Paul Biya: 92-year-old president struggles to woo young Cameroonians on social media
"Cameroon has over 5.4 million social media users, but 95% of young people rely on WhatsApp - a platform where presidential communication is nearly non-existent," says Rostant Tane, the director of Media Intelligence Sarl and author of the Cameroon 2024 Multimedia Audience Study."There's no regional segmentation, no interactivity, and very little effort to speak the digital language of young people," he adds.Another stumbling block is authenticity."Many know that it is not Paul Biya himself who is writing - which creates distance and limits trust," says Hervé Tiwa, a lecturer in communication sciences."Their communication remains very top-down without any real interaction - comments ignored or deleted, a lack of personalised responses... This gives the impression of a strategy that is more cosmetic than participatory."Why does this matter? Cameroon's population is overwhelmingly young. Over 60% of the population is under 25, with more than half the electorate being under the age of 30, meaning they could potentially decide the outcome of the election."Political communication must serve democracy and transparency, and not just be used as a marketing tool," says 27-year-old communications specialist Ulrich Donfack.Young people want to see concrete action on issues that affect them, agrees Falone Ngu, who is also 27."Cameroon's youth are not just looking for flashy graphics or slogans on the media! They want opportunities, change and hope," says the social enterprise founder, who did reserve some praise for the president's social media team for realising that "leadership and digitalisation go hand in hand".
Unemployment is high in Cameroon, with even the most qualified young people in possession of multiple university degrees struggling to find work. Corruption and security are also key concerns.But instead of focusing on those issues, many posts on Biya's social media accounts emphasise his track record during 43 years in power - a time before much of the population was even born.According to communication strategist Aristide Mabatto, Biya's team is now publishing excerpts in French and English from more than 300 speeches the president has delivered over the decades.One recent, pointed example drew on a speech from 2000, chiding people who lecture others but fail to preach by example. That was posted just two days after one of Biya's longest-standing allies criticised his rule and abandoned him.
This somewhat staid approach does not appear to have ignited much enthusiasm, but is still an improvement on what went before."His communication used to be limited to official decrees and state addresses. The shift to frequent digital messaging shows a deliberate effort to reclaim the narrative and appear more present," argues Tiwa.Biya's absence from the public for more than six weeks last year had led to speculation about his wellbeing and unfounded rumours that he had died.Supporters have praised these latest efforts, with state media like Cameroon Tribune highlighting Biya's digital outreach as a sign of vitality and leadership.But scepticism and sarcasm are in greater evidence online. Comments below recent posts on Paul Biya's X and Facebook accounts include:"It looks like he's discovering the internet in 2025, but it's primarily an electoral market test," says a user called Cynthia."Finally he's talking to young people!", comments Jean-Pierre."Cameroonians want roads, not hashtags," writes a user called Mireille."Personally, I'm not at all convinced," 32-year-old entrepreneur Che Arnold tells the BBC of the Biya camp's strategy to appeal to young voters."It needs to go beyond tweets, Facebook messages and a simple online presence to promote political reforms but also solve real social problems."Biya will have to wait until the election in October to see if these efforts will translate into more young people voting for him.Editing and additional reporting by Natasha Booty
You may also be interested in:
Biya's daughter hopes coming out as a lesbian will change anti-gay lawsUS cuts visa validity for people from Cameroon and three other African nations'Nowhere is safe' - Cameroonians trapped between separatists and soldiers
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Tulsi Gabbard details damning allegations against Hillary Clinton
Tulsi Gabbard unleashed a barrage of shocking charges against Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, claiming that she was on 'heavy tranquilizers' and was dealing with 'psycho emotional problems' during the 2016 election. Gabbard, who is President Donald Trump's director of National Intelligence, said Russia President Vladimir Putin had that information and planned to use it against Clinton when she was serving as president. The information was in the September 2020 report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Russia's attempts to influence the election that Gabbard declassified on Wednesday. 