easily play for hundreds of hours. These are the best options for teens.
Top of my list was Wild Rift, which is a battle arena game spun off from hit PC title League of Legends.
This game has a 12+ rating, and usually involves online multiplayer (although you can totally silence online chatting).
Second was Polytopia, which is a strategy game where you try to take over a colourful map by building a civilisation and conquering your enemies.
17
It has a 9+ rating on the iOS App Store, and is listed as having "infrequent cartoon or fantasy violence". It's a great game for honing your smarts, and it's very simple to pick up compared to other strategy games.
APPLE ARCADE COULD BE YOUR SAVIOUR
Here's an extra tip from The Sun's tech editor Sean Keach...
Often free games can be a bit rubbish, stuffed full of microtransactions, and littered with ads.
But forking out for every single game to avoid this is also a budgeting nightmare.
Instead, think about trying Apple Arcade.
It's a £6.99 a month subscription service from Apple that gets you access to over 200 games (with more added all the time).
These games don't have any ads or in-app purchases, so you can be sure your child won't accidentally splash £1,000 on virtual coins.
The games aren't all for kids, but there are some great child-friendly options, with my personal favourites including:
Sneaky Sasquatch (4+)
Hello Kitty Island Adventure (4+)
Crossy Road+ (9+)
Skate City (9+)
If you turn on Family Sharing, you can also enjoy Apple Arcade on your own device. Up to six family members can share one subscription.
Just head into the Arcade section of the Apple App Store to get started.
It'll work across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV.
Picture Credit: Apple
Third on the list is Kingdom Rush, which has a 12+ age rating.
It's a tower defence game set in a medieval fantasy world where you build up your forces to battle waves of baddies.
17
Fourth on the list is Old School RuneScape, which is a whimsical medieval-esque fantasy adventure game.
It's 12+ on the App Store – but it's online-only, so you'll want to go in and set it up so your child can't speak to strangers. It only takes a few seconds.
And fifth on my list was Hearthstone, which is a brilliant online card game where you collect virtual trading cards to battle with other players.
It has a 12+ rating on iOS App Store, and has the option for closed multiplayer – so you could battle against your kids on it. They can also play against the computer and avoid totally online play.
17
If you're looking for mobile games for even younger children, there are great options too.
One popular option is Lego Duplo World, which has an age rating of 4+ on the App Store.
It's a colourful app meant for very young kids where you play mini-games and build colourful creations in a child-safe environment.
It's won a load of awards, has rave reviews on app stores, and it's very easy for a youngster to pick up.
Another option that almost needs no introduction is Pokémon Go, which has a 9+ rating on the App Store.
It has an exploration element, where you walk around the real world to collect virtual creatures.
This is a great way to get your kid moving – and you can explore together on long walks to track down rare Pokémon.
For movement at home, you could try Just Dance Now.
It has a very low age rating of 4+, and has very good reviews online. It's a dancing game where you can dance to a free song every day. You'll need to match the dance moves using your phone's camera to win – so there's plenty of movement involved.
WHAT DO GAME RATINGS ACTUALLY MEAN?
Here are the official guidelines for PEGI ratings on game boxes...
PEGI 3
Considered suitable for all age groups
Should not contain any sounds or pictures that are likely to frighten young children
A very mild form of violence (in a comical context or a childlike setting) is acceptable
No bad language should be heard
PEGI 7
Scenes or sounds that can possibly be frightening to younger children
Very mild forms of violence (implied, non-detailed, or non-realistic violence)
PEGI 12
Video games that show violence of a slightly more graphic nature towards fantasy characters or non-realistic violence towards human-like characters would fall in this age category
Sexual innuendo or sexual posturing can be present
Any bad language in this category must be mild
PEGI 16
Tthe depiction of violence (or sexual activity) reaches a stage that looks the same as would be expected in real life
The use of bad language in games with a PEGI 16 rating can be more extreme
Use of tobacco, alcohol or illegal drugs can also be present
PEGI 18
The adult classification is applied when the level of violence reaches a stage where it becomes a depiction of gross violence, apparently motiveless killing, or violence towards defenceless characters
The glamorisation of the use of illegal drugs and of the simulation of gambling, and explicit sexual activity should also fall into this age category
And although it's not quite a game, you can turn the free Merlin app into one.
