Princess Anne spotted in Edinburgh as she attends Royal Highland Show weekend
Get the latest Edinburgh Live breaking news on WhatsApp
Princess Anne appeared in great spirits as she attended the Royal Highland Show on Friday.
The Princess Royal was pictured at the event to enjoy a tour, met primary school children taking part in activities and watched competitions - including the show jumping.
Enjoying the warm weather, she was escorted by RHASS Chairman, James Logan, and Chief Executive, Alex Paterson.
David Tennant, Head of the Royal Highland Show, said, 'Friday at the Show has been a true sun-soaked spectacle and we are thrilled to see our visitors and families enjoy all that the show has to offer.
"From sheep shearing to competitions, sheepdog skills to cookery demonstrations, there's something for everyone to enjoy.
'We were very honoured to have welcomed HRH Princess Anne today and shared with her all of the great achievements from the Scottish agricultural industry.'
Around 200,000 people are set to attend the show in Ingliston, which runs for four days until Sunday.
Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages.
On Thursday, over 50,000 people flocked to enjoy a range of food and drink, live music and agricultural displays.
Each year, there are over 800 trade exhibitors, over 2,000 livestock competitors entering into 900+ competitions and tens of thousands of visitors.
Over the past two days, Edinburgh motorists have been warned of major road delays as the event gets underway.
Traffic Scotland and Lothian have issued updates to road and public transport users with considerable tailbacks reported on the A8, M9, M8 and M90.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Nothing about the A9 dualling project suggests momentum
A promise to fully dual the single carriageway between Perth and Inverness by 2025 was first made in the SNP's 2007 manifesto, with plans to widen around 80 miles of road in 11 sections formally set out in 2011. However, little more than 11 miles – in just two sections –were dualled in 12 years. Six miles of the trunk road from Moy to Tomatin, south of Inverness, are currently being upgraded under a £185 million contract. In 2023, the Scottish Government admitted the dualling would now not be completed until 2035 at the earliest. However, that didn't stop Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop taking hyperbole to new heights with the latest pronouncement on the A9. She announced that a contract for the dualling of a fourth section of the road is due to be awarded imminently. Transport Scotland announced on Friday that Wills Bros Civil Engineering was the preferred bidder in the £152.7m deal to dual the road between Tay Crossing and Ballinluig. The government has planned to upgrade the road – one of Scotland's most dangerous – for more than a decade, with the work initially due to be complete this year. But it has since been pushed back to to Transport Scotland, the section will be complete in 2028, with 45% of the A9 between Perth and Inverness to be dualled by that time. I have walked amongst Scotland's largest seagulls - and they are a menace It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500 Alan Simpson: Giving CalMac contract is right - now give them better ships Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains The Transport Secretary said the announcement showed the 'continued momentum' of the project. "In addition to the improvements delivered through dualling, this investment will provide lasting social value to the communities and businesses local to these areas,' she said. 'We have seen already how contractors across the programme are making a positive impact through our social value programme, and I look forward to seeing further benefits delivered in the construction of this section. 'This is the second contract to be awarded since our delivery plan for A9 dualling was announced in 2023, and clearly demonstrates that we are delivering on our promises. 'The receipt of three valid tenders during this procurement process means that we can also be confident that our investment in this A9 dualling contract demonstrates value for money, and that the changes we have made to our contracts in recent years are making a real difference. 'We are achieving the targets we have laid out, and making steady progress across the corridor to ensure that the full route between Perth and Inverness is dualled by 2035.' While this is welcome news, to call it 'continued momentum' is a stretch and a bit of an insult to the hard-pressed regular users of the road. There is simply nothing that screams momentum about the A9, whether it be the glacial pace of dualling or getting stuck behind a lorry on the many single carriageway sections. Ms Hyslop also takes the biscuit for announcing that an announcement is imminent. That isn't really an announcement at all but perhaps shows the desperation among ministers to try to show that work is at least progressing. But just two sections of single carriageway, totalling about 11 miles (18km) of road have been upgraded over the past decade. About 77 miles (124km) have still to be improved as part of the £3 billion project, which will extend from Inverness to Perth. Delays and rising costs have repeatedly hit the dualling upgrades, which were initially scheduled to be completed this year. Why it is being done in sections is beyond me – surely a firm should just get the contract to build the whole lot, rather than handing out projects that seem to be by the yard. Earlier this year, the much-maligned quango Transport Scotland apparently rewrote the laws of physics by claiming that accelerating the dualling will not save any time on the project. In a report, the quango said it had explored whether some sections should be speeded