Contractor accused of rape says woman 'enticed' him by pulling his arm, bit him in excitement
Contractor accused of rape says woman 'enticed' him by pulling his arm, bit him in excitement
Selina Lum
The Straits Times
July 31, 2025
A 49-year-old man who is on trial for raping a woman after she hired him to repair the lights in her flat claimed that they had consensual sex after she made the first move.
Taking the stand on July 31, the third day of his trial, Koh Lee Hwa said he ended up having sex with the woman after she pulled him by the arm.
Denying that he had raped her, Koh said the sexual encounter took slightly over 10 minutes, which he compared with the "standard" length of time for sex between him and his wife.
"How could it happen so fast if it was rape?" he said through a Mandarin interpreter.
The prosecution said Koh's testimony was "unbelievable" and contended that the woman did not do anything to suggest that she wanted intimacy from him.
The Singapore permanent resident faces one count of rape, one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of outrage of modesty.
The offences were allegedly committed between about 11.40am and 12.40pm on Aug 23, 2021.
The woman, whose age has been redacted from court documents provided to the media, had earlier testified in private.
She had engaged Koh to renovate her flat in 2015. Over the years, she contacted him for various works.
On Aug 21, 2021, she asked him to repair the faulty light in the common toilet and the light switch in the kitchen.
The next day, Koh repaired the light switch.
On Aug 23, he returned with the necessary parts to fix the main circuit switchboard.
Koh allegedly hugged the woman without her consent in the living room.
Shocked, the woman pushed him away and went back to the bedroom, where she sent text messages to two friends to tell them about the hug.
A few minutes later, Koh asked her to turn on all the switches in the flat to ensure that they were working.
While they were outside the toilet in the master bedroom, Koh allegedly pushed her against the dressing table and hugged her.
She tried to push him away and told him to let her go. But he allegedly raped her on the bed and did not stop even after she bit him.
On July 31, Koh denied that he had hugged the woman in the living room.
He said she pulled his right arm while they were outside the master bedroom toilet after checking the water heater.
Koh said he asked her in Mandarin, "what do you want?", and she echoed the same words back at him.
He said he then put his arms around her waist while she placed her hands on his shoulders, and they started kissing.
"Things happened very quickly. The two of us landed on the bed," he said.
Describing their acts, Koh said she made sounds indicating she was excited.
When Justice Mavis Chionh asked if there was any conversation between them, Koh said there was none.
Koh said that while they were having sex, the woman bit him in excitement.
He said he pushed her to stop her because he did not want his family to know he had an affair.
Koh said that after sex, when he told her he was leaving, she uttered the word "money" and he replied "don't have".
He said he was confused about whether she was asking him for money or referring to the amount that she owed him for the repair job.
Koh said the woman could be jealous of him because she saw the gold chain he was wearing.
When the judge asked what this had to do with the incident, he said it was just his view.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Emily Koh sought to poke holes in the man's claims in cross-examination, pointing to the messages that the woman had sent to her friends.
The man insisted that he did not hug her, saying he was a "righteous and upright person".
The prosecutor contended that the alleged victim did not grab his arm, noting that the woman had never expressed romantic or sexual interest in him.
Koh disagreed.
He said the two of them "were in the mood" and that the woman was trying to "entice" him by pulling his arm.
He disagreed with the DPP's contention that the alleged victim had tried to push him away and told him to let her go.
The trial ended with Koh's testimony.
Both sides have four weeks to file written submissions, and another week to reply.
Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp
Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
a day ago
- AsiaOne
Parents reject $30k settlement from kindergarten in JB after son suffocates to death in school van, Malaysia News
In May, a five-year-old Malaysian boy died after he was trapped in a locked school van in Taman Bukit Indah. His parents have since rejected a RM100,000 (S$30,000) settlement offer from the kindergarten, reported China Press on July 30. Previously, the family had filed a claim of RM2,059,301 (S$626,000) through a pro bono lawyer. In response, the kindergarten proposed a settlement of RM100,000 through a representative lawyer on July 11. In a press conference held on July 30, the boy's parents rejected the settlement money and his mother said the school van driver was hired by the kindergarten, so the school should be held accountable. Speaking in Mandarin, she said: "Can this RM100,000 buy my child's life? I don't want money, I just want my child back. You have no sincerity at all." The deceased's mother also pointed out that the kindergarten claimed there was a roll call on the day of the incident and her child was marked present even when he did not appear in class. "The school director and teacher said they took roll call but when I asked who signed my child in when he didn't show up in class, no one answered," she said, adding that she could not accept that the kindergarten did not admit its negligence. The school van driver was supposed to go to court on June 17 but he, his representative lawyer and guarantor did not appear. The judge scheduled the case for another hearing on July 18 and issued an arrest warrant for the driver. The boy's father said he hopes the Attorney General's Chambers in Putrajaya will review the case and charge not only the driver, but also the kindergarten operator, so that every party involved will be held accountable. Driver charged, but not kindergarten operator The parent's lawyer said that on June 20, he appealed to the Attorney General's Chambers on behalf of the boy's parent's, seeking an explanation as to why only the driver was charged under Malaysia's Section 31 of the Child Act 2001 (negligence causing hurt to a child), but not the kindergarten operator, who should have borne greater responsibility. He pointed out that the kindergarten operator was the driver's employer and failed to fulfill their supervisory responsibilities. The lawyer will file a lawsuit in the Johor Bahru High Court in August and the parties being sued are Tadika Perintis kindergarten, YK Education Group Sdn Bhd, Double Tree Transport Sdn Bhd and the school van driver. "The family believes that the position of the kindergarten operator and the drier is unreasonable, not only lacking in sincerity, but also irresponsible. The party at fault does not need to express sympathy, but rather express remorse and apologise," said the lawyer. He also emphasised that the family is not seeking monetary compensation and just want to see the kindergarten operator take responsibility, express remorse, apologise and provide an explanation for the incident. melissateo@
Straits Times
3 days ago
- Straits Times
Contractor accused of rape says woman 'enticed' him by pulling his arm, bit him in excitement
Taking the stand on July 31, Koh Lee Hwa said he ended up having sex with the woman after she pulled him by the arm. PHOTOS: THE STRAITS TIMES Contractor accused of rape says woman 'enticed' him by pulling his arm, bit him in excitement Selina Lum The Straits Times July 31, 2025 A 49-year-old man who is on trial for raping a woman after she hired him to repair the lights in her flat claimed that they had consensual sex after she made the first move. Taking the stand on July 31, the third day of his trial, Koh Lee Hwa said he ended up having sex with the woman after she pulled him by the arm. Denying that he had raped her, Koh said the sexual encounter took slightly over 10 minutes, which he compared with the "standard" length of time for sex between him and his wife. "How could it happen so fast if it was rape?" he said through a Mandarin interpreter. The prosecution said Koh's testimony was "unbelievable" and contended that the woman did not do anything to suggest that she wanted intimacy from him. The Singapore permanent resident faces one count of rape, one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of outrage of modesty. The offences were allegedly committed between about 11.40am and 12.40pm on Aug 23, 2021. The woman, whose age has been redacted from court documents provided to the media, had earlier testified in private. She had engaged Koh to renovate her flat in 2015. Over the years, she contacted him for various works. On Aug 21, 2021, she asked him to repair the faulty light in the common toilet and the light switch in the kitchen. The next day, Koh repaired the light switch. On Aug 23, he returned with the necessary parts to fix the main circuit switchboard. Koh allegedly hugged the woman without her consent in the living room. Shocked, the woman pushed him away and went back to the bedroom, where she sent text messages to two friends to tell them about the hug. A few minutes later, Koh asked her to turn on all the switches in the flat to ensure that they were working. While they were outside the toilet in the master bedroom, Koh allegedly pushed her against the dressing table and hugged her. She tried to push him away and told him to let her go. But he allegedly raped her on the bed and did not stop even after she bit him. On July 31, Koh denied that he had hugged the woman in the living room. He said she pulled his right arm while they were outside the master bedroom toilet after checking the water heater. Koh said he asked her in Mandarin, "what do you want?", and she echoed the same words back at him. He said he then put his arms around her waist while she placed her hands on his