'This report shows Putin held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election,' Gabbard said. The declassified report also claims that Clinton suffered from severe health ailments like type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. It also claimed that Clinton - who then was serving as Obama's secretary of state -had her government aides hold secret meetings with religious leaders where they were offered 'significant increases in funding' from the State Department in return for their political support in the election. 'The intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the most damaging material that he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory,' Gabbard said. 'There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers,' she added. Clinton did have a public health scare during the 2016 contest. She swooned and stumbled at a Sept. 11 commemoration in New York in an incident captured on cell phone video. It showed Clinton wobbling and being lifted into the vehicle by her aides after leaving a memorial service at the site of the 2001 World Trade Center attack. The Clinton campaign later said she was diagnosed with pneumonia. And her doctor, a few days later, declared Clinton 'healthy and fit to serve' as president. She had other health scares. In January 2011, when on an official trip to Yemen, Clinton tripped and fell on the plane stairs as she was departing the country. The declassified House report made a slew of charges about Clinton, including: As of September 2016, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) had Democratic National Committee (DNC) information that President Obama and party leaders found the state of Secretary Clinton's health to be 'extraordinarily alarming' and felt it could have 'serious negative impact' on her election prospects. Her health information was being kept in 'strictest secrecy' and even close advisors were not being fully informed. The SVR possessed DNC communications that Clinton was suffering from 'intensified psychoemotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression. and cheerfulness.' Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers' and while afraid of losing, she remained 'obsessed with a thirst for power.' The SVR also had information that Clinton suffered from 'Type 2 diabetes, Ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.' The SVR possessed a campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to 'distract the [American] public' from the Clinton email server scandal. The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) in August had details of secret meetings with multiple named US religious organizations, in which US State Department representatives offered-in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton- 'significant increases in financing' from Department funds and 'the patronage' of State in dealing with 'post-Soviet' countries. Clinton has not publicly responded to the charges. And Gabbard charged former President Barack Obama with driving a 'false' narrative that Russia wanted Trump to win the election. Obama has denied this. 'The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly points to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact,' Gabbard said. She declined, when asked, to say if Obama was guilty of treason, noting she would leave decisions on criminal charges to the Department of Justice. Gabbard has been releasing a slew of reports that claim former President Barack Obama and his administration were part of a 'treasonous conspiracy' to allege Russia interfered in the 2016 election on Trump's behalf. She claims Obama was behind a smear campaign to sew doubt about Trump's 2016 victory. 'President Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a years long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency,' Gabbard said. Gabbard specifically charged Obama's CIA director John Brennan as the leading figure behind the 'conspiracy' to undermine Trump's first term. She repeatedly claimed Russia was preparing for a Clinton victory in 2016 and were preparing to release it after she won. 'They specifically withheld what they had on her, the most damning information, because they thought she would win he election. They had plans to release it, just prior to her inauguration ... to discord and chaos in America,' she said. President Trump has seized on the new information and accused his Democratic rivals of organizing a failed 'coup' in 2016. 'They tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be really severe consequences,' he said on Tuesday. Trump has long argued that the FBI counterintelligence probe that began during the 2016 election was the start of a 'coup' to prevent him from taking office. He also issued an extraordinary call to investigate the former president – accusing his predecessor of 'treason.' 'After what they did to me, whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. Obama fired back at the 'bizarre allegations' coming from Trump. His office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant 'nonsense and misinformation' that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' his post-presidency office said in a statement.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Greens issue new Holyrood candidate list after 'software error'
