GE2025: Liang Eng Hwa says ‘naive' of Paul Tambyah to think estate projects will continue on ‘autopilot'
"In most of my years of serving as an MP and in Bukit Panjang town, actually a major part of my effort is to work with the bureaucracy to bring much-needed projects to Bukit Panjang," said Mr Liang, the incumbent for the single-seat ward, ahead of Singapore's May 3 General Election.
"It is not like it is autopilot. It doesn't come to you on a silver platter as what SDP may seem to suggest."
He was responding to a rally speech by the Singapore Democratic Party's Bukit Panjang SMC candidate Paul Tambyah on Tuesday (Apr 29), where the party chairman said estate projects and services would continue even if SDP candidates were elected in place of PAP ones.
Dr Tambyah linked this to Singapore's civil service and government agencies being among the most professional and apolitical in the world.
At his own rally in Bukit Panjang on Wednesday, Mr Liang agreed that the civil service and government agencies were indeed professional and efficient, but noted that they could also reject projects that did not "align with their current plans or objectives" or that they have no budget for.
"And that is why MPs like myself, we play an important role in advocating for our residents," he said. "It is not always smooth-sailing. In fact, most of the time it is not."
"So, it is actually naive to think that it doesn't matter who is your MP – that agencies will do all these things for you; to carry out these projects for you. It's not the case," said Mr Liang.
He described MPs as bridging the gap between the agencies and residents.
Mr Liang cited some examples, including how he worked with the Ministry of Transport and Land Transport Authority to build the Senja-Kranji Expressway link to reduce traffic congestion in the area. He also pointed to how he initiated the construction of two hawker centres, and started bus service 972 to improve connectivity.
"You can't be telling your voters ... don't worry what the MPs have done. Someone will get elected, the things will continue and be delivered," said Mr Liang of Dr Tambyah's comments.
"But in reality, in-principle approval projects still require a lot of pushing to get it off the ground," he added. "These are things that an experienced MP like myself can do better ... and get it going, and see it to fruition."
"TALK IS EASY": EDWARD CHIA
Earlier in the night, the PAP's candidate for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC Edward Chia also spoke in praise of Mr Liang.
"As elected Members of Parliament we are responsible for our constituents. When it comes to responsibility, the person who has best lived by this principle is my friend, my mentor, Mr Liang Eng Hwa," he said, pointing out how Mr Liang first served as an MP for Zhenghua ward in Holland-Bukit Timah and later Bukit Panjang SMC for the past 19 years.
"Mr Liang is not just a ground MP - he is a complete MP. He is both firmly on the ground with you, understanding your everyday needs; and a strong voice in parliament, shaping national policies that impact all of us," said Mr Chia.
Mr Chia also warned that while the opposition had raised various ideas during campaigning, "ideas alone are not enough".
"When elected, words must turn into action. If all the opposition promises is to 'speak up' for you, then you need to ask - you really need to ask – is that all you're getting?" said Mr Chia. "Because talk is easy; talk is cheap. Talk alone doesn't build homes, create jobs, or raise wages to cope with the cost of living."
He said the opposition can speak but "cannot deliver".
"And in the end, it is all of us – all of us – who bear the consequences of empty promises."
