The Guardian view on Israel's aid blockade of Gaza: hunger as a weapon of war
S hameful. That was the word that Gideon Sa'ar, Israel's foreign minister, used to describe proceedings at the international court of justice (ICJ) last Monday. The United Nations asked the court to determine whether Israel must allow aid to enter Gaza, two months after it cut it off again just before the ceasefire deal collapsed. Supplies are running out. Unicef says that thousands of children have already experienced acute malnutrition.
Mr Sa'ar's complaint is that Israel is unfairly targeted. The separate international criminal court case against Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, and Yoav Gallant, the former defence minister, also focuses on the alleged starvation of civilians. It is true that withholding food is a common weapon in war, yet has rarely been the focus of international legal cases, in part because intent is hard to prove. It is the rhetoric of Israeli officials, suggests Dr Boyd van Dijk, an expert on the Geneva conventions, which has changed that.
Last summer, Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right finance minister, remarked that it might be 'justified and moral' to starve people if it brought home Israeli hostages seized in the Hamas atrocities of 7 October 2023, but that 'no one in the world will allow us'. Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, said last month that its 'policy is clear: no humanitarian aid will enter Gaza'. The far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, insisted that 'there is no reason for a single gram of food or any aid to enter' until hostages were freed. An aid ship destined for Gaza was attacked by drones and disabled on Friday. More than 52,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Gaza since the war began, according to its health authorities. Unicef says they include 15,000 children, with hundreds of deaths since the new Israeli offensive began in March. But withholding food kills just as bombs do. Farmland is devastated. Flour is said to cost 30 times more than before the war. Aid warehouses are empty. UN World Food Programme bakeries closed a month ago when supplies ran out; essential community kitchens are now following.
Israeli officials have said they need to stop Hamas getting their hands on aid. It's obvious that men with guns will secure food long after others have starved. Donald Trump says that he has told Mr Netanyahu to allow aid in. Yet the US told the ICJ that Israel's security needs override its obligation to do so. The strong legal consensus is that occupying powers have an absolute duty under the Geneva conventions to permit food to be given to a population in need.
Israel is reportedly planning to resume aid delivery 'in the coming weeks', but via a radically new mechanism. It claims the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, essential to humanitarian efforts, has been mass-infiltrated by Hamas – an allegation strongly disputed by the UN and others. The proposed alternative, of international organisations and private security contractors handing out food to individual families, looks both unworkable and dangerous for civilians.
As Israel and the US attack international courts, other nations – including the UK – must do all they can to defend and bolster them. They must also press harder for the immediate resumption of aid. What is shameful about this ICJ case is the need to bring it. What is shameful is that almost half the children in Gaza questioned in a study said that they wished to die. What is shameful is that so many civilians have been killed, and so many more pushed to the brink of starvation. What is shameful is that this has, indeed, been allowed to happen.
Read More Credit hire boom powers firm's 62% profit surge
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran hardens stance against IAEA and its chief in wake of US-Israel attacks
Iran has taken an unequivocal stance against the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), with the country's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi summarily dismissing its chief Rafael Grossi's request to visit nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the United States during a 12-day conflict earlier this month. 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent,' said Araghchi on X on Monday. 'Iran reserves the right to take any steps in defence of its interests, its people and its sovereignty.' In tandem, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran had halted cooperation with the IAEA due to what he called Grossi's 'destructive' behaviour towards Iran, his office said. 'The action taken by parliament members … is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call, according to a presidency statement. Al Jazeera's Resul Serdar, reporting from Tehran, said the Iranian leadership is making it clear that the IAEA is an 'international body with defined responsibilities and these responsibilities are not political but technical'. But, he added, Tehran views the nuclear agency as an international body 'under immense [political] pressure from Israel and the United States'. Iranian lawmakers on Wednesday voted in favour of a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, citing Israel's June 13 attack on Iran and later strikes by the US on nuclear facilities. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold on June 24. Since the start of the conflict, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA not only for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes, but also for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Tehran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, the day before Israel attacked. In the meantime, France, Germany and Britain have decried 'threats' made against Grossi. 'France, Germany and the United Kingdom condemn threats against the director general of the IAEA Rafael Grossi and reiterate our full support to the agency,' Foreign Ministers Jean-Noel Barrot, Johann Wadephul and David Lammy said in a joint statement. 'We call on Iranian authorities to refrain from any steps to cease cooperation with the IAEA,' they added. 'We urge Iran to immediately resume full cooperation in line with its legally binding obligations, and to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety and security of IAEA personnel.' While none specified which threats they were referring to, Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper recently claimed documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed. Iran has insisted no threats were posed against Grossi or the agency's inspectors. On Monday during his weekly press conference, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said the Iranian parliament's decision to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the 'concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion'. He further criticised US and European powers for maintaining what he described as a 'political approach' towards Iran's nuclear programme. At least 935 people were killed during the recent conflict with Israel, Iran's judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said, citing the latest forensic data. The deceased included 132 women and 38 children, Jahangir added. Meanwhile, a Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman has said the country is involved in efforts to reach an agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue and a guarantee against a return to escalation by all parties. Pezeshkian issued an official apology to the Qatari people in a phone call to Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani after the targeting of Al Udeid Air Base, the biggest US military base in the Middle East, he added.