The Scottish Greens have had to issue a revised set of candidate lists for next year's Holyrood election after an error was discovered in how selection votes were counted. The results, originally announced on Monday, sparked a row with members which saw the party's internal election officer resign. The new lists have the same candidates in the top positions, with most of the party's MSPs securing key places which give them an easier path to re-election. However there are changes further down the Edinburgh and Lothian East and South Scotland lists, with some members being moved up and down the rankings. Under the electoral system for Holyrood, the regional list vote involves parties ranking their higher an individual appears on the list, the better their chance is of becoming an had been raised by party members regarding a number of the internal include that of the Scottish Greens' current co-leader Patrick Harvie, and North East MSP Maggie Chapman who failed to secure top spot in her party has now blamed a "software error" at the external company used to process the has apologised for the "inconvenience and concern" caused by the third-party software it used to count votes. A Scottish Greens spokesperson party officials were assured on Monday afternoon that the counting "had been completed and confirmed to meet the standards requested under our internal party rules".But following further investigation the software error was detected in an external programme used to count votes. The party said was first made aware of this on Tuesday spokesperson added: "Party officials were not aware of this error at the time of previous statements, and had been reassured by the third-party provider on Monday afternoon that all counting had been completed and verified."Following a full revised count with oversight and verification from current party officials and those involved in previous Holyrood selections, we can confirm our full list of candidates for the Holyrood 2026 campaign. "All of the previously announced 15 lead candidates remain duly selected and will continue to lead the party's campaign to elect a record number of MSPs."The party acknowledged it had been a "stressful process" for candidates and members and thanked them for their "vigilance, patience and trust". Mi-Voice 'sincerely apologise' for anomalies Simon Thomson, director of Mi-Voice, said a review triggered by concerned party officials identified a "technical fault" with the vote counting Thomson said the party was notified at 10:00 on Tuesday and the issue was reported to the software also confirmed the updated candidate lists then underwent "additional manual validation" to ensure they represented "the final and accurate outcome". Mr Thomson said: "We acknowledge the concern this has raised for party members and candidates. "We understand the frustration and confusion, and we sincerely apologise for the inconvenience and concern it has caused." On Tuesday, Kate Joester, who was the party's internal elections officer, said she had not spotted the issue when the figures were first sent to initially endorsed a statement from the party reassuring campaigners that there were "no realistic doubts" about the after quitting her post Joester said she should not have given her backing amid concerns about how some votes were cast.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
JOHN MACLEOD: So long, Sir Jamie, but parliament won't see your like again - it won't be allowed to!
It was a balmy May 2011 day in Edinburgh and, down at Holyrood and after the latest Scottish parliament election – and in alphabetical order – all the MSPs, one at a time, were being sworn in. They sashayed down alternate ramps, hoisted in turn a right paw, and obediently repeated, clause by clause, the rubric read out to them. An alarming number merely 'affirm' – they don't do God. There's always some showboating. Folk who prate, in prefix, of their true loyalty to the 'people of Scotland', or who insist in repeating the whole rite in Gaelic, Catalan or Klingon. But when a venerable Conservative MSP for the Highlands and Islands sailed down to renew his troth to Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors according to law, we leaned forward in the cheap seats, sure something was poised to go wrong. In the event it took five stumbling attempts, each ever more desperate, before he finally managed to pronounce his own name. And, alas, 'I, Sir James Angus Rhoderick Neil McGrigor…' had an awful lot of name. When he finally crested that Everest, to the last syllable, there was whooping and thunderous applause, for he was – on all sides of the chamber – very much beloved. Sir Jamie, who died peacefully last Sunday, was often underestimated. He was a talented guitarist, a natural comic, and the first MSP to pilot a Private Member's Bill – in his case, establishing a national registry of tartans – onto the Holyrood statute book. Few such characters make it onto Westminster or Holyrood ballots today. They are seldom allowed to. The days when a local constituency association could simply anoint a candidate, when he is a fully paid-up party member and they like the cut of his jib, are long gone. They