Court ruling puts Ohio school vouchers in limbo
And they'll get it in the new Ohio budget that contains more than $700 million for vouchers that will go to private and parochial schools.
GOP deficit hawks list complaints on megabill ahead of vote
Last week, a Franklin County judge declared Ed Choice vouchers to be unconstitutional, but the order was delayed pending an appeal.
In 2024, the state of Ohio spent nearly $1 billion on private school vouchers, with leaders of School Choice Ohio saying it's money well spent, giving parents and students educational options.
'We've placed children in private schools using Ed Choice,' School Choice Ohio President Eric 'Yitz' Frank said. 'We find options in public schools that work best for them so we are kind of agnostic about where people go to school, but we do believe they should have the ability to take their tax dollars and go to a school of their choice, whether it's a private or a public school.'
'The only difference is who pays for it?' teacher and Cleveland Heights School Board Member Dan Heintz said. 'Ohio went very successfully for a century with great private schools and great public schools, and it's really only been about the last 20 years that the private schools started to expect their neighbors, citizens from around the state to underwrite their decision to send their children to a private school.'
How to get your unclaimed Ohio funds before they go to the Cleveland Browns
Heintz is part of the Vouchers Hurt Ohio group that is suing the state. Their first victory came in Franklin County Common Pleas Court.
'The 'why not' is the Ohio state constitution, and that's what we saw Judge Page here in Franklin County decide this week when she ruled that Ed Choice vouchers are a violation of the state constitution,' Heintz said.
Page ruled that lawmakers are violating the Ohio constitution by creating a second system of schools that receive an unreasonably high level of per-student tax dollars.
Critics also point out that vouchers were promised to pull poor students out of underperforming districts, but vouchers often go to affluent families in high-ranking public school districts who never intend to send their children to public schools.
Project underway to help relieve I-270/71 congestion on North Side
'There are kids that thrive in really what we would call poor-performing schools and there are kids that struggle in really what we consider to be, objectively, affluent schools and so putting the parents in the driver's seat, we think, will ultimately get better outcomes,' Frank said.
And, for now, parochial and private schools will continue to receive public dollars.
The vouchers are in the budget signed by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine. The state is poised to appeal the finding in Franklin County Common Pleas Court that the vouchers are unconstitutional. It is expected that the case will go all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court, where Republicans hold all but one seat.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thanks to the GOP Megabill, You'll Pay Higher Utility Bills
This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM's home for opinion and news analysis. Natural gas price spikes, grid transmission bottlenecks, and a data center construction boom are already straining America's power grid. The Republican Party just passed a budget bill that might break it. Donald Trump and the GOP's irrational energy agenda deliberately sidelines wind and solar energy — the lowest cost, fastest-to-deploy sources of energy generation available — to prop up a dying fossil fuel industry that won't be able to meet rising demand. The consequences will be severe: hundreds of billions in clean energy investment will evaporate, hundreds of gigawatts of power won't get built, and hundreds of millions of metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions will be produced. By 2035, according to Princeton's ZERO Lab for energy research, the U.S. will have added 45% less clean electricity to the grid than it would have if Trump had not been reelected. All of this comes as America's electricity demand is accelerating for the first time in decades. A report last year from the Clean Grid Initiative projected up to a five-fold increase in demand on the grid. Meanwhile, the U.S. added 64 TWh of solar generation to the grid in 2024 — enough to meet fully half of the record-breaking growth in electricity demand last year, according to independent energy think tank Ember Energy. The only way America can meet rising energy demand and keep costs down is by building more wind and solar. Clean energy means lower utility bills, more good jobs, and cleaner air. The Republicans don't care. It's a tale as old as the party. The GOP campaigns on one thing — lowering the cost of energy for Americans — and does the opposite. The final version of the GOP's bill, which Trump signed into law on July 4, phases out clean energy tax credits by the end of 2027, a year earlier than the timeline in the original House version. Rather than 'unleash' American energy, the Republican Party just kneecapped it. The loss of renewable subsidies threatens to disrupt or cancel a combined capacity of 547 GW of wind and solar by 2027 or later, according to Cleanview's tracker. That's not 'leveling the playing field' with the massively-subsidized fossil fuel industry — it's rigging the game. While the bill does give some juicy handouts to the fossil fuel industry, it's hard to see who else benefits. U.S. automakers will definitively lose the global electric vehicle race. Big Tech will have to pay a premium to power their AI data centers. Advanced manufacturers now face insurmountable regulatory hurdles. An estimated 2.3 million jobs in clean energy and associated industries will vanish over the next 10 years. The nascent battery manufacturing boom is over. And American households will soon face steep price hikes on their utility bills, with double-digit increases in states like Arizona and North Carolina. If that wasn't bad enough, in June, Trump stated plainly what he had already put into practice: a total ban on wind energy. 