Alberta's economy: Finding a footing in turbulent times
EDMONTON, AB, June 26, 2025 /CNW/ - ATB Financial's latest economic outlook shows a modest upgrade to the province's growth forecast, even as global trade negotiations and geopolitical tensions remain key sources of uncertainty. The report notes some de-escalation in trade tensions since the early spring, which offers a cautious improvement to the economic picture.
While the broader trade landscape remains challenging, Alberta's economy continues to show a degree of resilience, underpinned by activity in residential construction, steady energy production, and sustained population growth. Real GDP is forecast to grow by 1.9% in 2025 and 2.2% in 2026. That's an upgrade from 1.5% and 1.9%, respectively, in March.
"Alberta's economy is feeling the effects of the trade war, and the outlook for oil prices has softened. However, we expect that Alberta's economy will continue to weather the turmoil better than other provinces more exposed to U.S. tariffs," says ATB Financial's Chief Economist, Mark Parsons. "While population-driven demand and energy exports provide some foundational support, the unemployment rate is expected to remain elevated as employers remain cautious on hiring and more people enter the workforce."
ATB Economics forecasts that the Alberta economy will outpace the expected Canadian growth of 1.0 per cent this year. Alberta's higher growth will be driven by home construction and energy production supported by the Trans Mountain Expansion. Natural gas producers will benefit from the start of LNG Canada and increased demand from AI data centres. A broadening of Alberta's economic base, with recent expansions in sectors such as food processing, petrochemicals, and technology, supports the longer term outlook.
"While U.S. trade policy has been highly disruptive, it has also shone a spotlight on Canada's domestic challenges that long pre-dated President Trump's second term. In particular, there will need to be a sustained improvement in private capital investment in Alberta and Canada to drive future economic growth and productivity. Successfully fast-tracking major projects represents a clear upside to our forecast." added Parsons.
While the path forward is not without its challenges, solid fundamentals support Alberta's medium term outlook, namely, abundant natural resources, a skilled and young workforce, and relatively affordable housing.
About ATB Financial
With $64.2 billion in assets, ATB Financial is a leading financial institution that started in Alberta with the focus of putting people first. Our success comes from our more than 5,000 team members who love to deliver exceptional experiences to over 835,000 clients across our Personal and Business Banking, ATB Wealth Management and ATB Capital Markets businesses. ATB provides expert advice, services and products through our many branches and agencies, our 24-hour Client Care Centre, four entrepreneur centres and our digital banking options. ATB powers possibilities for our clients, communities and beyond. ATB is bronze certified as part of the Partnership Accreditation in Indigenous Relations commissioned by the Canadian Council for Indigenous Business. More information about ATB can be found at atb.com.
General Disclosure
ATB Financial's Economic Outlook is intended for general information and educational purposes only and should not be considered specific legal, financial, tax or other professional advice or recommendations. Information presented is believed to be reliable and up-to-date but it is not guaranteed to be accurate or a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgement of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. The actual outcome may be materially different. ATB Financial and any of its affiliates are not liable for any errors or omissions in the information, analysis or views contained in this report, or for any loss or damage suffered. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by ATB Financial or any of its affiliates and related entities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. boosts tax credit for developers of video games, virtual reality simulators
The B.C. government is boosting a tax credit to help developers of video games such as Electronic Arts hire additional staff and invest money locally. Premier David Eby said the interactive visual media tax credit will go from 17.5 per cent to 25 per cent starting Sept. 1, which is also when the credit will become permanent to give industry additional certainty. Speaking at Electronic Arts in Burnaby on Monday, Eby said the changes will help the sector remain competitive as part of a larger economic response to American tariff threats, which was a 'wake-up call' for the province to develop an economy that can stand on its 'own two feet.' Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Finance Minister Brenda Bailey said the measures will help B.C. grow its 'knowledge economy.' Bailey said they could have raised the tax credit higher as other provinces have, but chose 25 per cent because B.C. already has a competitive tax system and other factors that attract global talent. Government agency Creative B.C. says the interactive digital media sector, which includes video games, virtual reality and educational software, employs about 20,000 people in the province and adds more than a $1 billion to the economy. Government figures show the tax credit program is expected to cost $141 million in 2025-26, $151.3 million in the second year and $180.3 million in year three. 2027-28. Natali Altshuler, chief operating officer for EA Sports Studios, welcomed the changes. Altshuler said the change recognize the value of the industry, adding that it enables companies such as EA to contribute to the provincial economy. While EA ranks among the giants in the video-game industry, smaller developers are also welcoming the higher tax credit. Heidy Motta, CEO at game studio Coldblood Inc., said the credit has helped the company 'reach the finish line when resources were scarce.' The Entertainment Software Association of Canada says B.C. is home to 161 video game companies and 230 immersive technology companies. It says almost half of all video game companies in B.C. consist of 10 or fewer people. The additional support from the provincial government also raises the question of possible reactions from the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has previously criticized public support for industries from Canadian governments that he perceives to be unfair. Trump threatened earlier this year a 100 per cent tariffs on foreign-made movies to help bring more productions back to the United States after B.C. announced higher credits in late 2024 to attract and keep more film productions in the province. Eby said B.C. made the decision to boost the credit for interactive digital media independently of any possible reactions. 'We will cross the bridge's reactions when and if they happen,' Eby said.
Canada Standard
3 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Could new pipelines shield Canada from U.S. tariffs? The answer is complicated
It should come as no surprise that United States President Donald Trump's tariff threats have renewed interest in building pipelines that don't rely on access to the American market. Almost four million barrels of crude oil cross the Canada-U.S. border each day, generating revenue of more than $100 billion per year - a quarter of Alberta's GDP. A February survey by the Angus Reid Institute found that half of Canadians believe the federal government isn't doing enough to expand pipeline capacity. Meanwhile, two-thirds said they would back reviving the Energy East project - a cancelled pipeline that would have transported oil from western Canada to New Brunswick and Quebec. But would new pipelines truly insulate Canada from the threat of U.S. tariffs? And how much new pipeline capacity is necessary? Despite the apparent urgency of approving new infrastructure projects, these questions remain surprisingly unexplored. In a recent paper I co-authored with researcher Jotham Peters, which is currently under revision, we applied formal economic modelling techniques to parse through the costs and benefits of new pipelines, and in particular to understand the role of American tariffs in shaping these costs and benefits. In a worst-case scenario where the U.S. follows through on its threat of a 10 per cent tariff on Canadian oil exports, Canadian producers could lose as much as $14 billion in annual revenue - roughly a 10 per cent decrease. Simply put, Canada's existing pipeline network severely limits access to markets other than the U.S., and as a consequence oil producers bear the full brunt of American tariffs. But what if Northern Gateway and Energy East - two previously cancelled pipelines that would have brought Canadian oil to tidewater - had been built? If Northern Gateway and Energy East were operational in 2025, Canada would be more resilient, but not completely immune, to U.S. tariffs. Instead of a $14 billion loss, tariffs would reduce annual revenue by $9 billion. Ultimately, the combined capacity of Northern Gateway and Energy East, which would be 1.625 million barrels per day, pales in comparison to the four million barrels per day of existing pipeline capacity connecting Canadian producers with American refineries. Closing this gap would require an expansion of east-west pipeline capacity far beyond the cancelled pipelines of the last decade. So have the recent shifts in U.S. trade policy fundamentally altered the economic case in favour of new east-west pipelines? As with most economic analyses, the answer is complicated. On the one hand, any progress that mitigates the significant cost of U.S. tariffs are likely dollars well spent. Building new pipelines strengthens the bargaining power of Canadian producers, which carries an additional benefit of potentially increasing the return on each barrel sold to our southern neighbour. There's also a long-term capacity issue. Existing pipelines may reach their limit by 2035. In the absence of new pipelines, any new production after 2035 would either need to be transported by rail at a higher cost, or left in the ground. On the other hand, if the U.S. never follows through on tariffs on energy exports - or if future administrations