up on safety grounds, or where lengthy diversions could be put in place, should the road be closed. It said it had considered introducing 'overlapping' construction on the carriageway to speed up the project. It also suggested rescheduling the planned programme of work around the areas of the road deemed to be least safe. However, it said its findings revealed that current scheduling 'achieves an earlier overall completion date than would be achieved were it to be rescheduled'. In the meantime, more than 300 people have been injured in car crashes on the A9 over the past four years, recent figures revealed. According to the figures, 28 people were killed between 2021-22 and 2024-25, including 13 in 2022-23 alone. There were 321 collisions resulting in injury during that period, 134 of which were considered serious and 159 classed as minor. Of course, the fact that much of it is still single carriageway will not be a contributory factor in every crash, but every one should be a stark reminder to the Scottish Government of the pressing need for an upgrade. But given the track record of Transport Scotland and successive governments, we shouldn't hold our breath. The A75 urgently needs upgraded as does the A96 and the A82. It is easy to think that they all remain in poor condition in poor condition because they are all in rural areas, miles away from the glare of Holyrood. Out of sight, out of mind. Compare this to when the Forth Road Bridge fell into disrepair – a sparkling new crossing was delivered on time and on budget, and fairly quickly too. Only a cynic could suggest this happened because the bridge carries the main road into Edinburgh and many in the capital have holiday homes in the East Neuk of Fife. Transport infrastructure projects always seem to be a problem under a quango that orders ferries that are too big for ports and electrifying railway lines without ordering enough electric trains. In other European countries, roads seem to get built in one fell swoop rather in bits and pieces like here in Scotland. This leads to inevitable cost overruns and delays which adds millions more to the bill which on the face of it seems unnecessary. The more contracts that are handed out, the more can go wrong. So, surely, it would be sensible to award less. But sense seems to be in short supply at Holyrood.
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Who's with me? Car rentals are a massive rip-off, right?
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It must be the last frontier to be crossed. So much of modern life has been transformed by technology. Mobiles have replaced landlines, digital photography has pushed aside Kodak and emails have sent Royal Mail to the edge. Yet need to hire a car and the process remains as depressing and baffling as it has always been. It begins hopefully when you spot a good online price for a small vehicle and make your reservation. Then the big day comes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad You can always locate the company you booked with because they will be the one with the enormous queue. At every other window the staff will be staring into space but your reservation will be at the desk with ten people waiting, including one man who only speaks Greek and wants to swap his Honda Civic for a Bedford van but only if it's electric. READ MORE: Why Scottish cider converts like me head to Anstruther No one wants to end up careering down Rome's Spanish Steps in a two-tonne Dodge Durango because they were 'upgraded' from the Fiat Punto they booked (Picture: Alberto Pizzoli) | AFP via Getty Images After watching the start of your holiday disappear before your eyes, you eventually reach the front of the line and that's where the problems really begin. After being offered a bewildering range of additional payment options, the staff take a deposit the size of Belgium's national debt, then reveal your choice of car is unavailable. They always sweeten this by telling you that you've been upgraded, which is fine unless you've booked a Fiat Punto for ease of navigating the narrow streets of Rome and instead end up driving a two-tonne Dodge Durango down the Spanish Steps. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Do they even own the cars they advertise? I'm not sure because I really can't remember the last time I got the one I actually booked. This summer the Fiat 500 I'd reserved turned into some weird Kia with an enormous scratch down the side. And one on the bonnet... and the rear bumper. I pointed all that out to the man who gave me the key, shrugged and scribbled something on a piece of paper. Returning a week later, all seemed to be fine. I hadn't added to the scratches, I'd filled up with fuel and even got back a few hours early. The man grunted and scribbled on some more paper and that was that until a week later when an email arrived charging an extra 200 euros for Protection Plus (whatever that is) and the cost of filling up the tank... which I'd already done. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After some badgering, they backed down and refunded the money but what an amazing business model. You promise a product for a price, then make people queue, then give them a different product they didn't want, then charge them much more for it. And the worst thing is, they have different logos, brands and promises but they are all basically the same. The car rental market is ripe for an ambitious disruptor to move in, rip up the spurious charges and calculations and offer a transparent price and good customer service. Could the obstacle to that possibly be a cosy cartel involving car manufacturers who rely on fleet sales and the big rental operators who shield together to hold onto the biggest consumer-scamming operation in the holiday market?