"Ultimately this election is about whom we can trust to be responsible for securing your hopes and your futures," said Mr Chia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
4 days ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Countering misinformation requires both laws and access to trusted news sources: Josephine Teo
Countering misinformation requires both laws and access to trusted news sources: Josephine Teo Source: Straits Times Article Date: 17 Jul 2025 Author: Goh Yan Han Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo said Singapore must try to prevent 'cracks in our infrastructure of fact'. Laws against fake news and manipulated content during elections will continue to be essential in safeguarding Singaporeans against information threats, but by themselves they are not enough to push back against misinformation, Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo said on July 16. Instead, the Republic must try to prevent 'cracks in our infrastructure of fact', which pave the way for rogue actors to dominate its media and information landscape, as has happened elsewhere, said Mrs Teo. That is why the Government has stepped in to support public service media, she added, which ensures that Singaporeans have continued access to trusted news sources, and to uphold the integrity of the city-state's infospace. 'Our long-term goal remains unchanged, and that is to nurture a resilient information ecosystem – one where truth can stand on its own, and public trust is anchored in an informed, engaged and discerning citizenry,' she said at the Singapore Press Club Awards 2025 held at Pan Pacific Singapore. These efforts to counter misinformation are crucial because Singapore, as a diverse and open society, will always be susceptible to the dangers of misinformation, she said. Mrs Teo cited examples from the 2020 General Election, when there were falsehoods on projected population figures and Covid-19 testing of foreign workers; and the 2023 Presidential Election, when there was a false claim that the Government could trace how individuals voted and penalise them for their choices. Such attempts at misinformation could be addressed 'to some extent' with the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma), which came into force in 2019. This is as Pofma does not generally take a falsehood out of circulation but requires that a correction notice be carried alongside it, which means people can continue to believe the falsehood despite it being called out. Lies also tend to travel faster than the truth, she added. 'We are realistic that a factual correction does not reach everyone who had seen the falsehood.' The risks during the recent May 3 general election were much greater with the availability of artificial intelligence-generated deepfakes, she noted. A compressed election timeline – there were nine days of campaigning during GE2025 – meant that the window to react was extremely narrow, said Mrs Teo. 'We therefore needed to be absolutely clear what was permitted and what was not, and who was accountable for validating the suspected content,' she added. In October 2024, the authorities put in new safeguards when election laws were amended. The Elections (Integrity of Online Advertising) (Amendment) Act, or Eliona, prohibits digitally generated or manipulated election-related content that realistically misrepresents a candidate's speech or actions during the election period. Candidates have to declare whether content featuring them was true or false, and a wrongful declaration could have led to the result of their election being voided. Thankfully, GE2025 did not see a surge in egregious misinformation or malicious synthetic content, said Mrs Teo. Neither Pofma nor Eliona was invoked during the recent election. She added that Singapore is fortunate that its public service media remain trusted institutions, with the recent Reuters Digital News Report having found that 75 per cent of respondents trusted The Straits Times, while 74 per cent trusted CNA. 'These are outstanding achievements, especially when compared against the global average trust in media, which stands at just around 40 per cent,' she noted. Going forward, Mrs Teo said public service media has to continue developing the right talent and instincts to provide quality journalistic content for Singaporeans. 'Content is still key. Information is the currency of the industry, and your insight is what sets you apart from the rest. This is also your mission and duty to your audiences,' she said to a room of over 240 guests, including journalists past and present. Media outlets here must also keep pace with technology and the changing preferences of audiences by investing in new capabilities, adopting new processes and creating new products. Mrs Teo cited SPH Media's in-house multimedia facility Studio+65, which allows for virtual production, audiovisual storytelling and digital content creation. Mediacorp has also deployed AI in its newsrooms, automating translation and subtitling processes, she noted. In her speech, Mrs Teo spotlighted some award winners for innovating and finding new ways of bringing important stories to readers. They included ST senior correspondent Stephanie Yeo, who won a health journalism award for her well-researched reports on women's health issues that raised awareness of conditions such as endometriosis and menopause and their available treatment options. Endometriosis is a condition whereby tissue similar to the womb lining grows outside of the womb. Mrs Teo said public service media in Singapore has defied the odds and avoided the fates of many of its international counterparts, and that generations of journalists played an important role in fostering a thriving and vibrant media ecosystem here. 'It is fair to say that journalism has never been an easy job, and it has become only harder in recent decades. But you have soldiered on with a tireless commitment to excellence,' she said. 'Your dedication to the craft has been instrumental in upholding truth and trust in Singapore's information space, shaping an informed audience and a stronger Singapore.' Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
CNA
6 days ago
- CNA
Sabah election: Has political instability derailed development?
Sabah is expected to hold its state election this year, but which parties can finally solve its perennial problems? The election is the first in a series of noteworthy state polls - next up are Melaka, Johor and Sarawak - between now and 2028, by when Malaysia's 16th General Election (GE16) must be held.