'We're not going to let windmills get built because we're not going to destroy our country any further than it's already been destroyed.' Adding cheap, abundant energy to the grid that would lower costs for working Americans simply isn't worth the eyesore to Trump. Instead, Americans will foot the bill for Trump's aesthetic preferences. While China added 329 GW of solar last year alone, the U.S. added about 50. Once the tax credits expire, we'll add even less. As energy expert, Doug Lewin, puts it: this isn't energy dominance, it's 'energy submission.' The Trump administration champions fossil fuels as the energy solution for the modern world — but the industry can't come close to replacing the renewable capacity that would be lost under the GOP's rollback of clean energy incentives. Demand may be high, but the natural gas industry can't meet it. The cost of building new natural gas plants has already tripled since 2022, with orders for new gas turbines backlogged past 2029. And as Heatmap reports, manufacturers like GE Vernova have little incentive to ramp up production capacity and risk future profit margins due to overcapacity. By 2027, GE will be able to produce only 20 gigawatts' worth of gas turbines per year — worldwide. These supply constraints won't be fixed anytime soon. CEO John Ketchum of NextEra Energy calculates that natural gas will only be able to make up 16% of the 460 GW of additional capacity needed by the U.S. by 2030. The energy consulting firm, The Brattle Group, found that the combined capacity of new natural gas plants and nuclear plant restarts will only supply about a third of projected peak demand growth by 2030. And once gas plants are built, unlike wind or solar, their electricity prices are tied to a global market prone to volatility — as Russia's invasion of Ukraine made painfully clear. On top of that, the Trump administration's push to boost LNG exports will only intensify global demand for natural gas and raise prices at home. The administration's gung-ho nuclear stance also faces headwinds from its own self-defeating policies — like arbitrary staff cuts at the Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission — that make building nuclear power more difficult. Not to mention that tariffs on key components, like steel and aluminum, drive up already staggering construction costs — jeopardizing projects like the reopening of the Palisades Nuclear Plant. The final bill extended the window to claim tax credits for clean, firm power sources like nuclear, hydro, and geothermal for a decade — but this will still be too little, too late to stabilize energy prices. Industry analysts say no new nuclear plant will come online before 2032, at the earliest. And even if it did, the enormous upfront capital costs mean that any cost savings from nuclear appear on the timescale of decades, not years. While states like New York have moved forward with plans for new nuclear in an effort to improve 'reliability and affordability,' the experience of some nuclear customers has been the opposite. Integrating nuclear's constant baseload power may bolster the grid's long-term reliability — but it won't provide any short-term rate relief. Republicans can idolize fossil fuels all they want, but the industry lacks the physical capacity to expand fast enough to meet demand. Trump calls windmills 'costly and unsightly.' His Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright, derides net-zero goals as 'sinister.' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum warns that the U.S. has 'tipped' too far towards renewables. In one of the administration's first executive orders, Trump bizarrely claimed that clean energy 'makes worse the high energy prices that devastate Americans.' These lies are designed to obscure the reality: it's fossil fuels, not renewable energy, inflating energy prices. Sensitive to global markets, the price of natural gas fluctuates wildly in response to supply shocks and geopolitical instability, as the Russia-Ukraine war made painfully clear in 2022. Coal is even worse. In places like West Virginia, Republican regulators have long forced ratepayers to subsidize uneconomic, aging coal plants despite cheaper alternatives. Now, Trump is mandating the rest of the country follow suit. Republicans are forcing Americans to accept higher utility bills just to prop up a dying fossil fuel industry — one that has already saddled the public with trillions in climate damages while raking in historic profits. The clean energy transition is unstoppable. Stripping away renewable energy subsidies will only increase costs and slow the pace of adoption. But it won't kill the momentum.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Ron Johnson believes he will get ‘second bite of the apple' on Medicaid cuts