It's an app that listens out for birds making noises nearby using your phone's microphone.
And it'll identify the bird almost instantly, keeping track of them for you in a little log.
You can go on lovely walks and turn them into a Pokémon style game where you see how many birds you can "capture" with Merlin. It'll even flag up when you've heard a rare bird. It's even more fun when you try to spot the bird making the noise.
Then once your child is a natural bird expert, you can see if they can work out the bird behind the song before checking Merlin.
This is very educational, is a great way to get outdoors, and can be used over and over again.
The app is age-rated 4+ on the iOS App Store, so it's very child-friendly – and easy to use too. And it works great in the garden if you just want to get them outside near home.
Finally, if you want a fun and hidden video game to quickly entertain the kids on a mobile, try Google's hidden Dinosaur Game.
It's built into the Google Chrome web browser, and is meant to entertain you when you've got no signal.
Stick Airplane Mode on to cut off your Wi-Fi and mobile internet, then try to load a web page up on Google Chrome.
17
An error page should appear with a little dinosaur. Tap it and you'll start playing a hidden infinite runner game. Just tap the screen to make the dinosaur jump to clear obstacles.
See who can get the best high score – and try not to fall out over it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How Bannon's alleged 'Epstein tapes' could be made public
As journalists and internet sleuths pour over details of the life of disgraced financier and convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein , more details are emerging over the mysterious tapes of an series of interviews with former President Donald Trump 's campaign chief and White House advisor Steve Bannon . The details of the video interview were revealed by author Michael Wolff in 2021, who said that Bannon emerged as a kind of media coach for Epstein and captured interview footage he claimed was 'training' for the disgraced luminary who was looking for a comeback. Bannon reportedly recorded more than 15 hours of video, Wolff revealed, even as he disputed that he was acting as a media coach for Epstein and instead working on a documentary. Wolff said he obtained transcripts of the Bannon interviews of Epstein for his book, 'Too Famous: The Rich, the Powerful, the Wishful, the Notorious, the Damned.' Now Wolff is sharing further details of the transcripts and the tapes, which he says were recorded in Epstein's massive Manhattan townhouse. 'There's no question the tapes were media training,' he told The Hollywood Reporter. 'And there's no possible way Epstein would have signed off on them being used in a documentary.' The tapes could someday be released as part of an Epstein documentary that Bannon says he is working on. In March, Bannon told comedian Jimmy Dore on his show that he was working on a 'multi-part' documentary series for Netflix or some other video platform. 'The working title is 'The Monster,'' Bannon said, teasing that it would be 'pretty shocking about how this guy came from nowhere to the absolute highest level of the global elite.' 'It's a project I'm working on with my filmmaking team,' he said. Bannon said the enterprise was work in progress and that it would focus on the Epstein's mysterious case. 'I don't think there was any doubt he was taken out, I think he was murdered or executed however you want to say, I have no belief that he killed himself,' Bannon said. Wolff said that Bannon and Epstein frequently spoke and exchanged emails and spent time together in New York City at his apartment. For years now, the internet has buzzed about the existence of the Epstein tapes in Bannon's possession and what it could reveal about his motivations prior to his July 2019 arrest and subsequent prosecution. Political strategist Roger Stone has repeatedly called for Bannon to release the tapes. 'Steve has evidently done a documentary about him. I'd like to see that documentary,' Stone said in an interview with Benny Johnson of The Benny Show. 'Steve should release that audio and video immediately.' If Congress gets involved, they could potentially release a subpoena to force Bannon to release the tapes. Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna also encouraged Bannon to release the footage. 'I'd be very interested in seeing that footage and I think the American people would be too,' she said at a Turning Point USA summit of conservative activists in July. Wolff speculated that Bannon might not have the rights to the footage, which is why it had not been released. Bannon did not respond to a Daily Mail request for comment, but continues pressing the truth about the Epstein files, blaming Attorney General Pam Bondi for messing up the administration's handling of the case. Bannon has also warned that the Republican party would pay dearly politically if they did not release the truth about Epstein. 'For this to go away, you're going to lose 10 percent of the MAGA movement. If we lose 10 percent of the MAGA movement right now, we're going to lose 40 seats in (the midterms), we're going to lose the presidency,' he told activists gathered at the Turning Point USA summit. The future of Bannon's documentary remains unclear as the level of interest surrounding Epstein has reached fever-pitch after the Justice Department released a memo stating there was no record of a 'client list' in the Epstein files and no evidence of foul play in Epstein's death. In 2021, Bannon teased a section of the interview where Epstein says he is a supporter of the Time's Up movement, where women campaigned against sexual harassment. 'I made my living from old thinking. But the future is for the way women think,' he told Bannon.


