
Analysis: Trump seems to really be losing patience with Putin. But why now?
'I believe he wants peace,' Trump said, adding: 'I mean, I know him very well. Yeah, I think he wants peace. I think he would tell me if he didn't. … I trust him on this subject.'
Trump has sung a very different tune in recent days, and especially on Tuesday.
After days of expressing displeasure with his latest phone call with Putin, Trump went even further at a Cabinet meeting. He suggested the man he had vouched for and spent years curiously avoiding criticizing might not be a reliable interlocutor.
'We get a lot of bullsh*t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump said. 'He's very nice all of the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.'
It's not the only suggestion that Trump is evolving in his stance – or at least his rhetoric – on the war in Ukraine.
This week he has reversed a brief pause in defensive weapons shipments to Ukraine (while suggesting this was undertaken by others in his administration). He has, for now, largely abandoned blaming both sides for the war, after almost always pairing any critique of Russia with a critique of Ukraine – as if they were equal partners in prolonging Russia's war of aggression. And on Tuesday he without prompting praised the 'courage' of Ukraine's fighters, suggesting the huge investment the United States has made in Ukraine's defense hasn't been the boondoggle that many in the MAGA base believe.
'And I will say this, the Ukrainians, whether you think it's unfair that we gave all that money or not, they were very brave because somebody had to operate that stuff,' Trump said. 'And a lot of people I know wouldn't be operating it.'
So what's happening here?
Far be it from anyone to suggest that Trump has truly turned on Putin and landed firmly in Ukraine's corner. Trump has signaled over and over again in the last 10 years that he's happy to look unpredictable on the world stage – whether you call it the 'madman theory' or anything else. And even after his past strong words for Putin, his readouts of their subsequent calls – including a birthday call from the Russian leader – haven't suggested that Trump is applying direct pressure on him to agree to a ceasefire or to calibrate reprisals for Ukrainian attacks.
Now, it's quite possible Trump's latest public comments are an attempt to apply pressure on Putin rather than signal a firm shift in administration policy.
Quite notably, the American president on Tuesday declined to commit to a package of new sanctions on Russia that has the support of more than two-thirds of senators of both parties. To the extent Trump was truly done with Putin, that option is at the ready, and he's not going there yet.
He could just as easily try this strategy and revert to a gentler approach.
But sharply criticizing Putin is also a card that Trump has been extremely reluctant to play.
About the only other time he's gone this far was shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Trump briefly called Russia's invasion 'appalling.'
But that appeared to be a politically oriented course correction as much as anything. Trump, who was cueing up another campaign for president, had been sharply criticized for praising Putin's 'genius' and 'savvy' in invading Ukraine – at a time when virtually all of the Western world was condemning it. Those comments were shocking, even compared to Trump's years of cozying up to Putin. So he briefly rebuked the invasion and then moved on, resuming his kid-gloves treatment of the Russian leader.
The question before us is whether Trump's shift today will prove as fleeting as that was. Perhaps. But there are signs that it might not be.
For one, it seems the president might be coming to the realization that his goals in Ukraine are irreconcilable with Putin's.
For Trump, it's always about getting a 'win' – in this case, the peace deal he promised and failed to obtain on Day One of his presidency. He hasn't seemed to care too much about what that peace deal actually looks like and has floated huge concessions from Ukraine. But Putin has given almost no indication he's truly interested in cutting a deal that involves anything except obtaining all of Ukraine.
And Trump's comments Tuesday weren't just tough on Putin; they seemed to reflect deeper frustration that his Russian counterpart is stringing him along. (Trump in April also suggested Putin might be 'just tapping me along.') Perhaps Trump genuinely believed in his deal-making prowess, and he feels Putin has made a fool of him.
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce was asked Tuesday to square Trump's February comments about Putin with his latest remarks, and she suggested Trump was indeed responding to new inputs.
'He's an open-minded man, but he's not naive,' Bruce said. 'He is principled and clear in what he wants to achieve. That's what we're seeing.'
You could certainly understand Trump coming to that conclusion – however belatedly – after the events of last week. Shortly after his call with Putin, Russia launched its largest-ever drone attack on Ukraine.
And nobody should underestimate the role of pride and domestic politics in all of this. Trump has given Putin more of the benefit of the doubt than virtually any other Western leader, as evidenced by his February comments. Just as he has in other foreign areas, he's steadfastly declined to make moral judgments about a strongman leader whose tactics and consolidation of power he genuinely seems to admire.
But picking sides in the war in Ukraine isn't just about morals; it's also about realpolitik. And perhaps that latter calculation, which is much more important to Trump, is changing.
