Ron Johnson believes he will get ‘second bite of the apple' on Medicaid cuts
The brewing clash — not unlike the megabill saga — is over how big and how quickly Hill Republicans should deliver on one of Trump's most notable campaign pledges. In this case, it's about Trump's promise to make the U.S. 'the crypto capital of the world.'
The Senate last month passed a bipartisan bill to boost a specific slice of the crypto universe — so-called stablecoins — but the House GOP is now wrestling with a desire to go bigger. It's gearing up for a full-blown 'crypto week' to make the case when House members return next Monday.
House Republicans, who spent years incubating crypto legislation that Senate Democrats were unwilling to touch, plan to vote on the Senate stablecoin bill and a wider-ranging 'market structure' plan to overhaul securities and commodities rules impacting crypto trading.
The big hurdle for House Republicans is that Trump and Senate Republicans aren't on board with tweaking the stablecoin bill or using it as a vehicle to take a bigger swing on crypto policy. Trump says he wants a 'clean' version of the bill 'lightning fast' and key GOP senators say they won't take up a market structure overhaul until September.
Senate Republicans say it would be near impossible to muster Democrats to pass a revised stablecoin bill.
'For me to get eight or nine Democrats to vote for something here is extraordinarily difficult to do,' said Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), the lead sponsor of the Senate stablecoin bill, known as the GENIUS Act.
House GOP leaders signaled last week they won't seek to combine that legislation with their broader revamp, but they haven't yet said whether they will make changes to the measure.
House Financial Services Chair French Hill's sweeping market structure bill, which is the crown jewel of the House GOP's crypto push, is also the subject of eleventh-hour negotiating among House lawmakers ahead of next week's floor vote.
The Arkansas Republican is working to secure wide bipartisan backing that would signal its political viability to the Senate. But some Democrats who have been on board in the past are withholding support unless the bill imposes restrictions on the Trump family's entanglements in the crypto industry.
'For me, and I suspect for some other Democrats, if we can satisfy this question of conflict of interest — meaning there's a prohibition on the president being an issuer — a lot of us can get to 'yes,'' said Rep. Jim Himes, a senior Connecticut Democrat on House Financial Services. 'They're working in good faith to try to get us to 'yes.''
What else we're watching:
— Netanyahu on the Hill: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be on Capitol Hill on Tuesday and meet with Speaker Mike Johnson at 11:45 a.m. Netanyahu will then have a bipartisan Senate meeting with leaders John Thune and Chuck Schumer at 4 p.m., per two people granted anonymity to discuss the plans. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries didn't comment when we asked whether he plans to meet with Netanyahu.
— NDAA markups begin: Senate Armed Services will begin subcommittee markups of the National Defense Authorization Act at 4:30 p.m. The full panel will debate and vote on the whole package starting Wednesday at 9:45 a.m. (reminder: this could take several days).
— Rescissions updates: Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) is gearing up to offer amendments to Trump's request to claw back $9.4 billion in already-approved funds ahead of the Senate's July 18 deadline, and the contours of her desired tweaks are starting to take shape. Collins has already said she is strongly against the White House's proposed cuts to foreign aid and told Maine Public Radio that she would like to prevent drastic funding reductions to public media, too.
