UK's cheapest pub famous for £4 three-course lunches SOLD in shock move
The new boss has already broken his silence on what he thinks of the cheap lunchtime deal
'LOVE THIS PLACE' UK's cheapest pub famous for £4 three-course lunches SOLD in shock move
THE CHEAPEST pub in the UK, famous for its £4 three-course lunches, has been sold to new owners in a shock move.
The Star Bar, where patrons get a free starter and dessert with each main, is located on Eglinton Street in Glasgow.
Advertisement
2
The Star Bar has been bought over by new owners
Credit: GOOGLE MAPS
The beloved boozer has been serving the iconic three courses since the 1960s, giving patrons a cheap and filling meal for a knock-down price.
The eatery's basic but much-loved menu includes Scotch broth, fish and chips, macaroni and cheese, meat and potatoes, creamed rice and ice cream.
It has been serving bargain eats between 12pm and 2.30pm for more than 50 years.
Locals and visitors alike have long flocked to the pub on the ground floor of a tenement which was built in 1892.
Advertisement
The traditional pub on the south side is one of the busiest in the city, with many considering it to be of legendary status.
And it has now been bought over by new owners, according to The Herald.
Customers can be rest assured that I have no plans to change its distinctive character – or its famous lunch offer
David Low
The boozer has been purchased by David Low, a businessman from Glasgow who helped Fergus McCann take over Celtic in 1994.
But he has promised punters that he has "no plans" to change to pub's character or the famous lunch offer.
Advertisement
Mr Low said: "I've always had a keen interest in Glasgow's iconic bars, of which The Star Bar is a fine example, and there will be more to follow.
"Customers can be rest assured that I have no plans to change its distinctive character – or its famous lunch offer.'
Rangers-daft pub goes up for sale in Scots town
It comes after the businessman sold The Arlington Bar in the west end of Glasgow in October last year.
Customers have flocked to social media after hearing the news about the sale.
Advertisement
One person said: "Aw, hope it stays the same... love this place".
Another added: "Great pub, good food and cheap beer compared to the city centre".
Someone else wrote: "Beautiful old-fashioned friendly old place that has character about it, if they change it, it will never be the same".
Advertisement
While a fourth posted: "I just love The Star Bar".
And a fifth chimed in: "Been a long time but a fabulous old boozer".
The quirky diner has an impressive 4.5 stars out of five on Tripadvisor, with one glowing review branding it 'an excellent wee place'.
Another reviewer wrote: 'Been on our 'tick list' for MANY years!
Advertisement
'Finally got there! Lovely staff - very friendly. Great service!
'Soup like your granny made - macaroni with 'hot peas!' Then rice pudding with 'tinned' fruit. Loved it!
'Hubby had the pie which he said was spot on! Three courses - £4.00! You've got to go try it!'
2
The beloved boozer has been serving customers since the 1960s
Credit: Alamy
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Social Security Scotland is 'shining example of what independence can do'
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said after being in charge of the social security system in Scotland for more than half of its life, the 'extraordinary amount' the Holyrood government has to spend on mitigating Westminster policies has become 'a real frustration'. While she said she is proud of the way the Government has 'stepped up' to save Scots from the worst impacts of UK Government welfare policies – with £1.4 billion spent on mitigation over the last 15 years – she is 'angry' so much money has had to be spent on covering for 'the inadequacies of the Union'. Somerville insisted that with Social Security Scotland – which has been responsible for devolved benefits since 2018 – the Scottish Government has demonstrated how the welfare system could be transformed through independence. 'What we've done is demonstrate, through the work we've done through devolution, that you can have a robust system, but a fair and humane one, and it works exceptionally well,' she said. 