
Okay as neighbors, not as family: Korea's ambivalence about immigrants
A recent survey showed that nearly 96 percent of South Koreans are willing to accept immigrants as part of their society on some level, but only 8 percent said they are willing to accept them as family members.
The survey by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs asked Koreans aged 19-74 how open they were to immigrants, defined as people from other countries living in Korea on long-term visas. According to the KIHASA report, 38.7 percent of respondents said they were willing to accept immigrants as their neighbors. Another 30.51 percent said they were fine with having immigrants as colleagues, and 18.35 percent said immigrants could become their best friends. However, only 8.37 percent said they were open to an immigrant becoming their spouse or a member of their family.
The survey was part of KIHASA's report on generational differences here on accepting immigrants, and tasks for related policies. Answers were solicited from a total of 3,011 people.
The youth population (19-34) was generally less opposed to immigrants than other age groups, with only 2.59 percent of them saying they could not accept immigrants under any circumstances. This was significantly lower than any other age group, including 7.49 percent among senior citizens (65 and older), and the overall average of 4.07 percent.
But the vast majority of even the younger group showed reluctance toward marrying an immigrant or having one join their family, with only 8.61 percent saying they were open to the idea. Middle-aged Koreans (35-64) were marginally more open to marrying immigrants (9.13 percent), while over half of senior citizens (57.89 percent) said they were just fine with having an immigrant neighbor.
Only 5.05 percent of seniors were willing to accept immigrants as family.
"The senior group showed a dual attitude (toward immigrants), being open to them in everyday life with limited contact, but refusing to be in close relationships or to be close emotionally," the researchers said about the findings.
The survey also showed that Koreans were much more open toward immigrants staying here on ordinary long-term visas than toward refugees. For immigrants with permanent residency, less than 2 percent of the respondents across the age groups -- from 0.23 percent of the youth group to 1.65 percent of the oldest group -- said they could not accept them, but opposition surged when asked the same question about refugees.
About 29.57 percent of senior citizens said they were unwilling to accept refugees at all, followed by 19.27 percent of middle-aged people and 15.86 percent among the youth group.
The percentage of those willing to have a refugee as a family member or spouse was under 3 percent in all age groups, though 10.88 percent of the youth group said they could accept a refugee as a best friend -- the highest out of all three age groups.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Lee Kyong-hee] Fake news, false reports, conspiracy theories](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F27%2Fnews-p.v1.20250727.a91a4cf0574d4e6ca5224ba02614b75f_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Lee Kyong-hee] Fake news, false reports, conspiracy theories](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Lee Kyong-hee] Fake news, false reports, conspiracy theories
Within hours after President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law on Dec. 3, a rabid right-wing YouTuber contended that 99 Chinese spies were apprehended at an election management facility and transported to a US military base in Okinawa, Japan. Thereafter, social networks were rife with rumors that the Chinese accounted for 30 percent of anti-Yoon protesters demanding his impeachment. Nonsensical online demagoguery? Of course. But to many supporters of the disgraced YouTube-addicted former president, it rang true. After all, during his turbulent presidency, Yoon often blamed Chinese influence on domestic politics and elections without providing evidence. The Yoon supporters eventually descended on an enclave of lamb skewer restaurants mostly run by ethnic Koreans who left China for their ancestral homeland in search of better opportunities. Screams of 'Go back to China!' and 'Commies, disappear quickly from the Republic of Korea!' filled the air near Konkuk University, eastern Seoul. The pathetic scene of violence evoked a sense of deja vu. Rewind to July 1931, when Japan hyped a minor dispute between local Chinese farmers and Korean settlers in Manchuria to justify its aggression. The dispute began when a group of Koreans subleased land outside of Wanpaoshan village, north of Changchun, Jilin province, and began digging an irrigation ditch in an area not included in the sublease. Some 400 Chinese farmers, armed with farming tools, confronted the Koreans, and the Japanese consulate in Changchun dispatched police under the pretext of protecting subjects of their empire. The Chinese security authorities also sent police. The clash ended with several Chinese wounded, but Japanese police officers and Korean farmers unharmed. To ignite anti-Chinese sentiment, the Japanese colonial authorities had Korean newspapers publish fabricated reports claiming that hundreds of Koreans were killed during the so-called 'Wanpaoshan Incident.' Anti-Chinese riots erupted across Korea, causing hundreds of Chinese casualties and major property damage. Meanwhile, anti-Korean riots in China continued under Japan's wartime propaganda. Months later, a New York Times dispatch from Changchun dated Nov. 4 said: 'Fully 10,000 Korean farmers have been massacred by Chinese or slain while defending their homesteads during the last six weeks in Jilin Province alone, according to an estimate given out here today by a Japanese General commanding a division of 5,500 troops.' The media manipulation thus turned a minor skirmish between farming groups into a major conflict, devastating an ethnic community and eventually dealing a fatal blow to Korean independence movements in the broader Manchurian region. Fast forward to chaotic post-liberation Korea in 1945. Freed at last from four decades of harsh foreign rule, Koreans failed to achieve national unity and fell victim to great power politics. Again, newspapers played a role -- significant, if not decisive -- in the partition of the peninsula under two contesting regimes. In the summer of 1945, Koreans expected their country would quickly become free and independent again. They were not aware that the big powers, under US initiative, were considering a four-power trusteeship that might last as long as 40 to 50 years. The trusteeship issue was resolved by the foreign ministers of the US, the UK and the Soviet Union, who convened in Moscow in December 1945. Their communique, adopting the Soviet draft concerning the Korean question, stipulated a four-power trusteeship for up to five years to supervise a unified