Tesco, Asda, Aldi, and more to introduce car park changes
Disabled Motoring UK (DMUK) is urging individuals to participate in a survey between July 21st and August 15th to highlight the current challenges faced by the community.
DMUK's Baywatch campaign aims to highlight the persistent misuse of disabled parking bays and Blue Badges in supermarket car parks, and potentially advocate for stricter enforcement.
Hi @Tesco I've received a parking ticket after using your Cromwell Road superstore a week last Saturday. We took 86yo mother-in-law to store, spent more than £115 on shopping and then took her to the cafe for something to eat after she got tired. For this we've been fined £60
The campaign invites disabled motorists – and their companions – to fill out a survey after each visit to the supermarket.
The information gathered will help create a more accurate picture of the difficulties disabled people encounter when parking at six major supermarket chains: Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons, Aldi, and Lidl.
The 2024 survey revealed that nearly half (40%) of disabled drivers have had to leave car parks due to the lack of available suitable spaces. An additional 36% reported non-badge holders occupying accessible bays.
DMUK's data also indicated that another 40% of disabled individuals state that they are unable to park at local shops because they are inaccessible.
The need for accessible parking bays is surging at an alarming rate. With almost three million Blue Badge holders across the UK – and a 10% increase in England alone during the past year – there are currently around 52 Blue Badge holders competing for each accessible parking space.
These statistics highlight a wider accessibility crisis throughout public facilities and car parks, putting millions of disabled individuals at a serious disadvantage.
Recommended reading:
Dr Shani Dhanda, Award Winning Disability Inclusion and Accessibility Specialist, said: "Accessible parking bays aren't just a nice-to-have - they're a lifeline.
"Without them, so many disabled people are shut out of everyday life, whether that's getting to work, buying food, going to appointments, or just being part of their community.
"When bays are misused or not properly enforced, it sends a really clear message that our access and independence aren't a priority.
"Baywatch matters because it's not just raising awareness - it's holding people to account and pushing for real change."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
19 hours ago
- Sky News
RAC owners plot route to £5bn sale or stock market listing
The owners of the RAC roadside recovery service are preparing to offload the company in a deal which could value it at up to £5bn. Sky News has learnt that CVC Capital Partners, the Singaporean sovereign investment fund GIC and Silver Lake Partners have been in discussions about plans to launch an auction or a stock market listing of the company. The RAC, which was founded in 1897, is one of the world's oldest roadside assistance companies. It now has about 14 million members, making it nearly as large in customer terms as the AA, its biggest rival. A precise valuation of the business was unclear on Thursday, although insiders said a range of between £4bn and £5bn was reasonable. The AA is also backed by private equity investors who have begun exploring an exit. Sky News revealed earlier this year that Towerbrook Capital Partners, Warburg Pincus and Stonepeak have appointed JP Morgan and Rothschild to conduct a review of the AA's strategic options. The RAC's shareholders are at an earlier stage of deliberations, with investment banks yet to be appointed. People close to the situation said any decision about a transaction would not be made until next year, although it is possible that advisers will be hired in the next few months. The RAC was sold by Aviva, the insurer, to buyout firm Carlyle for £1bn in 2011 in order to focus on its core insurance operations. Carlyle then brought in GIC as a co-investor three years later in a move which derailed plans for a stock market flotation. CVC - a former joint owner of the AA - bought out Carlyle in 2015 through a deal involving its longer-term Strategic Opportunities Fund. Silver Lake, the technology-focused private equity firm, came on board in 2021. The RAC employs thousands of people and is one of Britain's most recognisable consumer brands. It is chaired by the former Debenhams chief Rob Templeman and run by chief executive Dave Hobday. The company's profitability has surged from roughly £170m at the point at which CVC invested to more than £300m. Bankers believe the RAC's owners will b keen to take it public if market conditions allow, but are open to a private sale of the business. The AA has also seen a major improvement in its performance, with it having recorded four consecutive years of customer, revenue and earnings growth. It has also been through a succession of owners during the last 25 years. In 1999, the AA was bought by Centrica, the owner of British Gas, for £1.1bn. It was then sold five years later to CVC and Permira, two buyout firms, for £1.75bn, and sat under the corporate umbrella Acromas alongside Saga for a decade. The AA listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2014, but its shares endured a miserable run, being taken private nearly seven years later at little more than 15% of its value on flotation.
