Judge stops Trump from tying DOT funds to immigration enforcement
Secretary of U.S. Department of Transportation Sean Duffy testifies at a House committee on May 14, 2025. On Thursday, a judge issued a preliminary injunction against his directive tying department grants to states' compliance with federal immigration enforcement policies. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo
June 20 (UPI) -- A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump's attempt to make federal transportation funding contingent on state compliance with his immigration policies.
In his ruling Thursday, Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell of Providence, R.I., said not only does the Department of Transportation lack the authority to tie grant funding to immigration enforcement, but the directive also usurps Congress' power of the purse while being "arbitrary and capricious."
"Congress did not authorize or grant authority to the Secretary of Transportation to impose immigration enforcement conditions on federal dollars specifically appropriated for transportation purposes," the President Barack Obama appointee said in his brief ruling.
The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by 20 state attorneys general challenging an April 24 directive sent to all Department of Transportation funding receipts, stating they must comply with an Immigration Enforcement Condition when applying for future grants.
The letter specifies that as recipients, they have "entered into legally enforceable agreements with the United States Government and are obligated to comply fully with all applicable Federal laws and regulations," particularly those relating to immigration enforcement and diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
"Adherence to your legal obligations is a prerequisite for receipt of DOT financial assistance," Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy's letter states.
"Noncompliance with applicable Federal laws, or failure to cooperate generally with Federal authorities in the enforcement of Federal law, will jeopardize your continued receipt of Federal financial assistance from DOT and could lead to a loss of Federal funding from DOT."
The 20 Democrat-led states filed their lawsuit against the directive in May, arguing the Department of Transportation has no authority to tie grants to federal civil immigration enforcement, as the two are unrelated.
In his ruling, McConnell agreed with the plaintiffs.
"The IEC, backed by the Duffy Directive, is arbitrary and capricious in its scope and lacks specificity in how the States are to cooperate on immigration enforcement in exchange for Congressionally appropriated transportation dollars -- grant money that the States rely on to keep their residents safely and efficiently on the road, in the sky and on the rails," he said.
"[T]he IEC is not at all reasonably related to the transportation funding program grants."
California Attorney General Rob Bonta applauded the ruling while chastising Trump for "threatening to withhold critical transportation funds unless states agree to carry out his inhumane and illogical immigration agenda.
"It's immoral -- and more importantly, illegal," the Democrat said. "I'm glad the District Court agrees, blocking the President's latest attempt to circumvent the Constitution and coerce state and local governments into doing his bidding while we continue to make our case in court."
Since returning to the White House, Trump has led a crackdown on immigration, with many of his policies being challenged in court.
Late Thursday, an appeals court handed Trump a victory in the battle, permitting California National Guard troops to remain deployed on Los Angeles streets amid protests against his immigration policies.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to continue to fight what he called "President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
43 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A lesson from RFK to Gov. Mills to run against Senator Collins
Advertisement Governor Janet Mills, on the other hand, has Mills, however, misses RFK's real lesson: The best way to change national policies is to seek national office like Kennedy did in 1964, when he challenged a middle-of-the-road US Senate incumbent much like Collins. So how about it, governor: Will you run against Collins next year if she continues to waffle about standing up to Trump? Crossing swords with the president is hardly easy, of course. Trump has demonstrated his readiness to eviscerate his opponents, even ones from his own party. But it wasn't easy for Smith to go up against McCarthy at the start of his red-baiting crusade in 1950, when no other Republican would. What's more, she was the Senate's only woman. It would be her proudest moment in the chamber, and one for which she would pay dearly. Advertisement On June 1, 1950, Smith It was a 15-minute act of sheer courage, one that McCarthy listened to silently from his desk two rows behind Smith's. The counterattack was as fast as it was furious. Columnist and McCarthy friend Westbrook Pegler derided Smith as 'a Moses in nylons' who 'took advantage … of her sex.' Others suggested that she and McCarthy had been romantically involved, or she'd wanted to be, and that the speech was personal revenge. McCarthy had the most belittling quip, dismissing Smith and the half-dozen Republican co-signatories to her Declaration of Conscience as 'Snow White and the Six Dwarfs.' His words were reinforced by splenetic action. Using his authority as ranking Republican, in 1951 he dumped Smith from the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that he'd named her to, replacing her with the more hawklike Richard Nixon. Advertisement Kennedy's challenge in taking on Senator Kenneth Keating of New York was even more daunting. The silver-haired incumbent, a born and bred New Yorker, had won all seven elections he had contested. Kennedy, a carpetbagger from Massachusetts, sent a young aide across the state to assess his chances, and the news wasn't good: Keating would trounce Kennedy by 650,000 votes. Yet on Aug. 25, 1964, the US attorney general announced to New York and the world that he was running and meant to win. 'There may be some who believe that where a candidate voted in the past is more important than his capacity to serve the state,' Even with his family money and connections, it wasn't easy for RFK. Through early October it looked like he might lose, but that prospect propelled him to break out of his shell, let the public see his wit and spunk and focus on issues that mattered, like ending poverty and the war in Vietnam. In the end he won by 719,693 votes, the biggest margin a New York Democrat had managed, for senator or governor, since 1934. Are you listening, Governor Mills? At 77, and after 35 years of public service, you might be too tired to run for Senate even if it would help your fellow Democrats retake that chamber and restrain the president. But as you recently wrote in a Globe Opinion essay, channeling RFK's call to arms 60 years earlier, 'Each of us can send forth that tiny ripple of hope; we can restore the rule of law, we can revive our rights, recharge our nation, and rewrite the history of our world.' Advertisement
