PBS sues Trump for stripping its funds
In its lawsuit filed on Friday, PBS relied on similar arguments, saying Trump was overstepping his authority and engaging in 'viewpoint discrimination' because of his claim that PBS's news coverage is biassed against conservatives.
'PBS disputes those charged assertions in the strongest possible terms,' lawyer Z W Julius Chen wrote in the suit, filed in US District Court in Washington, DC. 'But regardless of any policy disagreements over the role of public television, our Constitution and laws forbid the President from serving as the arbiter of the content of PBS's programming, including by attempting to defund PBS.'
It was the latest of many legal actions taken against the administration for its moves, including several by media organisations impacted by Trump's orders.
PBS was joined as a plaintiff by one of its stations, Lakeland PBS, which serves rural areas in northern and central Minnesota. Trump's order is an 'existential threat' to the station, the lawsuit said.
A PBS spokesman said that 'after careful deliberation, PBS reached the conclusion that it was necessary to take legal action to safeguard public television's editorial independence, and to protect the autonomy of PBS member stations'.
Through an executive order earlier this month, Trump told the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and federal agencies to stop funding the two systems. Through the corporation alone, PBS is receiving $325m this year, most of which goes directly to individual stations.
The White House deputy press secretary, Harrison Fields, said the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime.
'Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS,' Fields said. 'The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective.'
PBS, which makes much of the programming used by the stations, said it gets 22 percent of its revenue directly from the feds. Sixty-one percent of PBS's budget is funded through individual station dues, and the stations raise the bulk of that money through the government.
Trump's order 'would have profound impacts on the ability of PBS and PBS member stations to provide a rich tapestry of programming to all Americans', Chen wrote.
PBS said the US Department of Education has cancelled a $78m grant to the system for educational programming, used to make children's shows like Sesame Street, Clifford the Big Red Dog and Reading Rainbow.
For Minnesota residents, the order threatens the Lakeland Learns education programme and Lakeland News, described in the lawsuit as the only television programme in the region providing local news, weather and sports.
Besides Trump, the lawsuit names other administration officials as defendants, including Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. PBS says its technology is used as a backup for the nationwide wireless emergency alert system.
The administration has fought with several media organisations. Government-run news services like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty are struggling for their lives. The Associated Press has battled with the White House over press access, and the Federal Communications Commission is investigating television news divisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
5 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
ECB keeps rates on hold, cites trade disputes uncertainty
Agencies The European Central Bank (ECB) kept interest rates steady at 2% on Thursday, as expected, while warning that the environment remains 'exceptionally uncertain,' mainly due to trade disputes. The announcement by the ECB's Governing Council was widely expected, especially since inflation in the 20-nation eurozone stood at the central bank's 2% target in June. The benchmark deposit rate, which is important for both banks and individual savers, remains at 2%, down from a high of 4% in June 2024. Before Thursday's rate decision, the ECB had made seven consecutive rate cuts. Explaining the move, the ECB said: 'Domestic price pressures have continued to ease, with wages growing more slowly. Partly reflecting the Governing Council's past interest rate cuts, the economy has so far proven resilient overall in a challenging global environment.' But it also stressed in a clear reference to pending U.S. tariffs: 'At the same time, the environment remains exceptionally uncertain, especially because of trade disputes.' While the ECB has been able to tame consumer prices that rocketed after the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, a new threat has emerged this year: higher U.S. tariffs. U.S. President Donald Trump has vowed to impose 30% tariffs on imports from the European Union as of Aug. 1, unless a new trade deal between the allies can be agreed. The EU has stated that it is prepared to retaliate with tariffs on U.S. goods. The consequences of such a trade fight are difficult to assess, analysts say and this uncertainty likely influenced the ECB's decision to pause rate changes for now. Reports by the Financial Times, broadcaster CNBC and others stated that the two sides were closing in on a deal with 15% tariffs on both sides, similar to the one agreed upon with Japan this week. The ECB emphasized that it was 'determined' to ensure that inflation stabilized at 2%. According to recent ECB predictions, eurozone inflation is expected to come in on target for the year as a whole. The rate is forecast to decline to 1.6% next year, well below the target rate. The bank has in the past emphasized that its target is symmetrical and that falling prices are not its goal, as this could lead companies to postpone investments and consumers to delay purchases.
Qatar Tribune
5 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
China trade talks could include TikTok: Lutnick
Agencies TikTok may come up in trade talks with China next week, but if Beijing does not approve a divestment deal for Chinese owner ByteDance, the app will soon go dark in the United States, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday. US President Donald Trump's administration will allow TikTok to remain in the US 'if it's in American control, and … China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece', Lutnick said, speaking on CNBC. 'Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm. That's something Donald Trump is willing to do. If that deal gets approved then by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' he said. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' Asked whether an agreement over TikTok is part of current trade negotiations, Lutnick said 'yes and no'. 'It's not really part of the trade talks, but you can't really go meet somebody and not bring up the topics that are relevant,' he said. 'So … it's not officially part of it, but unofficially? Of course.' ByteDance is under pressure to divest the short-video app by September 17 or face a ban in the US. Last year, then-US President Joe Biden signed a sale-or-ban law, requiring that a 'foreign adversary' no longer control the app, defined as a 20 per cent stake, over national security concerns. Despite an original January deadline, Trump has repeatedly delayed enforcement of the law. The original deadline as set in law was January 19, with allowance for a one-time 90-day extension if progress towards a sale was evident. Trump had extended that deadline his first day in office via executive order, days after a call with Chinese President Xi Jinping during which TikTok was discussed. He has since extended it twice more. If the sale is approved, the app is expected to use an algorithm and data system separate from its global platform, Reuters reported this month. That would resolve years of debate over whether ByteDance would share what is considered TikTok's secret sauce – the recommendation algorithm – and mark a potential end to years of angst over the app's security concerns in Washington. A deal had reportedly been in the works earlier this year to spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. But the plan was put on hold after Beijing indicated it would not approve it after Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese imports, according to Bloomberg. Under current Chinese export controls, some technologies used by TikTok, including the recommendation algorithm, require Beijing's approval for export. The restriction was implemented by Beijing in 2020, killing a deal that had been under negotiation involving ByteDance, Oracle and Walmart during the first Trump administration. In the years since, Beijing had given little indication it would support a sale, urging the US to provide an 'open, fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment' for Chinese businesses. The law mandating the divestment, passed last year as part of a foreign aid package, reflects concern in Washington that TikTok's ownership makes it beholden to the Chinese government and that Beijing could use the app to spy on Americans or conduct influence operations. Free speech advocates have argued that a ban would unlawfully restrict Americans from obtaining access to foreign media in violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Other critics, including some US lawmakers, have pointed to the lack of evidence of content manipulation by Beijing. The US Supreme Court upheld the forced divestment law in January. Over 60 per cent of American teens and about a third of US adults use TikTok, according to a Pew Research Centre study from last year.
Qatar Tribune
5 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
So Trump-like: Relief but no surprise in Japan as US cuts tariffs
Agencies In the Japanese city of Seki, famed for its razor-sharp artisan knives, news that incoming US tariffs will be lowered is welcome but not entirely unexpected. Around 40 percent of kitchen blades produced in Seki, where knifemaking expertise dates back 700 years, are exported to the United States, local authorities say. The two countries announced Wednesday they had cut a deal to lower the 25-percent tariffs on Japanese goods threatened by US President Donald Trump -- starting on August 1 -- to 15 percent. 'Lower tariffs are better' but 'I'm not that surprised' at the trade deal, said Katsumi Sumikama, head of Sumikama Cutlery in Seki. 'I don't know what truly happened, but I feel like maybe Trump thought tariffs up to 15 percent were acceptable, and boldly proposed a higher tariff rate at first,' Sumikama told AFP. 'Then as the negotiations took shape, he tried to create a good impression in the public eye by lowering it from 25 percent. That kind of strategy would be so Trump-like.' The US leader, who hailed the Japan deal as 'massive', has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariffs if they do not hammer out a pact with Washington by the end of July. Japan is one of five nations to have signed an agreement -- along with Britain, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines -- after Trump said in April he would strike '90 deals in 90 days'. Headlines have focused on the impact of US tariffs on the likes of Toyota and others in Japan's huge auto industry, as well as trade in steel, rice and other key goods. But Japanese knives have in recent years become a luxury must-have in kitchens worldwide including the United States, partly fuelled by a pandemic-era home cooking boom. 'Weathered the storm' - Blademaking in Seki dates back to the 14th century, when the city in the mountains of Gifu region became a major producer of swords thanks to its rich natural environment.
