Netflix faces backlash as The Old Guard 2 sidelines iconic gay romance, leaving fans frustrated: 'The sequel was terrible'
With The Old Guard 2 now out, fans of the so-called 'Immortal Husbands' were eager to see how their story continued. But the sequel has sparked disappointment, not because Joe and Nicky's love disappeared altogether, but because it was quietly pushed to the background.
Netflix faces backlash for sidelining a fan-favourite queer couple
From the trailer to the actual runtime, Joe and Nicky's presence in The Old Guard 2 feels noticeably diminished. In the first film, they were front and centre emotionally, if not narratively. This time, they vanish for long stretches, only to reappear briefly, and by then, the film has already moved on. It's not that they've been de-aged or broken up; they're still together, still clearly in love. But the warmth and attention they were once given feels reduced, especially compared to the way Netflix promoted them as a central draw.
This shift hasn't gone unnoticed, especially in an entertainment landscape where queer visibility is increasingly under pressure. For a franchise that once proudly featured a tender kiss between two men as a defiant middle finger to homophobia, their reduced presence feels like a step backward.
Fans have plenty to say and they're not holding back
A thread on the popular subreddit r/popculturechat was flooded with opinions after a user shared a Daily Beast report highlighting the disappearance of the queer romance from the Netflix movie.
'They replaced a fantastic director with a director who has never made a good film, and then of course she handed in a terrible film,' one user wrote. Another chimed in, 'It wasn't that the couple wasn't gay anymore—it's that the whole movie didn't know what to do with them.'
Another fan added, 'A bit more gay content wouldn't have saved it. The poor fight choreography, fake-looking sets, bad dialogue, and nonsensical story with no payoff killed it.' One more echoed a similar sentiment: 'It's not like they were having sex in the first one. But this felt like half a (bad) story. Nicky still had his gay soulmate moment; it just wasn't given the same weight.'
Others were simply sad. 'I thought the first movie was fun and watchable, with interesting world-building, and I loved Joe and Nicky. The sequel was TERRIBLE. A literal hot mess. No wonder it has sat on a shelf since 2022.'
More about The Old Guard 2
The Old Guard 2 picks up where the first left off, with Charlize Theron's Andy once again at the centre. Premiered on Netflix on July 2, the sequel expands the world but spreads itself thin in the process. There are new characters, new threats, and a setup for yet another sequel, but the emotional grounding of the first film is noticeably absent. It feels more like a stepping stone than a standalone story, and in trying to set up the next big thing, it forgets what made the first film work: the human relationships behind the action.
Fans have echoed similar thoughts, with many calling the sequel 'lukewarm,' 'visually inconsistent,' and 'overstuffed without payoff.' Even with a three-year gap between filming and release, the final product feels unfinished, and for fans who waited half a decade, it was definitely a disappointment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Squid Game's Lee Jung-jae Expresses Interest In Indian Films: Would Love To Do Bollywood Movie
Seoul: Emmy-winning actor Lee Jung-jae, best known for his role as protagonist Seong Gi-hun in the hit Korean series 'Squid Game', would love to explore Indian cinema. In a virtual interview with ANI, Lee Jung-jae expressed his desire to work in Bollywood. He said, "I would love to be a part of a Bollywood film if I was given the opportunity." During the interaction, Lee Jung-jae also recalled reprising his character for the third season of the Netflix show. "It was a day of mixed feelings when I put on that green tracksuit with my number 456 on it and I stepped onto the set again for the first time. I also felt the same way when I put back on the red haired wig. I've worked in this industry for quite a long time but I have never felt a rush of emotions like the way I experienced on the day when I came back to the sets of Squid Game," Lee Jung-Jae shared. 'Squid Game' premiered on Netflix in 2021. The first season was nominated for 17 Emmys, with the show winning six, including one for best actor in a drama for Lee and another for best guest actress in a drama for Lee You-mi. The veteran Korean actor became a global icon with his intriguing performance in Netflix's dystopian survival thriller. Asked what made this show a huge success, Lee Jung-jae emphasised,"I did not expect this kind of success. I think it's about timing. When Squid Game season one was released, not only were we mid-pandemic, but also I think it was the beginning of a lot of global economic struggle, unfortunately. And so many people were struggling in real life, which has been reflected in the characters in Squid Game. So I think the overall timing of the release of the show and the things that were happening around the world and how much of that was reflected in the characters was partly what led to its huge success. " Interestingly, 'Squid Game' broke a new record for Netflix when it debuted its third and final season recently. Over the first three days, the smash-hit Korean drama drew 60.1 million views, setting a new high for the streamer, as per Variety. With that impressive opening stat, the third season is now Netflix's ninth most-watched non-English TV show ever on the streamer's regularly updated list of most popular series overall
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Patralekhaa talks about expecting first baby with Rajkummar Rao: ‘Want to go bungee jumping with my kid'
Actor Patralekhaa is over the moon as she awaits the arrival of her first baby with husband and actor Rajkummar Rao. Embracing this phase of her life, she reveals she has taken a break from work to focus on welcoming her baby and is cherishing every moment of this journey. Patralekhaa is expecting her first baby with husband and actor Rajkummar Rao. On her pregnancy The celebrity couple announced their pregnancy through social media earlier this week, with Patralekhaa stepping out on Thursday in Mumbai and flaunting her baby bump during an event. 'Apart from feeling really tired, I don't know if the news of being pregnant with our first baby has really sunk in or not,' Patralekhaa tells us with a chuckle over a phone call. Opening up about how she is preparing for the arrival of the baby, the actor reveals that she will not be shooting for a few months. 'I'm not going to shoot for another 6-7 months now. I'm just going to be at home,' she shares. With that being said, it doesn't mean she will be away from her work. 'Well, we have another baby that's going to come soon on Netflix. So, we are super excited about that. The poster for the project will drop very soon. It is really a piece of our heart and our hard work… Many years back, we had a dream of having our own production house, and now it is coming to reality… So, this is very special for us in many ways, personal and professional,' says the actor. On how Rajkummar will be as a dad Rajkummar and Patralekhaa dated each other for over a decade and got married on November 15, 2021. It was during her recent trip to New Zealand that she saw how Rajkummar would be as a father. 'Every travel opens up another door for us as a couple, and we understand each other better. With New Zealand, I felt that Raj is going to be an amazing dad. He really took care of me. In fact, he went out of his way to just figure out the food that I wanted to eat. He is a perfect partner, and that was reinforced during this trip,' says Patralekhaa, who, along with Rajkummar has associated with Tourism New Zealand for its campaign, #BeyondTheFilter. Patralekhaa was pregnant when she went to New Zealand. Now, she along with Rajkummar will be seen showcasing moments from their trip to the country as part of the campaign's cinematic mini-series, from going to the ancient Sanctuary Mountain to exploring Auckland's waters to indulging in the expression of Māori hospitality. In fact, Patralekhaa has planned a trip back to New Zealand again once the baby arrives. She feels the baby will be their 'new travel buddy'. 'We are thinking that once the baby is here, we must do a trip to the southern part of New Zealand because we didn't cover that. That's something that's on our bucket list now. Perhaps we can do some bungee jumping or something crazier with the baby,' Patralekhaa says, with Rajkummar chiming in and echoing, 'Yes, trying out some more adventure sports'.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Thug Life: They murdered the wrong character at the end of Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam's ghastly gangster drama; why in the world did they do that?
A regular reappraisal of old masters should be made standard practice in all art. Just because someone made a good movie once doesn't mean that they should be given immunity from bad reviews for the rest of their lives. Sure, making Piku and October and Gulabo Sitabo and Sardar Udham (in a row!) allows you one I Want to Talk, but that's all. It is only when certain sacred cows are nudged out of (self) harm's way that they can introspect. Had somebody somebody pointed out the obvious to Sanjay Leela Bhansali years ago, we wouldn't have had to endure Heeramandi. Had someone criticised Nayakan for what it is — a blatant act of plagiarism — we wouldn't have had to witness director Mani Ratnam and star Kamal Haasan doing it all over again in Thug Life. The gangster drama was released on Netflix merely four weeks after it flopped in theaters. Thug Life debuted to intense scrutiny, seeing as it marked the filmmaker and actor's first collaboration in nearly four decades. During those years, the two rose to the pinnacle of Indian cinema, having earned not just a reputation for making hits, but also a certain respect that eludes most of their colleagues. Mani Ratnam is the thinking man's blockbuster director; Kamal Haasan is the thinking man's movie star. And yet, the best that they could come up with is yet another tired reimagining of Francis Ford Coppola's The Godfather, injected with a toxic dose of Prashanth Neel. Also read – Ponniyin Selvan I: Mani Ratnam's magnum opus is a crash course in how to overcomplicate a straightforward story You'd think that Ram Gopal Varma was the Indian filmmaker most in need of an intervention for the Godfather obsession; he can narrate Sonny Corleone's introduction in the book from memory. But no, Ramu is doing just fine in his corner. It's Ratnam that needs a talking to. Thug Life takes several plot beats from The Godfather trilogy, misunderstands their meaning, and presents to us a pulverised version that retains neither the humanity of the original nor the fresh perspective of a remake. More egregiously, the movie aims for a similar poignancy in its climax, but makes the baffling choice to kill the wrong character. Thug Life features Kamal Haasan as Sakhtivel, a hardened mob boss who operates out of New Delhi. His greatest rival is played by Mahesh Manjrekar. Sakhtivel communicates with his troops in Tamil, which leads you to assume that he's a migrant. Manjrekar's character, on the other hand, is supposed to be a Delhi-based don. What criminally poor casting. Chances are, if you were to google the words 'Marathi manus' right at this moment, a picture of Mahesh Manjrekar would pop up within the first scroll. Could they have found a less appropriate actor to play an NCR gangster? Probably not. But this is among Thug Life's least annoying missteps. Remember, this is the film for which two-time Academy Award winner AR Rahman composed the song 'Sugar Baby.' In Thug Life, Sakhtivel is ambushed by his rival, leaving him battling for his life. He suspects his adopted son of having sold him out. This man, Amaran, is like a combination of Tom Hagen and Paulie, at least for this one section of the film. Later, he becomes a sort of stand-in for Michael Corleone, and even Andy Garcia's character from the third Godfather movie. Ratnam is an equal opportunity pillager here. Meanwhile the woman that Sakhtivel cheats on his wife with — she's played by Trisha Krishnan — dies in a blast orchestrated by the villains. His good-for-nothing brother, played by Nassar, is banished to oversee his casino business, like Fredo. Ratnam even finds an excuse for an extended wedding scene, where Sanya Malhotra shows up to shake a leg like Johnny Fontaine; except, her entire track seems to have been cut. Thug Life builds towards a grand clash in the climax, where Sakthivel seemingly returns from the dead to battle his protege. As Darth Vader says to Obi-Wan Kenobi at the end of Star Wars, 'When I left you, I was but the learner. Now I am the master.' In a sense, Thug Life follows the same model, adhering to tropes that have been rehashed innumerable times over the decades. There's only one logical conclusion to this saga: The ageing Sakthivel must clear his name and convince Amaran that he truly didn't wish him any harm; Amaran must recognise the mistake he made in challenging his guru, and he must live with the eternal guilt of killing him in combat. The cycle of violence continues; Amaran lives on, haunted, while Sakthivel is redeemed for all the sins he has committed over the years. It would've been the most obvious ending, but effective, nonetheless. Except, Ratnam and Haasan choose to kill Amaran instead, and not even by Sakthivel's hand. Ali Fazal's character pops out of nowhere and shoots him dead. Nobody cares about this guy; why was he given this responsibility at all? It sucks the air out of an already deflated movie. Sakthivel survives, and seemingly retires from a life of crime. Since he wasn't the one who was forced to kill his adopted son, he suffers no guilt. He just… exists. If anything, he seems to miss murder and mayhem. At least, this is what the movie seems to imply when it has Sakhtivel slip on his gangster glasses in the middle of a field. There's is no discernible reason for Amaran to have been killed in his place, unless you count causing trauma to his long-lost sister as probable cause. It's a truly puzzling creative choice that feels completely at home in a truly puzzling film. But the Indian film industry is a funny place. Only in our country can a movie like Nayakan be considered one of the GOATs. It should ideally be disqualified from any such discussion on plagiarism grounds alone. Forget being sued, or worse, shunned — plagiarism is the worst crime that a creative person can commit — Ratnam and Haasan have spent the last three-and-a-half decades basking in that film's success. This is the only reason why they've felt empowered to pull the same trick again. And while Thug Life has been criticised for several reasons, its kleptomania has seemingly been forgiven. Is this because of Indian cinema's long history of taking 'inspiration' from international films? Has this practice been so normalised that it doesn't even raise an eyebrow anymore? Also read – MobLand review: Tom Hardy grunts his way through Guy Ritchie's soapy homage to The Godfather It's worth investigating, isn't it? Because there's only a fine line separating thievery from tribute. Ramu made Sarkar, but his brash acknowledgement of its unoriginality shouldn't excuse him from a rap on the knuckles. Some years ago, Mahesh Narayanan directed Malik, the rare Indian Godfather rip-off that stands on its own two feet. It aped the original not in plot, but in tone and texture. And that's really the best way that a filmmaker can respectfully honour a movie they love. The reason why Thug Life doesn't have even a fraction of The Godfather's emotional heft, even though it's so indebted to that film, is because it is clueless about one hard fact: The Godfather isn't a gangster movie, it's a family tragedy. By allowing Sakhtivel to survive, the movie is shamelessly holding out out hope for a sequel, and, in doing so, disrespecting the story it's telling. Post Credits Scene is a column in which we dissect new releases every week, with particular focus on context, craft, and characters. Because there's always something to fixate about once the dust has settled. Rohan Naahar is an assistant editor at Indian Express online. He covers pop-culture across formats and mediums. He is a 'Rotten Tomatoes-approved' critic and a member of the Film Critics Guild of India. He previously worked with the Hindustan Times, where he wrote hundreds of film and television reviews, produced videos, and interviewed the biggest names in Indian and international cinema. At the Express, he writes a column titled Post Credits Scene, and has hosted a podcast called Movie Police. You can find him on X at @RohanNaahar, and write to him at He is also on LinkedIn and Instagram. ... Read More
