
Foreign transfers are now flowing mostly North to South via remittances — World Inequality Lab report
The World Inequality Lab, a think-tank fronted by the economic historian Thomas Piketty, has produced a new study that looks at the unequal North-South wealth exchange through the prism of global trade flows and balance of payments over the longue durée from 1800 to 2025.
Piketty is a prolific author and public intellectual whose work is focused broadly in readable and insightful ways on the history of inequality.
Piketty's latest effort is typically trailblazing and is erected from the foundations of a vast new database on global trade flows and the world balance of payments from 1800 to the present.
The study, co-authored by Gastón Nievas, covers a lot of ground but one of the many things that stands out is how financial transfers are now moving in a North-South direction – largely because of remittances. This is a striking contrast to the colonial era that defined the 19th century.
'No country or world region has ever received foreign income inflows approaching the magnitude of Europe's in the 19th century,' the study says.
This accumulation of foreign wealth to the European colonial powers – an extractive process – had many taps: France imposed a large debt in Haiti in 1825 to compensate former French slave owners for the loss of their property(!), Britain saddled China with a debt from the Opium War, and there were also massive transfers of tax revenues from colonies to the metropolis.
'Today, financial transfers mostly flow from North to South, particularly through private remittances, rather than from South to North, via colonial transfers. For instance, sub-Saharan Africa received very large cumulated net transfer inflows between 1970 and 2025 (the equivalent of +64% of its 2025 GDP), approximately as much as the cumulated foreign income outflows (-55%),' the authors write.
So one of the many trends the study has unearthed is that Africa's inflow of financial transfers since 1970 has exceeded its outflows, and this is mostly explained by wage and salary earners from the continent working abroad and sending part of their income home – and in a big way.
These findings come against the backdrop of a rising tide of xenophobia and racism in Europe and North America, fuelled on the far right by the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory which holds that white folks up North are being 'replaced' by a tsunami of dark-skinned migrants from the South.
Of course, there has been significant migration in recent decades from South to North, not least because of the labour market needs in advanced economies with ageing populations. Far-right shrills in the US and France who want to shut down such migration will shut down their own economies in the process.
The findings also underscore the importance of remittances to regions such as Africa. For families these can be literal lifelines of income support, and multiplied many, many times they amount to vast inflows of capital which are at odds with perceptions of capital flight.
Remittances, of course, can also create a dangerous economic dependency for the countries on the receiving end that can evaporate if the needs of the labour market change or an isolationist regime builds a wall.
Lesotho offers an arresting example on this front.
As this correspondent has previously reported, during the peak of South Africa's gold production under apartheid – which relied on a ruthlessly exploited pool of migrant, rural labour – remittances from the wages of Basotho working underground here amounted in 1987 to an astonishing 236% of the mountain kingdom's GDP.
They now equal 21% of GDP, according to World Bank data – a 'remittance shock' without parallel in modern global economic history.
South Africa's mines once employed almost 500,000 foreign workers. That number, according to the last available data, stood at 35,000 in 2022.
This explains why so many Basotho are now 'zama zamas' at the bottom of the exploitative and transnational criminal pyramid of illicit gold mining.
Lesotho's economy has not developed or industrialised in meaningful ways to provide jobs and domestic economic opportunities for its labour force. Exploited by the legal gold industry in the past, many of its young men are now exploited by the illicit sector in the precious metal.
Does that stand as a warning for Africa more widely?
Certainly there is a lot of talk these days about industrialisation and the 'beneficiation' of minerals and stuff like that. And remittance inflows to Africa are clearly important and at a scale larger than many have perhaps assumed.
Africa notably between 1970 and 2025 had a cumulated trade surplus from primary commodities that equalled close to 200% of its GDP, but a trade deficit in manufactured goods equal to 169% of its GDP.
It is surely no bad thing to develop your economy and raise the living standards for most of your population through processes such as industrialisation, and not just as a precaution if the remittance flows are suddenly staunched.