UPI
30 minutes ago
- UPI
Analysis: Lebanon intensifies efforts to have Syrian refugees go home
With the Gaza war still raging and ongoing challenges to achieving lasting political settlements, the refugee crisis that has swept the Arab region remains far from over. Here, Palestinians bid farewell to relatives who were killed in an Israeli airstrike at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City on Monday. Photo by Haitham Imad/EPA-EFE BEIRUT, Lebanon, June 30 (UPI) -- Syrian refugees, who fled to Lebanon more than a decade ago to escape war, violence and persecution, have slowly begun to return home, encouraged by improved conditions after President Bashar Assad's ouster. Firas al Saghir was among those who made the challenging decision to return, even though his house in the Khaldiyeh neighborhood of the largely destroyed Homs, Syria's third-largest city, was severely damaged and looted during the war. Al Saghir, a 41-year-old plumber who sought refuge in Lebanon in 2013, opted to send his wife and three children first. Last week, he accompanied them to the official Lebanese border crossing at Joussieh, intending to enter Syria legally. But he quickly changed his mind and arranged for their return through a nearby illegal crossing to avoid paying more than $300 to regularize their status, despite the fact that they would then be permanently banned from re-entering Lebanon. "I choose the illegal way to save our money," Al-Saghir, who is preparing to join his family in the coming days, told UPI. "We decided to go back because it is safe now, but we don't know what could happen there and we might be forced to return to Lebanon. ... Then we will do that illegally." Many refugees, like al-Saghir, were encouraged by Assad's ouster and the collapse of the Baath regime, the emergence of new leadership, the lifting of U.S. sanctions, the prospect of investment and reconstruction that could create numerous job opportunities, and the reduction or suspension of services by UNHCR, the U.N. Refugee Agency. Lebanon, still struggling to recover from its 2019 financial crisis and the recent devastating Israel-Hezbollah war, has seized the momentum to intensify efforts to encourage more Syrians to return; aiming to repatriate between 300,000 and 400,000 people before the start of the school year. "There is an opportunity for them to go back," Lebanese Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed told UPI, referring to the new conditions in Syria and Lebanon focused on facilitating the return of those living in makeshift camps, mostly along rivers in eastern Lebanon. Sayed said the government approved the "principles" of a plan earlier this month that provides for an "organized return," under which Syrian refugees would gather at designated collection points and be transported into Syria for $100 per person. Others may choose to return independently. Once in Syria, each returnee is expected to receive a one-time payment of $400, funded by international donors, according to a well-informed source within the ministerial committee overseeing the repatriation plan. In addition, Lebanon's relevant ministries and security services are coordinating efforts to facilitate exit formalities and secure the necessary documents for returning refugees, Sayed said. Lebanon continues to host a large Syrian refugee population, making it one of the countries with the highest number of refugees per capita in the world. This massive influx has placed immense strain on Lebanon's already fragile infrastructure, economy and social fabric, leading to increased poverty and pressure on resources. The World Bank has estimated the annual cost of hosting Syrian refugees in Lebanon at nearly $1.5 billion, while Lebanese officials reported last year that the combined direct and indirect costs have amounted to $58 billion over the past 13 years. According to UNHCR, an estimated 1.4 million Syrians and 11,380 refugees of other nationalities remain in Lebanon. Since Dec. 8, more than 177,000 Syrians are believed to have crossed from or through Lebanon into Syria, while 106,754 people have arrived in Lebanon during the same period. Most of these new arrivals fled due to sectarian violence that erupted in Syria's coastal areas last March and unrest that later spread to Druze-controlled areas in the south. To prevent newcomers and the return of those who had left, Sayed said the Lebanese Army has stepped up efforts to control the 230-mile Lebanese-Syrian border and to curb smuggling attempts. UNHCR spokesperson Lisa Abou Khaled emphasized the need to benefit from "this historical momentum" to ensure refugees can return in bigger numbers, alleviating the pressures on Lebanon. Abou Khaled said that 27% of Syrian refugees surveyed in Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq said that they were planning to return to their country in the next 12 months, up from below 2% before the fall of the Assad regime. This, she explained, comes against the backdrop of dire economic conditions in Syria, where nearly 16.5 million people or about 90% of the population require humanitarian assistance. In addition, more than over 7.4 million Syrians remain displaced within the country. "For returns to be sustainable, Syria needs more than just peace; it needs a comprehensive approach for recovery, including jobs, schools, hospitals and basic services like electricity and clean water," she told UPI. However, the recent funding freeze by the United States, compounded by broader donor shortfalls, has severely impacted the ability to deliver essential services to refugees and vulnerable Lebanese communities. Such funding cuts come at a time when needs across the region, particularly in Lebanon and Syria, are at their highest levels in years due to the