Only time will tell.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Six months in, Trump's numbers are stronger than in his first term
Six months into his second term, President Trump and Republicans are in better shape than eight years ago. Unquestionably, President Trump remains a divisive political figure. However, he has expanded his base and continues to hold it. In contrast, Democrats have been unable to capitalize on Trump's political vulnerabilities and have lost ground compared to 2017. With the House's passage of his rescission package, Trump scored another major win. He has had many, both at home and abroad: a successful strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, enactment of the ' big, beautiful ' budget reconciliation bill, a multitude of favorable Supreme Court decisions, DOGE's cuts, closing the border and deportations. Trump is doing what he promised. His base should be pleased. It is a striking contrast from 2017 when he had a much more mixed record: enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act but an Obamacare fiasco. However, while today's accomplishments play well to his base, how is Trump doing overall? The answer is important because Republicans took a beating in 2018's midterm elections, Democrats gaining 41 seats in the House and the majority. Trump's ability to pass legislation was derailed, his administration was continually dogged by House investigations and he was impeached twice. Trump remains divisive. That hasn't changed and clearly never will. Six months after his inauguration, according to the July 20 RealClearPolitics average of national polls, Trump's net job approval rating was minus-6.6 percentage points. His average approval rating of 45.5 percent is 4.4 percentage points below his share of the 2024 popular vote. However, Trump is well ahead of where he was at roughly the same point in his first term. On July 19, 2017, Trump was at minus-16 percentage points in his job approval: 39.7-55.7 percent. Further, Trump's current job approval-disapproval rating is 50 to 48 percent in Real Clear Politics' only poll (Rasmussen) of likely voters — which is tied with his share of 2024's popular vote. Trump's comparatively favorable showing is carrying over to congressional Republicans. In the July 22 RealClearPolitics average of national generic congressional vote polling, Democrats lead by 3 percentage points. To put this into historical context, we can look back at the earliest generic vote polls in July of the even years before each of the last six congressional elections, Democrats led in all six, yet the subsequent elections were a different story. Democrats lost either House or Senate seats in five of those elections. Looking more closely at today, the Democrats' average lead in likely voter generic polls (Rasmussen and Cygnal) — again the ones who matter most — Democrats' average lead is just 2.5 percentage points. A lot has changed in eight years. back in 2017, Trump's 2016 presidential victory was still being dismissed by some — including some Republicans — as a fluke, a factor of Hillary Clinton's weakness more than his strength. Not so much this time. Trump's 2024 victory was decisive and even quite impressive, considering the obstacles he faced — including but not limited to Democrats' lawfare, two assassination attempts and a concertedly negative establishment media. In office, Trump looked less in control, especially early on. Congressional Republicans reflected this and appeared to be in disarray, as exemplified by their failed efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare. The results reflected this — particularly their loss of 42 House seats in 2018. Of course, there are caveats about projecting too much from such an early look ahead to 2026. Today's generic numbers come from a much more greater number of polls than had been taken in some of those six previous elections. Republicans' numbers could yet slide. But they could also improve. Trump's approval ratings could slide too. But the same upside potential applies here as well. Invariably, there will be more polling of likely voters as the 2026 election nears — again, the ones that count (or rather, vote) — among whom Trump has historically outperformed among them. Many new issues will arise in the year and a half before 2026's midterms. Yet none may be larger than the negative one on Democrats' horizon: Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's nomination as their candidate for mayor of New York City. Should Mamdani win, he will draw attention away from Trump and onto a set of controversial policies and positions that many Americans view as extreme. He will also exacerbate fissures among Democrats. Although Trump is divisive, he is not dividing his base. And Trump's base is far bigger than it was eight years ago. Democrats are not capitalizing on Trump's divisiveness. They remain leaderless and look more divided than Republicans. J.T. Young is the author of the recent book, 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left' from RealClear Publishing and has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management, and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.


USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
How to watch the Donald Trump 'South Park' episode everyone's talking about
The newest season of South Park -- Season 27! -- started off with one of its all-time wildest episodes: "Sermon on the Mount," which skewers Donald Trump in some, uh, very NSFW ways and challenges Paramount just after the news about Stephen Colbert and The Late Show getting canceled. And if you want to watch it? You're in luck. We're here to tell you how you can see it. As of publishing this, you can't see it for free on South Park Studios. But what you can do is stream it if you subscribe to Paramount+. Here's what else you need to know about the South Park episode that has everyone buzzing. How did Donald Trump react to the South Park episode about him? Per USA TODAY: White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers slammed the episode in a statement to USA TODAY, calling "South Park" a "fourth-rate show" that "hasn't been relevant for over 20 years." How did the South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone react to all the controversy? "We're terribly sorry," came the response to a lot of laughs at a Comic-Con 2025 event in San Diego:


Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Why Americans love conspiracy theories
It's been weeks since the Jeffrey Epstein saga returned to dominate our political discourse. This is unusual. Trump scandals typically have short half-lives, burning bright before fading into the background noise of American politics. Yet here we are, still parsing documents and connections with the kind of dedicated attention usually reserved for major legislative battles that actually impact people's lives. There's something about conspiracy theories — and the Epstein story is nothing if not conspiratorial — that captures our imagination in ways that policy debates rarely can.