Straits Times
7 days ago
- Straits Times
Listen first, post later: Gen-Z-ifying the general election
Christie Chiu and Wong Yang were first-time voters, but also rookies to election reporting. Their brief was slightly different – cover Singapore's 2025 General Election, but for TikTok and Instagram. This sent them scuttling from Boon Lay to Bedok, Gen-Z-ifying rally speeches and devising skits, gags and punchlines. They look back at how they put a different spin on The Straits Times' tradition of covering elections. Screenshots of ST journalists Christie Chiu and Wong Yang in a (left) PAP Fullerton rally video wrap-up, and in a video talking about cost of living as an electoral issue. Christie (C): A lukewarm comment at a party struck me some weeks before the general election. 'Don't take this personally, I don't read ST's political coverage,' she said. I had just asked the crowd of 20-somethings what kind of election content they would like to see from The Straits Times. Call it a spur of the moment bit of user research. That The Straits Times might not be a young person's top pick was not news to me, but hearing it unvarnished still landed like a punch. She had her reasons for saying what she did, but it reminded me that others like her – those who shut the door tight – do exist. Finding a way to open it a crack falls on us. Many who scroll past our articles still stumble upon our social media posts – a vital doorway of its own. That offhand remark, humbling as it was, became an unsaid yardstick as we set out to cover the general election on social media. It made the weight of our work clear: It is often the first – and sometimes only – point of contact between The Straits Times newsroom and a generation that has no shortage of media outlets courting their attention. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3 Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat Yang (Y): That speaks to how young people consume news today. With content creators and alternative media, people around our age are less reliant on traditional media as their primary source of news. So how do we report on the general election for people who are not just digital natives, but 'social natives' – those who grew up with social media, and for whom being able to comment on and share content with friends is intrinsic to their way of being in the world? New age, new tools C: This generation's connection to social media as a way of life exists also within the orbit of another term of the era: brain rot. It was the 2024 Oxford Word of the Year , and refers to the decline of one's mental or intellectual state from excessive consumption of low-quality online content. Our team's task was to push against that: creating fun, short video explainers on the election's key concepts and developments, without cheapening the analysis. Becoming part-time comedians was an unexpected, and frankly welcome, addition to the job. Getting paid to crack jokes with colleagues? A dream. But fun for fun's sake quickly wears thin when the content doesn't mean anything. What value were we adding to our audience's lives? Were we helping them become more informed voters? Those were questions that grounded our approach – while keeping the brain rot at bay. Y: The first step towards answering these questions was to simply listen to our audience. We did this through several initiatives led by our supervisor, assistant news editor Danson Cheong – an audience survey in 2024, phone interviews, a focus group discussion, and a small audience panel on Telegram. We asked them what they were concerned about heading into the election, the questions they wanted answered, and what they thought of our drafts and final videos. This helped us respond directly to topics and concerns that interested young people, rather than approach election coverage in a way that evoked a top-down sense of 'here's why you should care about this'. We put the audience front and centre, fretted less over 'sounding Gen Z' and just tried to be honest. Carrying on traditions C: In the paper's 180-year history, just a sliver – the last 10 years or so – has focused in earnest on elevating online coverage, we learnt in a recent chat with Straits Times associate editor Zakir Hussain. Still, much of the ethos behind our videos is not exactly a reinvention. Putting the audience first, decoding dense information and bridging gaps in knowledge – these are classic tenets of journalism. Just rebooted for the screen instead of the page. We took a slightly different path, but we, too, felt we were part of the paper's enduring tradition of covering elections. The ST team's – (from left) video journalist Chong Lii, senior audience growth specialist Farzanah Friday and journalists Wong Yang and Christie Chiu – last shoot for the 2025 General Election. ST PHOTO: DANSON CHEONG Our rally wraps – where we broke down the key points of candidate speeches – reminded us of the stories Zakir shared about his first general election as a rookie reporter back in 2006. He recalled how in those days before smartphones, a group order going around for digital voice recorders set each reporter back a hefty $200. A hack was used for stories that needed speed: An intern or junior reporter would head over to the rally with a fully charged cellphone, dial a landline in the office and hold the phone aloft in the crowd, so the team back at HQ could follow along and take notes in real time. Reporters on the ground back then took notes – with pen and paper, and the soon-to-be lost art of Teeline shorthand. They would then call in or quickly cab back to the office to debrief editors, file a quick