Hywel Dda health board's fragile services need urgent change
Hywel Dda said changes were needed "because of the risks to them being able to continue to offer safe, quality services or timely care".The four main hospitals in the area, which covers Pembrokeshire, Carmarthenshire and Ceredigion, are Prince Philip in Llanelli, Glangwili in Carmarthen, Withybush in Haverfordwest and Bronglais in Aberystwyth.The health board said clinical teams were spread across multiple sites, over a wide geographic area, and there is an "over-reliance on a small number of individuals".The nine areas deemed most fragile are: Critical careDermatologyEmergency general surgeryEndoscopyOphthalmologyOrthopaedicsRadiologyStrokeUrology
The health board is not alone in facing challenges of reducing waiting times for treatment.At a time when parts of Wales still have patients waiting longer than two years for care, it has removed those waits entirely, but still has more than 12,000 waiting longer than one year.Staffing issues have improved predominantly due to the recruitment of international nurses, taking band five vacancies down from 280 whole-time equivalent to just 18.The health board said that had substantially reduced its agency spend, but vacancies remained in other areas of its workforce.Plans to update services were first drawn up in 2018 and while the pandemic increased demand, Hywel Dda has also had to contend with significant capital costs associated with issues around reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) at Withybush Hospital.A new hospital is planned for the area, but will not be built for at least 10 years after delays as well as the impact of inflation on construction costs.
Since the pandemic, there has also been an increased emphasis on regional working among health boards in Wales, meaning pressures can be spread across regions, though that also creates fresh logistical challenges.Meanwhile backlog maintenance costs for an ageing estate continuing to rise, meaning doing nothing is not an option.A previous report stated maintenance costs had increased from £60m to £255m since 2018, with £42m categorised as "high risk". Glangwili and Withybush have the "most significant backlogs" at £90m and £72m respectively.Any changes would be closely inspected by patients who are likely to face longer travel times for some services as a consequence, though the plans also include expansion in some areas and a greater role for primary and community services.A public consultation on the options will be held over the summer with final plans expected to be put to the board by November.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Hardline' BMA blocks emergency pleas for strike doctors to work
NHS bosses have criticised the British Medical Association for its "increasingly hardline" approach in rejecting emergency requests for striking doctors in England to return to work.A system known as 'derogation' is in place whereby the NHS can ask for resident doctors, who are taking part in a five-day walkout, to cross the picket line where patient safety is at of Sunday evening, 18 requests by hospitals for derogations had been rejected in this strike - the twelfth in the long-running pay dispute - with nine BMA said while it was ready to respond to emergencies, poor planning and the push to continue non-urgent care in this strike had stretched staffing too much. However, NHS England accused the doctors' union of putting safety at risk, criticising a "remote BMA panel" for "second-guessing" doctors on the ground who were trying to look after patients.A central committee of senior BMA doctors makes decisions on each derogation England said it was particularly worried about a number of requests relating to cancer care being turned it said the BMA was sitting on some requests for hours, with some rejected because hospitals would not pay striking doctors premium rates to come back this strike started, the BMA had only agreed to five derogations during the whole dispute. 'Rigorous' Among the requests agreed was a doctor to work at Nottingham City Hospital's neonatal intensive care unit over the BMA members were also brought in to work a night shift at the Northern General in the BMA rejected a request by Milton Keynes Hospital for a doctor to carry out prostate cancer checks. In that case the BBC understands a doctor did return to work under their own volition.A BMA spokesman added: "It remains our position that this agreement will be available for the NHS to rely upon should a safety-critical, urgent event occur."That process is there day and night throughout industrial action, and we remain ready to respond to any emergency requests."However, we need to be clear that the purpose of this agreement is not to facilitate the continued delivery of non-urgent care at the same time as senior doctors are covering for residents taking industrial action, as trusts simply do not have enough senior doctors to do that safely."NHS England sources said it was particularly disappointed with the rejections as the national organisation was now vetting every request from hospitals to ensure a consistency in approach between different request, they said, was based on "rigorous assessment"."We absolutely recognise the legal right for people to strike, but we also recognise that it's essential to maintain as many services for patients as possible," they five-day strike by resident doctors is due to run until 07:00 on Wednesday morning.