provisional Korean government, which would be established by a US-Soviet joint commission. On Christmas Day, before the announcement of the final decision, the United Press reported from Washington that 'Secretary of State Byrns went to Russia reportedly with instructions to urge immediate independence as opposed to the Russian thesis of trusteeship.' Korean media carried the story on Dec. 27, each editing and compiling it as they saw fit. The news bombarded the already polarized political scene. The idea of 'trusteeship' itself was unacceptable; anti-trusteeship became a strong rallying point for the right. The rightist Dong-A Ilbo had an inflammatory headline: 'Soviet Union Asserts Trusteeship; United States Asserts Immediate Independence.' The rightists seized upon the opportunity to denounce communists as 'country-selling Soviet stooges.' The US Military Government in Korea added to the confusion by deliberately implying that trusteeship was solely a Soviet policy. Amid extreme confrontation between the right and the left, leading politicians from both camps were assassinated. The turmoil ever deepened. The North-South division perpetuated. Much about the controversial newspaper reports on the Moscow conference, regarded as among the worst Korean press performances to date, remains a mystery. None of the newspapers offered an apology for false reporting, disregarding the basic principles of fact-checking and verification, nor did they elucidate the background of their reporting. Most recently, the press coverage of the visit by Morse Tan, a Korean American law professor and former US ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice, raises questions about his identity as well as evidence of his claims about election fraud in South Korea and President Lee Jae-myung's childhood. The press should focus more on fact-finding to enhance accountability and win back the public's trust, which has been lost to social media. Today's information disorder and consequent conundrum, complicated by the proliferation of new media and the ever-present foreign interference, requires unwavering journalistic integrity and professionalism. News consumers also need to improve their information literacy. Ultimately, they get the media they deserve.


Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
Lutnick says he could hear 'expletives' out of Korea following trade deal with Japan
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that he could hear "expletives" out of South Korea after Japan reached a trade deal with US President Donald Trump's administration earlier this week. Lutnick made the remarks, apparently suggesting that the tariff deal between the United States and Japan might have created a sense of urgency for South Korea, which seeks to reach a deal to avoid or lower the Trump administration's 25 percent "reciprocal" tariff set to kick in on Aug. 1. "I could hear the expletives out of Korea when they read the Japanese deal because the Koreans and the Japanese ... they stare at each other," he said in a CNBC interview. "So you can imagine what they were thinking when they saw that Japan made that deal ... They were like, 'Oh man!," he added, underscoring that Koreans "very much" want to make a deal. On Tuesday, Trump announced the deal with Tokyo that would lower the threatened 25 percent reciprocal tariff for Japan to 15 percent in return for Japan's agreement to invest US$550 billion in the US, increase US rice imports by 75 percent and buy 100 Boeing aircraft, to name a few. During the interview, Lutnick said that he will engage in a meeting with South Korean negotiators in Washington on the day, after bilateral high-level trade talks, slated for Friday, were postponed. Korea's Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan and Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo are currently in Washington amid Seoul's stepped-up efforts to strike a deal with the US "Of course, they are going to be in my office today talking," the secretary said. Seoul and Washington had planned to hold "two-plus-two" trade talks on Friday, where Seoul's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, Trade Minister Yeo, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were set to get together.


Korea Herald
4 days ago
- Korea Herald
Young workers say raising retirement age will hurt efficiency, older people disagree
6 out of 10 young Koreans says raising legal retirement age to 65 will reduce job opportunities for them As South Korea mulls raising the legal retirement age from 60 to 65, a generational divide is growing, with younger and older Koreans split over the potential impact on productivity, employment opportunities and workplace dynamics. A recent survey by the Korea Enterprises Federation found that 59 percent of respondents aged 20-34 believe raising the retirement age will be detrimental to work efficiency, while 62.6 percent of those aged 45-59, who have been in the workforce for at least 15 years, said it would not. The survey, conducted on two separate groups of 500 people -- one from the 20-34 age group without jobs and another from the 45-59 age group who have worked for at least 15 years -- also revealed disagreement on whether the higher retirement age would diminish job opportunities for young people. About 61.6 percent of young respondents said it would, while 50.6 percent of older respondents said it would not. The debate comes as a record number of Koreans over 60 remain in the workforce. According to government data in June, 60 percent of 60-somethings had jobs, just slightly lower than the 60.3 percent recorded for those in their 20s. With employment contracts generally ending when workers turn 60, the survey also showed disagreement about the best policy for enabling people to work beyond that age. Young people were split almost evenly between three options: allowing firms to choose whether to retain workers past 60 (36.8 percent), having firms formally terminate employees at 60 and then rehire them (31.8 percent), and mandating an extension of the retirement age by law (31.4 percent). But nearly half of the older respondents (46.8 percent) support the third idea -- the one least supported by the youth group -- that the government itself should mandate the change by raising the legal retirement age. However, a majority of respondents from both groups expressed concern that a greater number of older workers in a company could lead to workplace conflicts over the generational divide, work styles, difficulty adapting to new technology and overall communication. Those concerns were greater among the younger group, of whom 80.8 percent said the change would cause problems, while only 63.2 percent of the older group said the same. Officials at the KEF said raising the retirement age to 65 requires a cautious approach as it may frustrate young people not yet in the labor market, who may see the change as taking away their job opportunities.