WATCH: Chaos erupts in City Council as EFF leader assaulted
Image: Screengrab
EFF caucus leader in the City of Cape Town, Mzubani Dambuza, said he lodged a complaint of assault with police last night, after he was attacked and choked by security personnel inside the City Council Chambers on Wednesday.
Calls have since gone out for Cape Town Speaker, Felicity Purchase, to step aside, with the GOOD Party saying she was responsible for the incident after unlawfully allowing a Point of Order during the oral question period following Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis's address, which set in motion the chaos that followed.
The confrontation was caught on film and shared widely on social media, showing Dambuza attacked and choked by security personnel, allegedly to the point of unconsciousness, during the Council sitting.
Dambuza last night said he was doing fine after the assault.
"As much as we don't agree with SAPS, we believe this is an attempted murder case," he said.
In the video, other councillors are heard saying 'this is racism taking place", "get off him", and "why are you choking him? Stop choking him."
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The chaos allegedly started when Purchase ordered Dambuza to leave the house.
It's alleged security got involved when Dambuza's party members tried to shield him from them.
Hill-Lewis was also apparently asked during the incident to bring his security to order.
The GOOD Party's Roscoe Palm, who likened it to the killing of George Floyd in the US, said Purchase failed in her duty to apply the Rules of Order fairly and consistently.
'The Cape Town Speaker, Felicity Purchase, must step aside.
'Her actions, inactions and biases have resulted in violence and thuggery that have endangered lives.
'Today's scenes in Council were unfortunate, but not unexpected. Once again, the Speaker of the City of Cape Town has failed in her duty to apply the Rules of Order fairly and consistently.
'What happened in Council today must be addressed. GOOD will be calling for an urgent investigation into the Speaker's handling of the session, and disciplinary action against all councillors who disrupted proceedings, regardless of political party,' he said.
The City of Cape Town's speaker Felicity Purchase.
Image: FILE
The DA Western Cape declined to comment stating it was a matter for the City to respond.
The City Wednesday said: "The City is aware of recent events during the Council meeting and notes the related footage circulating on social media. We are reviewing the matter carefully to gain a comprehensive understanding of the context."
Purchase said Dambuza was repeatedly instructed to desist from disruptive behaviour, to resume his seat, and was given an opportunity to comply voluntarily.
She said despite her instructions that he leave the Chamber, he refused.
"Due to the severity and persistence of this conduct, and physical harm inflicted upon some of the designated peace officers, I was compelled to adjourn the sitting and temporarily reconvene the Council meeting in the Banqueting Hall. This decision was taken to allow for the removal of all disruptive EFF councillors from both the chamber and the broader precinct, thereby ensuring that Council could proceed with its mandated business.
"My stance on councillors who deliberately engage in disorder for the sake of political theatre is a matter of public record. As Speaker, I will not permit a minority of councillors to hold the Council and its work to ransom.
"Order, respect for democratic processes, and the integrity of Council proceedings will be upheld without exception," she said.
ANC caucus Leader in the Western Cape, Ndithini Tyhido, said in response to the incident: 'The ANC caucus in the City of Cape Town strongly condemns the violent treatment of the EFF councillors by an identified group of armed men organised by the reckless speaker Felicity Purchase, the ANC recommits itself to the full application of council rules.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.