Auto Express
2 days ago
- Auto Express
Car parks must prove they cancel fines, says RAC
Ever wondered whether car parks actually repeal any of the thousands of fines they issue? After claims that this is definitely the case, car park operators have been called upon to publish data to prove they are treating drivers fairly. The RAC says operators must provide 'full and transparent' information regarding how many fines are issued and what proportion of them are cancelled following complaints. At the time of writing, neither of the big car parking industry trade bodies – the British Parking Association (BPA) and the International Parking Community (IPC) – actively publish data on complaints. Furthermore, two of the main appeal bodies that were set up and paid for by the industry to process complaints are infamous for taking time to provide their insights. The BPA's Parking on Private Land Appeals (POPLA) service is still to publish its findings from 2024, for example. Advertisement - Article continues below In 2023, POPLA says 43 per cent of appeals were upheld, but look closer and it's a little more nuanced than that. Of those that appealed, 17 per cent went to adjudication and 25 per cent were simply cancelled by the operator with no contest. However, four in five (78 per cent) of cases reaching the adjudication stage were dismissed. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below With RAC research showing that private car parking firms are submitting almost 40,000 DVLA vehicle keeper requests per day – almost all of these likely resulting in a fine being sent out – head of policy Simon Williams said, 'Stories of drivers being treated poorly are all too common'. Williams called on the industry to publish complaints data in full, saying: 'We believe the industry should have to publish the volume of complaints made to operators, including the reasons tickets were issued and the nature of the complaints, and whether or not they were cancelled.' This comes soon after the Government said it plans to consult on a new state-backed Private Parking Code of Practice; there were plans to introduce one years ago, but its implementation was prevented by a legal challenge from car parking firms. The industry has since introduced its own code but, as you might expect, this leans heavily in the favour of operators. While the Government says that its plans will 'tackle misleading tactics and confusing processes, bringing vital oversight and transparency to raise standards across the board', there are concerns that it doesn't go far enough – particularly in the case of limiting maximum fines. The AA has since accused Labour of 'bending the knee to the private parking industry,' while the BPA told Auto Express, 'Without proper enforcement, parking quickly becomes a free-for-all, with some people taking advantage at the expense of others.' Did you know you can buy a used car with Auto Express? Choose from tens of thousands of cars with trusted dealers around the UK. Click here to buy used with Auto Express now... Find a car with the experts Hyundai reduces prices across its entire EV range Hyundai reduces prices across its entire EV range Korean brand acts swiftly to cut prices on all its electric cars, amid confusion over Government's grant scheme New Citroen C5 Aircross SUV undercuts the Volkswagen Tiguan by a huge £7k New Citroen C5 Aircross SUV undercuts the Volkswagen Tiguan by a huge £7k Citroen's revamped flagship C5 Aircross SUV is available to order now with hybrid or electric power Car Deal of the Day: Polestar 4 is a head-turning EV for a super cool price Car Deal of the Day: Polestar 4 is a head-turning EV for a super cool price The 'car with no rear window' is looking seriously cheap on lease right now. It's our Deal of the Day for July 28
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits warned of £5,000 fine for making footwear mistake while driving
The RAC has warned that footwear can be a driving hazard over summer. The penalties can be as costly as they are severe so UK motorists must take care on the warning Over the last weeks of summer, motorists are being warned about getting behind the wheel whilst barefoot, in flip-flops, or wearing sandals. Whilst it might not be against the law in every instance, failing to wear suitable footwear whilst driving breaches Rule 97 of the Highway Code. This could result in being deemed as driving without due care and attention. The penalties can be as costly as they are severe. To help motorists, the RAC has put together a list of footwear to steer clear of when behind the wheel. This list encompasses sandals, flip-flops and driving barefoot. Bulky hiking boots and towering stiletto heels are also deemed dangerous. It comes after UK drivers were warned over 'avoiding' a road instead of having to follow a new rule. Rule 97 of the Highway Code declares that you must wear footwear and clothing that won't stop you from using your vehicle's controls correctly. This means that if you're caught up in a crash and officers spot that you're sporting flip-flops or have no shoes on whatsoever, you could be hit with "driving without due care and attention", reports Chronicle Live. This charge brings a £100 immediate fine and three points on your licence. Should it reach court, the penalties could soar dramatically to £5,000 and lead to nine penalty points. You might also be slapped with a total driving ban. Selim Cavanagh, from insurance firm Ingenie, explained: "[Flip-flops] slip off, slide under the pedals, get caught between your feet and the pedals, and if your feet are wet, they'll affect your ability to brake if you need to. Driving in flip-flops can create a dangerous driving environment and put you, your passengers, and other road users at risk." The RAC states: "While light, flimsy and impractical footwear can be dangerous, so can sturdy, robust shoes, such as walking or snow boots. "It's important to have a good base and grip to apply pressure to the pedals, but you need a certain degree of finesse to manipulate the controls. If not, you could strike the brake and accelerator together, producing a heart-in-mouth incident." However, it clarifies that "you can get behind the wheel of a vehicle barefoot or while wearing flip-flops, provided you are able to operate the controls safely. If you do so with wet feet, for example, you might be putting yourself, your passengers, and other road users at risk by not being able to drive the car safely. "This is illegal. And while it's not illegal to drive without shoes on, that doesn't mean it's right." The Driving Standards Agency, which oversees UK driving tests, warns: "suitable shoes are particularly important behind the wheel. We would not recommend driving barefoot because you don't have the same braking force with bare feet as you do with shoes on." The RAC has issued guidelines on the appropriate footwear to wear whilst driving.