first cut, and refine it before off stone (printing time) to ensure the story earned a spot in the morning paper. In 2025, the newsroom again made a bulk order – this time for smartphone-compatible microphones and tripods, which reporters picked up before heading out to assignments. It also subscribed to artificial intelligence transcription services, which allowed the newsroom to monitor what was happening as long as someone was on the ground to hit record. Our project was helmed by a team of five, including our colleagues from the audience and video teams – Farzanah Friday, Vera Ang and Chong Lii – double hatters who produced and edited the videos. At the rallies we covered, Yang and I took notes on our smartphones. We were usually accompanied by Danson, who would clear our 'first cut' – the video script and raw footage of us presenting on site, filmed with a humble smartphone on a tripod. The other team members in the office would work their magic from there, polishing the final video for different editors to vet before releasing it the next day – just in time to catch the morning traffic. The digital age is a bittersweet companion. Its tools lighten the load but raise the demands. You have to be faster, fuller, sharper. Yet some things don't change: the thrill of front-row seats to democracy in motion, the privilege of capturing a moment in history, and the responsibility of conveying these vignettes to audiences accurately, fairly... Y: ...and fairly quickly. ST journalists Wong Yang and Christie Chiu debriefing their supervisor over the phone from Cavenagh Bridge about the PAP's Fullerton lunchtime rally on April 28. ST PHOTO: CHRISTIE CHIU What the audience said Y: Producing the videos sometimes felt like sending things out into the void, or adding to what was already a noisy media landscape. After coming up with the caption, deciding on a thumbnail and hitting 'post', would people latch on to the videos when there was already an information overload? To our surprise – and relief – viewers commented that they found our videos engaging, accessible and refreshing. People who might have previously been averse to reading The Straits Times were pleasantly surprised by this alternative approach. This was a great boost for the team. It affirmed that what we did had resonated with viewers, and we managed to cut through the noise in some ways. Our young democracy C: While researching the electoral journey of Pulau Ubin, an archival binder with weathered clippings of Straits Times articles, which we'd borrowed from the company's resource centre, struck a chord with me. The clippings dated back to 1959, and we learnt that the island had its own polling station until the 1990s, when residents started riding ferries to the mainland to vote. It hit me that despite the hundreds of faded, blurry newspaper scans we sifted through each day researching on past elections, Singapore's democracy is still a young one. An archival binder from the SPH library that offers a glimpse into Pulau Ubin's past, such as its electoral history. ST PHOTO: CHRISTIE CHIU This year marks the paper's 180th birthday, yet it also marks only the nation's 14th general election since independence. Our democracy, it turns out, is less than half as old as The Straits Times itself. This truth has revealed itself in several ways, especially in my own experience existing on people's feeds this election. The scrutiny of my mannerisms, appearance and voice by thousands of anonymous usernames often left me wondering – did these people even hear the message? The scripts we spent countless late-night hours crafting? It also deepened my empathy for the women politicians, who were often reduced to superficial comparisons – how attractive they were, rather than the substance of their political arguments. Our videos, engaging as they were, were a drop in the hours upon hours of work professional journalists put into the 2025 General Election. But when we tackled issues such as the cost of living, the significance of the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC walkover, or rally speeches, we tried to spark conversation – to plant a seed that would lead viewers to dig deeper or read more. That, to me, was the value of a cross-media publication: the ability to weave a tapestry of interconnected viewpoints. Videos, visuals and traditional reporting all play a part in painting a fuller story. ST executive producer Vera Chong (in pink) and video journalist Chong Lii orchestrating a scene for an explainer video that unpacks the significance of the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC walkover. Journalists Wong Yang and Christie Chiu are seen here preparing to fight for a 'seat' in Parliament. ST PHOTO: DANSON CHEONG Y: As Christie and I stood among Singaporeans of all ages and persuasions at the rallies, what stood out – as we listened to the crowd cheering and jeering – was the sheer diversity of views simmering in our political cauldron. These views all come from somewhere: they are shaped by every individual's unique lived experience and ever-expanding modes of 'being Singaporean', be they in the way we think of success, love, family or what the good life looks like. So, if going to the polls is about voting for the Singapore we want to see, how can we as journalists arm our audience – who hold these varied perspectives and aspirations – with the knowledge to make an informed decision at the ballot box, and in a way that speaks to them? As this experience covering the general election and working with our audience has shown, in a world full of sound and fury, it doesn't hurt to listen first.