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
A Bend it Like Beckham sequel is coming – here's where to watch the original in the UK
Football fans across the country are celebrating the Lionesses' win at the Euro 2025 final, so some other football news may have flown under the radar. But it's been revealed that a sequel to cult classic Bend It Like Beckham is in the works. The second instalment of Bend It Like Beckham has been awaited for more than two decades. Written and directed by Gurinder Chadha OBE, the original is beloved for its humorous and moving exploration of identity, race, gender and religion. In fact, speaking to the BBC on Saturday, Chadha revealed that she's been asked for a sequel almost twice a week. The hope is that the cast will reprise their roles, including Parminder Nagra as Jess and Keira Knightley as Jules. Chadha even hinted at potential cameo roles for England's Lionesses. In the first film, Jess, a British-Asian football fan with an undiscovered talent, is scouted by Jules for their local girls' team, the Hounslow Harriers. Throughout the film, there's a tension between her love of football and the traditional gender roles in her Punjabi family, as well as a love triangle between Jess, Jules, and their coach, Jo. Spoiler alert, but the original film ends with Jess and Jules leaving for a football scholarship in America, and Jess reconciling her football career with her parents, who had previously disapproved. But there's very little to know about the sequel so far. It's also unclear which form the second instalment might take; it may be either a film or a television series. But with the target date set for 2027 – coinciding with the film's 25th anniversary and the Fifa Women's World Cup – there's a little wait before the story continues. In the meantime, you might want to relive the fun of the first film. Where to watch 'Bend it Like Beckham' There are several ways to watch Bend It Like Beckham in the UK. It's available on Disney Plus, which costs £12.99 per month or £129.90 per year for the Premium subscription. You can also watch the film for free on ITVX with ads, or you can rent or buy it on Prime Video for £3.49. Prime Video comes included with an Amazon Prime account, which costs £8.99 per month or £95 per year.


Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Social media posts by Laurence Fox calling two people paedophiles would not have been taken 'seriously' by many people, Court of Appeal hears
Social media posts by Laurence Fox referring to two men as paedophiles likely would not have been taken 'seriously' by many people, the Court of Appeal has heard. The actor-turned-activist was successfully sued by now-Stonewall CEO Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal over a row on Twitter, now known as X. Fox, 47, called Mr Blake and the former RuPaul 's Drag Race contestant, whose real name is Colin Seymour, 'paedophiles' in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury's to mark Black History Month in October 2020. A High Court judge said Fox should pay both men £90,000 each in damages and slammed the Reclaim Party founder for trying to 'attach blame and discredit' the pair during litigation. Fox called for a boycott of the supermarket and was called 'a racist' by the pair, as well as broadcaster Nicola Thorp, before he responded with the 'paedophile' tweets, which led to the libel claims. The judge dismissed Mr Fox's counter claims against the pair and Ms Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism. The 47-year-old is now challenging the £180,000 High Court ruling at the Court of Appeal in London, attending the first day of the hearing today. Sporting a tattoo of a crucifix on his neck and smoking a cigarette, Fox arrived hand-in-hand with his wife Elizabeth, who he married earlier this year during a private ceremony. The former actor was dressed in a white shirt, jeans and a pair of tan Vivo barefoot hiking boots worth about £296. Patrick Green KC, for Mr Fox, said in written submissions that the judgment which found Mr Fox had libelled the pair should be quashed due to 'errors of approach' by the judge, including over whether Mr Blake and Mr Seymour were caused serious harm. Mr Green said: 'Her conclusions were in any event, plainly wrong, on any fair consideration of the evidence.' The barrister added that Mrs Justice Collins Rice had wrongly decided damages for the two men, who, along with Ms Thorp, are opposing the appeal. Mr Green said that the decision on damages did not consider the actual words Mr Fox used 'and the likelihood that many or the vast majority of readers would have not have taken them seriously, particularly in their context'. The barrister said that in one of her rulings, the judge 'ignores the actual words used, or their all important context'. He also said the judge 'failed to account adequately or at all' for an apology Mr Fox made, or alleged misconduct by Mr Blake and Mr Seymour in 'exaggerating' the harm and distress caused. Mr Fox told the original trial in November 2023 that his use of the term was 'rhetorical', and 'there was no inference at any point that I thought they were a paedophile'. 