do not share Trump's affinity for chaotic trade policy - Canada could end up right back where it started when these projects were cancelled. All pipelines carry some economic benefit, but such benefits were not enough in 2016 and 2017 to warrant the construction of the Northern Gateway and Energy East pipelines. The elephant in the room is whether a significant expansion in pipeline capacity could realistically be achieved at reasonable cost. Recent evidence suggests it could be a challenge. The Trans Mountain expansion project, for instance, was initially estimated to cost $5.4 billion in 2013. By the time it was completed in 2024, the final price tag had ballooned to $34 billion - a cost overrun of 380 per cent when accounting for inflation. The Coastal GasLink pipeline, which transports natural gas, faced similar issues. It was initially projected to cost $4 billion in 2012 and was completed in 2023 at a final cost of $14.5 billion, with an inflation-adjusted overrun of 180 per cent. While some of these costs were circumstantial - a major flood affected Trans Mountain, for example - increased efficiency in pipeline construction is necessary for the economic benefits of new pipelines to be realized, regardless of U.S. trade policy. While our research explores the economic impact of new pipelines in the face of U.S. tariffs, we acknowledge there are other issues that need to be considered. Chief among them is ensuring Canada meets its constitutional obligation to consult First Nations on decisions, like natural resources projects, that affect their communities and territories. Although this lies beyond our area of expertise, it will inevitably be an important element of consideration for any new pipeline developments. Read more: The complicated history of building pipelines in Canada The environmental impacts of new pipelines are another key concern. These impacts range from local exposure to oil spills to upstream greenhouse gas emissions associated with oil production. While these varying and complex impacts are also beyond the scope of our current work, future research should focus on quantifying the potential environmental impacts of new pipelines. Our research cannot say whether any new pipeline project is good, bad or in Canada's national interest. But we can help Canadians reach an informed decision about how changes in U.S. trade policy may or may not alter the economic case for new pipelines in this country. While Canada would undoubtedly be in a stronger position to respond to U.S. tariffs were Northern Gateway and Energy East operational in 2025, it would still find itself significantly exposed to Trump's tariff threats. Fully removing this exposure would require not one but seven pipelines equivalent to Northern Gateway. Whether that's a goal worth pursuing is a broader question - one we hope our research can help Canadians and policymakers reach on their own.
Canada Standard
3 hours ago
- Canada Standard
China buying up mines globally FT
Beijing is reportedly racing to lock in critical mineral supplies as the West restricts Chinese investments Chinese companies are buying more mines abroad than they have in over a decade to secure key raw materials as Western countries restrict their investments, the Financial Times has reported. Ten deals each worth more than $100 million were signed last year, the highest since 2013, the outlet reported on Sunday, citing an analysis of S&P and Mergermarket data. "The rise in dealmaking partly reflects China's efforts to get ahead of the deteriorating geopolitical climate, which is making it increasingly unwelcome as an investor in key countries such as Canada and the US," the FT quoted analysts and investors as saying. Major deals reportedly included gold mines in Kazakhstan, Ghana, and the Ivory Coast, a copper mine in Zambia, a copper-gold mine in Brazil, and a 50% stake in a rare-earth project in Tanzania. China is the leading refiner of rare earths, responsible for 90% of global processing capacity, and holds the world's largest reserves of the critical elements. Beijing has made mineral security a national strategic priority, as the global demand for lithium, cobalt, and nickel rises with the growth of clean energy and high-tech manufacturing. Western governments have been trying to curb China's access to key minerals and processing technologies, aiming to secure their own supply chains and reduce dependency. The US and its allies have blocked Chinese investments, imposed export restrictions, and launched new partnerships to source minerals elsewhere. US President Donald Trump has framed mineral access as a strategic priority, tying it to diplomacy and conflict resolution. Last month, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo signed a US-brokered peace deal, which Trump said secured American rights to Congolese mineral wealth. In April, Washington also signed a minerals agreement with Ukraine, presented as partial repayment for military aid. In June, Washington and Beijing reached a deal to resume rare-earth exports. China previously imposed export restrictions on these materials in retaliation to US tariffs, disrupting global supply chains. (
