AP optimizing data, AI for enhanced governance, economic growth
Minister of Human Resources, IT Nara Lokesh with UAE Finance Minister Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri and Minister of Industries TG Bharat on the sidelines of Investopia Andhra Pradesh-2025 in Vijayawada on Wednesday.
During a discussion on AI and data centers, Minister Lokesh highlighted some of the key tech initiatives of the coalition government. "The first 152-bit quantum computer in South Asia is set to be unveiled in Amaravati, the capital of Andhra Pradesh, in January. This will transform the entire ecosystem," he declared. He observed that Visakhapatnam was rapidly developing into a 'data city', with several renowned international organizations expressing interest in establishing their data centers in the port city.
Acknowledging the challenges of transforming well-entrenched education systems to embrace advanced technologies like AI, Minister Lokesh outlined significant curriculum changes. "In line with global advancements, we are introducing AI skill development programmes in polytechnic, degree, and engineering education. We are bringing radical changes to the curriculum with subjects like AI and quantum computing," he mentioned.
The Minister emphasised the state government's goal to provide improved public services through the integration of AI in daily administration. "During my 'Pada Yatra' (foot march), I personally witnessed the difficulties people faced in accessing basic land records. After our government came to power, we focused on delivering easier citizen services through AI," he said. In the context, he cited 'Mana mitra', a WhatsApp governance initiative, which now provides over 600 types of citizen services rapidly by integrating various government departments through a large back-end data lake.
Andhra Pradesh is looking to the UAE as a role model in adopting AI technology. "The United Arab Emirates was the first country in the world to establish a Ministry of AI," Minister Lokesh noted, adding that the UAE utilized AI for traffic regulation too.
Addressing concerns over job displacement due to AI, he stated, "I do not agree with the argument that some jobs will be lost due to Artificial Intelligence. I believe every industrial revolution creates new jobs."
According to Lokesh, Andhra Pradesh is poised to become a $2.4 trillion economy in the coming days. "As part of G2G collaboration, we aim at strengthening digital economy through mutual cooperation between the UAE and Andhra Pradesh," he said. Minister Lokesh affirmed that they would explore ways to drive economic growth through AI, data centers, digital innovations, and smart governance. Lokesh identified ChatGPT as his favorite AI application.
The event was attended by Manu Jain, CEO of G42 India, and hosted by Raksha Shraddha, Vice President of Primus Partners. Minister Lokesh also held discussions with the UAE Finance Minister Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri regarding investments in renewable energy, infrastructure, digital governance, AI-first universities, genome sequencing, quantum valley, and logistics sectors. He sought support from the UAE for investments in these areas. In response, Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri invited Minister Lokesh to visit the UAE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Neelam Sanjiva Reddy hailed as ‘beacon of hope'
Speakers at the 'Dr. Neelam Sanjiva Reddy Memorial Awards-2025' hailed him as a beacon of hope for the current and future generations in terms of honesty, integrity and public service. The event was organised by Association of Grassroots Studies and Research of India (AGRASRI) in association with Sri Venkateswara University's Department of Political Science and Public Administration on Friday. APPSC former chairman Y. Venkatrami Reddy and Andhra Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal former chairman Justice G. Yethirajulu hailed the first Chief Minister of combined Andhra Pradesh for prioritising rural development and agricultural advancement by improving irrigation, providing subsidies for farmers and promoting modern technologies. SVU Vice-Chancellor Ch. Appa Rao recalled Neelam's vision behind founding the varsity in the backward Rayalaseema region. 'Dr. Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy Vishishta Ratna' award was presented to Prof. Venkatrami Reddy, 'Nyaya Shiromani' to former Judge of Andhra Pradesh High Court Justice B. Sesha Sayana Reddy, 'Vidya Shiromani' to former Vice Chancellor of GITAM University Prof. S. Dayananda and 'Vaidya Shiromani' to noted Ayurvedic doctor Dr. G.V. Purrnachand. A special souvenir published in the honour of the awardees was released on the occasion. SVU political Science head B.V. Muralidhar, AGRASRI Director D. Sundar Ram and All India Radio retired Director A. Malleswara Rao also spoke at the event.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Centre notifies rules to identify, clean up contaminated sites
Agency: PTI New Delhi, Jul 25 (PTI) The Centre has notified new rules for the identification and clean-up of contaminated sites across India to prevent risks to human health and the environment. Titled the Environment Protection (Management of Contaminated Sites) Rules, 2025, and notified on Thursday, the rules aim to prevent exposure to hazardous and toxic substances in soil, sediment and water. The rules aim to establish a structured mechanism for identifying such sites, holding polluters accountable and ensuring scientific clean-up through risk-based remediation. The rules empower state pollution control boards (SPCBs) and local authorities to identify and list suspected contaminated sites based on industrial activities, historical waste dumps or community complaints. These sites will be mapped and tracked through a centralised online portal to be developed by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). As per the rules, 'The State Board shall list all such sites as suspected contaminated sites on the Centralised Online Portal" and initiate a series of assessments. These include initial screening followed by detailed site investigations to confirm the presence and extent of contamination. Once contamination levels are found to exceed defined risk-based thresholds, the site will be officially declared a 'contaminated site" and subjected to mandatory remediation. The rules introduce the concept of a 'responsible person", an individual, company, or entity found liable for causing pollution. The state board concerned shall identify the responsible person for contamination within 90 days from the date of publication of the site as contaminated. If the polluter cannot be identified, the government may fund remediation using a mix of resources, including the Environment Relief Fund created under the Public Liability Insurance Act and penalties collected from environmental violations. The rules also provide that 'responsible persons shall be liable for all forms of damage to the environment and human health" and prohibit them from transferring land ownership or land use during and after the clean-up without approval. To ensure transparency and accountability, a technical committee will oversee implementation and recommend additional remedial actions where needed. This committee will include representatives from central ministries, state boards, domain experts and industry regulators. 