Senate Republicans and President Donald Trump are pushing to jam the House again. This time, it's all about crypto. The brewing clash — not unlike the megabill saga — is over how big and how quickly Hill Republicans should deliver on one of Trump's most notable campaign pledges. In this case, it's about Trump's promise to make the U.S. 'the crypto capital of the world.' The Senate last month passed a bipartisan bill to boost a specific slice of the crypto universe — so-called stablecoins — but the House GOP is now wrestling with a desire to go bigger. It's gearing up for a full-blown 'crypto week' to make the case when House members return next Monday. House Republicans, who spent years incubating crypto legislation that Senate Democrats were unwilling to touch, plan to vote on the Senate stablecoin bill and a wider-ranging 'market structure' plan to overhaul securities and commodities rules impacting crypto trading. The big hurdle for House Republicans is that Trump and Senate Republicans aren't on board with tweaking the stablecoin bill or using it as a vehicle to take a bigger swing on crypto policy. Trump says he wants a 'clean' version of the bill 'lightning fast' and key GOP senators say they won't take up a market structure overhaul until September. Senate Republicans say it would be near impossible to muster Democrats to pass a revised stablecoin bill. 'For me to get eight or nine Democrats to vote for something here is extraordinarily difficult to do,' said Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), the lead sponsor of the Senate stablecoin bill, known as the GENIUS Act. House GOP leaders signaled last week they won't seek to combine that legislation with their broader revamp, but they haven't yet said whether they will make changes to the measure. House Financial Services Chair French Hill's sweeping market structure bill, which is the crown jewel of the House GOP's crypto push, is also the subject of eleventh-hour negotiating among House lawmakers ahead of next week's floor vote. The Arkansas Republican is working to secure wide bipartisan backing that would signal its political viability to the Senate. But some Democrats who have been on board in the past are withholding support unless the bill imposes restrictions on the Trump family's entanglements in the crypto industry. 'For me, and I suspect for some other Democrats, if we can satisfy this question of conflict of interest — meaning there's a prohibition on the president being an issuer — a lot of us can get to 'yes,'' said Rep. Jim Himes, a senior Connecticut Democrat on House Financial Services. 'They're working in good faith to try to get us to 'yes.'' What else we're watching: — Netanyahu on the Hill: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be on Capitol Hill on Tuesday and meet with Speaker Mike Johnson at 11:45 a.m. Netanyahu will then have a bipartisan Senate meeting with leaders John Thune and Chuck Schumer at 4 p.m., per two people granted anonymity to discuss the plans. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries didn't comment when we asked whether he plans to meet with Netanyahu. — NDAA markups begin: Senate Armed Services will begin subcommittee markups of the National Defense Authorization Act at 4:30 p.m. The full panel will debate and vote on the whole package starting Wednesday at 9:45 a.m. (reminder: this could take several days). — Rescissions updates: Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) is gearing up to offer amendments to Trump's request to claw back $9.4 billion in already-approved funds ahead of the Senate's July 18 deadline, and the contours of her desired tweaks are starting to take shape. Collins has already said she is strongly against the White House's proposed cuts to foreign aid and told Maine Public Radio that she would like to prevent drastic funding reductions to public media, too. Jordain Carney contributed to this report.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Senate Republican hawks cheer Trump's slams on Putin
Senate Republican hawks are eagerly embracing President Trump's increasingly critical comments on Russian President Vladimir Putin. Why it matters: U.S. military support for Ukraine has become one of the biggest flashpoints between the GOP's growing isolationist wing and more traditional Reaganite hawks. "I'm very happy that President Trump has recognized that Putin was giving him the Heisman," Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told Axios. Trump "is spot on about the games Putin is playing," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) posted on X, adding, "The Senate will move soon on a tough sanctions bill." During a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Trump lamented that Putin's warm words are ultimately "meaningless," saying, "We get a lot of bullsh*t thrown at us by Putin." Asked about who made the initial decision to briefly pause weapons shipments to Ukraine last week, Trump said, "I don't know. Why don't you tell me?" That pause sparked grave concerns among GOP hawks. "The self-indulgent policymaking of restrainers — from Ukraine to AUKUS — has so often required the President to clean up his staff's messes," Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said in a withering statement on Tuesday. He urged Trump to "reject calls from the isolationists and restrainers within his Administration to limit these deliveries to defensive weapons." What's next: Graham told reporters on Tuesday he feels confident Trump is on board after some changes have been made to the lawmaker's Russia sanctions bill — including a 180-day waiver. After that, any next waiver would be subject to congressional approval.