'I was diminishing the ridiculousness of calling me a racist,' he said. And on Monday, Mr Green said it was clear Mr Fox was being rhetorical. The barrister told appeal judges: 'He's not saying "I am a racist and they are paedophiles' and everyone understood it in that way." Adrienne Page KC, for Mr Blake, Mr Seymour and Ms Thorp, said in written submissions that Mr Fox's appeal was 'lacking in merit'. She continued: 'The "paedophile" tweets did not embody the appellant's opinions about Mr Blake and Mr Seymour. 'They conveyed factual imputations of the most serious defamatory character.' The barrister added there was 'no meaningful retraction or apology' by Mr Fox. She later said: 'Whichever way one looks at it, the judge was fully entitled to reach the factual conclusions that she did on the serious, real-world, reputational impact of the appellant's tweets, for the reasons which she gave. There was nothing wrong with her analysis in fact or law.' Ms Page added that Mr Fox's case at trial had been 'largely devoted to hypothesising, as already noted, a series of different scenarios as to the various ways or settings in which his tweets may have appeared to different readers'. 'After very careful and conscientious evaluation, the judge was, unsurprisingly, not persuaded of this on the facts,' she continued. Ms Page continued that the sums of £90,000 in damages awarded to the pair were 'unexceptionable'. The hearing before Lord Justice Dingemans, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing and Lord Justice Warby is expected to conclude on Tuesday. During the last court battle, Fox had counter-sued Mr Blake and Mr Seymour and broadcaster Nicola Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism. In a previous judgment in January 2024, Mrs Justice Collins Rice ruled in favour of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour, dismissing Mr Fox's counter-claims. During a ruling in April of that year, the judge said Mr Fox should pay Mr Blake and Mr Seymour £90,000 each in damages. She said: 'By calling Mr Blake and Mr Seymour paedophiles, Mr Fox subjected them to a wholly undeserved public ordeal. It was a gross, groundless and indefensible libel, with distressing and harmful real-world consequences for them.' During the previous court case, Lorna Skinner KC, for Mr Blake and Mr Seymour, had said the pair should receive 'at least six-figure sums' from Mr Fox, calling a suggestion the pair should only receive a 'modest' award 'nonsense'. However, Patrick Green KC, for Fox, said the starting point of damages should be between £10,000 and £20,000, with the total being 'substantially lowered' due to an apology from Mr Fox and the absence of malice. Fox previously described the original judgment as a 'bullies charter' and said he disagreed 'profoundly' with the result. He said in a post on X at the time: 'I don't know what the judge will award these people. But the costs of these proceedings are enormous. So a whopper of a cheque is getting written in the next few days.' Fox added: 'We are seeing the courts used maliciously across the west and that is a very concerning trend. So enjoy the victory guys and I hope it is short lived!' Mrs Justice Collins Rice declined to make an order requiring the 47-year-old to publish a summary of the judge's decision on his X account. During a hearing in March 2024, Mr Green had said there was no need for the Lewis actor to publicise the ruling decision on his social media. He said in written submissions: 'This has been the most high-profile libel action of the year and both the trial and the judgment were massively reported in the media.... There can be few, if any, original publishees in the present case who will be unaware of its outcome.' The barrister added: 'The outcome of this long-running case literally could not be better known than it is already. 'For whatever passing doubts or vague suspicions that may have at some time subsisted in the minds of readers, only a modest financial award in compensation should be due.' Mr Green added: 'The remarks were quickly retracted and apologised for, and at the very least it was clear to the public at large at an early stage that the allegation was baseless.'