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Nurses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland overwhelmingly reject 3.6% pay rise
Nurses have overwhelmingly rejected the government's 'grotesque' 3.6% pay award for this year, in a move that could lead to the NHS facing further strikes. Royal College of Nursing members in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have voted by a large majority against accepting the award in an indicative vote run by the union. The RCN previously called the 3.6% figure 'grotesque', said that it would be 'entirely swallowed up by inflation' and highlighted that it was less than doctors and teachers were given. Well-placed sources say the results of the union's online survey of 345,000 members in the three countries, which is due later this week, will show a 'clear' rejection of the award. That will increase the possibility that the NHS in different parts of the UK could face an autumn or winter of renewed disruption by staff unhappy about their pay, as it did in late 2023 and early 2024. Resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – in England are on the fourth day of a five-day strike in pursuit of their claim for a 29% pay rise. In addition, NHS staff in England belonging to the GMB union, including ambulance crews, last week rejected their 3.6% award in a consultative vote. Sir Jim Mackey, the chief executive of NHS England, has warned that 'continued disruption over the coming months could see a snowball effect for patients and for staff' as a result of doctors continuing to strike until the end of the year and other unions staging walkouts too. A spokesperson for the RCN said: 'The results will be announced to our members later this week. As the largest part of the NHS workforce, nursing staff do not feel valued and the government must urgently begin to turn that around.' Nurses have seen the real-terms value of their pay eroded by a quarter since 2010/11, as a result of low pay awards and rising inflation, the union says. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, announced in May that he was giving nurses a 3.6% pay increase for 2025-26. The devolved governments in Cardiff and Belfast have also awarded the same sum. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The RCN will not follow the results of its indicative vote by then staging a legal ballot for industrial action, in contrast to the British Medical Association, the doctors' union. They will instead ask ministers to talk to them about a range of changes to nurses' terms and conditions, including better financial support for nursing students to address a fall in applications and changes to Agenda for Change, the longstanding pay structure for UK-wide non-medical NHS staff. The BMA has also begun seeking the views of consultants – senior hospital doctors – and middle-grade medics in England on the 4% pay rise they were given for this year in a consultative vote, which it called 'an insult'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Miniscule public sector productivity growth is nothing to celebrate
Let us start with the good news. The latest official estimates suggest that public service productivity grew by 1.0 per cent in the first quarter of the year compared to the same period of 2024, led by a 2.7 per cent increase in healthcare. But gosh, was that needed. The annual data show that public service productivity was still 4.2 per cent lower in 2024 than the pre-pandemic peak in 2019. Over this period, the output of public services – such as the number of treatments on the NHS, and lessons provided in state schools – has risen by an average of around 12 per cent. However, the inputs required to produce that output – mainly labour and materials – have risen even further, by almost 17 per cent. The difference between these two numbers is the shortfall in productivity. Worse still, this follows a long period of stagnation which goes back to at least 1997, when comparable data are first available. Over more than a quarter of a century, productivity in public services has improved by a grand total of just 0.3 per cent. This year alone, day-to-day public spending is expected to exceed £500 billion, mainly on health, education and defence. Raising public sector productivity by one per cent a year over five years would therefore allow the government to provide the same services for about £25 billion less. In turn, this could fill the 'black hole' in the public finances without the need for any cuts in services, or yet more tax increases. Of course, this is easier said than done. It is generally harder to raise productivity in services activities than in, say, manufacturing, energy, or communications. This is especially true of activities requiring lots of personal contact, such as medicine and teaching, or the arts and entertainment. But the problems do appear to be much larger in the public than the private sector. Four factors come up over and over again. One is the lack of competition. It is no surprise that sectors where market pressures are stronger also tend to be those where productivity gains are greater. Another is that the public sector is more heavily unionised – and the unions themselves tend to be more militant. This is reflected in greater resistance to change, including more flexible working practices that put service users first. Third, public services are too reliant on the Treasury for funding. This might make sense for genuine public goods, such as defence, which cannot be left to the markets. But it leaves services like the NHS vulnerable to short-termist political choices. Providing any service 'for free' is also unlikely to be good for efficiency. Finally, and related to all the first three, the public sector has been relatively slow to adopt new technologies – as almost anyone who has engaged with the NHS will know. The scope for AI to transform the provision of public services is surely huge. There are at least some encouraging signs. NHS productivity did start to improve in the final years of the last Government, partly thanks to pressure from then-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt. The latest data suggest this trend is continuing and Wes Streeting is certainly making the right noises. However, the scale of the challenge cannot be underestimated either. The public sector is becoming an increasingly unmanageable Leviathan. The Government is taking on more and more functions, while backtracking on commitments to reform in many other areas – from planning regulations to welfare spending. Some real action is needed soon to keep the cost of public services from spiralling out of control.