can only pick someone off a centrally approved list of clones, bores and lickspittles – and few of any interest, character or backbone survive the process. That's before you even get to women-only shortlists or other diversity tick-box tricks. In 2021, Nicola Sturgeon got rid of Joan McAlpine – an SNP list MSP for South Scotland, not 'one of us' on trans issues – by the simple expedient of ruling that the top spot on the regional list (and, thus, the only Nationalist with a hope of election, given their near-sweep of physical constituencies) go to someone disabled. In like manner, when our local Western Isles MP Angus MacNeil a couple of years ago lost the Nationalist whip, a new face had to be signed up for the looming Westminster election. The obvious candidate was the Stornoway North councillor Gordon Murray. Smart, educated, delightful, happily married, a tireless community advocate and a Free Church adherent, big on the Lord's Day and that. But we never got to vote for him. Even signed-up SNP members were not allowed to vote for him, for Cllr Murray was blocked in 'vetting'. We ended up with a woman no one had ever heard of and Labour's Torcuil Crichton duly buried her by a country mile. You look back on the politics of yore and wonder how many would have made it onto the ballot paper in the modern era against the anointed ones – lanyarded aides, researchers, step-and-fetch-its and professional politicians ever since uni; those who have never actually had a real job, nor one original idea between their ears, nor psychologically ever left the student union. Which is why, from NHS Fife to the Scottish parliament, we see numpty reaching out unto numpty, signed up to the latest woke obsessions and totally out of touch with reality. You simply wouldn't get a Margo MacDonald in either parliament these days. Or a Michael Forsyth, or a Teddy Taylor – people with strong values, bold opinions and an incorruptible ethos of public service. Margo spoke up all her days for the poor, the marginalised and the voiceless. Teddy Taylor – a superlative MP for Glasgow Cathcart – clamoured for capital punishment as if he had shares in rope. Everyone hated Michael Forsyth – not least because, time and again, Stirling kept re-electing him – but I saw him holding the floor at an Edinburgh University 'Pies, Pints and Politics' town-hall in 1985, and not one trendy Leftie managed to lay a glove on him. 'And where did you hear that?' he inquired of one be-denimed brat. 'I read it in The Observer…' 'Ah,' mugged Forsyth, in sepulchral scorn, 'you read it in The Observer,' and – hostile to a man as the gathering was – everyone erupted in laughter. Four decades ago a joyous triple-act regularly did the studio rounds: Sir Julian Critchley (Con, Aldershot), Austin Mitchell (Lab, Grimsby) and our own Charles Kennedy. They were all blessed with fresh minds; distanced just a little from their respective parties. They were a hoot and, inevitably, were soon dubbed 'Critch, Mitch and Titch'. As the late Edna O'Brien once lamen-ted, the question these days is less, 'Where have all the fairies gone?' but, 'Where are all the thinkers now?' The hollowing-out of our political parties is one of the few debauchings in public life that cannot be blamed on Tony Blair. The likes of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell repeatedly rebelled in the voting lobby – in Corbyn's case, hundreds of times – but they were left to frolic, in entire irrelevance, to their hearts' content. John Prescott, as Deputy Prime Minister, was less a colleague than a sort of pet. The rot really began with the Tories when David Cameron – who had effectively franchised out his political brain to George Osborne – took command in 2005 and embarked on the 'Conservative modernisation project'. They looked not to Thatcher or Churchill, but to such improbable gods as Clinton and Blair, and did their best to reinvent one of Europe's oldest and most ruthlessly successful political parties as blandly cuddlesome. In the Nationalists, you might trace it back even to the late 1970s, when the SNP elite panicked after the disastrous Glasgow Garscadden by-election. (In a seat where Royal Navy shipyard orders really kind of mattered, local activists had mulishly nominated a pacifist.) The trouble with closed party lists is not that you identify and nail down your best and brightest. You are simply setting yourself up to be lied to, and the people who best game that process tend to be generally away on the moors of moral turpitude. As brilliant a mind as the SNP ever possessed, Stephen Maxwell stared when, amidst the 1999 selection winnowing, he was asked to assure his interlocuters he would never, ever vote against some decreed party line. He could readily imagine all sorts of situations when he might have to, he patiently explained. Maxwell did not make the list. Latterly frail, having to tote bottled oxygen wherever he went, Sir Jamie McGrigor was in 2016 heavily 'encouraged' not to stand for Holyrood again. He ended his career as only he could, as a councillor subsequently for Oban South and the Isles – and, in 2022, was expelled from the Scottish Tories. By accident.