'It doesn't mean to say we can't make it better, but we've demonstrated you can have a system that delivers for people, and I think social security and the success we've made of it, it doesn't just demonstrate why we should have the powers for the remainder of the social security system – because the vast majority is still down at Westminster – I think it demonstrates exactly why when Scotland has powers we use them differently and the people of Scotland benefit from that type of service that's done in a different way, that has their interests at heart.' Somerville (below) added: 'I am proud the Scottish Government stepped up [to mitigate Westminster policies], but I am angry and frustrated we have to, and that we do that because of the inadequacies of the Union and the settlement we are in. (Image: Jane Barlow) 'Everything we mitigate against is money we cannot spend on the NHS, on our transport system. That's the real frustration to me. 'While we remain in this settlement, we will continue to step up to protect people but there is a better way, and I think that's why, while I'm proud of what we're doing in social security, I think it is the shining example of how you can do things differently. 'If we had our independence, we could be doing that on a much bigger scale than we are at the moment when we are still beholden to Westminster.' Next year, the Scottish Government will mitigate against the two-child benefit cap introduced by the Tories at Westminster in 2017 and continued by Labour. An estimated £155 million will be spent on mitigating the policy in 2026/27, and this will rise to £200m by 2029/30, according to the Scottish Fiscal Commission. Somerville said: 'If you look at the cost of mitigation overall, we've committed £1.4 bn from 15 years of mitigation. That's an extraordinary amount that we have not been able to spend on other areas. 'That will go up still further when we begin to mitigate the full extent of the two-child cap. That's a choice we've taken and I'm proud of the fact we will do that and support people, but we have to recognise it has implications for the Scottish Government budget and it doesn't need to be like that if only the UK Government would do its job rather than us having to do that for them.' Social Security Scotland delivers several benefits including family and disability payments, many of which are unique to Scotland such as the Scottish Child Payment (SCP). In 2023, Oxford professor Danny Dorling said the SCP had sparked the biggest reduction in inequality caused by a single policy change since the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Statistics in March show rates of both relative and absolute child poverty were nine percentage points lower in Scotland than the UK average in 2023/24. Somerville explained the SCP was brought in as a response to the 'inadequacy' of Universal Credit – one of many benefits still reserved to Westminster. The SCP forms a significant part of Social Security Scotland's different approach to benefits administration which is based on 'dignity, fairness and respect'. (Image: NICK MAILER) Professor Stephen Sinclair (above), based at Glasgow Caledonian University, said in 2023 that the 'style and culture' around benefits in Scotland was different to that in the London government, as well as the benefits themselves being more generous. He said claimants on Scottish benefits felt a residual 'unease and suspicion' when interacting with social security agencies because of their experiences on the UK Government's systems – comparing this with the 'new more engaged human rights approach' of Social Security Scotland. Somerville said it had been made clear to her how much this different approach was valued. 'I spoke to one gentleman when I was on a visit who was too frightened to come forward [to DWP] when his disability worsened because he thought he might get the money he had taken away from him,' Somerville told The National. 'We know of people that didn't come forward because they found that system inhumane and degrading and what we've done is demonstrated we have a system that is based on dignity, fairness and respect and you have people who now feel they can come forward for the first time.' Asked how she felt about the welfare state in 2025, Somerville added the least society should expect from a government is that they are supported to get money they are entitled to. 'Every single one of us may need the support of a social security system at any point. The social security system is there for all of us and it's important we see that as a right and an investment in people and that has to be the core foundation of how we develop social security,' she said. 'If you're eligible, it is your right to get that benefit and it is our obligation to support you to get you what you're entitled to. That doesn't mean our system is soft-touch, but we go out of our way to make sure those people who are entitled to benefits get that money and they're supported to do so. 'That's the very least society should expect from their government.'