shoulders, and they started kissing. "Things happened very quickly. The two of us landed on the bed," he said. Describing their acts, Koh said she made sounds indicating she was excited. When Justice Mavis Chionh asked if there was any conversation between them, Koh said there was none. Koh said that while they were having sex, the woman bit him in excitement. He said he pushed her to stop her because he did not want his family to know he had an affair. Koh said that after sex, when he told her he was leaving, she uttered the word "money" and he replied "don't have". He said he was confused about whether she was asking him for money or referring to the amount that she owed him for the repair job. Koh said the woman could be jealous of him because she saw the gold chain he was wearing. When the judge asked what this had to do with the incident, he said it was just his view. Deputy Public Prosecutor Emily Koh sought to poke holes in the man's claims in cross-examination, pointing to the messages that the woman had sent to her friends. The man insisted that he did not hug her, saying he was a "righteous and upright person". The prosecutor contended that the alleged victim did not grab his arm, noting that the woman had never expressed romantic or sexual interest in him. Koh disagreed. He said the two of them "were in the mood" and that the woman was trying to "entice" him by pulling his arm. He disagreed with the DPP's contention that the alleged victim had tried to push him away and told him to let her go. The trial ended with Koh's testimony. Both sides have four weeks to file written submissions, and another week to reply. Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:
AsiaOne
3 days ago
- AsiaOne
Man accused of raping woman who hired him to fix lights in her flat claims she made first move, Singapore News
SINGAPORE — A 49-year-old man who is on trial for raping a woman after she hired him to repair the lights in her flat claimed that they had consensual sex after she made the first move. Taking the stand on July 31, the third day of his trial, Koh Lee Hwa said he ended up having sex with the woman after she pulled him by the arm. Denying that he had raped her, Koh said the sexual encounter took slightly over 10 minutes, which he compared with the "standard" length of time for sex between him and his wife. "How could it happen so fast if it was rape?" he said through a Mandarin interpreter. The prosecution said Koh's testimony was "unbelievable" and contended that the woman did not do anything to suggest that she wanted intimacy from him. The Singapore permanent resident faces one count of rape, one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of outrage of modesty. The offences were allegedly committed between about 11.40am and 12.40pm on Aug 23, 2021. The woman, whose age has been redacted from court documents provided to the media, had earlier testified in private. She had engaged Koh to renovate her flat in 2015. Over the years, she contacted him for various works. On Aug 21, 2021, she asked him to repair the faulty light in the common toilet and the light switch in the kitchen. The next day, Koh repaired the light switch. On Aug 23, he returned with the necessary parts to fix the main circuit switchboard. Koh allegedly hugged the woman without her consent in the living room. Shocked, the woman pushed him away and went back to the bedroom, where she sent text messages to two friends to tell them about the hug. A few minutes later, Koh asked her to turn on all the switches in the flat to ensure that they were working. While they were outside the toilet in the master bedroom, Koh allegedly pushed her against the dressing table and hugged her. She tried to push him away and told him to let her go. But he allegedly raped her on the bed and did not stop even after she bit him. On July 31, Koh denied that he had hugged the woman in the living room. He said she pulled his right arm while they were outside the master bedroom toilet after checking the water heater. Koh said he asked her in Mandarin, "what do you want?", and she echoed the same words back at him. He said he then put his arms around her waist while she placed her hands on his shoulders, and they started kissing. "Things happened very quickly. The two of us landed on the bed," he said. Describing their acts, Koh said she made sounds indicating she was excited. When Justice Mavis Chionh asked if there was any conversation between them, Koh said there was none. Koh said that while they were having sex, the woman bit him in excitement. He said he pushed her to stop her because he did not want his family to know he had an affair. Koh said that after sex, when he told her he was leaving, she uttered the word "money" and he replied "don't have". He said he was confused about whether she was asking him for money or referring to the amount that she owed him for the repair job. Koh said the woman could be jealous of him because she saw the gold chain he was wearing. When the judge asked what this had to do with the incident, he said it was just his view. Deputy Public Prosecutor Emily Koh sought to poke holes in the man's claims in cross-examination, pointing to the messages that the woman had sent to her friends. The man insisted that he did not hug her, saying he was a "righteous and upright person". The prosecutor contended that the alleged victim did not grab his arm, noting that the woman had never expressed romantic or sexual interest in him. Koh disagreed. He said the two of them "were in the mood" and that the woman was trying to "entice" him by pulling his arm. He disagreed with the DPP's contention that the alleged victim had tried to push him away and told him to let her go. The trial ended with Koh's testimony. Both sides have four weeks to file written submissions, and another week to reply. [[nid:720017]] This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.