Cape Argus

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
US State Department makes claim of targeted attacks on white farmers in South Africa
The meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump at the Oval Office in May. The US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor (DRL) says attacks on farms display a distinctly brutal pattern. Image: AFP The US has insisted on its claim that white farmers are being targeted in South Africa with the US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor (DRL) saying the farm attacks in the country are not ordinary crimes. The DRL said it has visited the country recently to learn more about the rural farm attacks and the breakdown of the rule of law. The bureau said the trip to South Africa was in support of the President of the United States' executive orders. US President Donald Trump took aim at South Africa earlier this year after he took office for the second term, promoting claims that white farmers were targeted-he stopped all aid to South Africa, accusing it of discriminating against its white minority. The South African government and President Cyril Ramaphosa have labelled notions that there is a genocide against White South Africans as false and said while there was crime in South Africa, the majority of victims were Black. Trump also imposed a 30% tariff wall on South African exports, while other African nations, including Nigeria, Ghana, Lesotho and Zimbabwe have been hit with 15%, which is expected to come into effect in days. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The bureau said South Africa holds enormous economic and geopolitical promise but the current breakdowns in law and order are not conducive to growth or collaboration with the US. It said the South African government must speak clearly and act decisively to address crime and condemn the violence. The bureau said violent crime is rampant in South Africa, but rural attacks - especially on farms- display a distinctly brutal pattern. 'Local sources reported 296 farm attacks and 49 murders in 2023, and that victims are disproportionately elderly, isolated and face delayed police response. The South African Police Service reports the number increased to 55 murders in 2024,'' said the DRL. The bureau said that these are not ordinary crimes, adding that in some documented cases, reports detail victims tortured or killed without anything being stolen. 'Earlier this year, a man was beaten and hacked with a machete. In another incident, an elderly woman was assaulted and repeatedly stabbed. In both cases, no theft occurred. These attacks are not motivated by poverty alone.''

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The Empire's New Script: Daily Maverick's Ukraine Article and the Commodification of Black Suffering
Gillian Schutte analyses how Daily Maverick's portrayal of the Ukraine conflict aligns with Western narratives, while neglecting the complexities of the situation and the commodification of Black suffering. Image: IOL / Ron AI Editorial Alignment and the Disappearing Context The article by Ukrainian Ambassador Liubov Abravitova, published in Daily Maverick, follows a familiar trajectory. It recycles NATO-aligned discourse under the cover of international law and moral concern, while omitting the layered political conditions surrounding the Ukraine conflict. Editorially, the piece settles into a pattern—endorsing diplomatic talking points as journalism, with no critical engagement or alternative framing. While Daily Maverick positions itself as independent, its pages increasingly echo the language of Western foreign policy briefings. The ambassador draws attention to Russia's March 2025 decree compelling residents in contested territories to accept Russian citizenship or leave. This is described as forced naturalisation, a phrase lifted from the Crimea discourse post-2014. The framing ignores the collapse of Ukrainian governance in these regions, where local populations have faced prolonged exclusion from state services and civil protection. In such conditions, administrative procedures around citizenship become entangled with survival, rather than forming part of a premeditated identity erasure campaign. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova stated on July 16 that 78% of Donetsk residents had applied for Russian passports prior to the 2025 decree. She also noted that it was Ukraine that first revoked their legal documents in 2019, creating a condition of statelessness. Denis Pushilin, head of the Donetsk administration, confirmed that over 412,000 passport applications had been filed since 2019. He characterised these as acts of necessity from a population abandoned by its state and subjected to years of shelling. The ambassador's article remains silent on this timeline. The suggestion that those who decline Russian citizenship are denied services or threatened with expulsion is presented as a given, yet demands closer interrogation. On July 18, Russia's Human Rights Commissioner Tatyana Moskalkova stated that services such as pensions, education, and healthcare—cut off by Ukraine since 2014—had been restored by Russia. She cited a 2023 census indicating a 94% increase in service accessibility. The article makes no mention of Ukraine's 2017 Cabinet Decision #365, which halted pension payments to these populations, nor the 2019 language law (Article 7), which eliminated Russian-language education. The absence of such details distorts the motives behind passport acquisition, and in doing so, misrepresents the nature of power in these contested zones. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Legal Rhetoric as Soft Power Strategy Legal arguments based on the Geneva Conventions feature heavily in the ambassador's narrative. Yet Geneva IV, Article 49, makes allowance for administrative action aimed at stabilising conditions in areas under military occupation. Vyacheslav Lebedev, Chair of the Russian Constitutional Court, has referenced this provision in support of the state's legal position—namely, that restoring local governance and documentation systems after Ukraine's retreat complies with international law. This interpretation is absent from the article, as is any reference to the broader jurisprudential debates surrounding conflict governance. President Vladimir Putin, responding on July 19 to international criticism, framed the humanitarian measures in these regions as necessary interventions. He remarked that Kyiv's government had subjected these communities to years of bombardment and deprivation while withdrawing their pensions and dismantling their hospitals. The historical record cited here is not addressed in Daily Maverick's editorial framing. The reader is left with a flattened timeline, in which Russia emerges as the sole aggressor and Ukraine as a passive victim. Abravitova's argument draws selectively from international conventions to characterise Russian legal policy as a weapon of war. There is no attempt to locate the policy within a broader geopolitical context. No reference is made to the 2014 US- and EU-backed coup in Ukraine, the repression of Russian-speaking populations in the east, or the years of NATO encroachment along Russia's borders. These factors are foundational, not peripheral, to understanding the trajectory of the war. Their omission renders the legal claims superficial—divorced from the material dynamics that shape the conflict. In practice, legal discourse becomes instrumentalised. Its invocation has less to do with principle than with narrative management. Misappropriation of South African Memory The ambassador also attempts to draw a parallel between Russia's citizenship policies and the apartheid-era creation of Bantustan citizenship in South Africa. This manoeuvre is emotionally calculated. It activates a deep well of Black historical trauma to fabricate an imagined solidarity between Ukrainian nationalism and African anti-colonial resistance. Such a comparison is politically incoherent. The architecture of the apartheid Bantustan system was built to forcibly erase African citizenship, enforce territorial fragmentation, and uphold white supremacy through administrative disenfranchisement. No such system operates in eastern Ukraine. To deploy this metaphor in the service of a NATO-aligned nationalist state is a profound distortion of Black South African memory. The reference does not clarify—it manipulates. It instrumentalises racial pain to secure moral capital for a state firmly embedded in the Western military and financial bloc. Daily Maverick enables this appropriation by providing a platform devoid of counter-analysis. The publication facilitates diplomatic theatre while denying space to voices grounded in multipolar perspectives, historical analysis, or anti-imperialist frameworks. The South African reader is shepherded toward a fixed moral interpretation: Russia is the villain, and Ukraine represents a parallel to their own liberation history. This curated moral arc collapses under scrutiny. The Zelenskyy regime has banned opposition parties, shut down media organisations, criminalised dissent, and instituted forced conscription. Reports from Ukraine reveal citizens being abducted from public spaces, hospitals, and workplaces. These are not isolated incidents but systemic practices in a state under internal siege. The article makes no mention of these authoritarian measures. There is no reflection on the closure of political space, the criminalisation of peace advocacy, or the role of Western donors in sustaining a government that cannot claim democratic legitimacy through free and fair public contestation. Civil society in Ukraine has been hollowed out under the pretext of war. International law, in this context, is selectively applied. States aligned with Western interests are immunised from scrutiny, while geopolitical opponents are subjected to universal moral codes retrofitted to match political objectives. Manufactured Consent and the Limits of Maverick Dissent The ambassador continues by appealing to the notion of a 'rules-based international order'. This phrase—like 'democratic values' or 'responsible actors'—has long been rendered void by the very powers who invoke it. States that preside over illegal wars, sanctions regimes, and coup operations still claim to uphold global rules. Ukraine operates within that system of protection. It is treated as a partner by virtue of its strategic position, not its internal democratic practices. The double standard is institutionalised. The architecture of international law becomes a tool for maintaining hierarchy, not justice. Daily Maverick has taken on the tone of advocacy while relinquishing its journalistic duty to interrogate power. Its editorial choices favour performance over critical engagement. The platform increasingly replicates the worldview of the donor class, aligning with Euro-American interpretations of global conflict and offering no substantial challenge to