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Coming clean about advice and guidance
Mark Polson | Supplied Dishwasher shopping disappointment makes Mark Polson of The Lang Cat ponder the difference Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There is great joy in being helped by someone who knows what they're doing. Equally, when you've put yourself out there and deferred to an 'expert', there's nothing more frustrating than not getting answers. I know it's not healthy to feel rage, but I had to buy a new dishwasher a while back – stick with me, it gets better –and so headed for a certain large electrical retailer for a poke around. And, of course, a young man with directional hair hoved into view, and for once I thought why not, I'm here to sort it out, so let's get it done. I said yes, and told him I was looking for a recommendation on which dishwasher to get, budget ideally just this side of preposterous. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And you could tell it was coming. The Answer. 'Well, it's really up to yourself…' I know. I know, young man. I am a free-born son of Embra with a credit card and I am free, in fact, to buy all or none of these metal cubes in which my children would stack dishes with all the care of a troupe of monkeys on a sugar high. What I need is a recommendation. Nope. 'It's up to yourself.' Sigh. My experience will be very familiar to anyone who's tried to get help with their finances without taking formal financial advice. All you want is someone to point you in the right direction, but it's much more complicated. The financial equivalent of 'it's up to yourself' is 'I'm sorry, I can't give financial advice' and it's so frustrating. This is on my mind because my firm has just published the latest wave of our study into what's known as the advice gap – broadly defined as people who could or should take financial advice, but don't for various reasons. Only about 9 per cent of UK adults take advice; they are broadly older and more affluent than the population as a whole. That's still lots of people, but there's no doubt some who would benefit from an independent professional helping them stop short of getting into that situation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are issues of trust, and reputation, and a very Scots desire to downplay one's own situation –'Och no, advice isn't for the likes of us, ken, it's for aw they rich folk'.But there are proper issues of cost – more than half the advisers we surveyed for the Advice Gap report have increased the minimum size of portfolio they'll look after because costs have crept up over time and it's just not economic to look after less-well-padded cats. At the same time, over in Pensions World (one of the world's five worst theme parks), employers, trustees and pension scheme administrators all feel a similar level of frustration because they're not allowed to answer perfectly reasonable questions.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Counting the cost of digital and financial exclusion
BerkahStock - Many Scots are facing digital and financial inclusion, which also places them at an increased risk of being scammed, and too many people are on the brink of financial crisis as high costs persist, according to two recently published reports. Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... One report published this week by Virgin Money and WPI Economics, Tackling the Barriers to Financial and Digital Inclusion in Scotland, highlights the significant impact it is having on the Scottish economy. Key findings include that digital exclusion impacts wellbeing in Scotland to the value of £1.2 billion annually, unbanked households pay £62 million more in bills per year, and digital and financial exclusion causes 36,000 additional scams each year, costing £32m. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are around 104,000 households in Scotland who do not have access to a bank account. Households without this facility face additional costs with bills and everyday expenses as they are unable to get better rates and payment plans. The report also found that 'digital natives' are no more protected from the impacts of such exclusion than older generations. In Scotland, Gen-Z adults (14 per cent) and older generations (another 14 per cent) are almost three times more likely to experience digital or financial exclusion than Millennials (5 per cent). Half of Gen-Z respondents also stated that they have very low confidence in money management or using financial products. The research revealed considerable concern about scams across Scotland –70 per cent of Scottish adults surveyed said they were worried about the sophistication of scams. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Half of scam victims reported worsening mental health as a result of being targeted by fraudsters, with 46 per cent saying that being targeted has made them less likely to access financial services online as a result. Some 36 per cent of Gen-Zers say they have been scammed, compared to19 per cent of older generations. Gen-Z is also the generation least likely to be confident in avoiding scams – 66 per cent, compared to 79 per cent of Millennials, and 73 per cent of older generations. Raymond Pettitt, director of customer service and operations at Virgin Money, says: 'This research busts the myth that younger generations are immune from digital and financial exclusion. In reality, Gen-Z is falling through the cracks, just like the oldest in our society. We encourage the Scottish Government to act swiftly in partnership with the UK Government, banking industry, and the third sector to create a unified approach to tackling this.