But for now, remittances are flowing one way, and that in itself speaks to enduring global disparities in economic opportunity. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Ukraine is becoming the wedge driving US and Europe apart
Europe's sabotage of US peace efforts might force the White House to shift the entire burden of aid to Ukraine onto Europe alone. The irony of geopolitics is that friends can become overnight enemies and enemies can become friends – it's all about power dynamics. That's exactly what is emerging among Western allies, whose common enemy all along has been Russia, until Donald Trump came around and spoiled the party. It was bound to happen that Trump's determination to end the war between Ukraine and Russia would cause tension among the Western nations. War is used by unscrupulous politicians to stay in power, manipulating public perceptions to create an impression that a particular leader is a patriot who loves their country by standing up against the enemy, no matter the cost to human life, even genocide. Ukraine has increasingly emerged as a critical fault line in relations between the United States and European nations. Tension has been exacerbated by Kyiv, which, amid Trump's withdrawal of unconditional support, has been pressing the European Union for military and financial guarantees, which has become Volodymyr Zelensky's favourite topic when visiting Europe. With this pressure, Zelensky cast European leaders as adversaries to their American counterparts. ALSO READ: Zelensky signs decree for Ukraine's withdrawal from anti-landmine treaty Some observers have described Ukraine as the 'gravedigger' of transatlantic unity, pushing Nato to the brink of collapse. This idea was confirmed by Politico, which emphasised the possibility of Nato's eventual breakup. It pointed to a growing convergence between US and Russian positions on a range of global issues, despite persistent anti-Russian sentiment among European elites. Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell described the current trajectory as an 'uncoordinated divorce' between the US and Europe. Amid this tension, Ukraine has signed bilateral security and mutual defence agreements with 28 countries across the collective West over the past year. This is in addition to the $50 billion in financial support pledged by the G7 nations to Ukraine last December, drawn from the proceeds of frozen Russian assets. The proposal to deploy Western peacekeeping forces to Ukrainian territory remains little more than rhetorical flourish by European politicians seeking to bolster their domestic standing. ALSO READ: Trump reassures allies as NATO agrees 'historic' spending hike That's what one means by war and power – the innocent must die because politicians need to stay in power, be it in Europe or Israel. The West appears far from reaching consensus on direct involvement. Trump's firm stance against sending American troops, coupled with Europe's limited military capacity, have effectively ruled out the deployment of even a modest peacekeeping contingent. In a recent piece, UnHerd, a publication that claims to be neither going with the crowd nor pushing an agenda, echoed this scepticism. The publication argues that while Europe may technically have the capacity to support Ukraine for 'as long as it takes,' the political and strategic appetite to do so appears increasingly fragile. It has become clear that under Trump, the Western alliance will never be stable. Trump may prefer to abandon US sponsorship of Kyiv in exchange for providing Russia with guarantees of American noninterference in the Ukrainian conflict. In the end, Europe's sabotage of US peace efforts might force the White House to shift the entire burden of aid to Ukraine onto Europe alone – leaving them it to deal with this overwhelming problem without US involvement. NOW READ: Europe's appetite for war: Why peace in Ukraine remains elusive


Eyewitness News
11 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Turkish magazine staff in custody over 'disrespectful' cartoon
ISTANBUL, TURKEY - Four staff members at satirical Turkish magazine LeMan were remanded in custody Wednesday over accusations they published a caricature of the Prophet Mohammed, a case that watchdogs have called an attack on press freedom. The four, who deny any link between the illustration and the prophet, were held as part of prosecutors' probe into what Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc called the "disrespectful drawing". He added that a warrant has been issued for two additional suspects who were abroad. The publication of the cartoon and arrests of staff at the opposition magazine led to clashes in Istanbul on Monday. News site T24 published the police deposition of cartoonist Dogan Pehlevan in which he said that he wanted "to talk about peace in this drawing" and condemned "provocateurs". "I have been drawing in Turkey for many years. The first rule you learn is not to address religious issues and not to mock religion," he said. "I have always adhered to this principle. I reject the accusations levelled against me," he added. The drawing in question shows two characters meeting in the sky above a city devastated by bombs. One is named Muhammed and the other Musa. "I just wanted to highlight the absurdity of war, to show that people can get along but do you have to be dead to realise that? That's my only message," he added. On Monday evening, a favourite haunt of LeMan staff in the Istiklal district of Istanbul was attacked. It escalated into a pitched battle between about 300 people, including people defending the magazine and furious at the arrests. On Tuesday, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called the cartoon a "despicable provocation" and a "hate crime" whose authors will have to answer for "disrespecting the prophet". 'POLITICAL OPPORTUNISTS' Despite a ban, some 300 people also gathered around Taksim Mosque in central Istanbul, shouting "don't forget Charlie Hebdo", referring to a deadly Islamist militant attack on the French magazine in 2015. LeMan's editor-in-chief Tuncay Akgun told AFP that the drawing in question "has nothing to do with the Prophet Mohammed", adding: "We would never take such a risk." "The character is a Muslim killed in Gaza... He was called Muhammed (like) more than 200 million people in the Muslim world," he said. In a joint statement, Turkey's TGS press union and professional organisations said they had "great concern" at the rise in attacks and "violent rhetoric" due to the publication. Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders, the international network Cartooning for Peace and the US association Cartoonists Rights condemned the attack on press freedom in Turkey. They called on the Turkish authorities to ensure the safety of the editorial team. Terry Anderson, of Cartoonists Rights, said the arrests were "based on a lie and are being exploited by political opportunists for intimidation and repression". "We demand the release of those detained and an immediate end to these baseless prosecutions," he added. Many Turks and press organisations drew a parallel with the attack on LeMan and the Sivas massacre in 1993, when a radical Islamist mob set fire to a hotel, killing 33 writers and artists mainly from the Alevi minority. The protesters had been angered by the presence of the writer Aziz Nesin who had questioned the authenticity of the Koran and also sought to translate Salman Rushdie's controversial novel "The Satanic Verses".


eNCA
17 hours ago
- eNCA
Iran ends cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog after Israel, US strikes
Iran on Wednesday officially suspended its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, a move triggered by the unprecedented Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear facilities. Last month's 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel has sharply escalated tensions between Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency. On June 25, a day after a ceasefire took hold, Iranian lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to suspend cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA. State media confirmed the legislation had now taken effect. The law aims to "ensure full support for the inherent rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran" under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, with a particular focus on uranium enrichment, according to Iranian media. While IAEA inspectors have had access to Iran's declared nuclear sites, their current status is uncertain amid the suspension. On Sunday, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, said the inspectors' work had been suspended but denied any threats against them or IAEA chief Rafael Grossi. He said the "inspectors are in Iran and are safe", but "their activities have been suspended, and they are not allowed to access our sites". Uranium enrichment has long been a core sticking point in nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington, which have since stalled due to the conflict. Israel and some Western countries accuse Iran of seeking nuclear weapons -- claims Tehran denies. The law did not specify exact steps following the suspension. The ISNA news agency cited lawmaker Alireza Salimi as saying the inspectors now needed approval from Iran's Supreme National Security Council to access nuclear sites. Separately, the Mehr news agency cited lawmaker Hamid Reza Haji Babaei as saying Iran would stop allowing IAEA cameras in nuclear facilities, though it was unclear if this is required by the new law. After parliament passed the bill, it was approved by the Guardian Council and President Masoud Pezeshkian formally enacted the suspension on Wednesday, according to state television. - 'Deceptive and fraudulent' - In response, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar urged European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal to trigger the "snapback" mechanism and reinstate all UN sanctions on Iran. The snapback, set to expire in October, was part of the nuclear accord that collapsed after the United States withdrew in 2018. Iran began scaling back commitments a year later. Iranian officials have warned the mechanism could prompt their withdrawal from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Israel, widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, is not an NPT signatory. Germany's foreign ministry spokesman Martin Giese said Iran's move to suspend cooperation with the IAEA was a "disastrous signal". Since the Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Tehran has sharply criticised the IAEA for its silence and condemned a June 12 UN resolution accusing Iran of non-compliance, which Iranian officials say provided a pretext for the attacks. On Wednesday, senior judiciary official Ali Mozaffari accused Grossi of "preparing the groundwork" for Israel's raids and called for him to be held accountable, citing "deceptive actions and fraudulent reporting". Iran has rejected Grossi's requests to visit bombed sites, accusing him of "malign intent", while insisting no threats have been made against him or inspectors. Britain, France and Germany and have condemned unspecified "threats" against the IAEA chief. Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper on Saturday accused Grossi of being an Israeli spy who should be executed. - Damage - On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the parliament vote to halt cooperation reflected the "concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion". The 12-day war began when Israel launched a major bombing campaign on Iran and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists, with Tehran responding with waves of missiles and drones launched at Israel. On June 22, Israel's ally the United States launched unprecedented strikes of its own on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. More than 900 people were killed in Iran during the conflict, according to the judiciary. Iran's retaliatory attacks killed 28 people in Israel, according to authorities. President Donald Trump said the US attacks had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme, though the extent of the damage was unclear. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has admitted "serious" damage to nuclear sites. But in a recent interview with CBS, he said: "One cannot obliterate the technology and science... through bombings". By Payam Doost Mohamadi