
83 per cent of 5-year-olds will be exposed to ‘unprecedented' extreme heat in their lifetime
Around 100 million of the estimated 120 million children born in 2020 face 'unprecedented' exposure to extreme heat under the world's current climate plans.
That's according to a new report from international charity Save the Children, which shows the huge difference that keeping to the globally-agreed target of
1.5°C
warming above pre-industrial levels could make.
Almost
ten years
after the Paris Agreement enshrined this goal, countries' climate policies put us on track for 2.7°C heating. Since even these commitments aren't being met, the world is currently on course for around
3.1°C
of warming.
'Across the world, children are forced to bear the brunt of a crisis they are not responsible for,' says Inger Ashing, CEO of Save the Children International. '
Dangerous heat
that puts their health and learning at risk;
cyclones
that batter their homes and schools; creeping
droughts
that shrivel up crops and shrink what's on their plates.
Related
From Finland to the UK, European countries are slashing aid. What does it mean for climate funds?
'Amid this daily drumbeat of disasters, children plead with us not to switch off.'
Released by the charity and researchers at Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) today,
the report
finds that meeting 1.5°C would reduce the number of today's five-year-olds impacted by extreme heat to 62 million - a difference of 38 million. That's almost a third of five-year-olds.
How will global heating impact children?
Heatwaves disproportionately impact young children's health, by increasing their risks of dehydration, respiratory illnesses, and ultimately mortality.
Extreme heat also disrupts access to food and clean water and forces schools to close - as it did for a fortnight in
South Sudan
earlier this year, after some students collapsed at their desks.
Under current national climate policy pledges - which would see a 2.7°C temperature rise by 2100 - even adults born in 1960 will encounter unprecedented heatwave exposure during their lifetime in the Americas, Africa, the Middle East, and Australia.
Children born in all regions of the world in 2020 face unprecedented exposure to
heatwaves
.
Researchers defined 'unprecedented' exposure as experiencing climate extremes that someone would have less than a 1 in 10,000 chance of experiencing during their life in a world without human-induced climate change.
Meeting the 1.5°C target would protect millions of children born in 2020 from the severest impacts of other climate-related disasters too, including crop failures, floods, tropical cyclones, droughts and wildfires.
Related
'Society is at a crossroads': 5 deep changes experts say will turn us away from the climate abyss
What do children say about the climate crisis?
16-year-old Denise (not her real name) and her family were forced from their home in
Brazil
last year when the country's worst floods in 80 years struck, devastating their community.
Their home, including Denise's bedroom, was severely damaged, and she was out of school for nearly two months.
'It really affected me mentally, and academically too,' Denise says. 'Catching up on all my grades to pass secondary school was really tough, especially at a state school. It massively impacted my schoolwork. My grades dropped significantly after the floods.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Inevitably, it is children affected by inequality and those in lower- and middle-income countries who are worst affected by climate extremes. Their families are less able to cope with climate shocks, and they are already at greater risk from vector and waterborne diseases, hunger and malnutrition.
Haruka, also 16, is from
Vanuatu
, which recently experienced three of the most severe types of cyclone in just a year.
'Cyclones are scary. For me, they continue to destroy my home, every year - we don't even bother trying to fix the ceiling anymore,' she says.
'The past few years, I've seen ceaseless destruction and constant rebuilding. This seemingly never-ending cycle has become our reality, and most people aren't even aware that it's not just nature doing its thing, but it's us bearing the brunt of a crisis that we did not cause.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Around five million children born in 2020 would be spared unprecedented lifetime exposure to tropical cyclones, the report finds, if the world manages to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C rather than 2.7°C.
A similar number would avoid unprecedented lifetime exposure to river floods.
Related
From living in tents to missing school, here's why climate change is a 'child rights crisis'
Extreme weather is turning many into climate migrants: How does it feel to face leaving home?
How can policy-makers put children at the heart of climate action?
'This new research shows there is still hope, but only if we act urgently and ambitiously to rapidly limit warming temperatures to 1.5°C, and truly put
children
front and centre of our response to climate change at every level,' says Ingersen.
Fundamentally, the charity is calling for the rapid phase-out of fossil fuels, with high-income and historically high-emitting countries leading the way.