recent conflict and new wave of displacements, Abou Khaled said. UNHCR, which was only 21% funded in Lebanon as of last May, will be forced to fully discontinue support for refugees' hospitalization costs by the end of the year. It is also phasing out education assistance, leaving 15,000 children without access to community-based learning and education retention support. How can Lebanon support Syrian refugees who choose to remain in the country? Lebanon can promote area-based development that benefits both local communities and refugees rather than focusing solely on refugee aid, according to Yeghia Tashjian, the Regional and International Affairs Cluster Coordinator at the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs. Tashjian said that Lebanon must also intensify its diplomatic efforts to pressure donor states to honor pledges and increase their humanitarian and development funding. He noted, however, that the willingness and readiness of global donors to support the stabilization and rebuilding of Syria and Lebanon are complex and influenced by a mix of political and economic considerations. "Unfortunately, donor fatigue is growing, but there is no lack of resources -- rather, a lack of trust," he told UPI. "For both Syria and Lebanon, substantial global support exists in principle, but hinges on local political will and reform credibility. Without these, aid will remain partial, slow and insufficient for long-term stabilization and rebuilding." Lebanon also would need to disarm Iran-backed Hezbollah to unlock international funds for its reconstruction. Otherwise, it will be further isolated and miss the opportunity of playing a transit role in launching reconstruction projects towards Syria, Tashjian warned. Initial estimates reveal a staggering cost for rebuilding the Middle East that could range from $350 billion to $650 billion, including some $53 billion for Gaza, $11 billion for Lebanon and $400 billion for Syria. With the Gaza war still raging and ongoing challenges to achieving lasting political settlements, the refugee crisis that has swept the Arab region remains far from over. "The atrocities in Gaza are ongoing and the future of the status of Gaza has not been resolved, I am concerned that a refugee crisis may erupt as many Gazans would be forced from their homeland," Tashjian said.
CNBC
33 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump administration probe finds Harvard violated civil rights of Jewish students
The Trump administration on Monday said an investigation into Harvard University found the school had violated the federally protected civil rights of Jewish and Israeli students. In a letter to university president Alan Garber, the civil rights office of the Department of Health and Human Services said Jewish students on campus were subjected to "severe, pervasive and objectively offensive harassment" following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. The investigation found what the Trump administration described as a "pattern of unlawful and unchecked discrimination" at the nation's oldest university. These actions, coupled with Harvard's response, comprised a violation of the students' civil rights under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The investigation concluded that Harvard's response to the alleged harassment was akin to "deliberate indifference," the civil rights office wrote. "Harvard's public pledges to improve its disciplinary framework for harassment and misconduct are inadequate to meaningfully address these serious findings," the office's director, Paula Stannard, said in a statement. The examples of alleged civil rights violations uncovered by the probe include "targeted harassment" of Jewish students and "institutional acceptance of antisemitism." The letter also claimed that Harvard's response to earlier notification that the Office for Civil Rights had launched an investigation was, "too little, too late." The letter said that "absent voluntary compliance" from Harvard, the civil rights office would refer the school to the Department of Justice, which could file a federal civil suit against the university. In response to the letter, Harvard said that it has taken "substantive, proactive steps" to address antisemitism on the campus. "Harvard is far from indifferent on this issue and strongly disagrees with the government's findings," the school said in a statement to CNBC. "Harvard has made significant strides to combat bigotry, hate and bias. We are not alone in confronting this challenge and recognize that this work is ongoing." The findings of the investigation are the latest in a series of escalating legal and policy confrontations between the Trump administration and Harvard, the nation's wealthiest university. In May, the administration announced it was terminating the remainder of its federal grants to the university. This final cut came on top of a grant freeze the month before that had amounted to more than $2 billion. Harvard is just one of several elite universities targeted by the Trump administration for alleged violations of students' civil rights. In May, HHS issued a similar notice of violation to Columbia University. Harvard has engaged in limited negotiations with the Trump administration, but paused them after the White House demanded federal supervision over the school's admissions and personnel decisions. President Donald Trump claimed earlier this month that the administration had been "working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so." Trump said the college had "acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right. If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country," he posted on social media June 20. At the time, Harvard declined to comment on the president's post.