STV News
3 days ago
- STV News
Fifth of motorists have drunk alcohol after 10pm ahead of morning drive
More than a fifth (21%) of motorists have drunk alcohol after 10pm when needing to drive before 9am the following morning, a new survey suggests. Road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, which commissioned the poll, warned that drinking alcohol the night before getting behind the wheel can pose a 'serious threat' because a 'groggy head' means slower reaction times. The survey of 1,072 UK motorists also indicated that 38% of people who have consumed several alcoholic drinks ahead of driving before 9am stopped drinking after 9pm. Charity Drinkaware states that alcohol is removed from the body at a rate of one unit per hour, although this varies depending on a person's weight, liver health and metabolism speed. Around three large glasses of wine or three pints of high-strength beer or cider is the equivalent of nine units. Someone consuming those drinks up to 10pm could still have alcohol in their body at 7am or later, IAM RoadSmart warned. Nicholas Lyes, the charity's director of policy and standards, said: 'Drink-driving is a killer, and drivers may be unwittingly getting into their vehicle in the morning unaware that they could be doing so illegally if they have been drinking alcohol the night before, posing a serious threat to the safety of others. 'Even if they are just inside the legal limit, the level of alcohol in their system will impair their reaction times. 'Moreover, consuming alcohol impacts on sleep quality.' Chief Constable Jo Shiner, the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for roads policing, said: 'There is simply no excuse for getting behind the wheel when you are impaired through drink or drugs, and this includes the morning after. 'If you choose to do so you are putting your life and the lives of others at risk.' The survey also suggested nearly a third (31%) of drivers in the previous 12 months had been with a friend or relative who drank alcohol before getting into a vehicle. Some 72% of this group warned them they should not drive, while 23% said they took no action. Four out of five (81%) people polled said rehabilitation courses should become mandatory for anyone convicted of a drink-drive offence. Currently the courses are sometimes offered in return for a shorter driving ban. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency statistics previously obtained by the PA news agency revealed 27,837 British motorists were convicted of drink-driving multiple times in the 11 years to July 20 2024. Some 372 were caught at least four times, including four who were prosecuted on seven occasions. Latest Department for Transport (DfT) figures show an estimated 300 people were killed in crashes on Britain's roads involving at least one driver over the legal alcohol limit in 2022. That was up from 260 the previous year and was the highest total since 2009 when 380 deaths were recorded. Separate figures show there are more drink drive-related casualties in July than any other month of the year. The Scottish Government reduced its limit to 50g/100ml in 2014. The drink-drive limit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is 80mg of alcohol in 100ml of blood. A DfT spokesperson said: 'We take road safety extremely seriously, and there are already strict penalties in place for those who are caught drink-driving, with rehabilitation courses offered to those convicted and banned from driving for over a year. 'While we don't have plans to mandate these courses, we are committed to improving road safety, and our Think! campaign will next week launch its summer drink-drive activity, timed to coincide with the National Police Chiefs' Council's Operation Spotlight.' – IAM RoadSmart commissioned research company Online95 to conduct the survey of 1,072 UK motorists last month. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
