Sir Keir must not surrender to Brussels

Telegraph

16-05-2025

For two centuries and counting, whether the threat arose from Germany, France or Russia, Britain's military has played a critical role in keeping tyranny from the European continent. With the United States increasingly unwilling to pay for the defence of countries that seem to treat Washington with a combination of entitlement and disdain, the United Kingdom's military is more vital to European security than it has been in decades.
This appears to have passed Sir Keir Starmer by. The idea that the EU could need defence co-operation with the UK more than Britain needs a further deal with the Continent is anathema to a Prime Minister who spent the Brexit years marinating in Remainer talking points. It is, nevertheless, more than likely true. The EU needs the reassurance and participation of the United Kingdom in its defence. The question is what price we should ask in return.
The status of Northern Ireland, for instance, is deeply unsatisfactory, and efforts to remove the barriers to the free flow of trade across the Irish Sea should be undertaken. The EU appears to wish this to be achieved through a deal which would see the UK align with laws made in Brussels, and submit to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. This, surely, would be an excellent point to leverage the threat of non-co-operation on defence matters, and to highlight just how weak the bloc's hand is.
For Sir Keir, regrettably, Britain's participation in Europe's defence is a prize and a privilege that London, and not Brussels, should pay for. As such, there is a real risk that the Prime Minister is about to sign away further fishing rights in the UK's waters in exchange for the right to pay into an EU rearmament fund where France is angling to limit the share of spending that can go to British companies, while also giving Brussels greater rights to interfere in the running of the British economy.
It is entirely understandable that European capitals might still be insistent that costs be imposed on Britain in case the visible successes of the Brexit project – and in particular, the flurry of free trade deals struck over the past year – might give various countries pause for thought about the continued desirability of membership. It is not clear why Sir Keir Starmer should be willing to go along with this.
If Brussels wants British soldiers deployed in its military missions and British foreign policy tightly aligned with decisions made in the bloc, then it is Europe that should be offering concessions. Sir Keir would do well to remember this. So, too, should the EU: given the surging support for Reform UK, and Nigel Farage's militant promises to tear up lopsided treaties with the bloc, a bad deal may well prove to be a short-lived one.