Jordain Carney contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kathy Hochul's only slowing down the suffering from her green-energy lunacy
Gov. Kathy Hochul finally admits the state's 'climate' goals are impossible to meet for now, but she offers no reason to trust she won't continue to pursue them to appease green extremists, at huge cost to regular New Yorkers, if she wins re-election next year. The climate law demands the state achieve 100% zero-emission electricity by 2040, but it's still burning as much carbon as ever; its faltering (but hugely expensive) alternative-energy gains aren't even enough to keep up with expected increases in demand. The gov is making the smallest possible concession to reality, while dodging as much blame as she can: 'We cannot accomplish what those objectives were back in before I became governor in a time frame that's not going to hurt ratepayers,' she announced this month. 'So, we're slowing things down.' Mind you, she's burning ever-more of your dollars (via taxes and utility bills) on costly offshore wind projects, still blocking new pipelines, still preventing new-home natural-gas hookups and making non-electric vehicles more expensive. She's simply admitting that it's not remotely enough, even though it keeps driving New York electricity costs through the roof. (Even roofs with solar panels on top!) Yet the gov isn't actually slowing down the 'green transition,' just (barely) admitting the fantasy isn't possible at the moment — and that closing down any more carbon-fueled power plant will mean rolling blackouts and send even more employers fleeing out of state. Whereas her economic-development (reelection) plans hinge on attracting high-paying but energy-intensive industries (chip-makers; AI server farms, etc.) that can't run on sunshine and intermittent breezes. Plus, the battery tech to store power (since wind and solar plants can never be 24/7) isn't remotely where the 'transition' needs it to be — and ever more communities resist building the massive battery plants required. Yet Hochul's simply recognizing that 'climate action' produces the opposite of 'affordability,' a driving issue for voters — and if she wins in 2026, she'll never again have to care what the voters think. Don't forget how she 'paused' congestion-pricing last year until Democrats were able to win several House seats in November, then promptly lowered the boom. There's no 'come to Jesus' moment here; as soon as it's politically safe, Hochul will be back to sacrificing New York jobs, hopes and dreams to please greenies. And the saddest part of all? All the pain she imposes won't move the needle on climate one bit.
Hamilton Spectator
27 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump announces 30% tariffs against EU, Mexico to begin Aug. 1, rattling major US trading partners
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — President Donald Trump on Saturday announced he's levying tariffs of 30% against the European Union and Mexico starting Aug. 1, a move that could cause massive upheaval between the United States and two of its biggest trade partners. Trump detailed the planned tariffs in letters posted to his social media account. They are part of an announcement blitz by Trump of new tariffs with allies and foes alike, a bedrock of his 2024 campaign that he said would set the foundation for reviving a U.S. economy that he claims has been ripped off by other nations for decades. In his letter to Mexico's leader, President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump acknowledged that the country has been helpful in stemming the flow of undocumented migrants and fentanyl into the United States. But he said the country has not done enough to stop North America from turning into a 'Narco-Trafficking Playground.' 'Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done, is not enough,' Trump added. Trump in his letter to the European Union said that the U.S. trade deficit was a national security threat. 'We have had years to discuss our Trading Relationship with The European Union, and we have concluded we must move away from these long-term, large, and persistent, Trade Deficits, engendered by your Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies, and Trade Barriers,' Trump wrote in the letter to the EU. 'Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.' The letters come in the midst of an on-and-off Trump threat to impose tariffs on countries and right an imbalance in trade. Trump in April imposed tariffs on dozens of countries, before pausing them for 90 days to negotiate individual deals. As the three-month grace period ended this week, Trump began sending his tariff letters to leaders but again has pushed back the implementation day for what he says will be just a few more weeks. If he moves forward with the tariffs, it could have ramifications for nearly every aspect of the global economy. EU members and Mexico respond European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen responded by noting the bloc's 'commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership.' 'At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required,' von der Leyen said in a statement. Von der Leyen added that the EU remains committed to continuing negotiations with the U.S. and coming to an agreement before Aug. 1. Trade ministers from EU countries are scheduled to meet Monday to discuss trade relations with the U.S., as well as with China. European leaders joined von der Leyen in urging Trump to give negotiations more time and warnings of possible new tariffs on Washington. 'With European unity, it is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to resolutely defend European interests,' French President Emmanuel Macron said in a statement posted on X. Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni's office said 'it would make no sense to trigger a trade war between the two sides of the Atlantic.' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen told broadcaster DR that Trump was taking a 'pointless and a very short-sighted approach.' Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson warned in an interview with SVT that 'everyone loses out from an escalated trade conflict, and it will be U.S. consumers who pay the highest price.' The Mexican government said it was informed during high-level talks with U.S. State Department officials Friday that the Trump letter was coming. The delegation told Trump officials at the meeting it disagreed with the decision and considered it 'unfair treatment,' according to a Mexican government statement. Trump, as he has in previous letters, warned that his administration would further raise tariffs if the EU attempts to hike its own tariffs on the United States. With the reciprocal tariffs, Trump is effectively blowing up the rules governing world trade . For decades, the United States and most other countries abided by tariff rates set through a series of complex negotiations known as the Uruguay round. Countries could set their own tariffs, but under the 'most favored nation'' approach, they couldn't charge one country more than they charged another. The Mexico tariff, if it goes into effect, could replace the 25% tariffs on Mexican goods that do not comply with the existing U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. Trump's letter did not address if USMCA-compliant goods would still be exempt from the Mexico tariffs after Aug. 1, as the White House said would be the case with Canada. Trump sent a letter to Canada earlier this week threatening a 35% tariff hike. Higher tariffs had been suspended With Saturday's letters, Trump has now issued tariff conditions on 24 countries and the 27-member European Union. European leaders had held out hope that they would avoid receiving a Trump tariff letter, and that a deal would be worked out. The European Union's chief trade negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, said earlier this week that a trade deal to avert higher tariffs on European goods imported to the U.S. could be reached 'even in the coming days.' The bloc collectively sells more to the U.S. than any other country. U.S. goods imports from the EU topped $553 billion in 2022, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former Congressional Budget Office director and president of the center-right American Action Forum, said the letters were evidence that serious trade talks were not taking place over the past three months. He stressed that nations were instead talking amongst themselves about how to minimize their own exposure to the U.S. economy and Trump. 'They're spending time talking to each other about what the future is going to look like, and we're left out,' Holtz-Eakin said. He added that Trump was using the letters to demand attention, but, 'In the end, these are letters to other countries about taxes he's going to levy on his citizens.' Potential impact is vast If the tariffs do indeed take effect, the potential impact on Europe could be vast. The value of EU-U.S. trade in goods and services amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024, or an average of 4.6 billion euros a day, according to EU statistics agency Eurostat. Europe's biggest exports to the U.S. were pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments and wine and spirits. Lamberto Frescobaldi, president of the Union of Italian Wines trade association, said Trump's move could lead to 'a virtual embargo' of his country's wine. 'A single letter was enough to write the darkest chapter in relations between two historic Western allies,' Frescobaldi said. 'At this point, our fate and that of hundreds of thousands of jobs are tied to the extra time, which will be crucial, because it is unthinkable to be able to sell these volumes of wine elsewhere in the short term.' Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more goods from European businesses than the other way around. However, American companies fill some of the gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. The U.S. services surplus took the nation's trade deficit with the EU down to 50 billion euros ($59 billion), which represents less than 3% of overall U.S.-EU trade. — AP writers Josh Boak in Washington, Angela Charlton in Paris, Regina Garcia Cano in Caracas, Venezuela, Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin, Dave McHugh in Frankfurt, Germany, and Giada Zampano in Rome contributed reporting. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump threatens to strip Rosie O'Donnell of U.S. citizenship.
President Trump said he was weighing using the power of the government against one of his longtime entertainment world nemeses, the comedian and actress Rosie O'Donnell, threatening to revoke her citizenship. Shortly before 10 a.m. on Saturday, Mr. Trump said on Truth Social, 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship.' The president called Ms. O'Donnell a 'threat to humanity' and said she should stay in Ireland, where she moved to in January after Mr. Trump won a second term. Mr. Trump's headline-grabbing provocation about Ms. O'Donnell comes at a moment in which his administration is contending with criticism on many fronts: His top law enforcement officials are bitterly feuding over the Jeffrey Epstein saga; there remain unanswered questions about the decision to halt munitions to Ukraine and who authorized it; the homeland security chief is facing intense scrutiny over FEMA's response in Texas; and so on. Ms. O'Donnell snapped back at Mr. Trump with her own barrage of insults on Instagram. 'The president of the USA has always hated the fact that I see him for who he is — a criminal con man sexual abusing liar out to harm our nation to serve himself,' she said. 'This is why I moved to Ireland.' She further taunted the president in a subsequent post showing a photo of Mr. Trump with Jeffrey Epstein, taken in 1997 in Palm Beach, Fla. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