ADVERTISEMENT
It also wants to see a gear-change in the provision of
adaptation
and
loss and damage
funding, with new climate finance that prioritises child-critical services - such as health and nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), education, child protection, and social protection.
Children must be centred in international climate plans, Save the Children adds, including in new
Nationally Determined Contributions
(NDCs) which were due to be submitted this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
21 hours ago
- Euronews
Can the EU establish common rules to limit sperm and egg donation?
Society is increasingly opting for children later in life, and more individuals choosing to become parents alone or with same sex partners. Combined with greater access to advances in assisted reproductive technology, this has led to a rise in Europe in births conceived through donor contributions. Regulation of sperm and egg donation falls entirely under the jurisdiction of each individual country. And the legislation varies from one to another. The maximum number of children that can be conceived from a single donor varies from one in Cyprus to 15 in Germany. And some member states prefer to limit the number of families that can use the same donor. Sweden and Belgium cap it at six families, while Denmark allows up to 12. For their part, commercial sperm banks set their own limits, which has resulted in some donors fathering up to 75 children. A recent high-profile case involved a Danish donor who unknowingly carried a rare genetic mutation that increases the risk of cancer and who helped conceive at least 67 children in Europe, 10 of whom were diagnosed with cancer. These "super donors" increase the risk of unintentional incest and the spread of genetic abnormalities. Additionally, there's the issue of donor anonymity. 'Sperm donation is anonymous in Italy, but not in the Netherlands. And in some countries, like Austria, it is semi-anonymous, which means that sperm donation is only anonymous between the donor and the recipients," said Amandine Hess, who has covered this topic for Euronews. "Due to DNA testing and social media, donor anonymity can no longer be guaranteed 100%, so it's increasingly common for children to connect with their half-siblings or donor, which can be challenging for them and also for their families,' she added. A European Donor Registry Because of these ethical concerns, eight EU health ministers—Belgium, Finland, France, Hungary, Netherlands, Romania, Spain, Sweden—joined forces to propose the establishment of common regulations on sperm donation in Europe. The proposal includes the possibility of creating a European donor registry, as regulatory differences lead patients and donors to travel to countries with more lenient rules. Spain, for example, carries out 50% of egg donation treatments and even receives patients from Latin America. "I believe it is more than necessary to create a European registry," said MEP Elena Nevado del Campo, and vice-chair of the public health committee. 'Many national laws already provide for the creation of such registries, but in reality, many have not been implemented, and more needs to be done for ethical reasons. International registries should be established, since these donations also cross borders beyond the European Union itself,' she told Euronews. According to the Oviedo Convention, an international treaty from the Council of Europe that sets ethical principles for biomedicine, the human body and its parts must not give rise to financial gain. But commercial cryopreservation banks make profits through the handling, freezing, and storage of sperm and eggs, as well as through the screening of potential donors. This cross-border business will likely continue to grow, along with the ethical and public health issues it raises. Watch the video here! Journalist: Mared Gwyn Jones Content production: Pilar Montero López Video production: Zacharia Vigneron Graphism: Loredana Dumitru Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Childhood vaccinations falling due to vaccine complacency, says WHO
European children are less likely to get routine vaccinations than they were five years ago, according to a new report from the World Health Organization (WHO). Immunisations against measles, whooping cough, polio, and hepatitis B remained below pre-pandemic levels in Europe and Central Asia in 2024, due largely to a sense of 'vaccine complacency' that is already causing a resurgence of preventable diseases, the agency said. Last year, nearly 300,000 people in the region got whooping cough, more than three times as many as in 2023, the report found. More than 125,000 people got measles, the region's highest case count in more than 25 years. 'These are not just numbers – it's hundreds of thousands of families in anguish because their children are sick, and it could have been prevented,' Dr Hans Kluge, the WHO's Europe director, said in a statement. More than half of the region's 53 countries had vaccination rates that were below the level needed to prevent outbreaks of measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, whooping cough, and tetanus. Health experts often point to vaccine hesitancy to explain why more parents are opting not to immunise their children. But Regina De Dominicis, who leads UNICEF's work in Europe and Central Asia, instead cited vaccine complacency, which is when parents believe the risks from preventable diseases are low and therefore do not see a reason to vaccinate their children. 'Today's generation has not witnessed the devastating impact of vaccine-preventable diseases – leading to complacency and making it easier for misinformation to take hold,' De Dominics said. Improvement on some newer vaccines Notably, Europeans are not turning away from all vaccines equally. Over the past five years, children and young people have become more likely to get vaccines that protect against human papillomavirus (HPV), rotavirus, pneumonia, and meningitis. Several countries have introduced these jabs in recent years, which is expected to help reduce rates of HPV infections and related cervical cancer, as well as child hospitalisations from bacterial diseases, pneumonia, and rotavirus-induced diarrhoea, the WHO said. To boost routine immunisation rates, health officials called on countries to shore up their health systems, ensure vaccines are widely available, and fight misinformation about the jabs. 'Communities must be empowered with trusted information, so parents can confidently vaccinate their children,' Kluge said.