the ideological premises embedded within them. South Africans are not obliged to adopt these narratives. The war in Ukraine cannot be reduced to simplistic binaries or emotive allegories. It must be understood in relation to NATO's expansionist project, the geopolitical repositioning of post-Soviet space, and the erosion of non-aligned internationalism. The rhetoric of human rights and legality is deployed in this context not as a means to achieve justice, but to consolidate allegiance. Ukraine has become a conduit for that project. And media outlets across the Global South are being pulled into the orbit of soft power operations disguised as journalism. This moment demands lucidity. Russia's actions emerge from a long history of encirclement and diplomatic betrayal. The war itself is a symptom of an unresolved struggle over sovereignty, balance of power, and the future of global order. South Africa's own history contains lessons here—about neutrality, non-alignment, and resistance to imperial scripts. The refusal to take sides in a conflict shaped by Western designs is not cowardice. It is memory made strategic. It is a principled refusal to be drafted into someone else's war. Daily Maverick has chosen to participate in this performance of alignment. It elevates moral spectacle over political insight. South Africans deserve better. They deserve access to analysis rooted in their histories, their positionalities, and their lived understanding of global power. Liberation movements were never built on the repetition of dominant narratives. They emerged from the courage to reject them. That same courage remains necessary—perhaps more than ever. Gillian Schutte analyses how Daily Maverick's portrayal of the Ukraine conflict aligns with Western narratives, while neglecting the complexities of the situation and the commodification of Black suffering. Image: IOL

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Crippling drug cartels: Recent police operations yield R70 million in drug seizures
Police officers in action during a significant drug bust in South Africa, showcasing the ongoing battle against international drug trafficking. Image: AI RON Experts have applauded the police and Hawks, who they say are slowly crippling the international drug cartel network. Large busts have taken place in Cape Town and around the country in recent weeks, totalling more than R70 million at various locations and warehouses. The latest Cape Town case is that of R18 million worth of cocaine, which was allegedly found with a suspended Standard Bank manager, Raed Cupido, 40, apparently linked to international cartels. A suspended senior banker is alleged to be a first receiver of the drugs from international drug cartels. Image: Supplied Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Cupido's alleged accomplice, Christopher Carlese, has also been charged. Another bust was made after a 25-year-old alleged drug trafficker was arrested on arrival from São Paulo (Brazil) via Doha (Qatar) on July 29. According to police spokesperson, Amanda van Wyk, Crime Intelligence Counter Narcotics in Gauteng, OR Tambo International Airport's SAPS team, Border Management Authority and private security intercepted the Brazilian national. 'About 10kg of cocaine worth R4.2 million was found in the luggage. The suspect was taken for a medical exam to check for swallowed cocaine bullets. SAPS continues to dismantle transnational drug syndicates, over 25 traffickers arrested at this port of entry since the start of the year,' Van Wyk said. Suspended Standard Bank manager Raed Cupido and co-accused Christopher Brice Carelse appeared in the Cape Town Magistrates Court on Friday. Image: Mandilakhe Tshwete On July 13, during a search of a premises in Goodwood in Cape Town, a 32-year-old man from Tanzania and a 28-year-old from Burundi were found with 145kg of tik and 16kg of heroin, totalling R54.3million. Willem Els, senior training coordinator on terrorism and explosives related incidents at the Transnational Threats and International Crimes Programme and of the Institute for Security Studies said cartels needed protection, and in some cases, politics were also at hand. 'South Africa is known as the 'Southern Route' for both heroin and synthetic drugs smuggled along the east coast of Africa, along the so-called Swahili coast, or also branded in an ISS Research paper, the 'Heroin Coast'. They make use of the existing trade route that has been in existence for around 1000 years,' he said. 'These drugs are smuggled on traditional boats or Dhows, entering the continent through southern Tanzania and Northern Mozambique. From there, they are smuggled over land to South Africa. "Of late, several major clandestine drug labs have been discovered, with many arrests, and amongst them, Mexican citizens. The busts in the Durban harbour, with the recent revelations of Lieutenant General Mkhwanazi, shed some light on why we do not see many arrests of kingpins. 'South Africa, with its porous borders, became a haven for these cartels to operate, and porous borders do not only refer to understaffed and ill-equipped ports of entry, but also to compromised state-embedded actors.' Els agreed, inroads and a dent was being made. 'We believe that the current shake-up within the law-and-order environment may lead to many more arrests and also the exposure of the state-embedded actors that facilitated and gained from this illicit trade,' he added. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus