
'Don't call it Wimbledon': The unspoken spectator rules and dress codes of the tennis tournament
Afternoon tea, a stiff upper lip and Wimbledon – all so deeply "British" that they've become part of the nation's international brand; the things that seem to make Britain, Britain, and tempt tourists from far and wide to observe them for themselves.
The optics of the annual tennis tournament in south London – the strawberries and cream, the Pimm's, the ball girls and boys – are all intrinsic to this frightfully British institution. It is a marker of "The Season", alongside the likes of the Chelsea Flower Show, Henley and Ascot, as well, of course, as being a place where balls are expertly hit by rackets. Equally intrinsic to the Britishness of the tournament are its less tangible cornerstones. Its rules and the etiquette are paramount, both in terms of behaviour and dress – in other words, what to wear, and what falls a little long of the baseline.
So what does the etiquette of Wimbledon entail? For starters, according to the self-styled queen of etiquette, Laura Windsor – who advised on the TV series Bridgerton – don't call it Wimbledon. "Really, when one refers to Wimbledon, one should say the Championships, as they are the oldest and most prestigious lawn tennis championships in the world." Another suitable moniker is simply "the tennis".
Attendees should, she tells the BBC, be behaving "with modesty… That's our Britishness, isn't it? We're prim and proper". What does this look like? For a start, avoiding many of the kinds of behaviours that are the norm at other sporting events, and instead behaving in ways arguably more in line with theatre-going, keeping things largely hushed, and not cracking out a selfie-stick – they were banned from the tournament in 2015. Although for British etiquette coach and author of Just Good Manners, William Hanson, "anyone who is still using a selfie-stick in 2025 should be monitored closely, anyway".
Best behaviour
According to Hanson, "while people love the social side of Wimbledon, it is worth remembering that it is a seated, sporting event that comes with its own set of court-side rules." He goes on: "Be punctual, and get in your seat in good time… respect the fact that you can only come and go during a changeover." Of course, phones should be on silent. But he also extends his guidance to how best to rally around the players, and officials, on court: 'Be sporting with your support, and never cheer errors or mistakes. Respect the silence during play, and save clapping and cheering for between points. Avoid disturbing the players by calling out, and remember the umpire's decision is final – never heckle or question line calls."
Beyond that, "keep your yourself to yourself," he says. "Be aware of those sitting around you, and keep within the space of your seat – even if it is limited, try not to spill over into someone else's personal space accidentally." And, in case you were thinking about sneaking in a tuna melt, "avoid disturbing the peace by rustling wrappers or eating messy or smelly food".
Most obviously, though, the rules are embodied in what to wear – "the best way to show good behaviour is by dressing appropriately," says Windsor. While Wimbledon has no strict dress code, smart dress is encouraged, especially on the show courts. Plus certain items, such as ripped jeans, dirty trainers and anything with a political statement, are banned. "Be comfortable and appropriate for the weather," says Hanson, "but avoid anything that is overly casual or better worn at the beach".
Unofficial dress code
Unofficially, however, Wimbledon has developed its own set of style rules. Take for proof of these unspoken but still-tangible "rules" the criticism that Meghan, Duchess of Sussex faced from some corners for wearing jeans, alongside a hat and blazer, to watch her friend Serena Williams play in 2019.
For Daniel-Yaw Miller, sports and fashion journalist and founder of the SportsVerse newsletter, "when you think about Wimbledon dressing, everyone has the same kind of thing in mind – either white or beige. You wear a blazer, you can wear a hat." Guests often favour floral frocks, polka dots and tailoring. By osmosis, a dress code seems to have been landed upon. For Windsor, dressing appropriately means "something that is demure and sophisticated," such as crisp linen and tailored pieces.
While Hanson points out that "wide-brimmed hats are best avoided as they can get in the way of those sitting behind you," Panama hats have become something of an official Wimbledon uniform, popular in the audience from the start of the 20th Century.
Over the years, a number of high-profile celebrities have offered up glowing examples of how to ace it sartorially in the stands of Centre Court. Zendaya, patron saint of "tenniscore", schooled Wimbledon-goers last year when she wore Ralph Lauren menswear-inspired looks – crisp white and old school tweed suit jackets, blue-and-white-striped shirts and ties.
More like this:• The world's first global sporting celebrity• How 'dollar princesses' brought US flair• Why Wimbledon players dress code is so strict
Other smashes include Meghan in neat pleats and white shirts, Keira Knightley in a dropped-waist Chanel dress, Tom Cruise, year-on-year, in natty suit after natty suit, Alexa Chung in Aran-knit cardigans and crisp cotton poplin skirts, and Pierce Brosnan in navy linen suits with neat pocket squares. Arguably, however, queen of SW19 dressing is Sienna Miller, thanks to her broderie anglaise dresses and easy-breezy linen suits, bright white Galvan jumpsuits and polka dots. Others have aced it despite not sticking to the script – see Grace Jones in a flight suit for a perfect example, or Idris Elba in a striking Super Eagles shirt.
Catherine, Princess of Wales, who is the royal patron of the All England Lawn Tennis Club, often wears green or purple, the official colours of the tournament since 1909. In recent years she's attended in a plethora of shades of green, such as a forest green Dolce & Gabbana crepe midi-dress in 2019, and in 2021 an emerald green Emilia Wickstead number – the colour of the grass at the beginning of the tournament, if not the end. Last year, Kate wore a purple Safiyaa dress to present the trophies for the men's singles.
Sense of tradition
The presence of royalty every year underlines the event's sense of tradition, and tennis has long been associated with wealth, status and glamour. "Tennis was this social game, rather elite and glamorous," says Elizabeth Wilson, author of Love Game: A History of Tennis, from Victorian Pastime to Global Phenomenon – its original setting was the country house. "It is, without doubt, a traditionally upper-class sport, and that essence still permeates through a lot of tennis," says Miller. He likens it to cricket, or Ascot, "where you have to be so respectful, as an outsider coming in, of the rules".
Even among tennis tournaments, Wimbledon is extra-proper. "You look at other grand slams, [it] is the polar opposite," Miller says, mentioning some examples: walk-out music, players dancing as they come out, Kiss Cam, hot dogs for sale and T-shirt guns.
It is, says Miller, "one of the last bastions of old-school British culture in the mainstream". Its archaic quality is, for some, part of its charm and appeal. "I see Wimbledon as essentially like a museum. You go there for a fascinating day out, for an insight into what the past of British society looked like," he says.
All this also has its downsides. "From a fan perspective, you're really made to feel like you're stepping into a space that is not yours," says Miller. You need, to a certain extent, "to act like you've been there before".
Shifting codes
Over the years, however, Wimbledon's codes have been shifting. In lots of ways Wilson thinks "it's more participatory [now]". In the past, "people have described how the atmosphere was more like a cathedral, there was a rather holy atmosphere – whereas that's very far from how it is today."
Hanson agrees. "If we think of the Henman Hill/Murray Mound (and the rest), levels of patriotism and emotion, it is unlike public displays we would have seen in the past."
Crowds do now whoop and shout, at least between points, and even partake in the occasional Mexican wave, which, according to Wilson, "nobody would have thought of doing in the 1950s". When Miller went last year, he "could definitely feel that it was a bit more of a modern tennis experience". He can feel it, he says, "loosening up, just the tiniest bit".
Dress-wise, also, attitudes are softening. Miller sees Idris Elba and David Beckham as shining examples of dressers who know how to be Wimbledon-appropriate without looking stuck in the past. "The look is more 'fancy barbecue' than 'super formal event'".
For Hanson, points of etiquette prevail. "Etiquette is all about how our actions and behaviours affect or impact other people. We need to be considerate and careful in how we behave to ensure that everyone has a great day watching tennis. Wimbledon thrives on its age-old rituals, and remains one of the key traditional British summer sporting events – hopefully, for this special fortnight, we can all remember our manners, on court and off."
--
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Truth about how 'frugal' 24-year-old junior sales executive who wants to retire at 40 REALLY saved £95,000
She is seen as a twenty-something graduate who by living frugally has saved £95,000 towards being able to retire by the age of 40. Mia McGrath says she has saved her sizable nest egg by cutting back on life's luxuries like takeaways and boasts of eating pasta meals for as little as £1 a time while living at home with her parents. But despite urging followers to cut back on luxury spending, Mia is also cultivating a parallel brand as a model and lifestyle influencer. Mia, who is signed to both Memesis Models and W Model Management, runs a second Instagram account under her full name, showcasing a far glossier life - with shots from holidays in Paris, Barcelona and Corfu, nights out in Chelsea, and shopping sprees at Prada. The junior sales executive is also facing claims she is in fact paid thousands of pounds by big brands like the BBC, American Express, British Airways and Marshmallow car insurance to promote them. Quite how much she receives is unclear as Mia Rose McGrath - her username across multiple platforms - doesn't declare this publicly. So adept is Mia at offering her services as a way for corporations to 'reach' young people that she even provides a breakdown of her influencer profile in the style of a media sales executive. She details her audience reach by age (85% of those following her posts are aged 18-34, for example), by country and by audience numbers reached: an astonishing 3.1million at last count. She even pitches direct to potential sponsors: 'I'm a 24-year-old London-based creator who has grown a TikTok account to over 125k followers, specialising in personal finance and investing content. 'While my niche focuses on finance, I've also worked on creating UGC [user generated content - ie her posts] for skincare and lifestyle brands, blending creativity with authenticity to connect with audiences.' All this seems distinctly at odds with the tone of her main output to TikTok viewers, describing herself as a 'fashion girly' and 'your financially literate bestie'. And her USP on social media comes from that professed financial literacy: she routinely lectures young people on how to achieve wealth young and offers tips on how to emulate her savings success. And she provides links that go straight to online trading platforms to assist. Of course influencers being paid to produce or promote content for commercial organisations is nothing new - and there's no suggestion that Mia is flouting any of the rules around this practice. But when your whole personal brand is about being relatable on a financial level as you're just the same as other struggling 24 year olds, then perhaps there are issues with this. Social media marketing expert Hannah O'Donoghue Hobbs told MailOnline: 'Mia should be more transparent about how much money she is getting from these affiliated brands. 'I know she does admit to having some privileges, due to her being an influencer, which means she's been able to find things more affordable. But I believe she needs to be more loud and proud about it. 'If you're going to make a living out of posting on Instagram, shout about - literally explains every perk you're getting so you are being super real with your followers and be as open as you can be as a creator.' Mia has repeatedly spoken in videos about her plan to 'soft retire' in just 16-years time - when she turns 40 in 2041. By this, she apparently means that she will still do part time work or things she's 'passionate' about, but won't need to work full time to 'stay alive'. She added: 'I'm not underestimating the work that goes into content creating, it can be an absolute graft and to build the TikTok following she has is no joke but her income stream from paid promos etc should be made clear. 'A lot of these brands look at the numbers, rather than the actual content, and jump on board. 'It's called 'vanity metrics', it will appease board members but they sometimes don't necessarily give too much thought into what these influencers are actually posting.' WIth this underpinning goal, she tells how she has already accrued £80,000 in savings - and regularly shares insights on her frugal lifestyle which involves shunning treats like takeaways, daily coffees and croissants as well as boozy trips to the pub. She has also says that a significant part of her accrued savings had come from saving money on rent by living at home with her parents. On one of her TikTok videos she told how living at home for a year and a half after graduating from university helped her save ''50 to 70' percent of her income at the time- or £22,500. Of course, to be able to do this, it helps if the family home is a £900,000 house in a pleasant corner of Lewisham, South East London. For someone who lives her life so apparently openly online, Mia has been relatively guarded about her family but those parents are Danny McGrath, an actor and drama teacher, and mum Louise Balmain, who adopted her after she was born in China. She also has a sister, Emily. Apart from saving money from avoiding rent she also rails against wasting income on fripperies like food treats and throwaway fashion. 'These are the things I just don't spend money as a financially responsible 24-year-old who wants to retire early,' she said in one TikTok video, which has racked up more than 500,000 views. She then cites ordering food via her phone as a waste of money and says she doesn't even have the Deliveroo app on her phone: 'I won't get a takeaway if I can't be bothered to cook. If you can cook really good food, you just don't need to get a takeaway.' In a similar vein, she also says she won't treat herself to a daily coffee or a pastry: ''I don't see the point of buying one every single day. They're four or five pounds sometimes. That really adds up,' she says. She also appears to be unwilling to splash the cash on trinkets, referencing the viral 'labubu' trend - 'monster toys' that have grown popular on social media - and said she would never be caught buying one. She also doesn't buy 'extra' make-up and skincare beyond the 'capsule' collection she sticks to. She said: 'I couldn't tell you the last time I tried out a new product. I really just stick to the same routine of the same essential products and I just top up when they run out.' And when it comes to nights out, again abstemiousness is the rule, she says: 'I'm just not a big drinker. If I'm out with friends, I'll probably just have one or two.' Despite all this frugality, she is apparently now making enough money from her day job - her LinkedIn says she is a Junior Sales Account Manager for a fashion company - combined with what she calls her 'side hustles' that she can now contemplate spending £15,000 a year on rent. Because Mia has recently moved in with boyfriend Archie Steves a few months ago to a two-bedroom flat in Clapham, South London. She and Archie now pay £1250 each a month for the attractive property in London's Zone two. She says despite this big new monthly outgoing, she can still invest £1,300 in shares every month and has a dividend stock portfolio- with links so that fans can emulate her in this. She has also said she's hoping to increase her savings to £100,000 by the end of this year. Her commercial interests will certainly help.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Village torn apart after woman writes '50 Shades of Grey' style erotic novel 'about her neighbours'... but 13 years later has peace broken out?
Most people don't like their neighbours for various petty reasons. But most people don't live in Eccleshall. In 2012, a raunchy novel about a fictional village packed with anecdotes of bed-hopping and romps in the garden was published. Rotten Row was written by a vegetarian housewife Lesley Cleary (pen name Angela Hargreaves) from Eccleshall - a quaint village in Staffordshire. And despite being advertised as a fictional tale about 'living in close proximity to some neighbours', residents of Eccleshall felt the book rang a little too true. At the time, her neighbours were furious at the portrayal of an in-fighting, sex-obsessed bunch of cranks and Mrs Cleary insisted the similarities were pure fiction. But MailOnline can reveal that Mrs Cleary, now 70, and her husband Martin - a retired mine surveyor - fled Eccleshall to live a a quiet life in the seaside town of Ilfracombe in Devon. Two years after the book was released, the couple settled down in a pretty detached Victorian home close to beaches and museums for £220,000. It appears the move spelled the end of her literary career with Mrs Cleary now preferring dog walks and gardening. The Amazon page for Angela Hargreaves still shows just the two published titles. Despite being advertised as a fictional tale about 'living in close proximity to some neighbours', residents of Eccleshall felt the book rang a little too true Rotten Row published in 2012 and Hard Times, published in 2013, the cover of which shows a naked couple doing the hoovering. Set in the fictional village of Upton Green, it promised, according to its Amazon entry, a tale of 'petty spitefulness and complexity of living in close proximity to some neighbours'. It was compared with E. L. James's saucy bestseller Fifty Shades Of Grey, and is packed with stories of bed-hopping, romps in the garden, and gossipy accounts of drunken debauchery. Unfortunately for residents of Eccleshall, everything about the book - from the names of its characters to their bickering over damsons - rang a little too true. That, at least, was the claim of Lesley's neighbours, who were furious at the portrayal of an in-fighting, sex-obsessed bunch of cranks - or, to use the book's description, the most 'bossy, gossipy, hissy, humourless, competitive bunch of Hyacinth Buckets one could ever wish not to encounter'. Lesley, however, insisted any similarities between her book and life in Eccleshall was pure coincidence.'It's fiction,' she says, matter-of-factly. 'All I know is what was in my head. Some people just want to be in the book, I don't know why. I'm the one who's upset - my characters are being hijacked. It's silly.' The saga started in 2012 when Lesley told her next-door neighbours Emma and Kevin Williams she had been writing a novel to be published online in September. Emma and Kevin shrugged off the book as a pipe dream. It wasn't until a few months later, once the book had been published online, that they heard the book's title, Rotten Row, and decided to look it up. 'I had no idea it would seem to be about life here - or that it would be so revealing,' said Emma, who had lived in Eccleshall for decades. 'It's a little village and we all get along well. Or we did.' The cover image, drawn by Lesley, shows a pretty row of cottages at the end of a village High Street. With their pastel-coloured walls, picture windows, and sloping slate roofs, they are remarkably similar to cottages at the end of Eccleshall High Street, one of which is Lesley's home. 'It's definitely our street - you only need look at it,' she concluded at the time. Lesley claimed the cover 'could be a row of terraces anywhere in the country. It may look like here, but it isn't meant to be here,' she says, crossly. 'If you look closely you'll see there is a road continuing round a corner, which doesn't happen here. And the windows are different.' She said she'd been writing the book since 2006. 'I've kept a file over the years with all sorts of snippets and bits from my life. My idea was just to write a little book that would sell a few copies - not to cause a fuss like this. I thought I'd get a few royalties for dog food.' But it wasn't long before her novel became the talk of the village. One Friday evening, a group of locals gathered in the cosy, red-walled sitting room of Brenda Chatterjee, a glamorous widow who lives in the white-washed Old Bakery next door to Emma and Kevin, to read the book on Brenda's Kindle. Soon they were compiling mental check-lists of everything that sounded familiar. The book's narrator, Louisa, enjoys interior design, and moves to Upton Green having lived in London and Hampshire - both of which apply to Lesley. Her cottage, like Lesley's, is at the end of the 'Georgian High Street' and has a pretty wrought-iron fence and side entrance. Meanwhile, the book is packed full of events that villagers say have really happened, and conversations that they've really had. They include such pulse-racers as an argument about damson-picking rights, a row over a leaking loo, and a dispute with the florist over past-their-best roses. 'It's as if she's been following us,' says Brenda. 'I feel like she's been looking at us through binoculars the whole time.' Many of the lead characters have similar names, physical characteristics or jobs to Lesley's neighbours. Brenda believes she is the inspiration for the character 'Babs', and her good friend, former company director Rob Johnson, the inspiration for Bab's lover, 'Barbour Bob'. Their neighbour Martin Ratcliffe an architect, is certain the fictional architect Declan is based on him. And Emma and Kevin, who keep chickens and grow vegetables, believe chicken-loving, veggie-growing Lucy and Jeremy are their mirror images. Gordon Dale is sure parish councillor Reg is him - they both even have matching gold teeth. Amusingly, when it came to the book's racier passages, the villagers deny any similarities at all. The book has architect Declan engaging in an illicit romp with Babs (Martin insists 'I've certainly never broken any antique beds!') and Louisa the narrator receives a sloppy, unsolicited snog from a stranger in the supermarket. Are the villagers sure they weren't imagining the similarities, and a tiny part of them rather liked being immortalised in print? 'Not at all!' says Brenda, horrified. 'I just want a quiet life. This is all so awful - it's upsetting.' Nobody answered the door at the immaculately renovated five-bed home when MailOnline visited this week. Neighbours described Leslie and Martin as a 'friendly and charming couple'. None knew of her literary past or had ever heard of the pen name Angela Hargreaves. One told MailOnline: 'I had no idea she was an author, they are nice and we've said hello a couple of times but keep themselves to themselves generally. 'I don't think there's much danger of my life being in one of those books, it'd send readers straight off to sleep.' The couple appear to have regularly visited Ilfracombe - famed for its stunning coastline, historic harbour and 66ft tall Damian Hurst statue - regularly for years before moving down. In 2008 - while she was writing Rotten Row - Leslie wrote a testimonial praising the town in the local newspaper the North Devon Journal. She wrote: 'Ilfracombe is a beautiful place with wonderful historic architecture, a museum that shouldn't be missed and the Landmark Theatre is fabulous.' Martin meanwhile has ventured into local politics, serving on the Harbour Board as well as being a site representative on the Ilfracombe Allotment and Leisure Gardens Association. In 2024 he stood unsuccessfully for the town council under the Ilfracombe First party. Meanwhile, back in Eccleshall her old neighbours have 'moved on' and brushed past the topic of their former resident author. But the original 'stars' of the novel still live on the same charming street, including Brenda Chatterjee who she believed was inspiration for the character 'Babs'. And while life in Eccleshall now seems uneventful... who knows what's going on behind closed doors.


Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Iga Swiatek has to give back Wimbledon trophy after thrashing Amanda Anisimova
Iga Swiatek was forced to give back the Venus Rosewater Dish almost immediately after winning Wimbledon, with the All England Club taking the trophy and giving the Polish star a replica instead Polish tennis star Iga Swiatek experienced a bittersweet moment as she won the Wimbledon Women's singles on Saturday. Despite her stunning 6-0, 6-0 victory, which she chalked up in just under an hour, the 24-year-old soon learned that the Venus Rosewater Dish wouldn't be hers to keep. After dominating an emotional Amanda Anisimova, in what turned out to be the most lopsided final in the Open Era, Swiatek was quickly acquainted with Wimbledon's harsh tradition. The iconic trophy is traditionally taken back soon after the presentation ceremony, leaving champions like Swiatek with a smaller replica. The revelation came to light during the BBC's coverage, where host Clare Balding, and pundit Tracy Austin, were chatting about the champion's walk towards the balcony for Swiatek's celebratory moment. Balding said: "It looks so lovely that side of the clubhouse and it's just great, you've got your hands on this trophy." Austin then chimed in adding: "She keeps looking at it! It's so beautiful to see her smiling." However, 2013 Wimbledon winner Marion Bartoli was on hand to drop a bombshell. "But she can't keep it," she interjected. Bartoli continued: "You only get a replica of it. This one goes back into the trophy gallery. You will have it at the Champions Ball in your hand again, then it will go back to the trophy gallery. You don't go back home with that trophy, there is only one place and it stays in the trophy gallery at Wimbledon." After Swiatek returned indoors to snap some photos with the trophy and her team, she encountered All England Club CEO Sally Bolton, who promptly reclaimed the trophy, reports the Express. Bartoli humorously said that the Wimbledon boss will have told Swiatek that she had to give the famous trophy up. When Balding queried the French legend about the size of the replica trophy winners keep, she responded: "Three-quarters size." She added: "But all the names are engraved, all the names of the past champions who have graced that court before you are engraved with the replica you can take home. But it's only three-quarters size. But it's still beautiful." Coco Gauff also learned this hard truth in June when she clinched her first French Open title. The US Star even created a TikTok video where she joked about the smaller size of her replica trophy. Meanwhile, Andy Murray, who was absent from Wimbledon this year before the Sunday final, playfully took issue with the replica trophy situation by taking to Instagram. "Surely the tennis majors can do a better job with the replica trophies?! They are tiny," he wrote. He did add a laughing emoji in his response to Gauff's complaint however.