Fashion Network
3 days ago
- Fashion Network
Toxic beauty? The rise of unsafe dupes from online platforms
They're the internet's latest obsession—beauty dupes that promise luxury looks for a fraction of the price. But behind the viral appeal lies a growing health concern. Imitation skincare and makeup products, designed to mimic high-end brands, are now under scrutiny from toxicologists and regulators who warn they may contain hazardous—and sometimes banned—ingredients. Online marketplaces like Temu, Shein and AliExpress are awash with low-cost cosmetics marketed as 'dupes'—from foundations and sunscreens to serums and lipsticks. While not always counterfeits, these products often closely resemble high-end originals, and their ultra-low prices make them especially tempting—particularly for younger shoppers on TikTok. The trend is spreading fast across Europe. On TikTok alone, hundreds of thousands of videos feature users showing off these bargain beauty buys. Influencers hype them as affordable alternatives that 'deliver the same results.' But experts warn that's where the similarities stop. 'This isn't traditional counterfeiting—it's more discreet and far harder to monitor,' says Xavier Guéant, head of legal affairs at France's Federation of Beauty Companies (Febea), which issued a public warning on World Anti-Counterfeiting Day. Guéant warns that many beauty dupes circulating online bypass all regulatory oversight and safety checks. 'These products exist completely outside any safety framework,' he explains. 'They're untested, they ignore European standards—and that poses a real public health risk.' A recent consumer survey by C-Ways for Febea revealed that nearly one in three French shoppers bought a beauty dupe in the past year—yet 96% had no idea those products could carry serious health risks. Toxic ingredients and no real protection Cheap cosmetics from unregulated sites can come with hidden dangers, warns Dr. Stéphane Pirnay, toxicologist and director at Expertox Laboratory. Many contain toxic chemicals—including substances banned under European law. 'In France, products go through strict safety testing,' he says. 'But on these platforms, there are no rules. We've seen everything from heavy metals and phthalates to contaminants that should never touch human skin.' Some tested products even contained traces of soil, stones, bird feathers—and in some cases, feces. At the University of Nantes, pharmacy professor Laurence Coiffard has analyzed counterfeit and dupe sunscreens purchased online. Her findings are alarming: fake SPF 50+ creams provided no actual UV protection. 'These products offer zero sun protection,' Coiffard says. 'That's extremely dangerous, especially given the direct link between UV exposure and skin cancer.' She identifies marketplaces such as AliExpress and Temu as major sources of both counterfeit and unregulated dupe products—calling them 'a blind spot for consumer safety.' A fast-growing threat and overwhelmed system The issue isn't marginal—and regulators are struggling to keep pace. A February 2025 report by the European Consumer Organization (BEUC) found that over 80% of products tested from Temu failed to meet EU safety standards. In cosmetics, common violations included missing or inaccurate ingredient labels—leaving consumers unaware of what they're applying to their skin. 'When something costs just a few euros, you can bet no one's paying for proper testing,' says Guéant. 'That's the tradeoff—low price, no safety.' With TikTok Shop now allowing users to purchase directly within the app, experts fear the spread of unregulated dupes could accelerate. Febea is calling for stronger regulation, clearer legal definitions, and increased oversight to ensure product safety. Without intervention, they warn, the public health risk will continue to grow. 'It's not about blaming consumers,' says Guéant. 'It's about protecting them—and making sure they have clear, honest information about what they're buying.' This article is an automatic translation. Click here to read the original article.