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Philadelphia city workers strike after contract talks fail
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Nearly 10,000 city workers in Philadelphia who collect trash, answer 911 calls, maintain city pools and perform other jobs went on strike Tuesday after contract negotiations broke down. District Council 33 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees announced the strike on its Facebook page early Tuesday, saying 'HOLD THE LINES.' Mayor Cherelle Parker said the city would suspend residential trash collection, close some city pools and shorten recreation center hours, but vowed to keep the city running. Police and firefighters are not on strike. Parker, a pro-labor Democrat, promised that Fourth of July celebrations in the nation's birthplace would go on as usual. 'Keep your holiday plans. Don't leave the city," she said at a Monday afternoon news conference that followed hours of last-minute negotiations. Parker said in a statement early Tuesday that the city had 'put its best offer on the table' but District Council 33 hadn't accepted it. "The City of Philadelphia remains committed to reaching a fair and fiscally responsible contract with our municipal workers who are a part of DC 33," Parker said. 'We are ready, willing and able to resume negotiations with the union at their convenience.' City officials urged residents to be patient and not hang up should they need to call either 911 or the city's non-emergency helpline. They said they would open drop-off sites for residential trash. Parker said she had offered raises that amount to 13% over her four-year term and added a fifth step to the pay scale to align with other unionized workers. District Council 33 is the largest of four unions representing city workers. Union leaders, in their initial contract proposal, asked for 8% annual raises each year of the three-year contract, along with cost-of-living hikes and bonuses of up to $5,000 for those who worked through the pandemic. The union also asked the city to pay the full cost of employee health care, or $1,700 per person per month. 'District Council 33's members contribute as much blood, sweat and tears as does anyone else,' they said in a demand letter. 'We all make the city work. Our contract must reflect that reality.'
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Elon Musk Vows to Campaign Against Republicans Who Back Debt-Raising Megabill
President Donald Trump has made clear that any Republican member of Congress who opposes his sprawling tax-and-spending package dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will face his wrath. He launched a campaign to primary Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and suggested he would do the same against Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, before Tillis announced that he wouldn't seek reelection. Now, however, another powerful political kingmaker has vowed to challenge any Republican who supports the bill. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' tech billionaire and former close ally of Trump Elon Musk posted on X. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' Musk spent more than $250 million to help elect Trump in 2024 but said in May that he had 'done enough' and was going to do 'a lot less in the future.' He added at the time, however, 'if I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it.' Musk posted his warning, among many posts on the topic, on Monday night as Senators continued to vote on a series of amendments to the megabill, which estimates say will add trillions to the national deficit and lead to cuts to Medicaid. Reigniting a once-regretted feud with the President and Republicans that exploded after Musk left a temporary government role in the Administration in May, Musk reiterated a prior idea he'd floated of starting a new political party. 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' he posted on X. 'Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people.' In another post, he said that if the bill actually passes, the 'America Party will be formed the next day' to provide 'an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' When former Rep. Justin Amash, who left the Republican Party in 2019 and opted not to run for reelection in 2020 amid criticisms of Trump, asked Musk to support his friend and fellow libertarian-minded conservative Massie, whom Trump has set his sights on ousting from the House, Musk responded 'I will.' 'The establishment is working to primary him because he's a genuine fiscal conservative and opposes the Big, Bloated Scam,' Amash said of Massie. Trump took to his own Truth Social platform Monday night to lash out at Musk, suggesting that the wealthiest man in the world, who is also the CEO of electric-car company Tesla and space-technology company SpaceX, is self-interested. 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate,' Trump posted, referring to policies that incentivize—though don't require—the manufacture and purchase of electric vehicles. 'It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one. Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE,' Trump added. Musk's companies are estimated to receive about $38 billion in government contracts and subsidies. 'Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?' Trump added, referencing the Department of Government Efficiency that Musk spearheaded. 'BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Musk previously dismissed Trump when the President made a similar claim about the former White House adviser's priorities. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!),' he posted on X in early June. Over the weekend, however, Musk posted that 'A massive strategic error is being made right now to damage solar/battery that will leave America extremely vulnerable in the future.' The bill threatens to end billions of dollars in green-energy tax credits, which some say could decimate the country's wind and solar industries. Musk reposted on Monday a post by Tillis, the Republican Senator who announced on Sunday that he planned to retire at the end of his term and would be free from expected deference to party leaders, which backed Musk. 'Folks, @ElonMusk is 100% right, and he understands this issue better than anyone,' Tillis posted. 'We should take his warnings seriously. We can't let Communist China become the long-term winner.' Still, Musk insisted that his main focus is the national deficit. 'All I'm asking is that we don't bankrupt America,' he posted as Senators continued to vote on amendments early Tuesday. The White House has maintained that the bill 'actually reduces the debt burden on future generations,' claiming that it 'will unleash robust, real economic growth and restore fiscal sanity in America.' But a new estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released on Sunday showed that the Senate version of the bill would add nearly $3.3 trillion to the deficit over a decade.