'The committee shall monitor the implementation of the provisions of these rules and submit an annual report to the central government," the notification said. The rules exclude specific categories from their ambit such as sites contaminated with radioactive waste, mining areas under existing mining laws and maritime oil spills already regulated under other frameworks. However, if contamination from these sources exceeds acceptable limits or is mixed with other hazardous waste, the rules may still apply. Another key provision mandates public participation and disclosure. The state board shall invite comments and suggestions from affected stakeholders within 60 days of publication of the site and publish final lists in local newspapers to inform communities. To fund remediation, the rules allow cost-sharing between the Centre and states in a 90:10 ratio for Himalayan and northeastern states, and 60:40 for others. In Union Territories, the Centre will bear the full cost. In case of voluntary clean-up, industries can submit proposals if they prove financial and technical capability, have agreement from landowners and commit to full compliance. PTI GVS ZMN view comments First Published: July 25, 2025, 20:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
The Income Tax Bill does not award arbitrary power to the state by allowing digital search and seizure. Here's why
On July 21, the Parliamentary Select Committee tabled in Parliament its report on the Income Tax Bill, 2025, aimed at simplifying and reforming the country's primary legislation on income tax. The Bill was introduced in the Lower House of Parliament in February this year, and the Select Committee was tasked to sift through the text of the Bill, clause by clause, to ensure that its objects and purposes are clearly and adequately spelt out. Importantly, the Committee has retained — and rightly so — the controversial provisions dealing with powers and procedures relating to digital search and seizure. The digital search and seizure powers are contained in Clause 247 of the Bill, which empowers the tax authority to enter and search any place where an electronic media or computer system (used to store relevant information or evidence) is suspected to have been kept. Clause 261(e) seeks to define 'computer system' to include virtual digital space, that is, personal and professional communications platforms and social media accounts, among other things. The power of the tax authority to enter and search a taxpayer's digital space has been criticised on the ground that wide search and seizure powers arbitrarily infringe upon the taxpayer's fundamental right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Income Tax Act, as it currently stands, was introduced in 1961, and came into force in 1962. Section 132 of the 1961 Act — which corresponds to Clause 247 of the Bill — has always vested wide search and seizure powers in the tax authority. The Finance Act, 2001 inserted Section 2(12A) into the Act to extend legal recognition to books of account maintained on computers, and Section 2(22AA) was inserted to include 'electronic record' within the meaning of the word 'document' defined under the Act. Subsequently, the Finance Act, 2002 inserted Section 132(1)(iib) facilitating access to electronic devices. Finally, Section 275B made it a punishable offence to refuse cooperation with the tax authority in this regard. The power to conduct digital search and seizure, therefore, has always been available with the tax authority. In defining the term 'virtual digital space', the new Bill simply makes explicit what was already implicit in the law. Not only that, search and seizure powers have survived judicial review and scrutiny of the Supreme Court. In 1973, the constitutionality of Section 132 of the 1961 Act was unsuccessfully challenged before a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Pooran Mal vs Director of Inspection. There, the Court categorically held that the tax authority must possess the power to conduct search and seizure to combat tax evasion. There is no reason why the underlying legal reasoning should not extend to digital search and seizure. Of course, our jurisprudential understanding of the right to privacy has since changed, especially after 2017, when a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in K Puttaswamy vs Union of India recognised the right to privacy as part of the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The right to privacy, however, is not absolute and, even if we were to apply Puttaswamy principles, search and seizure powers would still survive the scrutiny of our constitutional courts. Importantly, Clause 247 of the Bill (much like Section 132 of the 1961 Act) has sufficient safeguards in place and satisfies the Puttaswamy test of proportionality. For instance, the law requires the tax authority to record reasons before initiating a search and seizure action, and sanction must be obtained from, and granted by, the appropriate authority. Moreover, the powers so exercised would be subject to judicial review and a constitutional court may call upon the tax authority to disclose the reasons behind the search and seizure operation and may even examine the circumstances based on which sanction was obtained and granted. In fact, in a recent decision in the case of Principal Director of Income Tax vs Laljibhai Kanjibhai Mandalia (2022), the Supreme Court applied the Wednesbury principle to allow for search powers by deferring to the wisdom of the tax authority. In the past decade, Parliament has incorporated several changes in the tax law to keep pace with the digital transformation of the society. For instance, the concept of significant economic presence was incorporated in the income tax law to tax business profits of foreign companies deriving income without having any physical presence in India. Likewise, a digital services tax was enacted (now withdrawn) to tax revenues generated from digital services offered in India by foreign digital platforms. India is also actively participating in the Pillar One tax project spearheaded by the OECD to address tax challenges posed by digitalisation. Digital search and seizure powers contained in the Bill, which facilitate recovery of incriminating digital data, have a similar objective. The writer is an advocate in the Bombay High Court. Views are personal