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Focus group discussions carried out for the report revealed that those living in Scotland were fearful about the risk of being scammed. For example, Dave, 39, said: 'Unless it's absolutely vital that I need to do something [online], I would probably not do it or at least have a lot of hesitation. I've heard a lot of crazy scams and I always [think] it is a matter of time before it happens. I try and avoid doing it unless I'm 100 per cent sure, and to be 100 per cent sure is pretty tricky.' The research started from the basis of assuming some digital and financial capabilities. But 5 per cent of Scottish adults surveyed said that they do not have access to a current account. Just over a quarter have no savings, and almost a third do not have a credit card. The report made three key recommendations for Scotland, focusing on the actions the Scottish Government can take to bolster levels of financial and digital inclusion: Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 1. The administration should swiftly deliver a new Digital Inclusion Action Plan. 2. Holyrood should use its convening power to establish a Financial and Digital Inclusion Taskforce, drawing on the public sector, the financial services industry, and key third sector stakeholders. 3. The Scottish Government should commit to using dormant assets to provide funding to organisations and initiatives seeking to tackle financial and digital exclusion, adopting a similar policy to that in action across England and Wales. Virgin Money insists it remains focused on addressing these issues. It states that it is the only bank working with the National Databank to offer free SIM cards in its branches to those facing data addition, its funding through the Virgin Money Foundation has delivered £1.3m to 15 community anchor organisations in Glasgow through its Building Digital Skills fund, which has awarded 93 grants to schools totalling £203,000 via its Volunteer and Connect fund. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sandy Begbie, Scottish Financial Enterprise chief executive, comments: 'Digital exclusion puts people at a distinct disadvantage in today's society, making it harder to receive benefits, secure housing or get a job. 'When we launched our sector growth strategy, we made clear that tackling financial exclusion was a priority for our industry – one with potential to make a meaningful difference to the lives of people across Scotland. Through our work with regulators, charities and the banks themselves to establish a pilot project delivering bank accounts to school leavers, we want to connect more people to the banking system. 'As an industry, we are determined to ensure that everyone in Scotland feels the benefits of having a strong financial sector, and providing greater access to the financial system is a key part of this plan.' A separate report published this month by Royal London revealed that a significant number of UK households remain financially vulnerable and are struggling to stay afloat. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Its annual Financial Resilience Report found large numbers of people saying they are facing financial hardship. Some 41 per cent of Scots aged 50 to 69 said their discretionary income has reduced in the past year, 39 per cent said it has stayed the same, and only 20 per cent reported an increase. Meanwhile, a fifth of Scots expect to have less money for retirement due to the cost of living crisis. Some 3 per cent have had to delay retirement, and 5 per cent have had to prioritise short-term bills over terms of retirement planning awareness, 37 per cent of Scots aged 50 to 69 said they have thought about how much they might need in retirement, but haven't done the calculations. And just under a third said they haven't even thought about how much they might need. Confidence tends to be lacking when it comes to retirement savings, according to the Royal London report. Only 4 per cent aged 50 to 69 feel very confident that they are saving enough for a good standard of living in retirement, and 36 per cent are not at all confident. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Across the UK, Royal London said that one of the most concerning findings is that one in five adults have less than £100 in cash savings, a figure that has remained unchanged for two years. With little or no financial buffer, the report warns that these individuals are highly vulnerable to rising costs and unexpected expenses. The research also found that, looking at the UK as a whole, one in ten are on the brink of a financial crisis and 2 per cent are already in one. Mid-life UK adults are the worst affected age group, with 16 per cent either in or close to a financial crisis. Only 41 per cent of mid-lifers are satisfied with their current standard of living. But there were some signs of recovery in some people's finances. This year, 59 per cent of UK adults said they had money left over at the end of the month, compared to 49 per cent last year, and there was a small rise – £15,864 per person compared to £15,549 in2024 – in the average amount of people's cash savings. Across the whole sample, more than half of mortgage borrowers said their housing costs had increased in the last year by an average of £327 per month. Among single mortgage borrowers, the rise was £252 per month with those living alone paying £298 per month more. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sarah Pennells, consumer finance specialist at Royal London, says: 'We have seen some signs of an improvement in people's finances in the last year, but those still struggling with higher bills and food prices face difficult decisions. 'We're seeing a big divide between those who can absorb higher costs and those making daily sacrifices – cutting back on essentials, dipping into their savings, or going overdrawn at the end of the month. 'After more than three years of rising costs and higher bills, we're seeing the impact on people's longer-term finances, as well as their day-to-day spending. 'For those feeling the squeeze, it's worth checking if you're eligible for state benefits, grants or help from local councils. Many miss out simply because they're unaware of what is available.'
